Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 235: Autopsy-Turvy

Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Nelson_Mandela 08/20/19 9:14:03 PM #252:	What is more embarrassing: referring to President Trump as "Orange Man" or "Drumpf" or calling detention centers mandated by Congressional law "concentration camps"? Both are signs of really embarrassing individuals who can't make their own independent thoughts but it's so hard to decide which person is more unoriginal! --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted [p:926333765] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>What is more embarrassing: referring to President Trump as "Orange Man" or "Drumpf" or calling detention centers mandated by Congressional law "concentration camps"? Both are signs of really embarrassing individuals who can't make their own independent thoughts but it's so hard to decide which person is more unoriginal!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Reg 08/20/19 9:20:54 PM #253:	Jakyl25 posted... Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances Most reasonable countries are probably also looking at this as "What's stopping that country from electing another guy just like Trump in 4 years?" <cite>Reg posted [p:926334068] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances</quote> Most reasonable countries are probably also looking at this as "What's stopping that country from electing another guy just like Trump in 4 years?"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/20/19 9:21:59 PM #254:	Nelson_Mandela posted... What is more embarrassing: referring to President Trump as "Orange Man" or "Drumpf" or calling detention centers mandated by Congressional law "concentration camps"? Both are signs of really embarrassing individuals who can't make their own independent thoughts but it's so hard to decide which person is more unoriginal! Well they are concentration camps by definition Congress can mandate concentration camps --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926334117] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote>What is more embarrassing: referring to President Trump as "Orange Man" or "Drumpf" or calling detention centers mandated by Congressional law "concentration camps"? Both are signs of really embarrassing individuals who can't make their own independent thoughts but it's so hard to decide which person is more unoriginal!</quote> Well they are concentration camps by definition Congress can mandate concentration camps</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/20/19 9:23:30 PM #255:	Reg posted... Jakyl25 posted... Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances Most reasonable countries are probably also looking at this as "What's stopping that country from electing another guy just like Trump in 4 years?" Sure. My bottom line point though is that W foreign policy was much more disastrous for the world in unfixable ways than Trump foreign policy (so far) --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926334186] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Reg posted...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances</quote> Most reasonable countries are probably also looking at this as "What's stopping that country from electing another guy just like Trump in 4 years?"</quote> Sure. My bottom line point though is that W foreign policy was much more disastrous for the world in unfixable ways than Trump foreign policy (so far)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/20/19 9:25:04 PM #256:	And I could totally see and probably support the argument that Trump is worse than W for America, but W was worse than Trump for the world --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926334259] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>And I could totally see and probably support the argument that Trump is worse than W for America, but W was worse than Trump for the world</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nelson_Mandela 08/20/19 9:25:25 PM #257:	Jakyl25 posted... Nelson_Mandela posted... What is more embarrassing: referring to President Trump as "Orange Man" or "Drumpf" or calling detention centers mandated by Congressional law "concentration camps"? Both are signs of really embarrassing individuals who can't make their own independent thoughts but it's so hard to decide which person is more unoriginal! Well they are concentration camps by definition Congress can mandate concentration camps I guess every local jail is a concentration camp. A nation full of Auschwitzes! --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted [p:926334274] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote>What is more embarrassing: referring to President Trump as "Orange Man" or "Drumpf" or calling detention centers mandated by Congressional law "concentration camps"? Both are signs of really embarrassing individuals who can't make their own independent thoughts but it's so hard to decide which person is more unoriginal!</quote> Well they are concentration camps by definition Congress can mandate concentration camps</quote> I guess every local jail is a concentration camp. A nation full of Auschwitzes!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nelson_Mandela 08/20/19 9:28:24 PM #258:	I still think people who say concentrations camps are more embarrassing, since they do not realize that they have completely fallen for a very obvious strategy by the DNC. Pawns gonna pawn I guess. --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted [p:926334391] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>I still think people who say concentrations camps are more embarrassing, since they do not realize that they have completely fallen for a very obvious strategy by the DNC. Pawns gonna pawn I guess.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Grimlyn 08/20/19 9:28:53 PM #259:	Jakyl25 posted... Reg posted... Jakyl25 posted... Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances Most reasonable countries are probably also looking at this as "What's stopping that country from electing another guy just like Trump in 4 years?" Sure. My bottom line point though is that W foreign policy was much more disastrous for the world in unfixable ways than Trump foreign policy (so far) to be fair, I don't doubt Trump would do the same if he were president in 2000-2008 --- GuessMyUserName's account's very own account <cite>Grimlyn posted [p:926334414] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Reg posted...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances</quote> Most reasonable countries are probably also looking at this as "What's stopping that country from electing another guy just like Trump in 4 years?"</quote> Sure. My bottom line point though is that W foreign policy was much more disastrous for the world in unfixable ways than Trump foreign policy (so far)</quote> to be fair, I don't doubt Trump would do the same if he were president in 2000-2008</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Reg 08/20/19 9:29:38 PM #260:	Jakyl25 posted... And I could totally see and probably support the argument that Trump is worse than W for America, but W was worse than Trump for the world I do agree with this, especially in the terms you're talking. My point was that I don't see reasonable countries rushing to restore "normal" (pre-2017) relations with the United States because Trump has demonstrated that there's nothing stopping a malicious actor from being elected President and blowing everything up every 4 or 8 years. Donald Trump has completely shot the credibility of the good faith and word of the President of the United States (And Diplomats), even if said President or Diplomats is acting honestly and with everybody's best intentions in mind. But that's far more "bad for America" than it is "bad for the world", which is your point. <cite>Reg posted [p:926334452] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>And I could totally see and probably support the argument that Trump is worse than W for America, but W was worse than Trump for the world</quote> I do agree with this, especially in the terms you're talking. My point was that I don't see reasonable countries rushing to restore "normal" (pre-2017) relations with the United States because Trump has demonstrated that there's nothing stopping a malicious actor from being elected President and blowing everything up every 4 or 8 years. Donald Trump has completely shot the credibility of the good faith and word of the President of the United States (And Diplomats), even if said President or Diplomats is acting honestly and with everybody's best intentions in mind. But that's far more "bad for America" than it is "bad for the world", which is your point.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/20/19 9:32:28 PM #261:	Grimlyn posted... Jakyl25 posted... Reg posted... Jakyl25 posted... Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances Most reasonable countries are probably also looking at this as "What's stopping that country from electing another guy just like Trump in 4 years?" Sure. My bottom line point though is that W foreign policy was much more disastrous for the world in unfixable ways than Trump foreign policy (so far) to be fair, I don't doubt Trump would do the same if he were president in 2000-2008 Hey he did run in 2000. Wanted a Trump/Oprah ticket! --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926334539] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Grimlyn posted...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Reg posted...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances</quote> Most reasonable countries are probably also looking at this as "What's stopping that country from electing another guy just like Trump in 4 years?"</quote> Sure. My bottom line point though is that W foreign policy was much more disastrous for the world in unfixable ways than Trump foreign policy (so far)</quote> to be fair, I don't doubt Trump would do the same if he were president in 2000-2008</quote> Hey he did run in 2000. Wanted a Trump/Oprah ticket!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Grimlyn 08/20/19 9:37:51 PM #262:	y'know we might have been better off if Trump won in 2000 --- GuessMyUserName's account's very own account <cite>Grimlyn posted [p:926334780] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>y'know we might have been better off if Trump won in 2000</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7 08/20/19 9:42:58 PM #263:	Payroll taxcut would be sweet. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Division 2 <cite>Corrik7 posted [p:926335010] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Payroll taxcut would be sweet. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/20/19 9:46:14 PM #264:	Trump said that American consumers are already rich because of him. You need more?! --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926335140] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Trump said that American consumers are already rich because of him. You need more?!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
red sox 777 08/20/19 9:47:12 PM #265:	Please. Trump wouldn't have gone to war with Iraq. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! <cite>red sox 777 posted [p:926335192] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Please. Trump wouldn't have gone to war with Iraq.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
