Current Events > Actors lose Romeo & Juliet nude scene lawsuit

Topic List	Page List: 1
solosnake 05/26/23 4:50:15 PM #1:	https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65725714 A Los Angeles judge says she will dismiss a child sex abuse lawsuit brought by the stars of the 1968 film Romeo and Juliet. Olivia Hussey and Leonard Whiting alleged the film's director coerced them into filming nude while underage. A Superior Court judge found the scene wasn't "sufficiently sexually suggestive" to overrule First Amendment protections. Hussey was 15 at the time of filming and Whiting 16. In a tentative ruling issued on Thursday, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Alison Mackenzie said the plaintiffs "cherry picked" which statutes applied to their case. She also said the lawsuit did not meet the requirements for suspending the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse. Attorney Solomon Gresen, who represented both Ms Hussey and Mr Whiting in the case, told BBC News he felt the ruling was on "the wrong side of this issue." "There's no First Amendment protection of nude children simulating sexual congress," Mr Gresen said. He said his clients are considering an appeal and he intends to file a separate lawsuit in federal court. In a joint statement, Ms Hussey and Mr Whiting, now both in their 70s, said they would continue to fight. "We waited going on 55 years for justice. I guess we'll have to wait longer," they said. --- "We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade <cite>solosnake posted [p:973735684] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65725714<quote>A Los Angeles judge says she will dismiss a child sex abuse lawsuit brought by the stars of the 1968 film Romeo and Juliet. Olivia Hussey and Leonard Whiting alleged the film's director coerced them into filming nude while underage.A Superior Court judge found the scene wasn't "sufficiently sexually suggestive" to overrule First Amendment protections.Hussey was 15 at the time of filming and Whiting 16.In a tentative ruling issued on Thursday, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Alison Mackenzie said the plaintiffs "cherry picked" which statutes applied to their case. She also said the lawsuit did not meet the requirements for suspending the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse.Attorney Solomon Gresen, who represented both Ms Hussey and Mr Whiting in the case, told BBC News he felt the ruling was on "the wrong side of this issue.""There's no First Amendment protection of nude children simulating sexual congress," Mr Gresen said.He said his clients are considering an appeal and he intends to file a separate lawsuit in federal court.In a joint statement, Ms Hussey and Mr Whiting, now both in their 70s, said they would continue to fight."We waited going on 55 years for justice. I guess we'll have to wait longer," they said.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
radical_rhino 05/26/23 4:51:26 PM #2:	I saw her boobs in 9th grade English class --- .____ [____]===0 . . . . Ye olde beating stick. <cite>radical_rhino posted [p:973735709] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>I saw her boobs in 9th grade English class</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cjsdowg 05/26/23 4:52:23 PM #3:	A Hollywood Judge can't shake the boat. --- "Big Sweaty Otis" -Titus O'Neil <cite>cjsdowg posted [p:973735723] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>A Hollywood Judge can't shake the boat.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeoShadowhen 05/26/23 4:56:03 PM #4:	Its hard to argue that nudity isnt sexually suggestive when the purpose of the nudity in the scene was to suggest sex between them. <cite>NeoShadowhen posted [p:973735793] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Its hard to argue that nudity isnt sexually suggestive when the purpose of the nudity in the scene was to suggest sex between them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LeoRavus 05/26/23 4:56:12 PM #5:	https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/9/7/9/AABulwAAEg0D.jpg --- This is where cool people write stuff. <cite>LeoRavus posted [p:973735795] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/9/7/9/AABulwAAEg0D.jpg </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Spurner 05/26/23 4:56:25 PM #6:	radical_rhino posted... I saw her boobs in 9th grade English class Same here. Had to get that permission slip. <cite>Spurner posted [p:973735799] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>radical_rhino posted... </cite><quote>I saw her boobs in 9th grade English class</quote>Same here. Had to get that permission slip.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ai123 05/26/23 5:00:46 PM #7:	That film is rated PG in the UK. I saw it at school with no permission needed. Teachers were allowed to show films that the class were old enough to see in the cinema. --- (We Don't Need This) Fascist Groove Thang <cite>ai123 posted [p:973735900] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>That film is rated PG in the UK.I saw it at school with no permission needed. Teachers were allowed to show films that the class were old enough to see in the cinema. