Poll of the Day > Kyle Rittenhouse is raising ANOTHER 2 MILLION..Look at what he's SELLING!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

Dailymail has learned that The Trailer Trash Family of Kyle Rittenhouse are now selling FREE KYLE branded merchandise including BIKINIS and CROP TOPS to help raise ANOTHER 2-2.5 MILLION for the teen's defense after they DRAINED all of it to set him free!!

The 17 y/o Illinois teen is charged with shooting 2 BLM protesters dead and injuring a 3rd as "fans" of the teen cn now buy an array of products of t-shirts, hoodies, stickers, laptop sleeves for 40-42.99 each!!

They even have face masks with the title "Free Kyle" on them

All of the products listed are on sale at freekyleusa with all proceeds going to his legal defense fund

However, a rittenhouse family member said the company, Printful, responsible for making these had placed unfulfilled orders on hold following one complaint

They said "We had over 400 orders, they had one complaint. This is what they fear so much. We have yet to receive any formal notification or response to our emails. Nothing. Let that sink in"

The "store" tab on the site is not working as the website appeared to have photoshopped the free kyle logo on the stock images as it appears the models were unaware of their picture being used for this

T-shirts celebrating his release were also sold on Etsy but were banned

Wendy thanked supporters and said "I alone control this website and Kyle's defense fund. We estimate Kyle's defense costs for trial to be 2 to 2.5 million after turning over the 2 million cash bail we are essentiall starting at zero"

Printful says they have raised around 56,700 of its 2 million goal and said "Asking for help has never been easy for me, but Kyle and my family really need your help"

Kimberly Motley, the attorney for Gaige Grosskreutz, one of the men shot by Rottenhouse said the family is attempting to financially benefit from the alleged actions of her son

She said "They are going to be celebrating Christmas without their loved ones. Meanwhile, you know, Kyle Rittenhouse's mom is trying to profit off these tragedies. And i think that's frankly vile and disgusting and in extreme poor taste"

President Trump and Conservatives are painting Kyle as an american patriot and hero for killing the men and said he defended the country and did what "needed to be done" as they will fight for him tooth and nail for his freedom

Dailymail also learned that his former lawyer, John Pierce threatened to kill his ex wife and have MILLIONS in DEBT from unpaid taxes and defaults on business loans.

Kyle's trial is scheduled to be January 5 and faces up to 6 years in prison if found guilty

Do you think this trailer trash family is trying to profit off right-wingers from this tragedy?

https://i.imgur.com/XHDuJ6a.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Zg3xqdr.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/k5X8Fxb.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/6FJPZyC.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/UhJUqiX.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/LumwRDU.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/wQE2Gcy.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/PoBo3Ce.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/l4KAY5J.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/hgbYvdU.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/blqCDLg.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/4dHRIGu.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/D289wcn.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Kf5rKWO.jpg
---

you wouldn't have to raise money for bail or a lawyer if your kid didn't murder two people.

---

Even more than that if he didn't go out of his way to enter a potential place where violence could break out he wouldn't be in this thing. This isn't a case of some guy trying to defend his property or his family he literally drove to get to this drive took him 30-40 minutes at least.

Joe_Biden posted...

you wouldn't have to raise money for bail or a lawyer if your kid didn't murder two people.

Citation needed.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Citation needed.

people don't need bail money if they didn't do something illegal and end up in jail and need to be bailed out

so yes, they wouldn't have to raise money for bail or a lawyer if their kid did not murder two people and end up in jail

---

Joe_Biden posted...

people don't need bail money if they didn't do something illegal and end up in jail and need to be bailed out

so yes, they wouldn't have to raise money for bail or a lawyer if their kid did not murder two people and end up in jail

That's not a source.
---

Revelation34 posted...

That's not a source.

okay

https://money.howstuffworks.com/bail.htm

though my explanation was much shorter and concise

---

Joe_Biden posted...

people don't need bail money if they didn't do something illegal and end up in jail and need to be bailed out

exonerated verb - (especially of an official body) absolve (someone) from blame for a fault or wrongdoing, especially after due consideration of the case.

