Lurker > texanfan27

The table breaks, they both fall with all their strength aimed downward breaking the planet.

isnt this the plot to outbreak?

wait, so Karl was involved with Nazi stuff? This just got beyond weird

It would take a fight to figure it out, with him having to fall back to regroup. Once he figures out fire and sonic work well, he can start hitting him hard.

it mainly comes down to not getting hit, as venom can likely kill batman in one good hit

They would need to step up with this one.

the first wasnt bad, but lack of variety hurt it in a few ways. Needs more enemy types, better guns.

the dialogue however was on point for OW1 and avowed.

This is going to go to massive shit, and all cause of the president.

seriously, what will it take for people to say enough is enough

At some point, meaningful guidelines need to be set for politicians. If are mentally compromised, then it should go to review, a temp is put in place from the same party till next election.

Looking more at the website wow, thats full gop take over levels.

They just dont care about the constitution. They will ignore what doesnt help them

Anyone got a typewriter? Ill just place one in the room designating it a safe room and just watch as he cant come in.

Wow, beyond petty.

this is what some people voted for

That is heaven to eat, and hell for your close by friends and coworkers a few hours later

Prismsblade posted...

Ive heard places like Walmart in certain places and citys were going to lockdown and shift to online orders only for the time being.

As for how long itll probably depend on however dependent a location was on SNAP Id assume.

i was hearing that as well, also was hearing people condoning just walking in and taking stuff as well. This is going to be a rough time it feels like

I liked Karls speed running videos, didnt mind the Billy Mitchell stuff, but honestly, after the reveal on Jirads charity issues and brief follow up, it feels like he just kept trying to strike gold on a dead topic.

this is just these two picking an fight with each other at this point.

also holy crap, 4 hours. Thats at obsession levels now

during the last major shutdown (the 40 something long one) I dont recall there being riots. Did snap benefits not getting effected during last big shutdown?

At some point, the world leaders are going say enough, remove the clown or we are done with you.

CableZL posted...

Have you tried it with a jalapeno bread bun?

goes from amazing, to godlike

Im wondering if Imu cant be damage when she projects onto someone like Saturn (he taking the hits, not her).

And how is Garp not in deep shit for this incident?

Mine would just tell Im full of shit likely. And need more fiber

Honestly, I couldnt identify it, but if you are going use something and tattoo yourself with it, research is always needed

Jagus posted...

You justify terrorism when it suits your goals. You literally support terrorism. If Muslims bombed hospitals churches and schools youd lose your mind. Evil fanatic.

i do not justify terrorism, but I understand war. Nagasaki was a valid target due to factories and a port. Hiroshima also had schools and hospitals that were affected, but you dont call them out.

it was a major loss of life that shouldnt happen, but at the end of the day, it was done, it wasnt a war crime at the time. Lets be thankful that none of those weapons or worse have been used since.

Thought it supposed to be owls that worked well this, why coyotes, they cant catch a bird, especially a roadrunner

Jagus posted...

you shoudnt drop a bomb on schools churches and hospitals and justify starving people Jesus Christ. Show Russia we have the biggest bomb? You sound psychopathic. Priorities man. They absolutely ahould never have dropped it.

youre the same as people who justify terrorist attacks on American civilians

no, I justify ending a fight by what means are needed and not holding past actions to current standards. War isnt nice, its tragic and bloody. The best course is always to end it quickly in your favor so less have to die in the long run

also saying I would justify of terrorist attacks against America? That kind of stupid doesnt even justify a response

A_Good_Boy posted...

It doesn't count as a war crime until Canada does it anyways.

ok this got a good laugh from me

Jagus posted...

Is it really gray when Nagasaki wasnt originally the target and the epicenter was schools, churches, and hospitals? That one at least seems pretty clear to me. They didnt even target military infrastructure.

it was primary a trade port, but at that point you are over enemy territory and its either drop it, or risk never getting another chance.

also economic targets are also valid if you are trying to end a war in my view. If they cant get resources, it both starves the people and the war machine. Its not preferred as military should be first picks, but war is about winning whatever your objective is, in this case, breaking the Japanese military spirit was the goal. And showing Russia we had the biggest bomb

ssjevot posted...