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bfslick50 05/26/23 5:03:21 PM #8:	Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Alison Mackenzie said the plaintiffs "cherry picked" which statutes applied to their case. Wha..... In data analysis cherry picking is looking at the data that makes your case while ignoring the data that contradicts you. Here wouldn't that mean using the laws that applied to their case and ignoring the laws that didn't? Isn't that how all court cases work? --- "Something's wrong! Murder isn't working and that's all we're good at." ~Futurama <cite>bfslick50 posted [p:973735942] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote><quote>Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Alison Mackenzie said the plaintiffs "cherry picked" which statutes applied to their case.</quote>Wha..... In data analysis cherry picking is looking at the data that makes your case while ignoring the data that contradicts you. Here wouldn't that mean using the laws that applied to their case and ignoring the laws that didn't? Isn't that how all court cases work?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VampireCoyote 05/26/23 5:04:48 PM #9:	Some judges are such dipshits --- She/her <cite>VampireCoyote posted [p:973735967] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Some judges are such dipshits</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
radical_rhino 05/26/23 5:46:51 PM #10:	Spurner posted... Same here. Had to get that permission slip. Our teacher was just slow on the draw and didnt censor it in time. --- .____ [____]===0 . . . . Ye olde beating stick. <cite>radical_rhino posted [p:973736810] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Spurner posted... </cite><quote>Same here. Had to get that permission slip.</quote>Our teacher was just slow on the draw and didnt censor it in time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#11	Post #11 was unavailable or deleted.
Starks 05/26/23 5:51:58 PM #12:	I remember being in school and the music teacher was showing us clips from both the 1968 and 1996 movies. A lot of fast forwarding past the nudity for the 1968 one was required and even then that wasn't good enough. --- Paid for by StarksPAC, a registered 501(c)(4) <cite>Starks posted [p:973736921] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>I remember being in school and the music teacher was showing us clips from both the 1968 and 1996 movies.A lot of fast forwarding past the nudity for the 1968 one was required and even then that wasn't good enough.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I_is_smart 05/26/23 5:52:46 PM #13:	bfslick50 posted... Wha..... In data analysis cherry picking is looking at the data that makes your case while ignoring the data that contradicts you. Here wouldn't that mean using the laws that applied to their case and ignoring the laws that didn't? Isn't that how all court cases work? Yeah that was a weird statement --- Tah-rah-rah-boom-dee-aaay, did you get yours todaaay? I got mine yesterdaaay, that's why I walk this way. i.imgur.com/FoxGIbC.jpg <cite>I_is_smart posted [p:973736933] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>bfslick50 posted... </cite><quote>Wha..... In data analysis cherry picking is looking at the data that makes your case while ignoring the data that contradicts you. Here wouldn't that mean using the laws that applied to their case and ignoring the laws that didn't? Isn't that how all court cases work?</quote>Yeah that was a weird statement</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
the_final_bahamut 05/26/23 5:56:52 PM #14:	bfslick50 posted... Wha..... In data analysis cherry picking is looking at the data that makes your case while ignoring the data that contradicts you. Here wouldn't that mean using the laws that applied to their case and ignoring the laws that didn't? Isn't that how all court cases work? No it would mean picking laws/precedent that works in favour of your case while ignoring stuff that actively works against it. Like claiming that free speech is unlimited because it says free speech in the constitution while also ignoring that it is very much law that you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theatre. --- "The US military is not an effective proxy for humanity" ~ Folding Ideas Faciendere id pro RAVz <cite>the_final_bahamut posted [p:973737023] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>bfslick50 posted... </cite><quote>Wha..... In data analysis cherry picking is looking at the data that makes your case while ignoring the data that contradicts you. Here wouldn't that mean using the laws that applied to their case and ignoring the laws that didn't? Isn't that how all court cases work?