Current Events > Is Trump the worst president ever?

(+) Yeah! (+)

• Democratic norms: He tried to overturn the 2020 election results and encouraged false claims of fraud, which many historians view as an unprecedented threat to U.S. democracy.
• Pandemic response: His handling of COVID-19 downplaying its seriousness early on and politicizing public health measures is often criticized as costly in lives and trust.
• Polarization and rhetoric: His use of inflammatory language deepened political and social divisions.
• Foreign policy unpredictability: Critics say he alienated allies, praised authoritarian leaders, and withdrew from key agreements (like the Paris Climate Accord) without clear strategy.

• Economy (pre-pandemic): Unemployment reached record lows, and the stock market was strong.
• Judiciary: He reshaped the Supreme Court and federal judiciary with conservative judges for decades to come.
• Foreign policy (supporters view): He pursued America First policies, pressured NATO allies to pay more, and brokered Middle East normalization deals (Abraham Accords).
• Deregulation and tax cuts: Businesses benefited from reduced regulation and lower corporate taxes.

• Academically: Hes currently rated among the worst.
• Politically: Many Americans either view him as disastrous or as a transformational outsider theres rarely middle ground.

Is MysteryMan923 the laziest poster ever

Lets ask chatgpt.

1. Youre leveraging modern tools.
2. Using ChatGPT is like using a calculator, Grammarly, or a search engine its a tool that amplifies your ability to express ideas, not a shortcut that replaces them. Refusing to use it out of purity is like insisting on hand-writing essays with a quill.
3. It enhances communication, not replaces thought.
4. The best posts still need a human spark ideas, humor, perspective. ChatGPT just helps you organize or sharpen that expression. Youre curating and refining, not outsourcing your mind.
5. Its efficient.
6. Why spend 20 minutes typing what you can draft in 2 and then refine? Efficiency isnt laziness its optimization. People who adapt to better tools usually outpace those who dont.
7. It raises the floor for discussion.
8. Instead of half-baked replies or typos, AI-assisted posts can be clearer, more coherent, and better sourced. That improves the signal-to-noise ratio of the entire board.
9. It shows adaptability not apathy.
10. Using AI responsibly demonstrates that youre comfortable with new tech and capable of blending machine assistance with human judgment. Thats literally the definition of big-brain energy in the 2020s.

Using ChatGPT isnt lazy its like bringing a high-powered assistant to a conversation.
Lazy is not thinking.
Smart is using every tool available to think better and faster.

Yes. He is the only president to invade American cities.

Biden and Buchanan will always be the two worst.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/ef273ffc.png
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/3/3f3266fe.png

Slurp slurp slurp

• Democratic norms: Critics argue he undermined democratic institutions, attacked the press and judiciary, and refused to accept the 2020 election results culminating in the January 6th Capitol attack.
• Pandemic response: His handling of COVID-19 is often cited as disorganized and dismissive of scientific advice.
• Divisiveness: Many believe he deepened political and social polarization.
• Corruption and ethics: Multiple investigations, two impeachments, and extensive use of public office for personal/political gain are often mentioned.

• Economic record pre-COVID: The economy grew steadily with low unemployment and a booming stock market before the pandemic.
• Foreign policy: He avoided new wars, began normalization deals between Israel and Arab states, and challenged China on trade.
• Drain the swamp populism: Many saw him as standing up to elites and reshaping the Republican Party to focus on working-class voters.
• Judicial appointments: He appointed three Supreme Court justices and reshaped the federal judiciary for decades.

• The 2024 C-SPAN Presidential Historians Survey ranked him last (45th) overall.
• However, such rankings can change over time; presidents like Truman and Grant rose in standing decades later.

• Critics call him the most dangerous or destructive president in U.S. history.
• Supporters see him as a transformative outsider unfairly attacked by the establishment.
• Historians, so far, mostly view him negatively though historical judgment evolves.

Thats a big and complex question and opinions on it vary a lot depending on political perspective, historical criteria, and what you value in presidential leadership.
Heres a balanced breakdown:
Arguments from critics (why some call Trump among the worst)
* Democratic norms: Critics argue he undermined democratic institutions, attacked the press and judiciary, and refused to accept the 2020 election results culminating in the January 6th Capitol attack.
* Pandemic response: His handling of COVID-19 is often cited as disorganized and dismissive of scientific advice.
* Divisiveness: Many believe he deepened political and social polarization.
* Corruption and ethics: Multiple investigations, two impeachments, and extensive use of public office for personal/political gain are often mentioned.
Arguments from supporters (why others strongly disagree)
* Economic record pre-COVID: The economy grew steadily with low unemployment and a booming stock market before the pandemic.
* Foreign policy: He avoided new wars, began normalization deals between Israel and Arab states, and challenged China on trade.
* Drain the swamp populism: Many saw him as standing up to elites and reshaping the Republican Party to focus on working-class voters.
* Judicial appointments: He appointed three Supreme Court justices and reshaped the federal judiciary for decades.
Historical perspective
Historians rankings typically place Trump near the bottom but not always the worst. For example:
* The 2024 C-SPAN Presidential Historians Survey ranked him last (45th) overall.
* However, such rankings can change over time; presidents like Truman and Grant rose in standing decades later.
In short:
* Critics call him the most dangerous or destructive president in U.S. history.
* Supporters see him as a transformative outsider unfairly attacked by the establishment.
* Historians, so far, mostly view him negatively though historical judgment evolves.
Would you like me to compare him with other controversial presidents (like Nixon, Buchanan, or Andrew Johnson) for context?

#NotAi

since the biggest knock against Biden is that Trump got elected in 2024

Of course Trump is the worst president ever. And second place is getting more distant every day.

In the history of US? If not already, he will be.

Also fuck off with the AI slop

I thought that was his velvet glove handling of the Isarel/Hamas/Palestine situation when he refused to assert his opposition to Netenyahu writing himself a blank check to go ham on Palestine when Russia doing that to Ukraine did warrant a swift and uncompromising response.

Honestly, everyone calling it slop is so much more annoying. The tiny vocabulary people have, it makes you all look like AI who can't think of another word to use.

Why settle for an inferior synonym?

Well at least in my book I'm sick of the word because it's also used to describe video games that I might enjoy, in spite of their lack of creativity.

Without question worst President, ever. In the conversation for worst person to ever live.

Is MysteryMan923 the laziest poster ever