Lurker > Purple_Cheetah

SimpleMan posted...

Why is it that tanks got named after both Tigers and Leopards, but not Lions?

Actually, there is a lion which was panzer 7, but it was never built. Instead it was cancelled and they went straight to building the Maus (mouse) which was panzer 8 and far heavier.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzer_VII_L%C3%B6we

Also before you ask, because probably see my name. Yes, there is a cheetah(or two of them technically, one current and one former). It's the Gepard and both are self propelled anti-air. One is based on the Leopard 1 hull, the other a Pz. 38(t) hull.

I guess it makes sense, cheetahs are too weak to fight straight up, instead they intercept fast moving aircraft. :P

There's also ships named named after the lion, tiger, panther, jaguar, cheetah, but that's a whole different can to open. Just look up the Lion class battleship or Guepard french destroyer, think there might be a Jaguar class, if not it's one of the sister ships.

Lick that sweet meat.

If that's true I'm sure the theater would have loved having phones out and on. Not saying it isn't, but if you think that one guy who can't stop peeking at it is bad.

It's not cheating, just clever use of life mechanics.

This reminds me of the one kid who got a fish in his penis while cleaning the fishbowl.

I'm not saying it's impossible, but imagine it happening, then grabbing the stingray to make it on shore while it's still attached somehow. Plausible, but it seems...

fishy

I wouldn't be suprised if he saw that sweet smooth underside with a hole or the side gills and thought 'I want a piece of tail'

I'll take it, but instead make the tank a Maus and let them figure out how to pull it by horse or whatever means. Now that would be a sight more interesting. Not like they really need the protection from CE anyways.

Vitaly
Tanya

I didn't realize it was for both genders at first and it was lumped in there practically on top of the male one. Looking at it, it's slavic... close enough.

I don't know the name of the movie, but this was back when they had adult channels on cable you could buy through that. However the TV guide's description for it will forever stick with me.

It was some sort of black and asian one. The description was simply "Black cockzillas destroy little tokyo"

It was quite better than some of the other boring descriptions. As for why I was looking there I simply liked to skip over them and see if there were any lulzy names. Too pricey and didn't want to explain the 10-15 dollar extra on the bill.

Mow the lawn 4 times a week until it's just barely half an inch off the ground, I'd brutally work that turf day and night.

I really like that one saying 'if it's inevitible, just relax and enjoy it'

I can just see it being said during the act and then followed up by one of the others regarding how her body didn't fight it off like some sort of invading illness therefore it was meant to be. Could apply to guys as well, but not sure of too many mpregs irl so part of that wouldn't work.

Ugh...

Huh, glad it worked. I was doubting it'd even be possible due to the glass/layer some displays have being fairly hard. I've only ever had to use it on the softer ones, so I knew it was plausible from experience.

Could be a lazy pixel, depending on if you want to try and massage it with slight pressure. I had a tv with a lazy green pixel. It'd get stuck on green and the only way to fix it was to gently press on it on/off with a thumbnail as it was on and eventually it'd sort itself out. Would return once every 6-10 months. However if it's black or white then it's a good chance it's dead or hot. If it's not lazy, then do whatever route you take, just don't break it pressing on the screen. Don't know if you can even massage a touch screen's pixels.

This reminds me of the owner manuals for stuff. I know Leno and May have made jabs at some of the stuff they have, but a few weeks back I was going through something for a heater and it told me on about 7-8 pages nonstop how heat and electricity can kill me if I let it burn me or get it wet, etc.

Eventually I found instructions on how to use it and 1 mention of 'oh that's useful' in a sea of 'electricity and heat can cause fires and kill you'

They literally mentioned the same warning around 5-7 times for a few, it was ridiculous.

BalanceLost posted...

What happened in here while I slept?

Here and in other topics there were naked men and their naked men accessories.

In clear view. Nothing new so to speak.

My favorite thing about Wendy's that finally got solved/changed after several years was some sort of vent for the sewer or grease pit. Don't know what it was, but it was between Wendy's and either mcdonalds or another fast food place. Out in the parking lot you had this spot that was basically the free petting zoo because it had a massive swarm of roaches and it was always fun as a kid to stomp near em and see 30-50 of em scurry across the lot.

