Poll of the Day > So I guess the new thing is to accuse politics of being a sexual predators?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Like who fucking cares? It's none of your business what someone does in their personal life.

---

New? Heck they been tossing that shade since ben franklin found another use for the common key.

https://www.ranker.com/list/facts-about-benjamin-franklin/katia-kleyman

Source isnt always accurate but these are common things associated with ol benji

---

Also my topic title is completely messed up.

---

are you saying who cares if someone sexually assaults someone because its their personal life? Im pretty sure youre trolling lol

---

Yeah but I knew the implication and didnt assume it was a sign of mental imparement. Beware the shade coming. But seriously look at the rumors spread about catherine the great, cleopatra (forcing oral on males before they were allowed to speak), heck even ghandi had his fare share.

I took it as who cares what a person does in there personal life, barring the of course illegal stuff

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

are you saying who cares if someone sexually assaults someone because its their personal life? Im pretty sure youre trolling lol

I just don't care.
It has zero bearing on your ability to be a politician.

ScritchOwl posted...

mental imparement

"Everything I don't like is a mental disorder".

---

ScritchOwl posted...

New?

---

Year who cares? Let's just hand the keys to the world to rapists and child molesters. Fucking dipshit

OhhhJa posted...

Year who cares? Let's just hand the keys to the world to rapists and child molesters. Fucking dipshit

According to #metoo you are guilty until proven innocent regardless of police affidavits, video evidence, and hospital bills that prove you were the injured party. See amber heard vs johnny depp to show how it has been grossly misused. Regardless of what any verdict says or does he has been smeared with a mark most people will always associate with him.


---

Judgmenl posted...

It has zero bearing on your ability to be a politician.

literally everything you say should be completely disregarded if you truly believe this. that is a stupid ass opinion

---

ScritchOwl posted...

According to #metoo you are guilty until proven innocent regardless of police affidavits, video evidence, and hospital bills that prove you were the injured party. See amber heard vs johnny depp to show how it has been grossly misused. Regardless of what any verdict says or does he has been smeared with a mark most people will always associate with him.

what the fuck are you talking about

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

what the fuck are you talking about

When amber heard made a statement to the police that johnny depp abused her, the police looked at her and saw no evidence of her claims. The next day she goes to instagram with pics that look like she was in a car wreck saying she was abused. Depp faced backlash as she jumped onto the #metoo bandwagon. Several SJW took his employers to task and allegedly had him bumped off future disney projects including future voice acting roles of his characters. He had to take her to court over this.

Basically #metoo is being weaponized which is a shame because if the abuse does happen a woman deserves protection. People that cry wolf make in near impossible for real victims.

Also here is a timeline of this bullshtuff if you care to read (dont not worth the time)
https://www.etonline.com/news/189603_johnny_depp_and_amber_heard_to_divorce_a_timeline

---

Judgmenl posted...

Like who fucking cares? It's none of your business what someone does in their personal life.

It becomes my concern when organizations like the WHO push pedophilia as progressive. It is not progressive.
---

This topic is pretty deep into bananaland

---

ScritchOwl posted...

According to #metoo you are guilty until proven innocent regardless of police affidavits, video evidence, and hospital bills that prove you were the injured party.

Not if you're a Democrat. The same people who went apeshit over Brett Kavanaugh are accusing Tara Reade of colluding with Trump when there's more evidence against Biden than there was against Kavanaugh.

Hop103 posted...

It becomes my concern when organizations like the WHO push pedophilia as progressive. It is not progressive.

Source?

---

not new.... bill clinton had a bunch too, google how hillary shut them up.
---

ScritchOwl posted...

When amber heard made a statement to the police that johnny depp abused her, the police looked at her and saw no evidence of her claims. The next day she goes to instagram with pics that look like she was in a car wreck saying she was abused. Depp faced backlash as she jumped onto the #metoo bandwagon. Several SJW took his employers to task and allegedly had him bumped off future disney projects including future voice acting roles of his characters. He had to take her to court over this.

Basically #metoo is being weaponized which is a shame because if the abuse does happen a woman deserves protection. People that cry wolf make in near impossible for real victims.

