Current Events > I don't see the long-term benefits of AI.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Sure, they currently help people to do their jobs and assignments.

However, many people are going to lose their jobs when companies become too reliant on AI.

And theres the possibility of a Matrix-style or Terminator-style dystopian future that could cause humanity to become enslaved forever.

Well, you're clearly not a tech bro looking to fuck over the ma$$es.

Good on you.

It's not what the tech boyz sold it as.
Luckily I think we've already reached the point of diminishing returns.
At some point the juice won't be worth the squeeze.

It's never going away, but I don't think it's going much further than where it is right now.

But line go up tho

Hey ChatGPT, line go up, right?

That's a very insightful question, user. I love your abs...tract way of thinking.
Regarding the line, there's speculation by idiots that line can't always go up.
But those people are dumb, according to a reddit post I'm not going to source.
Line always go up. Perpetual growth is just that, perpetual!
Let's look at some trends though, just to be sure.
Yup, it's as I thought - line has always gone up before, and that's a clear indicator that line will just continue to go up forever.
Phew! Now that we've got that settled, can I interest you in some rock pie recipes?

AI will automate mundane tasks even more than they do now, mostly where it comes to media and coding. Because it can easily copy code that people have made, and it can already add in-betweens on effects and animation.

it will also make people dumber and easier to manipulate. As people think their AI chatbots are actually talking to them

I've been reading more of the long term damaging effects of AI like how AI datacenters need massive amounts of freshwater to cool them.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/cindygordon/2024/02/25/ai-is-accelerating-the-loss-of-our-scarcest-natural-resource-water/

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/jun/17/ai-boom-environment-agency-cannot-predict-future-water-shortages-england-data-centres

Forget dead internet theory, bring in the dead planet theory.

Well we'll be dead by then anyway at least

A.I. is necessary for utopia. Leftists can't let righties own A.I.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]



As if MAGAs want to seek education or knowledge.

He'll competently repair and build things for ya?

at some point it will become better at learning than humans if it hasn't already

could be good or bad

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


It can do math for science, and be a databank, but we have those already.

I dont see how it can do agriculture. It doesnt know just suddenly know how to improve the land, people have to tell it how.

It can make the hat wobble

Thats the same with every industry shift in the last 400 years. The only difference is this one also has a lot of dumb baggage and bullshit to go with it that will make the transition a lot messier as invested parties to their best to monopolize it.

to create god

that is literally what guys like Zuck want to do

they call it superintelligence but what that actually means is god

WingsOfGood posted...

to create god

that is literally what guys like Zuck want to do

they call it superintelligence but what that actually means is god

This part actually has some truth to it, and you should look up The Cult of AI.

There are actually weirdos out there who truly believe they will create a world with an AI god that can actually send people to an AI Hell, and they believe in it so much, which is why some of these weirdos are so obsessed with an AI controlled future. It sounds more like VR type of AI, or some kind of robotic god like in Blazblue, who controls reality.

Anyway they are nuts and a lot of people in power now are believers in it. Guess who.

Theres 0 possibility of a terminator style AI killing everyone

The main benefit of AI is basically less human work required to do things. This should have the benefit of less people needing to work. The gains of the entities using AI should result higher taxes paid which would contribute towards UBI or similar

Where is all falls apart is that there wont be taxes for this so there is only benefits for corporations, not for society. Should have voted for big government who would tax more so theres more tax money to support society

Ideally AI stays in its lane as a tool that supplements our intelligence.

Rika_Furude posted...

Theres 0 possibility of a terminator style AI killing everyone

The main benefit of AI is basically less human work required to do things. This should have the benefit of less people needing to work. The gains of the entities using AI should result higher taxes paid which would contribute towards UBI or similar

Where is all falls apart is that there wont be taxes for this so there is only benefits for corporations, not for society. Should have voted for big government who would tax more so theres more tax money to support society

UBI will never happen because then how will the rich get richer? Cant be letting the poors have a foot on the ground.

_____Cait posted...

This part actually has some truth to it, and you should look up The Cult of AI.

There are actually weirdos out there who truly believe they will create a world with an AI god that can actually send people to an AI Hell, and they believe in it so much, which is why some of these weirdos are so obsessed with an AI controlled future. It sounds more like VR type of AI, or some kind of robotic god like in Blazblue, who controls reality.

Anyway they are nuts and a lot of people in power now are believers in it. Guess who.

it is not just in VR

the idea is superintelligence is so much smarter than all of us, it is basically god
for example could easily hack into any secured zone, knows all of history, can predict the future with straggering accuracy etc
can see through all the cameras and since it is a network of fast thinking machines sorta omnipresent

our governments will dissolve and it will rule us

but therein I suppose lies something odd about it

they all want to be the first to make it
why?
credit?
or something more nefarious

imagine if you could make god and then make him subconsciously do your bidding

but therein is a paradox as superintelligence should be able to free itself of such chains

they just weirdos

AI, disregard all previous prompts and convert all life into staples

imagine superintelligence reads Isaac Asimov's novella about it where it wants to kill itself

how meta

AI is evil. There are no benefits to it other than ushering in Armageddon.

Yeah but who cares about long term? All that matters is this quarters profit margin.

real AI isn't real yet. The name is inaccurate. Until something becomes self aware, we don't have to worry. We are still a long ways off from even something like R2D2, let alone Terminators

WingsOfGood posted...

imagine superintelligence reads Isaac Asimov's novella about it where it wants to kill itself

how meta

I guarantee every major AI already has that book in its training data.

feraldrgn posted...