---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

exonerated verb - (especially of an official body) absolve (someone) from blame for a fault or wrongdoing, especially after due consideration of the case.

he has not been exonerated of anything.

and, again, he would not have needed bail money if he did not do something illegal and end up in jail and need to be bailed out.

an example of this would be: kyle rittenhouse wouldn't need money to be bailed out of jail if he didn't murder two innocent people.

---

Joe_Biden posted...

he has not been exonerated of anything.

and, again, he would not have needed bail money if he did not do something illegal and end up in jail and need to be bailed out.

an example of this would be: kyle rittenhouse wouldn't need money to be bailed out of jail if he didn't murder two innocent people.

I feel you're ignorant of the criminal justice system in this country. He has been accused of crimes, not convicted

Joe_Biden posted...

...

In other words no one who has paid bail has ever been found not guilty.

---

OhhhJa posted...

I feel you're ignorant of the criminal justice system in this country. He has been accused of crimes, not convicted

weirdly enough murder is a felony, which means...crime

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

In other words no one who has paid bail has ever been found not guilty.

there's indisputable proof that he murdered two people, unfortunately, so it's a pretty clear sentencing of guilty

---

Joe_Biden posted...

there's indisputable proof that he murdered two people, unfortunately, so it's a pretty clear sentencing of guilty

You can just as easily say there's indisputable proof that he was acting in self defense, and thus the killing was not murder. That's why there are trials.

---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

You can just as easily say there's indisputable proof that he was acting in self defense, and thus the killing was not murder. That's why there are trials.

you cannot do that, unfortunately, because he was not. there's video proof and all.

they will go to trial, the prosecutors will play the video, the judge will look at it and go "yep he murdered those people" and, if there is one, the jury will also go "yep he murdered those people" and he'll be found guilty.

it'll take like 5 minutes.

---

Joe_Biden posted...

weirdly enough murder is a felony, which means...crime

Sure is. And he hasn't been convicted

For sleepy Joe (helly):

https://accinfosys.com/employee-criminal-record-arrest-vs-conviction/#:~:text=An%20arrest%20record%20is%20not,in%20a%20court%20of%20law.

"An arrest record is not definitive proof that someone broke the law. It simply indicates that there was a suspicion that they may have"

How do I fund raise without criming?

---

Joe_Biden posted...

and, again, he would not have needed bail money if he did not do something illegal and end up in jail and need to be bailed out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Stinney

Joe_Biden posted...

there's indisputable proof that he murdered two people, unfortunately, so it's a pretty clear sentencing of guilty

Sure if you never watched the video.
---

If you have very legitimately need money for a legal defense, you're not "profiting" off anything. As it is, they're still likely going to come up short on money.

Monopoman posted...

Even more than that if he didn't go out of his way to enter a potential place where violence could break out he wouldn't be in this thing. This isn't a case of some guy trying to defend his property or his family he literally drove to get to this drive took him 30-40 minutes at least.

Or, in other words, you're saying it was Kyle's fault that he was attacked on a public street, chased down, had people attempting to attack him while he was on the fucking ground -- including one guy who pulled a gun of his own on Kyle and, even after Kyle shot at his attackers, was moving in with that gun (which he had in his hands PRIOR to Kyle shooting at his first attacker) to shoot Kyle (and only stopped because he got shot in the arm) -- is that really what you're going with? If it is, it's kinda fucking weird because you're using that as a justification for him not being there, while both failing to address the same thing could be said of anybody else there and also handwaving the fact he was fucking physically attacked in the first place which is unacceptable under any circumstances.

Joe_Biden posted...

people don't need bail money if they didn't do something illegal and end up in jail and need to be bailed out

That's not how the fucking legal system works.


---

Zeus posted...

If you have very legitimately need money for a legal defense, you're not "profiting" off anything. As it is, they're still likely going to come up short on money.

