Lurker > Sativa_Rose

Depends on what I'd have to do.

My lowest price would be having another guy blow me. I'd do that for $100 probably.

Blowing another guy? I'd need $1000.

Anal? If I'm giving probably like $5000, receiving? I don't know but let's say $25,000
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

There is no evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman is guilty. You are right that we don't have those facts, which actually strengthens Zimmerman's case because of the way the justice system works, innocent until proven guilty, etc.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

I don't think it's something to be ashamed of to get a role because you fit the image for that character they were imagining.

It's true of old men, short people, fat people, sexy women, etc. all the fucking time.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Malcolm_Matar posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

Malcolm_Matar posted...

Zimmerman attacked and murdered that kid, and CE rushed to condemn him because he was black and defended himself

Actually I think CE was pro Trayvon at first before the facts came out

Lol, what facts? You follow someone, you brandish a gun, the person defends himself, and you pop him. Sounds like murder one to me.

The facts of Zimmerman being beaten in the face repeatedly by Trayvon before Zimmerman reached for his gun

These are pics of Zimmerman taken by the police the night of the incident




I am someone who was initially pro Trayvon but then switched to pro Zimmerman after the facts came out.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Malcolm_Matar posted...

Zimmerman attacked and murdered that kid, and CE rushed to condemn him because he was black and defended himself

Actually I think CE was pro Trayvon at first before the facts came out
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Yeah the McGregor thing was just a joke lol >_>
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

DyingPancake posted...

This topic was literally made last week and not one person pro-Martin could actually defend him and ended up sounding like an idiot

Its already started again in this topic. Do we really need to hear more?

But was there a poll in that topic last week? I didn't think so.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

hollow_shrine posted...

The 'mc' prefix implies common quality or an off-branded knockoff of something sincere.

McGregor
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

No, it was George Zimmer. He is the source of it all. He used his fashion savvy, his business expertise, and his charisma to make it all happen.

You're gonna like the way you look. He guarantees it.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Vote
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

I heard that McDonalds requested people stop doing this or something, did that actually end up happening?
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Trump is pro LGB, just not the T
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

This is the Chad I care the most about

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chad
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Steve Howey? Don't know who that is, but I'd want to see Steve Harvey's penis on screen
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Ivynn posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

I'm a 90s kid, not a millennial.

Same thing bruh

Nope, millennials aren't real 90s kids.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

I'm a 90s kid, not a millennial.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

runescape.com

actually go to old school runescape
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

America becomes even more overprotective, and then angry older males complain about how kids these days don't know anything.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Hmm well I can see this being kind of a big issue if you two have very different ideas for where you see yourself ending up.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

#9 sounds political (just based off of what I read in the OP), but the others are things I agree with for the general population for sure.

The amount of time, research, learning of skills, etc. that goes into being informed enough to pick individual stocks is incredibly great, so great that the vast majority of people are probably best off never doing it. If it's something you really have taken a great interest in, then okay maybe, but I know too many people who aren't that into it who I could see being susceptible to getting sucked into the buying and selling of stocks without really knowing what they are doing, but as a "get rich quick" type thing. That will never work.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

How far away would you be moving? Like very very far away?
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Natural disasters really highlight how many people have no grasp of the concepts of supply and demand.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

The two party system in the US has turned people against each other. The two party duopoly which keeps people unnecessarily divided and the issue of money in politics (legal bribery) are ultimately the core issues in US politics right now.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Patty_Fleur posted...

No it's not. The United States could literally blow Denmark into smithereens if we wanted to. It's a weak tiny nation in the grand scheme of things

I'm not talking about military might lol, and you have to make comparisons on a per-capita basis because the US has 60x the population or so.

But yes, even on a per-capita basis (so same # of troops) I am sure the US military could defeat Denmark's easily. Every western European country (excluding the UK) has been able to get away with not spend as much on military in the post Cold War era because the US and a few other countries pick up all the NATO slack for them.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Denmark is one of the best run countries in the world. It might even be #1 when you consider that its neighbor Norway gets so much of its wealth from fossil fuels, and Denmark also has an economic edge over its other neighbors on a per-capita basis.

It gets tough when you start talking about countries with populations of 50m or greater though. The UK, France, Germany, the US, etc. None of these countries are doing as well as Denmark or Norway on a per-capita basis at all. It seems harder in general to run bigger countries than smaller ones.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Nikra posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

It probably has happened at some point in Denmark too. There have been many laws that haven't been attempted to be undone by the opposition in recent US history too, it is worth pointing out.

There are some big controversial laws like the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) that were put in place under Obama that Republicans are now trying to undo, but so far all three efforts to do so have failed. They couldn't get enough votes.

So the democracy probably isn't as flip-floppy as you think it is. There's a lot of rhetoric, but at the end of the day, they still have to get a lot of votes in Congress to actually do that, and they very rarely ever do.

But for an outstanding like me, it looks like it's a war between republicans an former president obama: Not really give a crap about the american population.