red sox 777 08/20/19 9:47:36 PM #266:	Jakyl25 posted... Trump said that American consumers are already rich because of him. You need more?! The richer you are, the more tax cuts you need. It's a fact! --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! <cite>red sox 777 posted [p:926335208] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Trump said that American consumers are already rich because of him. You need more?!</quote> The richer you are, the more tax cuts you need. It's a fact!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/20/19 9:48:04 PM #267:	Grimlyn posted... y'know we might have been better off if Trump won in 2000 He lost the primary to PAT BUCHANON of all people --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926335225] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Grimlyn posted...</cite> <quote>y'know we might have been better off if Trump won in 2000</quote> He lost the primary to PAT BUCHANON of all people</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7 08/20/19 9:51:16 PM #268:	Jakyl25 posted... Trump said that American consumers are already rich because of him. You need more?! Sure. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Division 2 <cite>Corrik7 posted [p:926335353] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted... </cite> <quote>Trump said that American consumers are already rich because of him. You need more?!</quote>Sure. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MalcolmMasher 08/20/19 10:29:35 PM #269:	Corrik7 posted... That isn't what you said. You said, he said if it were any other person than the president he would have. That was NOT said. That was you making up what you wanted to be said. Lieu did not say "the reason that you could not have indicted". He said, "the reason that you "did not indict". And Mueller told Lieu that Lieu was correct; that the reason Mueller did not indict Trump was that he was forbidden to do so. By saying this, Mueller also expressed that if he were permitted to indict Trump, he would have done so. And that clearly wasn't something that Mueller wanted to express, since he later revisited that remark long enough to clarify that his official position of "since we could not indict the President regardless, we chose not to decide whether or not we should" remained inviolate. So, I'm not sure how to take your objections, Corrik. I can see two ways. First, that you think that we should pretend Mueller's statement to Lieu never happened because of Mueller's subsequent, contradictory reaffirmation of his official position. In which case, I disagree. I do think it's important to mention that Mueller felt the need to walk back his statement, but I believe that I have been consistently doing so. Or, that you think that what Mueller communicated in his conversation with Lieu is the same thing that Mueller has communicated the rest of the time on this topic. In which case, further discussion is probably pointless, if only we don't appear to speak the same dialect of English - although I must say, if what Mueller said then was the same thing that he's always said, then why'd he bother to clarify his remarks? Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances. While I hope this is true, let's not forget that Trump's election is a reminder to our foreign allies and diplomatic partners that America is not reliable. --- I don't like this duchy. Now, it's an adventurer. <cite>MalcolmMasher posted [p:926337040] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Corrik7 posted...</cite> <quote>That isn't what you said. You said, he said if it were any other person than the president he would have. That was NOT said. That was you making up what you wanted to be said.</quote> Lieu did not say "the reason that you could not have indicted". He said, "the reason that you "did not indict". And Mueller told Lieu that Lieu was correct; that the reason Mueller did not indict Trump was that he was forbidden to do so. By saying this, Mueller also expressed that if he were permitted to indict Trump, he would have done so. And that clearly wasn't something that Mueller wanted to express, since he later revisited that remark long enough to clarify that his official position of "since we could not indict the President regardless, we chose not to decide whether or not we should" remained inviolate. So, I'm not sure how to take your objections, Corrik. I can see two ways. First, that you think that we should pretend Mueller's statement to Lieu never happened because of Mueller's subsequent, contradictory reaffirmation of his official position. In which case, I disagree. I do think it's important to mention that Mueller felt the need to walk back his statement, but I believe that I have been consistently doing so. Or, that you think that what Mueller communicated in his conversation with Lieu is the same thing that Mueller has communicated the rest of the time on this topic. In which case, further discussion is probably pointless, if only we don't appear to speak the same dialect of English - although I must say, if what Mueller said then was the same thing that he's always said, then why'd he bother to clarify his remarks? Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances. While I hope this is true, let's not forget that Trump's election is a reminder to our foreign allies and diplomatic partners that America is not reliable.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7 08/20/19 11:00:00 PM #270:	MalcolmMasher posted... Lieu did not say "the reason that you could not have indicted". He said, "the reason that you "did not indict". And Mueller told Lieu that Lieu was correct; that the reason Mueller did not indict Trump was that he was forbidden to do so. By saying this, Mueller also expressed that if he were permitted to indict Trump, he would have done so. And that clearly wasn't something that Mueller wanted to express, since he later revisited that remark long enough to clarify that his official position of "since we could not indict the President regardless, we chose not to decide whether or not we should" remained inviolate. So, I'm not sure how to take your objections, Corrik. I can see two ways. First, that you think that we should pretend Mueller's statement to Lieu never happened because of Mueller's subsequent, contradictory reaffirmation of his official position. In which case, I disagree. I do think it's important to mention that Mueller felt the need to walk back his statement, but I believe that I have been consistently doing so. Or, that you think that what Mueller communicated in his conversation with Lieu is the same thing that Mueller has communicated the rest of the time on this topic. In which case, further discussion is probably pointless, if only we don't appear to speak the same dialect of English - although I must say, if what Mueller said then was the same thing that he's always said, then why'd he bother to clarify his remarks? Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances. While I hope this is true, let's not forget that Trump's election is a reminder to our foreign allies and diplomatic partners that America is not reliable. You are twisting what was said to get to where you are, bud. He literally did NOT say what you said he said. You just want it to be that way. You can rationalize all you want how he said what he didn't say. But, it doesn't mean it happened. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Division 2 <cite>Corrik7 posted [p:926338219] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>MalcolmMasher posted... </cite> <quote>Lieu did not say "the reason that you could not have indicted". He said, "the reason that you "did not indict". And Mueller told Lieu that Lieu was correct; that the reason Mueller did not indict Trump was that he was forbidden to do so. By saying this, Mueller also expressed that if he were permitted to indict Trump, he would have done so. And that clearly wasn't something that Mueller wanted to express, since he later revisited that remark long enough to clarify that his official position of "since we could not indict the President regardless, we chose not to decide whether or not we should" remained inviolate. So, I'm not sure how to take your objections, Corrik. I can see two ways. First, that you think that we should pretend Mueller's statement to Lieu never happened because of Mueller's subsequent, contradictory reaffirmation of his official position. In which case, I disagree. I do think it's important to mention that Mueller felt the need to walk back his statement, but I believe that I have been consistently doing so. Or, that you think that what Mueller communicated in his conversation with Lieu is the same thing that Mueller has communicated the rest of the time on this topic. In which case, further discussion is probably pointless, if only we don't appear to speak the same dialect of English - although I must say, if what Mueller said then was the same thing that he's always said, then why'd he bother to clarify his remarks? Also I think most countries understand that Trump is the issue, and the next reasonable President will want to restore alliances. While I hope this is true, let's not forget that Trump's election is a reminder to our foreign allies and diplomatic partners that America is not reliable.</quote>You are twisting what was said to get to where you are, bud. He literally did NOT say what you said he said. You just want it to be that way. You can rationalize all you want how he said what he didn't say. But, it doesn't mean it happened. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 08/20/19 11:00:03 PM #271:	They are concentration camps and it's absolutely disgusting that Trump is using them. Contrary to your claim, he is not required by law to do so, and before he was in office most border crossers were released pending trial. Furthermore, Trump started the policy of routine family separation, including doing so for asylum seekers who had broken no laws. There is no defense for this shit. --- Congrats to Advokaiser for winning the CBX Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:926338224] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>They are concentration camps and it's absolutely disgusting that Trump is using them. Contrary to your claim, he is not required by law to do so, and before he was in office most border crossers were released pending trial. Furthermore, Trump started the policy of routine family separation, including doing so for asylum seekers who had broken no laws. There is no defense for this shit. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MalcolmMasher 08/20/19 11:17:00 PM #272:	You are twisting what was said to get to where you are, bud. He literally did NOT say what you said he said. Reposting: Ted Lieu: The reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the O.L.C. opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting President. Correct? Mueller: That is correct." It is clear, Corrik, that these words somehow mean different things to the two of us. I believe there is nothing further to be gained from this discussion. --- I don't like this duchy. Now, it's an adventurer. <cite>MalcolmMasher posted [p:926338868] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>You are twisting what was said to get to where you are, bud. He literally did NOT say what you said he said. Reposting: Ted Lieu: The reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the O.L.C. opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting President. Correct? Mueller: That is correct." It is clear, Corrik, that these words somehow mean different things to the two of us. I believe there is nothing further to be gained from this discussion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7 08/20/19 11:24:23 PM #273:	MalcolmMasher posted... You are twisting what was said to get to where you are, bud. He literally did NOT say what you said he said. Reposting: Ted Lieu: The reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the O.L.C. opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting President. Correct? Mueller: That is correct." It is clear, Corrik, that these words somehow mean different things to the two of us. I believe there is nothing further to be gained from this discussion. Correct. That does not say what you are trying to say it does. Since you cannot get past that, there is no reason to continue discussing it. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Division 2 <cite>Corrik7 posted [p:926339127] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>MalcolmMasher posted... </cite> <quote>You are twisting what was said to get to where you are, bud. He literally did NOT say what you said he said. Reposting: Ted Lieu: The reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the O.L.C. opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting President. Correct? Mueller: That is correct." It is clear, Corrik, that these words somehow mean different things to the two of us. I believe there is nothing further to be gained from this discussion.</quote>Correct. That does not say what you are trying to say it does. Since you cannot get past that, there is no reason to continue discussing it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NFUN 08/20/19 11:41:47 PM #274:	what the fuck? --- Video Game Music Contest 14 winner: Terraria Calamity - Scourge of the Universe <cite>NFUN posted [p:926339714] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>what the fuck?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7 08/21/19 1:26:13 AM #275:	I would love to see all the evidence from this case because by all accounts, this result seems interesting.... To me based in what I have read. I feel I am missing something. https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/ncaabk/mateen-cleaves-rape-trial-acquitted-on-all-charges/ar-AAG4S5s --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Division 2 <cite>Corrik7 posted [p:926342674] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>I would love to see all the evidence from this case because by all accounts, this result seems interesting.... To me based in what I have read. I feel I am missing something. https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/ncaabk/mateen-cleaves-rape-trial-acquitted-on-all-charges/ar-AAG4S5s </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Leafeon13N 08/21/19 2:00:01 AM #276:	red sox 777 posted... Please. Trump wouldn't have gone to war with Iraq. Trump would have never left the bunker after 9/11. <cite>Leafeon13N posted [p:926343458] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>red sox 777 posted...</cite> <quote>Please. Trump wouldn't have gone to war with Iraq.</quote> Trump would have never left the bunker after 9/11.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 08/21/19 3:21:05 AM #277:	https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1163890096321507328 No puppet! --- Congrats to Advokaiser for winning the CBX Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:926344977] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1163890096321507328 No puppet! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 08/21/19 1:20:38 PM #278:	https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1164138795475881986 he is literally insane --- Congrats to Advokaiser for winning the CBX Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:926359910] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1164138795475881986 he is literally insane </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Not_an_Owl 08/21/19 1:43:23 PM #279:	Oh, and speaking of Trump and Jews: https://twitter.com/AndrewFeinberg/status/1164204228883230722 --- Besides, marijuana is far more harmful than steroids. - BlitzBomb I headbang to Bruckner. <cite>Not_an_Owl posted [p:926360900] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Oh, and speaking of Trump and Jews: https://twitter.com/AndrewFeinberg/status/1164204228883230722</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Grimlyn 08/21/19 2:00:45 PM #280:	LordoftheMorons posted... https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1164138795475881986 he is literally insane "They love him like he is the second coming of God..." uhhh... but they don't believe the first happened yet --- GuessMyUserName's account's very own account <cite>Grimlyn posted [p:926361614] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>LordoftheMorons posted...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1164138795475881986 he is literally insane </quote> "They love him like he is the second coming of God..." uhhh... but they don't believe the first happened yet</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Maniac64 08/21/19 2:01:23 PM #281:	Second coming of God doesnt even make sense from a Jewish perspective. Second coming is a Christian term about Jesus. The guy Jews dont believe was God. Edit: ninja'd --- "Hope is allowed to be stupid, unwise, and naive." ~Sir Chris <cite>Maniac64 posted [p:926361634] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Second coming of God doesnt even make sense from a Jewish perspective. Second coming is a Christian term about Jesus. The guy Jews dont believe was God. Edit: ninja'd</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7 08/21/19 2:04:56 PM #282:	LordoftheMorons posted... https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1164138795475881986 he is literally insane Lol wtf --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Division 2 <cite>Corrik7 posted [p:926361791] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>LordoftheMorons posted... </cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1164138795475881986 he is literally insane</quote>Lol wtf </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Grimlyn 08/21/19 2:05:08 PM #283:	m64 is my second coming --- GuessMyUserName's account's very own account <cite>Grimlyn posted [p:926361800] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>m64 is my second coming</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/21/19 2:30:28 PM #284:	He should subtitle his 2020 campaign The Second Coming --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926362880] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>He should subtitle his 2020 campaign The Second Coming</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
