Current Events > Detroit man accused of raping teen gets severely beaten by her family

(+) Yeah! (+)

DPD is probably going to let that whooping slide. They let a lot of shit slide >_>

I've seen cases where the person beaten actually didn't do anything or what at least what was accused. Need to leave this to play out in court

And they should. Dude deserved it.

And if its proven he did?

If I was on the family's jury, I would be inclined to agree.

Then they shouldnt be arrested at all.

https://youtu.be/rMYR8_33XgQ

I swear there was a story about a year or so ago where CE got super excited about a guy killing his daughter's rapist and then it turned out the dead guy hadn't even done it

https://youtu.be/uqH_Y1TupoQ

The jury is allowed to vote I know what they did is illegal but Im voting they are innocent regardless I believe, I think its called Jury Nullification. If the guy actually did rape their daughter then that would be a good reason to proceed down that route (morally)

That has nothing to do with the situation. If it's proven someone committed a crime, some cute video won't save the criminal. Mob justice is a crime. Simple as that. And as I just said, the judge of the trial would probably overrule the jury's decision because I would hope the judge would actually understand the law. But it probably would not get to that point

The jury gets instructions before the trial. They would be told you have to discover if the family beat up the accused rapist. And that's all they can do. And if the answer is yes, they have to find the family guilty

You yourself already admitted they did do it. They are guilty. In a jury you would not be allowed to admit they did it, but that it was justified. If you insisted it was justified, you would be removed from the jury before the trial happened

You are beyond help and also very ignorant about how the law and juries work.

My own brother is a lawyer

There is nothing moral about mob justice

Then ask your brother about jury nullification.

you arent the victim or the victims family or friend

But I already know you can't vote to set a person free who is found to have done the crime

That has nothing to do with anything. Mob justice is illegal. I don't have to be connected to the case to know that

Youre confusing morals and legality. I wonder why that is not

No I am not. I know I said mob justice is not moral, but it also is not legal. I dare you find a law in America that says people can kill a person before a trial happens

Again you are confusing morals and laws

Explain how then. Because I don't see it.

You are going on nonstop about the law when I specified morals

And I said its not moral. But I also also said it is not legal. So I don't how mixing up morals and legality even matters. Either way, I say its wrong

You're literally saying juries can be punished for getting the verdict "wrong" or that juries must rule in a way ordered by the court, which is the stupidest thing I've heard in a long time.

and I said you have lesser moral standing in this since you arent part of the affected group

I dont think a jury that let this family go free would even be legally allowed to do so. The trial would her overruled by the judge maybe. Or the Supreme Court.

/yawn

No that is not what I said. Proving you aren't understanding my posts. I said a juror get get removed from the jury before the trial happens if they can't listen to instructions. And both sides of the trial get to weed out jurors they don't like before day 1 of the trial

And I said that juries have to abide by the law. The judge would accept if the trial proves the family did not beat up the accused. But if they did, then they must find the family guilty. That is literally what the law on mob justice says. The trial would not be if it was justified, it would he if the family did the beating or not. And even you admit the beating happened

His reaction when he has the law explained to him:

https://i.imgur.com/tdCMH1f.png

https://i.imgur.com/BMSP41m.png

https://i.imgur.com/MoIviE6.png

https://i.imgur.com/Qn9cbYd.png

https://i.imgur.com/a6oCSdm.png

So how were these juries "legally allowed" to let these people go, and why weren't those verdicts overturned? LMAO

Putting Zimmerman on the same level as OJ, Rittenhouse or rapists is crazy

Putting Zimmerman on the same level as OJ, Rittenhouse or rapists is crazy

No that is not what I said. Proving you aren't understanding my posts. I said a juror get get removed from the jury before the trial happens if they can't listen to instructions. And both sides of the trial get to weed out jurors they don't like before day 1 of the trial

And I said that juries have to abide by the law. The judge would accept if the trial proves the family did not beat up the accused. But if they did, then they must find the family guilty. That is literally what the law on mob justice says. The trial would not be if it was justified, it would he if the family did the beating or not. And even you admit the beating happened

Not how anything works in the law. The only thing remotely like this is if someone walks in on a still happening rape, amd then it can be defense of the victim. That does not apply if the rape was in the past and nobody but the victim witnessed it. You have to go by evidence. And proving a recent rape is extremely easy with modern technology. There was no reason for the mob to go beat him up. If he is guilty, forensics will figure it out