Poll of the Day > Man pulls a KYLE RITTENHOUSE and SOBS UNCONTROLLABLY for Killing AHMAUD ARBERY!

(+) Yeah! (+)

Trailer Trash, Travis McMichael pulled a Kyle Rittenhouse and sobbed UNCONTROLLABLY in court after he testified about the "life or death" situation where he HAD to shoot Ahmaud Arbery dead after wrestling over the shotgun before he shot him THREE times as he thought of his "son" when he did it.

Kyle had previously sobbed uncontrollably after telling his side of the story to the jury

He took to the stand on the 8th day where attorneys are expected to present evidence the murder was out of self defense as he and his father, Gregory McMichael and neighbor, William Bryan Jr attempted to conduct a citizen's arest of him under their suspicion that he committed a burglary

The 35 y/o said "I wanted to give my side of the story" as the former coast guard petty officer said he was in a life or death battle on the roadway after the duo tusseled over control of his shotgun before he pulled the trigger

He said "I was thinking of my son. It sounds weird, but that's the first thing that hit me"

He confirmed that they followed him after 25 y/o Arbery switched back 3 times and the pair interacted as Travis claimed he repeatedly told him to stop

Eventually Arbery went out of sight around a dogleg bend in the mainly white community as Travis parked his pick up with his father in the flatbed telling jurrors that at that point he did not want to escalate the situation but then arbery ran back into sight and towards the son and starts fighting over the shotgun

Travis then tears up and said he was thinking of his son and that he can't leave this earth knowing he might die as he wiped off tears on his face and said "I shot him. He had my gun. He struck me. It was obvious that he was attacking me, that he would have got that shotgun from me, it's a life or death situation. I wanted to stop him from doing this so i shot him"

Arbery was shot once under his armpit according to the medical examiner before being shot twice more

They claim there has been a rash burglaries in the area and said Arbery looked suspicious and not from the area so that is why they pursued

No evidence has emerged that Arbery took anything from them or the property in question as the owner of that property said arbery may have stopped to take a sip of water at the water faucet there

It's also revealed that Travis yelled the N-WORD and their father's truck had the confederate flag on his vehicle..

The defense was also blasted for stating he does not want to see anymore BLACK PASTORS at the trial attempting to intimidate the jury

The 11 WHITE men and women and 1 person of colour will decide their fate

Do you think these trailer trash men are guilty?

https://i.imgur.com/yJma8aG.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/nPhBNo9.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/tzTURyu.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/72OojFl.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/1M1eN3c.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/lkSdLtt.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/breVjle.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/UCdpIPF.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Om9uAQ8.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/YcmircN.jpg
---

Ya know if KR isnt charged I can at least understand the views of the jury even if I dont personally agree

This case though. The guy was just running through the neighborhood. They claim they think he was trespassing but that claim isnt enough try to pull a weapon and arrest the man yourself. He may have been scared when the victim tried to grab the gun but the guy was trying to get away. If you try to do a citizens arrest and the person flees you dont pursue them you call the cops.

---

mrduckbear posted...

Trailer Trash, Travis McMichael pulled a Kyle Rittenhouse and sobbed UNCONTROLLABLY in court after he testified about the "life or death" situation where he HAD to shoot Ahmaud Arbery dead after wrestling over the shotgun before he shot him THREE times as he thought of his "son" when he did it.

How to commit murder and claim self-defense:

1. Attack/threaten an innocent unarmed person with a gun
2. Once he's frightened for his life, he tries to disarm the gun from you in a desperate struggle to not die
3. The SECOND his hand touches the gun, you're now clear to fire "in self defense". Of the situation you created and instigated, and brought the weapon to.
4. Just to be safe, make sure you're white and the other guy's black

I'm so fucking sick of this bs. It's always the armed aggressor talking about HIS right to "self defense". The idea that the murder victim was trying to defend himself from a crazy ass hole with a gun somehow doesn't get any air time.

The 35 y/o said "I wanted to give my side of the story" as the former coast guard petty officer said he was in a life or death battle on the roadway after the duo tusseled over control of his shotgun before he pulled the trigger

Go fuck your self, you steaming pile of feces! I want to hear Arbery's side of the story. But I can't. Because you fucking hunted him down for sport and murdered him!

There is no ambiguity in the Aubery case. He was murdered because a band of vigilante racists profiled him.

---

Of course they are fucking guilty. And the justice system was so fucking rigged that they were going to get off because one of them knew the right people. https://apnews.com/article/georgia-brunswick-ahmaud-arbery-savannah-583c175e91787305180682f10671d2e7

But then the idiot is so arrogant he apparently puts out the video of his drive by lynching himself. It's just mindblowingly stupid.