XIII_rocks 08/21/19 3:02:05 PM #285:	I laughed out loud at this I know it's out of context and I guess I know what he means but still. What a quote. https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1164217925152067584?s=19 --- Not to be confused with XIII_Stones. <cite>XIII_rocks posted [p:926364296] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>I laughed out loud at this I know it's out of context and I guess I know what he means but still. What a quote. https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1164217925152067584?s=19 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
red13n 08/21/19 3:30:24 PM #286:	Those Trump quotes are all so hilariously insane. What a world we live in. --- "First thing that crosses my mind: I didn't get any GameFAQs Karma yesterday." Math Murderer after getting his appendix removed. <cite>red13n posted [p:926365566] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Those Trump quotes are all so hilariously insane. What a world we live in.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
red sox 777 08/21/19 4:50:12 PM #287:	Trump wants to be King of Israel? --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! <cite>red sox 777 posted [p:926368961] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Trump wants to be King of Israel?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7 08/21/19 4:53:27 PM #288:	I mean, I guess it is a noble goal. Always say you should aim high. Look where it got him. The measly presidency of the United States. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Division 2 <cite>Corrik7 posted [p:926369106] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>I mean, I guess it is a noble goal. Always say you should aim high. Look where it got him. The measly presidency of the United States. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Maniac64 08/21/19 4:54:44 PM #289:	red sox 777 posted... Trump wants to be King of Israel? No no. Trump is already the unofficial King of Israel. --- "Hope is allowed to be stupid, unwise, and naive." ~Sir Chris <cite>Maniac64 posted [p:926369164] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>red sox 777 posted...</cite> <quote>Trump wants to be King of Israel?</quote> No no. Trump is already the unofficial King of Israel.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik7 08/21/19 5:07:24 PM #290:	https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-cancelling-student-loan-debt-for-disabled-veterans --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Division 2 <cite>Corrik7 posted [p:926369727] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-cancelling-student-loan-debt-for-disabled-veterans </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Maniac64 08/21/19 5:14:52 PM #291:	That's great. Though I sincerely hope there isnt hundreds of millions in student loan debt for disabled vets. --- "Hope is allowed to be stupid, unwise, and naive." ~Sir Chris <cite>Maniac64 posted [p:926370093] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>That's great. Though I sincerely hope there isnt hundreds of millions in student loan debt for disabled vets.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Suprak the Stud 08/21/19 5:16:22 PM #292:	Hey at least we get a little bit of good news out of the Trump administration this week! --- Moops? "I thought you were making up diseases? That's spontaneous dental hydroplosion." <cite>Suprak the Stud posted [p:926370158] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Hey at least we get a little bit of good news out of the Trump administration this week!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/21/19 5:44:50 PM #293:	Corrik7 posted... https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-cancelling-student-loan-debt-for-disabled-veterans I cant wait to hear the arguments against this from other mainstream Republicans --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926371402] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Corrik7 posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-cancelling-student-loan-debt-for-disabled-veterans </quote> I cant wait to hear the arguments against this from other mainstream Republicans</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Suprak the Stud 08/21/19 5:54:23 PM #294:	I know this doesn't compete with his other stuff today, but this made me laugh too: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1164169890917433346 Like somewhere there is an executive somewhere like "shit, make them cheaper and better - WHY DIDN'T WE THINK OF THAT" --- Moops? "I thought you were making up diseases? That's spontaneous dental hydroplosion." <cite>Suprak the Stud posted [p:926371840] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>I know this doesn't compete with his other stuff today, but this made me laugh too: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1164169890917433346 Like somewhere there is an executive somewhere like "shit, make them cheaper and better - WHY DIDN'T WE THINK OF THAT"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nelson_Mandela 08/21/19 6:04:29 PM #295:	Jakyl25 posted... Corrik7 posted... https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-cancelling-student-loan-debt-for-disabled-veterans I cant wait to hear the arguments against this from other mainstream Republicans How does this work? Is it just canceling federal loans? If so, I don't imagine that's a big expense. If it's all student loans, then this is 100% not legal through executive order. --- "A more mature answer than I expected."~ Jakyl25 "Sephy's point is right."