Also here is a timeline of this bullshtuff if you care to read (dont not worth the time)
https://www.etonline.com/news/189603_johnny_depp_and_amber_heard_to_divorce_a_timeline

Now, now, you have to understand that in an ordinary crime there's the accused, the victim, and witnesses. But in the case of #MeToo, there is only the accused and the victim. And you can't expect the accused to testify against himself, can you?!


---

Hop103 posted...

It becomes my concern when organizations like the WHO push pedophilia as progressive. It is not progressive.

Well we already know the WHO is a trash organization that is basically a puppet of whoever pays them the most.

---

Judgmenl posted...

It has zero bearing on your ability to be a politician.

Being in jail has considerable bearing on one's ability to be a politician. Sexual predators should be in jail for the good of society. By the transitive property, we can therefore conclude that being a sexual predator should have considerable bearing on one's ability to be a politician.

---

I think that movement destroyed the credibility of women and it's totally deserved. Lots of people are faking their stories for a quick profit and need to be held accountable.

---

Judgmenl posted...

Well we already know the WHO is a trash organization that is basically a puppet of whoever pays them the most.

so theyre like most other organizations?

---

I'm sorry, am I misunderstanding this? Are you saying a rapist could/should be a politician?

Does that extend to all crimes or is it just rape? Like, if the dude was a drug trafficking kingpin, would he also be fine being a politician?

---

Smarkil posted...

I'm sorry, am I misunderstanding this? Are you saying a rapist could/should be a politician?

Does that extend to all crimes or is it just rape? Like, if the dude was a drug trafficking kingpin, would he also be fine being a politician?

Technically speaking, there's a semantic difference there. A drug kingpin is only a drug kingpin so long as he controls a drug empire. When somebody isn't a drug kingpin, they're referred to as a former drug kingpin. However, there's no such thing as a former rapist. A rapist isn't called a rapist just in the act of rape, they're always considered a rapist even if their crime was 20 or 30 years ago. And, not for nothing, but there are politicians who go to jail on corruption charges who get re-elected for office so singling out other groups of ex-cons as being unsuitable for office seems silly by comparison.

And pragmatically speaking, a lot of politicians *have* been rapists. Not just in the past sense, but they did it while in office. So the "could" question kinda goes out the window, just leaving the "should" question and the vast majority of politicians shouldn't be politicians regardless.

---

Lots of guys with huge victim mentalities here

---

PK_Spam posted...

Lots of guys with huge victim mentalities here

Check your privilege.

---

Ya, who cares if they hunt human for sport in their spare time. It's their personal life.

---

ScritchOwl posted...

When amber heard made a statement to the police that johnny depp abused her, the police looked at her and saw no evidence of her claims. The next day she goes to instagram with pics that look like she was in a car wreck saying she was abused. Depp faced backlash as she jumped onto the #metoo bandwagon. Several SJW took his employers to task and allegedly had him bumped off future disney projects including future voice acting roles of his characters. He had to take her to court over this.

Basically #metoo is being weaponized which is a shame because if the abuse does happen a woman deserves protection. People that cry wolf make in near impossible for real victims.

Also here is a timeline of this bullshtuff if you care to read (dont not worth the time)
https://www.etonline.com/news/189603_johnny_depp_and_amber_heard_to_divorce_a_timeline

#BelieveAllWomen

---

rexcrk posted...

#BelieveAllWomen

https://almasveganas.org check this out they need your support but not that they need it from a man

---

Judgmenl posted...

Like who fucking cares? It's none of your business what someone does in their personal life.

I've seen some pretty ignorant comments on this website, but this might take the cake. Read your topic title and then read this statement again.

They're elected officials because they're obligated to the serve our interests, not theirs. If you were raped, you'd have an entirely different view of the world. You wouldn't be bitching on a website intended for nerds because you see your loser party tanking themselves.

ScritchOwl posted...

According to #metoo you are guilty until proven innocent regardless of police affidavits, video evidence, and hospital bills that prove you were the injured party.

Not if you're the Democrat's chosen candidate.

---