</quote>No it would mean picking laws/precedent that works in favour of your case while ignoring stuff that actively works against it. Like claiming that free speech is unlimited because it says free speech in the constitution while also ignoring that it is very much law that you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theatre.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solar_Crimson 05/26/23 5:58:01 PM #15:	cjsdowg posted... A Hollywood Judge can't shake the boat. --- Eat the rich Destroy the GOP <cite>Solar_Crimson posted [p:973737051] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>cjsdowg posted... </cite><quote>A Hollywood Judge can't shake the boat.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Michael_Booth 05/26/23 6:00:22 PM #16:	the_final_bahamut posted... No it would mean picking laws/precedent that works in favour of your case while ignoring stuff that actively works against it. Like claiming that free speech is unlimited because it says free speech in the constitution while also ignoring that it is very much law that you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theatre. Uhhh... Oliver Wendell Holmes made that analogy during a controversial Supreme Court case that was overturned more than 40 years ago. <cite>Michael_Booth posted [p:973737097] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>the_final_bahamut posted... </cite><quote>No it would mean picking laws/precedent that works in favour of your case while ignoring stuff that actively works against it. Like claiming that free speech is unlimited because it says free speech in the constitution while also ignoring that it is very much law that you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theatre.</quote>Uhhh... Oliver Wendell Holmes made that analogy during a controversial Supreme Court case that was overturned more than 40 years ago.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Arcanine2009 05/27/23 6:36:40 PM #17:	If they won, I wonder what it would entail. --- Less is more. Everything you want, isn't everything you need. <cite>Arcanine2009 posted [p:973757597] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>If they won, I wonder what it would entail.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FunWithAFryPan 05/27/23 6:39:28 PM #18:	NeoShadowhen posted... Its hard to argue that nudity isnt sexually suggestive when the purpose of the nudity in the scene was to suggest sex between them. That isnt the argument. Read the judges comments again. --- He who strikes with meaning is killed by meaning. <cite>FunWithAFryPan posted [p:973757651] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>NeoShadowhen posted... </cite><quote>Its hard to argue that nudity isnt sexually suggestive when the purpose of the nudity in the scene was to suggest sex between them.</quote>That isnt the argument. Read the judges comments again. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FortuneCookie 05/27/23 6:40:15 PM #19:	solosnake posted... Hussey was 15 at the time I'm sorry, that made me snicker. "That fifteen year old hussy!" <cite>FortuneCookie posted [p:973757664] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>solosnake posted... </cite><quote>Hussey was 15 at the time</quote>I'm sorry, that made me snicker."That fifteen year old hussy!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeonTentacles 05/27/23 6:41:36 PM #20:	radical_rhino posted... I saw her boobs in 9th grade English class 10th grade literature class for me >_> My teacher didnt try to block it or anything, but told the class "there's gonna be a nude scene coming up and I expect you all to act very mature about it." Of course everyone started hooting and hollering when her tits popped out and someone even yelled out "Nice jugs!". The teacher got mad but still kept the movie going lol --- https://imgur.com/aMaI3hj https://imgur.com/7PsdJNc https://imgur.com/eK8vZVn https://imgur.com/u2HR4nG https://imgur.com/nQGM5cZ <cite>NeonTentacles posted [p:973757690] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>radical_rhino posted... </cite><quote>I saw her boobs in 9th grade English class</quote>10th grade literature class for me >_>My teacher didnt try to block it or anything, but told the class "there's gonna be a nude scene coming up and I expect you all to act very mature about it."Of course everyone started hooting and hollering when her tits popped out and someone even yelled out "Nice jugs!". The teacher got mad but still kept the movie going lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#21	Post #21 was unavailable or deleted.
Crimson_Corsair 05/30/23 7:56:39 AM #22:	Everytime CE discusses this movie multiple people get suspended. --- My head's not torn off, my sunglasses aren't broken. Amen, hallelujah, peanut butter. <cite>Crimson_Corsair posted [p:973807110] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Everytime CE discusses this movie multiple people get suspended.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#23	Post #23 was unavailable or deleted.
