I thought I didnt like steak growing up because my parents genuinely believed that anything short of well done was disgusting.Same, I never had a steak with even a hint of pink in it growing up. I wish Id tried cooking them myself long ago.
After leaving home, I quickly discovered that steak is glorious.
Sort of.Except for the "hundredths of a percent" thing not being even remotely true.
Savings accounts have negligible interest across the board.
I'm talking like hundredths of a percent.
If you wanna invest, check out a mutual fund. If you legit need a savings account for savings reasons, don't even worry about the rate.
Even basic ass Capitol One has a high yield savings account that gives I think 4.35%.
So you think it's fair for 99% of a social group to exclude the 1% because that 1% can also exclude them back? Even if they do not want to?I think that people should be able to have social groups for specific demographic and also that it's not right to only grant that ability to certain demographics and not others.
The big problem comes in something like FFT where OCD compels me to master every job with every character.Oh man, systems where mastering a job/class grants an ability or something that can be used with other jobs/classes definitely triggers the obsessive need to min/max in me hard.
i like have options within set rolesYeah, when it comes to traditional RPGs I think this is my favorite system. The best combo of set archetypes and party customization adding to replayability.
so the thief can become a backstabbing rogue or a pickpocket or a swordfighter kind of thing.
I'm asking for these examples that you are drawing this comparison against.Well there's your problem, I didn't compare anything to any examples.
Ah yes all the "no cis allowed" trans-friendly businesses and events.Do you not think that somebody should be allowed to make a club for trans and non-binary people?
Where are the bars that only have trans people allowed in them?It seems like you failed in reading what I posted.
I have a hard time believing someone has genuine empathy for poor people when they're driving a Bugatti.Yeah, there is definitely a point where somebody who claims to be in favor of wealth distribution moves into big ol' hypocrite territory and parking a car that costs hundreds of thousands of dollars at your house that costs millions of dollars is well beyond that point.
gifs and gifts sound exactly the sameDo you have a speech impediment that keeps you from pronouncing the letter T?
And people wonder why more houses aren't being built.Yep, its all TCs fault for selling their house.
reading the topic titlesThat would be you assuming what's going on in threads, not seeing.
... it's not even a take. Just how words work.Not straight + not straight = straight is how words work?
no they aren'tWhat is your secret for seeing what goes on in threads without clicking on them? That would be real useful for CE browsing.
Like if a male bisexual and female bisexual get married it's still a straight wedding."A wedding where neither participant is straight is still a straight wedding" is an...odd take.
He put himself out there in front of a large audience. I don't feel he deserves the bashing he's getting here.Eh, he's knowingly cryptobros with full on White nationalists and at best doesn't care that they have those beliefs, at worst agrees with them.
Oh, we're playing games instead of addressing the issue as an adult, and since you as a conservative have no moral issue with lying you can pretend it stops there - no reason to be concerned.You say I have no issue lying yet here you are once again lying about me being a conservative despite me repeatedly asking you to stop repeating that lie. I am not a conservative.
"Taylor swift is my favorite musical artist."And we have our first really dumb "red flag."
... Yeah no
Lets start with 125 of them, including the current Speaker of the House.A bill to cement "life begins at conception" into law is not opposition to IVF.
https://www.jezebel.com/here-are-the-125-members-of-congress-who-sponsored-a-bill-that-would-restrict-ivf
Why are religious people against IVF?The overwhelming majority of them aren't.
They are instructing people to express support for IVF while banning it on the paperwork where it actually matters. That's called lying.What do you mean "banning it on the paperwork?" Where or by whom has IVF been banned?
You heard about that recent court decision, yeah?The recent court decision is not candidates opposing IVF. This memo is telling candidates to express their support of IVF treatments, so unless there have been candidates who have opposed IVF treatments then it's not telling anybody to lie.
That can get rough later if you don't have good mana leech.Yep. It's a nice mix of challenging but survivable with both a merc and valk, plus your syngergies automatically set you up for both area and single target damage. It's fun and I like that it's finally viable with the D2R buffs.
People should not be in politics that long. It should not a career path. Its a public service.You're just repeating your stance, not displaying how it isn't short sighted. Please give some examples of other areas in life where you feel it's best that nobody is allowed to have long term experience at the job. Do you prefer that doctors are only allowed to practice for eight years? If you need a lawyer, are you going to find the most recent graduate from law school you can? Engineers are only allowed to design three buildings and then they're out?
Even newly elected people should only stay temporarily to give new younger people a voice.