Or, in other words, you're saying it was Kyle's fault that he was attacked on a public street, chased down, had people attempting to attack him while he was on the fucking ground -- including one guy who pulled a gun of his own on Kyle and, even after Kyle shot at his attackers, was moving in with that gun (which he had in his hands PRIOR to Kyle shooting at his first attacker) to shoot Kyle (and only stopped because he got shot in the arm) -- is that really what you're going with? If it is, it's kinda fucking weird because you're using that as a justification for him not being there, while both failing to address the same thing could be said of anybody else there and also handwaving the fact he was fucking physically attacked in the first place which is unacceptable under any circumstances.

Here is the problem with this analysis, we know Kyle bought a gun just weeks before he went there. Kid went to the place looking for trouble, and I would have no problem with the people he killed being put on trial but guess what, you can't prosecute a dead man/woman.

This is basically like someone swimming through a river filled with human feces then wondering why he smells like it. He went to this place looking for action and a potential fight period, it would be like someone going into a bank with a loaded assault rifle, where we know 4 armed bank robbers are in there and in the ensuing shoot out 3 hostages get shot. Should that person not face a penalty for being the instigator of a shoot out that killed 3 innocent bystanders?

This was not Kyle's place to do this period we have military and police to handle situations like this, he should have never been there. Kyle views himself as some sort of fucking crusader who believes he is helping every situation he is in, and as we can see he is fucking completely deluded. I also think anyone that enters any high tension situation packing a major weapon is going to pour more gasoline on the fire. It's basically like driving into a protest with a tank all of a sudden things that were bad are going to get worse if you start firing the cannon on that tank.

I also will point out Kyle did not follow proper self defense protocol, if someone breaks into my house and I shoot the guy and kill him I must IMMEADITLY call the cops to let them know. Kyle shot people and killed them, yet he makes no attempt to notify police about it. So even if you believe 100% that Kyle was just defending himself he did not follow the proper method of that.

Monopoman posted...

Here is the problem with this analysis, we know Kyle bought a gun just weeks before he went there. Kid went to the place looking for trouble

All that means is he went in prepared. Knowing that there will be trouble and still going isn't the same as looking for trouble.

Wikipedia

Rittenhouse was seen talking with police officers, as well as offering medical aid to those who were injured.

According to his attorneys, after he had heard about a local business owner who wanted help defending his car dealership, he and his friend Dominick David Black "armed themselves with rifles" and went to that business.

It sounds like his intent wasn't to cause trouble but to help others who were in trouble.

---

Monopoman posted...

Here is the problem with this analysis, we know Kyle bought a gun just weeks before he went there. Kid went to the place looking for trouble, and I would have no problem with the people he killed being put on trial but guess what, you can't prosecute a dead man/woman.

This is basically like someone swimming through a river filled with human feces then wondering why he smells like it. He went to this place looking for action and a potential fight period, it would be like someone going into a bank with a loaded assault rifle, where we know 4 armed bank robbers are in there and in the ensuing shoot out 3 hostages get shot. Should that person not face a penalty for being the instigator of a shoot out that killed 3 innocent bystanders?

This was not Kyle's place to do this period we have military and police to handle situations like this, he should have never been there. Kyle views himself as some sort of fucking crusader who believes he is helping every situation he is in, and as we can see he is fucking completely deluded. I also think anyone that enters any high tension situation packing a major weapon is going to pour more gasoline on the fire. It's basically like driving into a protest with a tank all of a sudden things that were bad are going to get worse if you start firing the cannon on that tank.

I also will point out Kyle did not follow proper self defense protocol, if someone breaks into my house and I shoot the guy and kill him I must IMMEADITLY call the cops to let them know. Kyle shot people and killed them, yet he makes no attempt to notify police about it. So even if you believe 100% that Kyle was just defending himself he did not follow the proper method of that.

Huh. I didn't know April was only mere weeks before August.
---

Monopoman posted...

I also will point out Kyle did not follow proper self defense protocol, if someone breaks into my house and I shoot the guy and kill him I must IMMEADITLY call the cops to let them know. Kyle shot people and killed them, yet he makes no attempt to notify police about it. So even if you believe 100% that Kyle was just defending himself he did not follow the proper method of that.

He was making a phone call though after the first guy he shot. Not sure if it was confirmed who he was calling but then he ran when an angry mob came after him. Then he once again tried to surrender to the cops who drove by him