Poll of the Day > Do you think the collective female desire to avoid monogamous relationships is

(+) Yeah! (+)

An evolutionary dead end?

Consider a few factors
-Human children are not capable of caring for themselves, and typically require some approximation of the "family unit" to flourish. When fathered by "alpha" males, children are denied this atmosphere and this leads to a lower socioeconomic status later in life
-Human evolution has traditionally involved min-maxing towards cooperative, communal behavior patterns. When we introduce an alternative driving force towards selfish and less socially adaptive traits, we introduce cracks and fissures into the gene pool.
-By incentivizing direct competition between human males rather than binary pairings dictated by affection or economic alliance, women unknowingly encourage violent conflict between potential mates which results in only the more "primal" males prospering through force of arms (ie white genocide).

This leads to a few potentially contradictory conclusions
-while the shift in women's attitudes has traditionally been analyzed through the lens of social decay (sin) the consequences are much more broadly reaching than that and could alter humanity on a broader scale
-the issue is potentially self correcting as we will eventually reach a point where copulation through feminism is no longer viable and more natural means of dividing this resource will emerge as a survival mechanism

Thoughts?

Tf are you on about

I struggle to remember why I keep coming here.

keyblader1985 posted...

I struggle to remember why I keep coming here.

At this point it's just habit

It's only an evolutionary dead-end if society/technology never goes backwards and we also never inhabit another planet.

If some natural disaster wipes out a large part of the population we'll be back to needing non-monogamous relationships to survive as a species. Same if we last long enough to start populating other planets.

Soon we will all have sex through VR with no real physical contact and insemination will only be done through a doctors visit and you can choose the gender and many physical aspects of the child.

Blightzkrieg posted...

An evolutionary dead end?

Consider a few factors
-Human children are not capable of caring for themselves, and typically require some approximation of the "family unit" to flourish. When fathered by "alpha" males, children are denied this atmosphere and this leads to a lower socioeconomic status later in life
-Human evolution has traditionally involved min-maxing towards cooperative, communal behavior patterns. When we introduce an alternative driving force towards selfish and less socially adaptive traits, we introduce cracks and fissures into the gene pool.
-By incentivizing direct competition between human males rather than binary pairings dictated by affection or economic alliance, women unknowingly encourage violent conflict between potential mates which results in only the more "primal" males prospering through force of arms (ie white genocide).

This leads to a few potentially contradictory conclusions
-while the shift in women's attitudes has traditionally been analyzed through the lens of social decay (sin) the consequences are much more broadly reaching than that and could alter humanity on a broader scale
-the issue is potentially self correcting as we will eventually reach a point where copulation through feminism is no longer viable and more natural means of dividing this resource will emerge as a survival mechanism

Thoughts?

It sounds like a college professor threw a bunch of big-sounding words around to confuse the students so they could force their own viewpoints and opinions under the guise of making it sound educated/scientific/etc.

I'm no expert in the scientific aspects of monogamy, but from what little I understand it's basically that it's a 'compromise' between the man and woman. The man isn't going around sleeping with multiple women and devoting his resources to the wife and children while the woman isn't getting knocked up by other guys and devoting her time to raising her husbands kids. However this only affects the biological level (and isn't a good explanation either) and the fact is that many PEOPLE in general look forwards to finding the special someone and are happy to have a monogamous relationship.

While there is definitely a massive cause for concern about divorce rates; I don't think an internet forum for video games has the qualifications to really understand what is being discussed beyond the most superficial of levels.

Blightzkrieg posted...

When fathered by "alpha" males, children are denied this atmosphere and this leads to a lower socioeconomic status later in life

From a social standpoint, you're going to have "alphas" (if you use that term) in monogamous relationships. Likewise, there are non-alphas who abandon their kids.

Blightzkrieg posted...

in only the more "primal" males prospering through force of arms (ie white genocide).

jfc, living up to your username.

The fuck

lmao

DocDelicious posted...

If some natural disaster wipes out a large part of the population we'll be back to needing non-monogamous relationships to survive as a species. Same if we last long enough to start populating other planets.

While I understand what youre saying, you wouldnt technically need non-monogamous relationships. But more like non-monogamous breeding, essentially And thats if you dont have the means to artificially inseminate people

Blightzkrieg posted...

An evolutionary dead end?

Consider a few factors
-Human children are not capable of caring for themselves, and typically require some approximation of the "family unit" to flourish. When fathered by "alpha" males, children are denied this atmosphere and this leads to a lower socioeconomic status later in life
-Human evolution has traditionally involved min-maxing towards cooperative, communal behavior patterns. When we introduce an alternative driving force towards selfish and less socially adaptive traits, we introduce cracks and fissures into the gene pool.
-By incentivizing direct competition between human males rather than binary pairings dictated by affection or economic alliance, women unknowingly encourage violent conflict between potential mates which results in only the more "primal" males prospering through force of arms (ie white genocide).

This leads to a few potentially contradictory conclusions
-while the shift in women's attitudes has traditionally been analyzed through the lens of social decay (sin) the consequences are much more broadly reaching than that and could alter humanity on a broader scale
-the issue is potentially self correcting as we will eventually reach a point where copulation through feminism is no longer viable and more natural means of dividing this resource will emerge as a survival mechanism

Thoughts?

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/4/6/AAQwHjAACP4i.jpg

You almost had me

I think you made a false assumption in the topic title, and the rest of your post sounds sexist as hell.

Copypasta.

PMarth2002 posted...

I think you made a false assumption in the topic title, and the rest of your post sounds sexist as hell.

And racist

TC the Hedgehog

https://youtu.be/n__GJuqLb00

faramir77 posted...

TC the Hedgehog

https://youtu.be/n__GJuqLb00

While I appreciate the attempt to engage, I think this shows a misunderstanding of my original point.

Shadow sees the development of the beta male (aka the speedrunner) as an unnatural response to societal pressures. What Shadow misses is that these traits have been present throughout history. Beta males aren't an unnatural development, but rather a flailing response by the traditional male towards a foreign intrusion outlined in my original post.

I sympathize with Shadow's rage towards the fall in virility in liberal society, he misattributes the cause in an almost Bidenesque manner. I think this is intentional on the part of the author though, Shadow is an antihero. He represents the classical Id, a necessary but often misdirected part of the sophisticated western mind.

Plenty of women want monogamous relationships, just not with you.

the collective female desire to avoid monogamous relationships

I always thought the stereotype was the opposite