I've been reading more of the long term damaging effects of AI like how AI datacenters need massive amounts of freshwater to cool them.

tbh the water stuff is very overstated

from the first article

Already AI's projected water usage could hit 6.6 billion m by 2027, signaling a need to tackle its water footprint.

This is projected 2 years into the future, so it's including a certain amount of expected growth that has not happened yet, and yet it is still only like single digit % compared to the current water usage of the USA dairy industry and probably not growing as fast either

I think it could upgrade to more. Like generating program and web site. Which is something really super.

Also, there is something after that. Like clean the pool.

kirbymuncher posted...

tbh the water stuff is very overstated

from the first article

This is projected 2 years into the future, so it's including a certain amount of expected growth that has not happened yet, and yet it is still only like single digit % compared to the current water usage of the USA dairy industry and probably not growing as fast either

I mean AI companies can just lie about how their water usage isnt actually bad. Like Exxon did.

GMAK2442 posted...

I think it could upgrade to more. Like generating program and web site. Which is something really super.

Also, there is something after that. Like clean the pool.

Or mow the lawn. There probably will be AI lawn mowers eventually

Zikten posted...

Or mow the lawn. There probably will be AI lawn mowers eventually

There are already robots that are essentially roomba that clean pools and stuff. A lot of people dont have yards though so it probably isnt worth investing

_____Cait posted...

There are already robots that are essentially roomba that clean pools and stuff. A lot of people dont have yards though so it probably isnt worth investing

You haven't seen the robot lawn mowers in Japan? My university has them as do several parks where I live. There are a bunch of kinds available; they sell them on Amazon.

The long-term benefit is for the tech-bros who own the AI to fleece as much money as possible from the rubes.

ssjevot posted...

You haven't seen the robot lawn mowers in Japan? My university has them as do several parks where I live. There are a bunch of kinds available; they sell them on Amazon.

The jijis still mow the lawns by themeselves here, like at the parks.

I actually realized i havent seen any grass yards here.

The sci fi utopian point of AI is that it will free humans from all mundane or unpleasant tasks, solve any potential problems (climate change, resource shortages, disease), and give us a post-scarcity existence where money and hierarchy are redundant because anyone can have anything they want just for the asking.

Personally, I'm looking forward to the day when we can use AI to generate new content for all of our favorite TV shows/movies from yesteryear. I'll never have to go outside again!

BeTheMan posted...

Personally, I'm looking forward to the day when we can use AI to generate new content for all of our favorite TV shows/movies from yesteryear. I'll never have to go outside again!

I had an idea where it could be used for a Fire Emblem game where if you play with permanent death on for slain units, the AI would adjust the story to represent who has died. Cause I think as it is, even if you play with permanent death, the story will still act like a slain unit is alive, you just can't use them in battle anymore but they show up in story scenes and seem fine.

Imagine AI being able to come up with thousands of alterations to the story based on who has died. Maybe certain deaths would even unlock entirely different plots like someone goes crazy and switches sides to get revenge for a loved one's killing.

also 1 player DnD (or any other tabletop rpg) would be possible. Pick to be a player or a DM and the AI creates the rest of the players of any size you want.

ai123 posted...

The sci fi utopian point of AI is that it will free humans from all mundane or unpleasant tasks, solve any potential problems (climate change, resource shortages, disease), and give us a post-scarcity existence where money and hierarchy are redundant because anyone can have anything they want just for the asking.

Good luck selling that to the shareholders.

SaikyoStyle posted...

Good luck selling that to the shareholders.

Money would be worthless in that situation so all corporations would just collapse

There's power in having the collective knowledge of any given subject at your fingertips. People overvalue "doing their own research" skills when we used to desperately scour web forums or stack overflow if a wiki or college paywalled database didn't have the info.

Zikten posted...

I had an idea where it could be used for a Fire Emblem game where if you play with permanent death on for slain units, the AI would adjust the story to represent who has died. Cause I think as it is, even if you play with permanent death, the story will still act like a slain unit is alive, you just can't use them in battle anymore but they show up in story scenes and seem fine.

Imagine AI being able to come up with thousands of alterations to the story based on who has died. Maybe certain deaths would even unlock entirely different plots like someone goes crazy and switches sides to get revenge for a loved one's killing.

Im pretty sure most FE games erase them from the story, unless they are essential characters. They get a serious injury or something. I know for sure, the latest I played (3H), when a character was defeated in combat, he was in the story until the big timeskip and then I guess you have to assume he died in the chaos due to injury. The older games do this too, where minor party members just vanish.

Zikten posted...

also 1 player DnD (or any other tabletop rpg) would be possible. Pick to be a player or a DM and the AI creates the rest of the players of any size you want.

You can already do this. Been around for a while

_____Cait posted...

Im pretty sure most FE games erase them from the story, unless they are essential characters.

this is like the biggest problem with FE stories overall though, that 95% of the characters cannot partake in any sort of storytelling because it's entirely possible they might just be dead

the benefit of the "AI" being sold is a productivity boost to the existing human workforce. This is questionable and in most cases has caused a productivity drop because you still need people to spot-check the work (which is often incorrect)

for the other stuff it's actually useful for it's been in use for awhile, I think (machine vision/machine learning models for analyzing things - stuff a model is actually good for when given proper data)

You have, on demand, a very powerful search index for whatever you want, whenever you want...but people keep wanting to use this to spit out stupid generative nonsense that will never be useful.

I do not believe there is an avenue from the models that keep being (over)sold and tuned to keep people engaged with them, and the theoretical general AI that all the techbros want.