It's pretty much all talk though. Very very little has actually changed in the functioning of government since Obama took office. Congress has been able to pass nothing, and the President doesn't have executive control over all that much in the grand scheme of things. He can control the military, but the same generals are all running things as when Obama was in charge, so it's really not going to be much different.

The biggest thing Trump has actually been able to do was issue an executive order telling the State Department or whatever to temporarily halt entrance to the US for people from like 7 countries or something (the "Muslim" ban), but that only lasted a few days before a federal judge struck it down. So that gives you some perspective on what they call the "checks and balances" of the US system.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

scar the 1 posted...

Thanks, but I was looking more for a summary of the politics over maybe the last two decades.

I would search for recent history of denmark or recent denmark politics or something
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

That's true too, but even with all the lobbyists (like the ones who basically wrote Obamacare), it still is not all that flip floppy. Once the lobbyist-controlled Congressmen are able to get something passed, it's a lot harder to get it repealed than you are making it out to be. All of the big legislative bills since like George W. Bush are still there for the most part, like the PATRIOT ACT (which was basically extended with the USA Freedom Act), The Affordable Care Act, Dodd-Frank, etc.

Not to mention stuff like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid which is all based on stuff passed in the 40s-60s I think, though some changes have been made.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

The money would be better spent on some kind of investment in the community, like hiring people to go tutor kids in the home and provide help and coaching to super poor parents and stuff.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

It probably has happened at some point in Denmark too. There have been many laws that haven't been attempted to be undone by the opposition in recent US history too, it is worth pointing out.

There are some big controversial laws like the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) that were put in place under Obama that Republicans are now trying to undo, but so far all three efforts to do so have failed. They couldn't get enough votes.

So the democracy probably isn't as flip-floppy as you think it is. There's a lot of rhetoric, but at the end of the day, they still have to get a lot of votes in Congress to actually do that, and they very rarely ever do.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Some parents are so dumb. It makes me angry.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Salem seems pretty normal, just hotter than usual. But I didn't spend much time outside today
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

The dumb thing about all this crap is the idea that some dumbasses waving around nazi flags at a protest are morally equivalent to the actual leadership of the Third Reich.

Actions actually matter. It's not just all about what comes out of your mouth or what you post on social media.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Justin Bieber
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Nikra posted...

Those IQ tests are worthless: They are only for theorists. Real clever people combine theory with practical. IQ tests don't consider practical people.

Yeah I am not going to plan my life around this or anything. It's just a silly test. It would be kind of fun to study some of my weaker sections and take another test to try to maybe get up into the mid 130s or maybe even 140+, but I do realize it has no relevance in the real world.

It's not something you would put on a resume unless you want to get laughed at.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Well if your ex is cool with you being at his place and you're his ex then it doesn't really matter
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Sluts are the best
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

damn son :O
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

I would rather be a detective hunting down human traffickers or something
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Mile and a half in 5 minutes is like Olympic runner status. I don't think that guy is being truthful. Maybe there's some departments that are much harder to get into than others, probably depends on local job needs. If there is a huge need for more officers, the standards are probably lower. I certainly heard that was true for the military when they needed tons of people for Iraq and no one wanted to sign up.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Start googling. I think each department is kind of like its own employer, so you can apply to be a police officer at different cities, or a sheriff, or a state police, or whatever it is you want to do.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

The op-ed the professor wrote sounded like typical right wing stuff you'd hear from a Sean Hannity or Bill O'Reilly type. I don't know why it's causing outrage.

I don't agree with much of it. I agree that the fact that the single parenting rate has gone up has had a negative effect on things like education, also that education in general has become really shitty, but I don't think it's because society abandoned some better culture we had in the 40s - 60s. And respect for authority is not the problem right now in a society where the federal government regularly abuses its OWN authority (with stuff like the NSA and mass surveillance), along with police brutality. We need people speaking out against authority.

We have problems, but this woman doesn't blame the right issues for them. But all the SJWs who freaked out about this op-ed are being silly too, this is just some silly right-wing social conservative stuff you hear all the time if you listen to those Rick Santorum types of Republicans.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

dragnmaninferno posted...

More like 5-6 hardcore members. The others appear once in a while when they have the time myself included

Oh hell yeah that's awesome, you might be the first person to have gone to two different meetup groups I think?
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Oh nice I didn't know you guys had enough meetups down in DC to have regulars yet ;)
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

LightningAce11 posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

I didn't know running over fleeing suspects was a tactic that the police were trained to employ

I doubt the police in america are even trained nowadays.

They probably have it setup like a drive thru now. You drive up to one window and hand them your job application and background check, then you pull up to the second window and they hand you a bag with your uniform, badge, gun, keys to a patrol car, etc. then smile at you and tell you have a nice day.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

lol it would probably have to be NYCE vs everyone else or something because it would be hard to get a lot of people from any other one area
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

I didn't know running over fleeing suspects was a tactic that the police were trained to employ
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.