Poll of the Day > What is your view on abortion?

(+) Yeah! (+)

What is your view on abortion?

It should be mandatory.
---

You should be able to abort a baby but only if it seems racist
---

Why is this getting asked so much?
Anyway I'm fine with current laws in the UK. Unless it's for life threatening reasons, illness or the baby will be born with disabilities a abortion should only be legal up to 24 weeks of pregnancy. After that said gal is stuck with her choice. Needless to say I'm pro choice for those 24 weeks.
---

I wish there was an "indifferent" option.

Part of me thinks it's murder and what they do with the procedure is disgusting...

Other part of me says the government shouldn't be able to decide for me, and the rebel in me says pro choice is the answer.

That said, I would always choose pro life as it affects ME and ME ONLY-- indifferent and not wanting to be FOR the alternative, I am truly indifferent.
---

love it

i'd have an abortion everyday if i could
---

Up to the woman. I think it women shouldn't use it as form of birth control (and I know a couple who basically have). But if a woman needs one, she should be able to get one
---

"It should be legal, but only in early pregnancy"

After that, only under extreme circumstances.

CTLM posted...

Up to the woman. I think it women shouldn't use it as form of birth control (and I know a couple who basically have). But if a woman needs one, she should be able to get one

What about guys?
---

CTLM posted...

Up to the woman.

And the father, if possible.

As they say, it takes two to tango. So those two can also carry such responsibilities together.
---

Nichtcrawler X posted...

And the father, if possible.

I mean the farther can have a opinion but that's all it is. If the gal doesn't want the kid then it's:

---

It would be funny if you had to get a tattoo every time, like a kill counter on the side of a fighter plane.
---

It should be decided by the man so long as there's a financial responsibility imposed on him.
---

Legalize it! Legalize it all night long! Well, and all day, as well...
---

It's a start, but there are alot of people who were already born that need to be taken out as well.
---

Nichtcrawler X posted...

CTLM posted...

Up to the woman.

And the father, if possible.

As they say, it takes two to tango. So those two can also carry such responsibilities together.

It really has to be 100% up to the woman cause you cant force a woman to get an abortion and a guy shouldnt be able to force a woman to carry it to term either.
---

Mead posted...

Nichtcrawler X posted...

CTLM posted...

Up to the woman.

And the father, if possible.

As they say, it takes two to tango. So those two can also carry such responsibilities together.

It really has to be 100% up to the woman cause you cant force a woman to get an abortion and a guy shouldnt be able to force a woman to carry it to term either.

But you can force the man to pay out for the child until said child is 18? Sounds like bullshit to me. Have to make a concession one way or the other!
---

Yeah cause the guy helped make the baby

Duh. If a guy doesnt want the possible responsibility of a child he can always keep his sperm in his balls.
---

Zeus posted...

Mead posted...

Nichtcrawler X posted...

CTLM posted...

Up to the woman.

And the father, if possible.

As they say, it takes two to tango. So those two can also carry such responsibilities together.

It really has to be 100% up to the woman cause you cant force a woman to get an abortion and a guy shouldnt be able to force a woman to carry it to term either.

But you can force the man to pay out for the child until said child is 18? Sounds like bullshit to me. Have to make a concession one way or the other!

Sweet straw man.
---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIgSTjzrmRg" data-time="
---

To fully legalize the killing of an unborn child? I think the answer is straightforward. I cannot fathom the idea of murder becoming legal. Also, to state "it is up to the woman" means openly denying the human condition of the baby and ignoring the baby's incapacity to make a decision about his/her life. It would also imply that the woman can live as irresponsibly with her body as she likes, because the government will pay the bills of her promiscuous mess.

I do think there should be a way for a guy to get out of it completely... Possibly...

ElCochran90 posted...

To fully legalize the killing of an unborn child? I think the answer is straightforward. I cannot fathom the idea of murder becoming legal. Also, to state "it is up to the woman" means openly denying the human condition of the baby and ignoring the baby's incapacity to make a decision about his/her life. It would also imply that the woman can live as irresponsibly with her body as she likes, because the government will pay the bills of her promiscuous mess.

Well, that would happen either way. If she carries the baby full term and gives it away to an orphanage or something, then the government is possibly paying for the child for 18 years. Instead of paying once to get rid of it... When people use the money reason, it's weird because that would normally be in favor for the abortion. Less money because it's a one time thing instead of an up to 18 years type thing...
---

I'm just some guy that went on the march for life three times, and protested outside an abortion clinic at 13, where I was told to give women going in dirty looks. I know exactly how fucking crazy I was.

I fully support a woman's right to remove a fertilized egg up until a fetus with no functioning nervous system, because I believe in no pizzaghetti monster, and anyone who says otherwise is a nutjob nuisance to society, despite having the best intentions of saving souls from damnation, and evidence of the destructive cultish side of religion.

I fully support a woman's right to remove a modestly functioning fetus from her body, considering it's the right thing to do.

I fully support women who want to decide what can happen to an unborn fetus after that, considering right now it's currently a bunch of old shriveled old entitled ballsacks on their soap boxes telling women "no".

And if you want to say "men are effected by abortion as well!", fine. Let's say abortions involve two people at any given moment. 100% of the time person #1 is going to be a female, 50% of the time person #2 will be a female. So we can have a 3:1 female:male ratio of people deciding who's allowed to have abortions. Right now it's just about 95% male representation of women.
---

LinkPizza posted...

I do think there should be a way for a guy to get out of it completely... Possibly...

Yeah. Men should have an "abort from legal ownership of child" option.
---

Mead posted...

Yeah cause the guy helped make the baby

Duh. If a guy doesnt want the possible responsibility of a child he can always keep his sperm in his balls.

...he unironically says using the argument against letting women have abortions.

Yellow posted...

LinkPizza posted...

I do think there should be a way for a guy to get out of it completely... Possibly...

Yeah. Men should have an "abort from legal ownership of child" option.

I'd be fine with that.... although I guess those bills might fall onto the state.
---

Mead posted...

You should be able to abort a baby but only if it seems racist

We should abort racist babies
---

"It should be legal, but only in extreme circumstances"

Unless the mother's life is in danger, I feel it should be illegal across the board.
---