NeonTentacles 05/30/23 8:09:25 AM #24:	[LFAQs-redacted-quote] LOL, no it wasn't me. It was some jock >_> I swear --- https://imgur.com/aMaI3hj https://imgur.com/7PsdJNc https://imgur.com/eK8vZVn https://imgur.com/u2HR4nG https://imgur.com/nQGM5cZ <cite>NeonTentacles posted [p:973807246] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote><cite>[LFAQs-redacted-quote]</cite> LOL, no it wasn't me. It was some jock >_> I swear</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 05/30/23 8:42:32 AM #25:	the_final_bahamut posted... No it would mean picking laws/precedent that works in favour of your case while ignoring stuff that actively works against it. Like claiming that free speech is unlimited because it says free speech in the constitution while also ignoring that it is very much law that you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theatre. You can yell fire in a crowded theater though. What you can't do is deliberately incite a false panic design to cause injury. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:973807728] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>the_final_bahamut posted... </cite><quote>No it would mean picking laws/precedent that works in favour of your case while ignoring stuff that actively works against it. Like claiming that free speech is unlimited because it says free speech in the constitution while also ignoring that it is very much law that you can't yell "fire" in a crowded theatre.</quote>You can yell fire in a crowded theater though. What you can't do is deliberately incite a false panic design to cause injury. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#26	Post #26 was unavailable or deleted.
Noumas 06/03/23 3:43:35 AM #27:	Ok I watched the scene and its fucking awful and they absolutely should have won. It was absolutely not okay. Side note just found out this movie was way back in 1968. Did this movie pave the way for the 70s era of pedophilia? There were a whole bunch of movies like that, and I think stuff like underage or even 16 year old girls in porn. There was also this actress who was like consistently cast nude when she was like 13. Not sure if the same girl who was on the lame island movie of the shipwrecked kids. Just feels like this movie started it all now that I know it exists <cite>Noumas posted [p:973896065] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Ok I watched the scene and its fucking awful and they absolutely should have won. It was absolutely not okay. Side note just found out this movie was way back in 1968. Did this movie pave the way for the 70s era of pedophilia? There were a whole bunch of movies like that, and I think stuff like underage or even 16 year old girls in porn. There was also this actress who was like consistently cast nude when she was like 13. Not sure if the same girl who was on the lame island movie of the shipwrecked kids.Just feels like this movie started it all now that I know it exists </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 06/03/23 3:44:46 AM #28:	...did it literally take fifty-five years to settle this suit? <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:973896080] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>...did it literally take fifty-five years to settle this suit?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Serious_Cat 06/03/23 3:47:42 AM #29:	Questionmarktarius posted... ...did it literally take fifty-five years to settle this suit? No. It was filed relatively recently. --- I are Serious Cat This is serious thread <cite>Serious_Cat posted [p:973896103] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Questionmarktarius posted... </cite><quote>...did it literally take fifty-five years to settle this suit?</quote>No. It was filed relatively recently.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AbstraktProfSC2 06/03/23 3:50:20 AM #30:	my teacher fast forwarded through it lol --- Talk about backseat fishing. <cite>AbstraktProfSC2 posted [p:973896136] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>my teacher fast forwarded through it lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#31	Post #31 was unavailable or deleted.
Foppe 06/03/23 5:19:10 AM #32:	[LFAQs-redacted-quote] I think we saw his ass. --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:973896770] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote><cite>[LFAQs-redacted-quote]</cite> I think we saw his ass.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GuerrillaSoldier 06/03/23 6:36:37 AM #33:	crazy how afraid we are of our own bodies --- Disclaimer: There's a good chance the above post could be sarcasm. Die-hard Oakland A's fan --- Keep the A's in Oakland! <cite>GuerrillaSoldier posted [p:973897313] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>crazy how afraid we are of our own bodies</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
solosnake 06/03/23 9:30:09 AM #34:	Noumas posted... Ok I watched the scene and its fucking awful and they absolutely should have won. It was absolutely not okay. Side note just found out this movie was way back in 1968. Did this movie pave the way for the 70s era of pedophilia? There were a whole bunch of movies like that, and I think stuff like underage or even 16 year old girls in porn. There was also this actress who was like consistently cast nude when she was like 13. Not sure if the same girl who was on the lame island movie of the shipwrecked kids. Just feels like this movie started it all now that I know it exists I think what makes it worse is the fact the film was kind of shown to other children around the country as part of school curriculum. --- "We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade <cite>solosnake posted [p:973898960] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Noumas posted... </cite><quote>Ok I watched the scene and its fucking awful and they absolutely should have won. It was absolutely not okay. Side note just found out this movie was way back in 1968. Did this movie pave the way for the 70s era of pedophilia? There were a whole bunch of movies like that, and I think stuff like underage or even 16 year old girls in porn. There was also this actress who was like consistently cast nude when she was like 13. Not sure if the same girl who was on the lame island movie of the shipwrecked kids.Just feels like this movie started it all now that I know it exists</quote>I think what makes it worse is the fact the film was kind of shown to other children around the country as part of school curriculum. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#35	Post #35 was unavailable or deleted.