Dude is minding his own business jogging gets random ass holes pull up on him telling him to stop so he tries to run away (as most people would), they strike him with the truck and rush him with a gun where he is forced to try and defend himself before they blow him away without hesitation. Apparently they might have said the n-word over his body? This is a clear cut murder, but unless I'm misunderstanding they aren't being charged with murder they are being charged with "felony murder" which is a charge applied when someone dies while under commission of a different felony in this case a charge of false imprisonment.

Kyle Rittenhouse, first man to ever cry during a trial, you heard it first here folks.

Also:
Gaawa_chan posted...

There is no ambiguity in the Aubrey case. He was murdered because a band of vigilante racists profiled him.

BlackScythe0 posted...

Of course they are fucking guilty. And the justice system was so fucking rigged that they were going to get off because one of them knew the right people. https://apnews.com/article/georgia-brunswick-ahmaud-arbery-savannah-583c175e91787305180682f10671d2e7

But then the idiot is so arrogant he apparently puts out the video of his drive by lynching himself. It's just mindblowingly stupid.

Dude is minding his own business jogging gets random ass holes pull up on him telling him to stop so he tries to run away (as most people would), they strike him with the truck and rush him with a gun where he is forced to try and defend himself before they blow him away without hesitation. Apparently they might have said the n-word over his body? This is a clear cut murder, but unless I'm misunderstanding they aren't being charged with murder they are being charged with "felony murder" which is a charge applied when someone dies while under commission of a different felony in this case a charge of false imprisonment.

that sounds like what they probably should have charged Kyle Rittenhouse with

i mean not the false imprisonment part

---

BlackScythe0 posted...

Of course they are fucking guilty. And the justice system was so fucking rigged that they were going to get off because one of them knew the right people. https://apnews.com/article/georgia-brunswick-ahmaud-arbery-savannah-583c175e91787305180682f10671d2e7

But then the idiot is so arrogant he apparently puts out the video of his drive by lynching himself. It's just mindblowingly stupid.

Dude is minding his own business jogging gets random ass holes pull up on him telling him to stop so he tries to run away (as most people would), they strike him with the truck and rush him with a gun where he is forced to try and defend himself before they blow him away without hesitation. Apparently they might have said the n-word over his body? This is a clear cut murder, but unless I'm misunderstanding they aren't being charged with murder they are being charged with "felony murder" which is a charge applied when someone dies while under commission of a different felony in this case a charge of false imprisonment.

The dad and the son are charged with murder amongst other things. The neighbor that filmed the scene is charged with felony murder, since he was not as involved being the camera man hanging back and all. Overall, I don't like felony murder rules and don't think the neighbor should get a life sentence for the poor judgement of the father and son (although it was stupid to chase the guy in a car), but the father & son are guilty as sin as far as I am concerned. Getting out to assault the suspect with a deadly weapon doomed thier case no matter how much crying the son does.

---

I don't understand how there are votes that they are innocent.

From what I know about the case, theyre probably guilty of something.

---

Im not so familiar w the the specifics Under what Premise was the neighbor charged w the felony murder rule?

my recollection was that it was the father and son chasing the victim. To what extent was the neighbor involved?

---

PeterPumpknhead posted...

Ya know if KR isnt charged I can at least understand the views of the jury even if I dont personally agree

This case though. The guy was just running through the neighborhood. They claim they think he was trespassing but that claim isnt enough try to pull a weapon and arrest the man yourself. He may have been scared when the victim tried to grab the gun but the guy was trying to get away. If you try to do a citizens arrest and the person flees you dont pursue them you call the cops.

Pretty much this. This guy have no reasonable defense. You don't have the right to pull a gun on someone even if you think they're trespassing/stealing

Conner4REAL posted...

Im not so familiar w the the specifics Under what Premise was the neighbor charged w the felony murder rule?

my recollection was that it was the father and son chasing the victim. To what extent was the neighbor involved?

From what I remember the neighbor was the one that caught the murder on video. The father and son were already stopped in the middle of the road waiting for Ahmaud to make the turn in the road and the neighbor was trailing behind in a car with his phone recording.

I never heard what the explanation was for the neighbor following Ahmaud while already recording, but presumably he was involved with the other two men's plans to stop and "arrest" the jogger.

It worked once why not again although suspect Rittenhouse was crying crocodile tears.

---

BUMPED2002 posted...

It worked once why not again although suspect Rittenhouse was crying crocodile tears.

What's the point of fake crying if you already know you're going to get off a hundred percent?

...how does anything in this story resemble Rittenhouse? wtf? That's just some lazy trolling.

