Lurker > Murphiroth

Because, relevant to this topic, this is not a safe place.

I don't want to discuss it and have made that clear.

Alright, here's one... It's not very political, but it is relevant.

If an actor has a social media account they use to raise awareness of a film, people should be able to tell them how they feel about their acting even when it's poor. It's not harassment.

Why would I?

I mean I just want to point out again that I'm being reasonable and calm and people are assuming I'm talking about extreme things. It's that twisting that I talk about. And the mods do it too.

So arguing in bad faith and acting like it doesn't happen while you're actively doing it is the problem.

You're so biased you think everything is about whatever weird offensive thing you have on your mind all the time.

And, in the process of all that on this topic, I've been openly insulted a handful of times without any perceivable action being taken on those posters.

The fact that you read that as ominous is the "twisting" I'm talking about.

It's kind of FUCKING HARD WHEN SO MANY PEOPLE I ENCOUNTER ARE DESERVING OF BEING CALLED MORONIC SHIT-SUCKING FATFUCKS WHO NEVER CONTRIBUTE ANYTHING OF VALUE.

Please appreciate the frustrations one goes through when trying to stay composed in the face of those who insist on not being sensible, civil, or otherwise a quality member of the community.

No amount of processing this topic was going to give me the knowledge that it was a meme. I simply don't care enough to try to learn all those nonsense things the perpetually online have learned. Although, after it was pointed out I did get a chuckle at the OP's account name.

But I have a feeling that no matter what I say at this point, you all are seeing blood in the water and have received permission to attack without fear of moderation. Just another example of the hypocrisy.

Also, how is this not trolling? How is anyone supposed to respond to this constructively or continue a conversation with it? The only response to this is either to ignore it or respond negatively. And that's the definition of trolling. Mods create the most insane reasons to call stuff trolling, but stuff like this is posted by them.

1. Trolling
Posting messages intended to cause a negative reaction from other users is not permitted on GameFAQs. This includes topics and messages that deliberately provoke other users by being inflammatory, irrelevant, misleading, offensive, or disruptive.

You exaggerated and twisted what I said to make it an attack against me

Maybe do a little bit of reading and try to be a bit more understanding of what people suffer from

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperacusis

I don't get why you feel the need to be so antagonistic

Why can y'all only respond in gotcha statements instead of having a fucking discussion? Grow up.

It's an honest question.

In the 15 years after Star Wars, were there any movies as big as Star Wars? Star Wars is so huge that creates an impossible standard.

Indiana Jones, Air Force One

She was the one who got all sorts of editor-in-chief job offers out of nowhere just because she was hot lol

Maybe try to understand why I don't want to say what it exactly is out of respect for her

I read the tweet in full. I want receipts and screenshots proving an actual harassment campaign, not some random tweets from people with 2 followers and no profile picture. She didnt even provide that much.

Where is the targeted campaign? I want to see it and Ill be happy to admit Im wrong if it exists.

Really weird people are like I want my loans forgiven but if people get their money back I dont want my loans forgiven. or something? Really dont understand the argument lol

whether it is a punishment or not is a red herring idk why you are trying to limit the conversation so much lol

If you paid off your loan, you dont get your loan forgiven. You would have been much better off not paying it and investing that money and waiting for forgiveness.

It sounds like you also want a fuck you got mine situation? Lmfao

Why not not? Seems unreasonable to punish people for paying their loans off. Its literally the only equitable solution? Why are debt havers so against other people getting their money back?

You cant forgive debt without cutting a check to the people who already paid for their education. In which case, it would be the most popular legislation haha

Exactly they like tits.

It's them Western developers that give women square frames, a cups and buccal surgery.

No its not. Digital storefronts are an easy microcosm.

Sony tried to shutdown old stores and the internet lost its collective shit so hard they backpedaled within days.

Nintendo said it was going to close old stores and most people didnt give a shit because Nintendo can do no wrong.

This is about as dishonest as it gets. In both cases, you had people upset and defenders all being very loud.

I dont understand why people ride so hard for Nintendo when theyre constantly bullying their user base. Buying their games, sure, but most Nintendo fans online are pretty fervent in defending them from any criticism.

My thumbs are too short for this controller, it's actually unusable

Why do you make the topics that you do?