Almost as good as a feral cat population at KFC for several years.

What if they both have twins? Then it's a Pacific Rim prequel?

No, I'll wait until they release all the expansions for it.

They want to go back to the good ole days when they were on top of the world. Castles, incest, and double digits is fine by me.

I don't know, but if that's true... I have no idea. I could see 14 as the lowest and even that is questionable in itself.

Parappa09 posted...

im glad its only 5 episodes

Yeah, I'll wait until it's over before I decide whether or not another episode would have rounded it out or wish they covered something(kinda hard to judge when it's still going). When you've got stuff running to 20-80 episodes each an hour long it gets old and then you feel trapped to see it to the end. With 5 it's enough to get invested without being held prisoner so to speak. So far the pacing feels just right without being too rushed/slow while having a sense of urgency looming about.

Yep, enjoying it.

You don't have to know about the actual event to really follow along, but it certainly helps I guess. So far it's only lead me to being like 'pfft' at the lies and denial. If you go in blind I guess it helps with the confusion and uncertain dread part.

Definitely recommend it so far and it's only 5 episodes. Can't say they'll add onto it or not, but that's fairly easy to digest compared to some other series out there.

The real question is what kind of car it is... if it's one that's front engine rear wheel drive it'd be annoying, but not the worst. If it's a front engine front wheel drive it'd be a slight nightmare in comparison because of how the engine is most likely transversely mounted and the transmission hugs and wraps around the bottom side of the engine with 2 CVs running out either end. 4wd/awd are some sort of the above.

There is an offchance it's mid or rear with the same transverse layout, but can't think of any that would be for sure automatic outside of maybe an oldie that eludes me.

UnfairRepresent posted...

Purple_Cheetah posted...

I was expecting it to be a full body attempt of the dog and it being partially curled up or something, like it's laying down on its side and a combination making it look like one from the side.

wut

I was expecting the tattoo to be a poor attempt at making a full body image of the dog instead of just the face. The dog would be curled up partially or laying somehow, a sort of side view if you will. If done so poorly it could look like a melted shape and ressemble the side on profile of a flaccid member, or if the outline/detail was so terrible front on as well. If this were the case I could understand it being mistaken as there's no context outside of a weird shape that looks phallic.

Instead we get a straight on approach which very vaguely looks like one on its own, but has too much surrounding context. So the only way to single it out is to imagine a dog with a dick and balls for a muzzle. It's a bit too much a stretch and is only something someone who has a preemptive thought or has to try and find the bad in everything would think/mistake. Granted the first isn't the greatest, but it somewhat resembles a dog face. If you want to take it a step further it could be a dog face drawn around a previous penis tattoo to cover it up.

UnfairRepresent posted...

I remember reading some erotica aimed at women years ago where all the guys in the story had like 12-16 inch cocks.

And it was like "Do you have any idea how fucking stupid this is?"

How fitting, just last night I was reminded for some reason about someone's 'character' yes, let's leave it at that. You know those reference sheets floating around. The only thing that stuck to me even after these 1-3 years was the fact it had a dong jutting out with a reference measurement of 38 inches. Now at first I was thinking 'maybe they mean cm, nope it's written with the word inches so no mistaking'

I then just stared. That's 3 feet 2 inches, a damn yard stick and then some, but the proportions were more like a 12-14 on a 5.5-6 foot persons. Between that and so many other things I've decided that no one really seems to know how measurements and such work anymore. Both in the real and the fantasy.

Though it does remind me of this picture someone had of a tape measure where the inches were all shorter and only 80% the size of other more calibrated ones. So all their projects ended up looking weird. Guess guys need to get ahold of that one so we can squeeze 1-2 more out for free.

In the first one I can sorta see the balls and flopping penis. But I had to seriously seriously study it and have the preemptive thought of it being that in the first place, it was still hard to connect. The second is improved, but feels over saturated with detail so can't tell if that's good or bad yet. Could wind up being too detailed and thus easy to go wrong down the road. Either way, that's a hell of a stretch to say that's what it looks like... definitely has to be someone who points out the worst of something just for the sake of it.

I was expecting it to be a full body attempt of the dog and it being partially curled up or something, like it's laying down on its side and a combination making it look like one from the side.