Trumble 06/04/23 3:47:06 PM #36:	Michael_Booth posted... Uhhh... Oliver Wendell Holmes made that analogy during a controversial Supreme Court case that was overturned more than 40 years ago. A bad example doesn't invalidate the overall point. --- Trumble 6800U - 16GB TRUMBLERAM - 1TB Trumble-State Drive - Trumble 680M GPU <cite>Trumble posted [p:973924579] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Michael_Booth posted... </cite><quote>Uhhh... Oliver Wendell Holmes made that analogy during a controversial Supreme Court case that was overturned more than 40 years ago.</quote>A bad example doesn't invalidate the overall point.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tom_Joad 06/04/23 3:51:55 PM #37:	The film was made in 1968. You can't retroactively apply laws from today to events that happened before the laws were passed. It's that simple. And in 1968, the movie (and it's filming) broke no laws. --- "History shows again and again that nature points out the folly of man. Go go Godzilla!" Godzilla - Blue Oyster Cult <cite>Tom_Joad posted [p:973924662] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>The film was made in 1968. You can't retroactively apply laws from today to events that happened before the laws were passed. It's that simple.And in 1968, the movie (and it's filming) broke no laws.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Noumas 06/07/23 1:19:56 AM #38:	Tom_Joad posted... The film was made in 1968. You can't retroactively apply laws from today to events that happened before the laws were passed. It's that simple. And in 1968, the movie (and it's filming) broke no laws. What about the hays code? <cite>Noumas posted [p:973979086] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Tom_Joad posted... </cite><quote>The film was made in 1968. You can't retroactively apply laws from today to events that happened before the laws were passed. It's that simple.And in 1968, the movie (and it's filming) broke no laws.</quote>What about the hays code?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 06/07/23 2:19:34 AM #39:	Didnt Hays code end in 1968? --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:973979610] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Didnt Hays code end in 1968?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wanderingshade 06/07/23 2:28:55 AM #40:	I've only watched Shakespeare in Love. That one has Gwyneth Paltrow's tits in it. --- "You're made of spare parts, aren't ya, bud?" <cite>wanderingshade posted [p:973979677] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>I've only watched Shakespeare in Love. That one has Gwyneth Paltrow's tits in it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Punished_Blinx 06/07/23 2:30:41 AM #41:	It's weird how the generation that's so concerned about drag queens grooming children don't care at all about the dodgy shit that happened to actresses in movies they watched over the last few decades. Weird ass 'lolita' shit was happening in public until at least the 90s with stars like Drew Barrymore. --- A Fallen Mascot <cite>Punished_Blinx posted [p:973979684] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>It's weird how the generation that's so concerned about drag queens grooming children don't care at all about the dodgy shit that happened to actresses in movies they watched over the last few decades. Weird ass 'lolita' shit was happening in public until at least the 90s with stars like Drew Barrymore. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Noumas 06/10/23 4:39:44 AM #42:	Punished_Blinx posted... It's weird how the generation that's so concerned about drag queens grooming children don't care at all about the dodgy shit that happened to actresses in movies they watched over the last few decades. Weird ass 'lolita' shit was happening in public until at least the 90s with stars like Drew Barrymore. No one freaks out because it's all according to plan, but suddenly drag queens and everyone loses their minds! Joker.jpg <cite>Noumas posted [p:974051457] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Punished_Blinx posted... </cite><quote>It's weird how the generation that's so concerned about drag queens grooming children don't care at all about the dodgy shit that happened to actresses in movies they watched over the last few decades. Weird ass 'lolita' shit was happening in public until at least the 90s with stars like Drew Barrymore.</quote>No one freaks out because it's all according to plan, but suddenly drag queens and everyone loses their minds! Joker.