Lurker > OhhhJa

Load up on Taco Bell then squat by their door.

You do realize that horse s*** guy is laughed at in Philly also. And that people who climb poles are also laughed at and the city has no sympathy for those that fall.

That's pretty weird.

green dragon posted...

What's funny is that white people whine about turning traditionally white characters into minorities

Lmfao so true

green dragon posted...

What's funny is that white people whine about turning traditionally white characters into minorities

So whitey rolling his eyes is equivalent to SJWs shutting down school performances?

Revelation34 posted...

Super_Thug44 posted...

wwinterj25 posted...

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think what she did crossed the line?

She's teaching kids something with demonstrations.

Having middle school kids lie down on the floor doesn't really demonstrate anything. Nothing really wrong with it but still unnecessary and doesn't really convey any educational meaning. But this part?

When one of the students said she felt fine, the teacher then put her foot on the girl's back and said "How does it feel now? See how it feels to be a slave?"

That's not only unnecessary but also kind of fucked up. Not in a "white lady stomping on black kid" kind of racist way, but more of a "get your fucking foot off of that kids back" kind of way. I'd be pissed as hell if that was my daughter's teacher. You don't tell kids to lie down and put your feet on them.

From whatever perspective you look at (racist or just unnecessary) this lady is an idiot and should be reprimanded appropriately.

Except she literally did nothing wrong.

So physically assaulting a kid is nothing wrong?

Mead posted...

I mean there are attractive women that have married fat dudes that arent rich

Not sure why the concept of people falling for each other for reasons not solely based on physical experience is so hard for some to grasp

Maybe you should read my post first? I never mentioned anything about my physical appearance.

Even if you "commit" to someone, its not your responsibility to take care of their children unless you and your partner agree to that.

Just because you date someone with kids doesnt automatically make them your kids.

OhhhJa posted...

Cacciato posted...

I highly suggest downloading a police scanner app and listening to the Philly area right now.

Thanks for suggesting this. So far I've heard Christmas tree on fire in the street and "they flipped a car over"

Yeah man. Its fucking nuts. Theyve got people beating the shit out of each other and pulling guns off people

I highly suggest downloading a police scanner app and listening to the Philly area right now.

Some guy wore a Hernandez Patriots Jersey to the bar as a joke. No one thought it was funny and he put on a sweater. None of the Philly fans hurt him.

Patriots winning too much is a fairly significant factor too.

the implied option is just not voting. when the question is "who do you want to win?" it doesnt make much sense to add in a "press here if you dont care" button. cause if you dont care why vote?

First off, since when does Fox want Hillary?

not sure.

AverageBoss posted...

symptom of something wrong in our country rather the a disease in and of itself.

it's because mental illness is on the rise and there is not very much support for people with mental illness

OhhhJa posted...

Man, look at the spewing of rhetoric and propaganda going on. Defending speech even If it hurts someone's feelings equates to burning crosses on people's lawns... Give me a fucking break . Typical leftist identity politics garbage... anyone who disagrees with you is a murderous, racist, uneducated bigot. If anyone's brainwashed about what American people are like it's Canadians. What have the Canadian people contributed to the world... nothing compared to Americans. The only reason the rest of the world is obsessed with our culture and politics is because of our influence and importance globally.

Also, equating being legally obligated to use specific gender pronouns to threatening someone is absurd. Believe or not, hurting someone's feelings isn't the same thing as threatening them. You can do one without the other. Restricting speech does nothing but hamper discourse. There is always someone that will find almost anything you say offensive. Restricting any speech that isn't a threat is tyrannical. The government should have no place in telling people they can't hurt someone's feelings

Pictured: someone who's totally not insecure guys, like, seriously!

OhhhJa posted...

I have a friend who will get totally shit hammered though and says he just doesn't have them no matter how much he drinks. I honestly don't believe him. People like that defy science

But I'm like that, too. It's not my fault...

19

Should've fist bumped her

Nightengale posted...

Americans are by and large confused and that is how someone like Trump gets elected.

well... no. the media wanted Hillary. Trump is the americans' response to this same kind of extreme-left nonsense trying to rear its ugly head there. but yeah, Trump is gloriously anti-left and anti-political-correctness, not a nazi.

likehelly posted...

if you don't think there's anyone in here defending nazis, then you are defending nazis

https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/evelyn_beatrice_hall_109645

I don't read any CNN headlines but I don't think you're in any position to lecture me about your media, lol. Though I'm sure you'd be totally chill if it was Fox News, innit.

Like this dude actually thinks were the one with a nazi problem.

OhhhJa posted...

Bagamak posted...

EvilMegas posted...

People still defending Nazis lol

not a single person in this entire topic has yet to defend any nazis

Hard to argue with idiots entrenched in identity politics

People sexually identify as Nazis?

OhhhJa posted...

IShotJR posted...

OhhhJa posted...

IShotJR posted...

OhhhJa posted...

IShotJR posted...

I'm not too sure that the majority of users are a) from the US

Well, they definitely are so...

Based on what evidence?

There have been polls in the past. It should be self evident anyway. Shall I do a poll topic to prove what you know to be true?

But that would only provide info on the nationalities of the people who post on this particular message board, not on the site as a whole.

Like I said there have been multiple polls of the day in the past that prove this. Anyway, i don't really care enough to continue this. There's a super bowl poll today. If you don't like it then you'll have to get over it

I have no real issue with a super bowl poll, my issue is with there not being an option in the poll for those with no interest in the super bowl. Also, no-one is forcing you to respond and to be honest, I'd prefer if you didn't because your condescending attitude is adding nothing to the topic.

OhhhJa posted...

IShotJR posted...

OhhhJa posted...

IShotJR posted...

I'm not too sure that the majority of users are a) from the US

Well, they definitely are so...

Based on what evidence?

There have been polls in the past. It should be self evident anyway. Shall I do a poll topic to prove what you know to be true?

But that would only provide info on the nationalities of the people who post on this particular message board, not on the site as a whole.

EvilMegas posted...

People still defending Nazis lol

not a single person in this entire topic has yet to defend any nazis

You can't get charged for not using someone's pronouns. You can get charged for refusing to hire someone solely because of their gender identity.

Morons heard "can't discriminate based on gender identity" and made up the pronouns garbage. You're literally believing fake news.

OhhhJa posted...

IShotJR posted...

I'm not too sure that the majority of users are a) from the US

Well, they definitely are so...

Based on what evidence?

Nightengale posted...

Please cite an official government link of our Criminal Code that mandates use of specific pronouns.

my understanding of this issue is:

Bill C-16 "adds 'gender identity or expression' to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination in the Canadian Human Rights Act"

"gender identity" and "gender expression" are poorly defined terms. the ontario human rights policies have said that refusing to use someone's pronouns can be considered gender-based harassment and that it is "likely" discrimination. not knowing or not intending to harass is still harassment.

ontario has *human rights tribunals* which is already ridiculous by itself. they enforce ontario human rights policies, and you can hypothetically legally find yourself in front of a tribunal, and be found guilty of a hate crime, for not using someone's pronouns, even inadvertently.

A lot more times, the ones who seem to oddly and fervently feel the need to defend nazis are more likely to....

I'm not too sure that the majority of users are a) from the US

SunWuKung420 posted...

Are people seriously defending the rights of a guy who would happily remove all rights from a lot of people based on their skin color?

Be better than that!

you are confused. it's the other way around. we are better than him because we stand up for his rights even though he would deny us ours. It's just like how Batman is better than his enemies because they would kill him but he refuses to kill them

TheWorstPoster posted...

The cop was acting like the man who he took the flag from.

No.