I haven't followed the Arbery case closely, but the core details show Rittenhouse to have more in common with Arbery (who was chased down) than the men who chased Arbery.

streamofthesky posted... I'm so fucking sick of this bs. It's always the armed aggressor talking about HIS right to "self defense". The idea that the murder victim was trying to defend himself from a crazy ass hole with a gun somehow doesn't get any air time.

...again, we literally saw this in the Rittenhouse case when armed grown men chased down and tried to murder a teenager. And even after the first shots fired, Gaige approached Rittenhouse and aimed at him... and yet the prosecution has him up there crying and pretending he's blameless despite again, chasing down and trying to murder a teenager. And even after Gaige admitted on the stand to pointing that gun at Rittenhouse, the media defended it -- arguing that he was nervous, etc, not sure what he was doing... unless the kid a large group was chasing and trying to murder. FFS!

BlackScythe0 posted... Of course they are fucking guilty. And the justice system was so fucking rigged that they were going to get off because one of them knew the right people

...a claim that's particularly galling given that the verdict still hasn't come in.

Not to mention the pragmatic matter of effectively skirting double-jeopardy laws by both the state and feds charging somebody with things related to the same crime.

PeterPumpknhead posted...

Ya know if KR isnt charged

He was charged, that's required to go to trial >_>

PeterPumpknhead posted...

They claim they think he was trespassing but that claim isnt enough try to pull a weapon and arrest the man yourself. He may have been scared when the victim tried to grab the gun but the guy was trying to get away. If you try to do a citizens arrest and the person flees you dont pursue them you call the cops.

Which is ironic in that the prosecution in the Rittenhouse case tried to argue that the mob who chased, assaulted, and attempted to murder Rittenhouse were trying a citizens arrest -- despite talking to one of the hundreds of cops on the scene -- and now you have the prosecution rejecting that claim (when if Gaige had murdered Rittenhouse as planned -- which was only stopped when Gaige was shot, and even on cross-examination Gaige admitted to pointing his handgun at Rittenhouse -- the prosecution likely wouldn't have pressed a single charge despite Gaige helping to instigate the initial confrontation and forced the eventual shooting).


---

You know I was expecting 2-3 nos from our regular scumbags but 6 is surprising to me.

Zeus posted...

...again, we literally saw this in the Rittenhouse case when armed grown men chased down and tried to murder a teenager. And even after the first shots fired, Gaige approached Rittenhouse and aimed at him... and yet the prosecution has him up there crying and pretending he's blameless despite again, chasing down and trying to murder a teenager. And even after Gaige admitted on the stand to pointing that gun at Rittenhouse, the media defended it -- arguing that he was nervous, etc, not sure what he was doing... unless the kid a large group was chasing and trying to murder. FFS!

I was talking about the Arbery case. Nothing in my post was about Rittenhouse's case.
This topic is about the former, despite Duckbear naming it after the latter.
I haven't followed the Rittenhouse case much b/c it doesn't seem anywhere near as much of an outrage as this case (not to mention the cover up involving DA officials that almost kept it under wraps until the perpetrators leaked their own incriminating evidence to the public).
And frankly I'm very irritated that the media has focused on the Rittenhouse trial like 200x as much as they have this one, it's a pretty clear cut example of everything wrong w/ our news outlets.

Because the Rittenhouse case is far more interesting and controversial. Most people seem to agree that the McMichael's are guilty, so what is there really to talk about?


---

DragonClaw01 posted...

Because the Rittenhouse case is far more interesting and controversial. Most people seem to agree that the McMichael's are guilty, so what is there really to talk about?

Like I said, the background behind why it took so long and took the murderers leaking their own video to generate an arrest is on its own enough controversy and rage-fuel to get a 500 topic.
The jury selection was incredibly racially biased, w/ the defense getting rid of as many black jurors from the pool as possible to get 11 white and 1 black juror in a community that's like 38% black. And further made the racist intentions blatant by asking for the judge to remove black pastors from the court because they were "intimidating".
And the scum bags' incriminating statements on the stand really are something else.

Plenty to talk about, and I was criticizing the news. Whose job is supposed to be to inform, not revel in partisanship for cheap ratings (I know that it's the opposite in reality, my whole point is this is indicative of everything wrong w/ the news media).
How many of the people seeing dozens of hours of Rittenhouse footage are even aware of these verifiable and disturbing facts surrounding the Arbery case?
The news is fucking failing us.

Best guess I have is the reason no one is talking about it is because even conservative don't really have an argument they can make to defend these guys since there is video proof they were wrong every step of the way and instead provides a self defense case for the victim.

Then you have Rittenhouse who was wrong every step of the way and they aren't even allowed to show all the evidence at the trial. It's definitely more controversial.