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hayame_Zero 06/12/23 9:46:07 PM #43:	Punished_Blinx posted... It's weird how the generation that's so concerned about drag queens grooming children don't care at all about the dodgy shit that happened to actresses in movies they watched over the last few decades. Weird ass 'lolita' shit was happening in public until at least the 90s with stars like Drew Barrymore. There's a rape scene in Last Tango in Paris that wasn't in the script. They told the actress it was happening the day of shooting, and said she was left feeling sexually humiliated. The director later said it was done to get a genuine reaction out of her, and when accused that her stole her innocence, he said "she wasn't mature enough to understand what was going on anyway." --- ...I think I'm done here... <cite>Hayame_Zero posted [p:974116135] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Punished_Blinx posted... </cite><quote>It's weird how the generation that's so concerned about drag queens grooming children don't care at all about the dodgy shit that happened to actresses in movies they watched over the last few decades. Weird ass 'lolita' shit was happening in public until at least the 90s with stars like Drew Barrymore.</quote>There's a rape scene in Last Tango in Paris that wasn't in the script. They told the actress it was happening the day of shooting, and said she was left feeling sexually humiliated. The director later said it was done to get a genuine reaction out of her, and when accused that her stole her innocence, he said "she wasn't mature enough to understand what was going on anyway."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
legendarylemur 06/12/23 9:51:50 PM #44:	Lol funny story about this one, the teacher knew where the scene was and attempted to fast forward. The shitty VCRs in those days didn't really respond all too well, so the moment she pressed fast forward, the scene froze for a good 3 seconds before actually fast forwarding, and us boys deep in the puberty phase got to see some boobs Good times --- "Iwata was awesome" - Mr. Nintendo https://i.imgur.com/krtFHol.jpg <cite>legendarylemur posted [p:974116273] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Lol funny story about this one, the teacher knew where the scene was and attempted to fast forward. The shitty VCRs in those days didn't really respond all too well, so the moment she pressed fast forward, the scene froze for a good 3 seconds before actually fast forwarding, and us boys deep in the puberty phase got to see some boobsGood times</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JasonSehorn 06/12/23 9:53:01 PM #45:	radical_rhino posted... I saw her boobs in 9th grade English class same teacher told us to behave or she would turn it off <cite>JasonSehorn posted [p:974116302] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>radical_rhino posted... </cite><quote>I saw her boobs in 9th grade English class</quote>same teacher told us to behave or she would turn it off</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trumpo 06/12/23 9:56:05 PM #46:	Noumas posted... Ok I watched the scene and its fucking awful and they absolutely should have won. It was absolutely not okay. Side note just found out this movie was way back in 1968. Did this movie pave the way for the 70s era of pedophilia? There were a whole bunch of movies like that, and I think stuff like underage or even 16 year old girls in porn. There was also this actress who was like consistently cast nude when she was like 13. Not sure if the same girl who was on the lame island movie of the shipwrecked kids. Just feels like this movie started it all now that I know it exists Blue Lagoon? --- Lancool II \| Z690 Tomahawk \|12700K \| Fuma 2 \| RTX 3070Ti \| 16GB 3600MHz \| FireCuda 530 1TB \| Inland NVMe 1TB \| RM750x <cite>Trumpo posted [p:974116368] in Actors los... [t:80456854]...</cite> <quote>Noumas posted... </cite><quote>Ok I watched the scene and its fucking awful and they absolutely should have won. It was absolutely not okay. Side note just found out this movie was way back in 1968. Did this movie pave the way for the 70s era of pedophilia? There were a whole bunch of movies like that, and I think stuff like underage or even 16 year old girls in porn. There was also this actress who was like consistently cast nude when she was like 13. Not sure if the same girl who was on the lame island movie of the shipwrecked kids.Just feels like this movie started it all now that I know it exists</quote>Blue Lagoon?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Actors lose Romeo & Juliet nude scene lawsuit (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Actors lose Romeo & Juliet nude scene lawsuit