~ Inviso <cite>Nelson_Mandela posted [p:926372273] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Corrik7 posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-cancelling-student-loan-debt-for-disabled-veterans </quote> I cant wait to hear the arguments against this from other mainstream Republicans</quote> How does this work? Is it just canceling federal loans? If so, I don't imagine that's a big expense. If it's all student loans, then this is 100% not legal through executive order.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/21/19 6:07:07 PM #296:	Suprak the Stud posted... I know this doesn't compete with his other stuff today, but this made me laugh too: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1164169890917433346 Like somewhere there is an executive somewhere like "shit, make them cheaper and better - WHY DIDN'T WE THINK OF THAT" Im not even sure what he means by politically correct here --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926372379] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Suprak the Stud posted...</cite> <quote>I know this doesn't compete with his other stuff today, but this made me laugh too: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1164169890917433346 Like somewhere there is an executive somewhere like "shit, make them cheaper and better - WHY DIDN'T WE THINK OF THAT"</quote> Im not even sure what he means by politically correct here</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/21/19 6:08:01 PM #297:	Nelson_Mandela posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik7 posted... https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-cancelling-student-loan-debt-for-disabled-veterans I cant wait to hear the arguments against this from other mainstream Republicans How does this work? Is it just canceling federal loans? If so, I don't imagine that's a big expense. If it's all student loans, then this is 100% not legal through executive order. Well he said its hundreds of millions of dollars --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926372420] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Corrik7 posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-cancelling-student-loan-debt-for-disabled-veterans </quote> I cant wait to hear the arguments against this from other mainstream Republicans</quote> How does this work? Is it just canceling federal loans? If so, I don't imagine that's a big expense. If it's all student loans, then this is 100% not legal through executive order.</quote> Well he said its hundreds of millions of dollars</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChaosTonyV4 08/21/19 6:10:46 PM #298:	Jakyl25 posted... Nelson_Mandela posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik7 posted... https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-cancelling-student-loan-debt-for-disabled-veterans I cant wait to hear the arguments against this from other mainstream Republicans How does this work? Is it just canceling federal loans? If so, I don't imagine that's a big expense. If it's all student loans, then this is 100% not legal through executive order. Well he said its hundreds of millions of dollars How do disabled Vets get hundreds of millions in college loans with the GI Bill + tuition assistance Vets get? Are there that many 100% disabled vets going for a second Bachelors or Masters when they technically shouldnt even be able to work? --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado <cite>ChaosTonyV4 posted [p:926372548] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Nelson_Mandela posted...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Corrik7 posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-cancelling-student-loan-debt-for-disabled-veterans </quote> I cant wait to hear the arguments against this from other mainstream Republicans</quote> How does this work? Is it just canceling federal loans? If so, I don't imagine that's a big expense. If it's all student loans, then this is 100% not legal through executive order.</quote> Well he said its hundreds of millions of dollars</quote> How do disabled Vets get hundreds of millions in college loans with the GI Bill + tuition assistance Vets get? Are there that many 100% disabled vets going for a second Bachelors or Masters when they technically shouldnt even be able to work?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/21/19 6:11:54 PM #299:	Also why would it not be legal through executive order? Couldnt he just cite eminent domain and compensate the lenders? --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926372601] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>Also why would it not be legal through executive order? Couldnt he just cite eminent domain and compensate the lenders?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HeroDelTiempo17 08/21/19 6:12:59 PM #300:	glad to see Trump taking on big pharma and demanding free access to life-saving medication https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1164252571420233734?s=19 --- DPOblivion was far more determined than me. <cite>HeroDelTiempo17 posted [p:926372651] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>glad to see Trump taking on big pharma and demanding free access to life-saving medication https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1164252571420233734?s=19</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 08/21/19 6:13:33 PM #301:	ChaosTonyV4 posted... Are there that many 100% disabled vets going for a second Bachelors or Masters when they technically shouldnt even be able to work? is that what 100% disabled means? Asking from ignorance --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:926372684] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>ChaosTonyV4 posted... </cite> <quote> Are there that many 100% disabled vets going for a second Bachelors or Masters when they technically shouldnt even be able to work?</quote> is that what 100% disabled means? Asking from ignorance </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 235: Autopsy-Turvy (+) Yeah! (+)

Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 235: Autopsy-Turvy