Hiroshima:
90,000166,000 killed
80,000156,000 civilians
10,000 soldiers
12 Allied prisoners of war
Nagasaki:
60,00080,000 killed
60,00080,000 civilians
150 soldiers
813 Allied prisoners of war

Nagasaki was literally dropping in a primarily residential neighborhood, not near the port, so bringing that up is nonsense. It did almost no damage to any military infrastructure in the port because it wasn't dropped near it (ground zero was a prison for the Korean and Chinese prisoners you like to pretend to care about). Also more Korean forced laborers were killed than Japanese soldiers (about 1/5 of deaths were Koreans, many forced laborers being made to work against their will). I know you love pretending to care about victims of Imperial Japan, so you might need to pretend to care about that too.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/f81c84a5.jpg

If you didn't lie constantly while defending US war crimes maybe people would take your claims more seriously.

worth noting Nagasaki was not the preferred target, I was supposed be Kokura which held an army arsenal. Just weather screwed it up and forced them to go to the 2nd target instead.

Hiroshima being picked as it was the least damaged from fire bombing is new info for me.

https://www.history.com/articles/nagasaki-atomic-bomb-drop-secondary-target

LightSnake posted...

I have a hard time believing any general in history is sacrificing 500 of his own troops to save 500 enemy civilians, tbh.

In some militaries in history, that would probably get you killed.

only time this is a factor is if its your nations civilians, or there is a VIP you must take in

Think Im at 2 weeks currently, and I just use them
for more emergency issues or Im tired of everyones BS days. Also skipping out on last week of the year

Ending the war the most effective way to end deaths is the only option. Civilian can still refer to someone supporting the enemy, so less of my soldiers that die, the better.

While its not truly part of the original building, if this was the plan it should been thought out more.

It has instant kill enemies and traps

My only rules on protesting is it must stay non violent and emergency vehicles must be able get through.

6
4
X
13
5
8 and 1
7
12
15
2

i never played 3, 9 (on my list), or 16. Online FF dont count.

That sounds like a horrible idea on all fronts.

Any country that didnt follow would suffer.

first thing is figuring out what it would be then you have fix all the vending machines likely. Being honest we all bring using a card for purchase, no more bills or coins

Its a 9, it degrades once Mariah Carey breaks free from being frozen. Dont thaw her out for my sanity!

Ff3 for snes. 65 since its loose

Throw me in, I know nothing, so Ill likely get someone killed, but its a risk you have to take

not knowing a mod hurt me a bit, really surprised I was the only one to say bowser

shouldn't that break guidelines or something?

also hope all the money from that stream goes into the kids college fund.

Got the first, need to sit down and start it at some point.

Roughly twice a week I think

Guess Civvie11 going have do one more round of pro blood.

Garioshi posted...

It's worse than you think, about 40% of news coverage about cops is about these bad cops. For more information, Google "40% cops".

the 40% from what I can gather is a study that states that 40% of officers have had a form of violence between them and family members from 1990. So Not related to the news from what I can gather.

30% of the news is crime related, but that doesnt guarantee bad cops, just police activity.

so Ill do some math based on what Ive was able to pull up

https://policescorecard.org/

Im seeing roughly 900k to 1 million officers nationwide. Ill run both numbers for the % at the end

roughly 324,000 reported misconduct cases between 2016 -2022 (latest I could find). Going divide that by 6 for a rough year count of 54,000. Now not all are reported for multitude of reasons (scared or criminal records), so Im going say half that number isn't reported. So 81,000 a year roughly. Mindful most dont make news unless there a fatality involved.

so that data points to 5-9% bad cops (assuming no repeat offenders.) still higher than it should be.

Things need to change, officers should be held more accountable. There should be better training to limit excessive force and de-escalation.

ToadallyAwesome posted...

Is it just me or do more and more cops seem to be extra jumpy/anxious all the time now? Like arent cops suppose to be cool headed and able to handle stressful situations?

sadly its training and environment. They are trained there is danger constantly, and then it is enforced whenever something does go wrong.

sone people are jerks though as well

not all police are this way, there are good ones you just never see cause that isnt good news. You will always hear about the bad 1 in a group of a 1000, never the 999 who just did traffic stops that day with no incident.

261 had issues (like any online space), but not everyone one there was terrible, but there were a lot that were needing the ban.

blood and body parts dont bother me, just the medical side of my learning let me look and say, hey that guy had 4 rib cages

This isnt about justice, its extortion.

Previously, the states law allowed someone with a permit to carry their handgun into a store, for instance, unless the property owner explicitly prohibited it. The new law flipped that around and required unambiguous written or verbal authorization. It also barred the carrying of guns on beaches and in parks as well as bars and restaurants that serve alcohol.

the 51% law (if a business profits are 51% alcohol, then you cant carry there. In restaurant bars are considered separate entities) exists for a reason! Its so you dont think drink and carry a gun.

likewise if a business posts the restriction signage (Texas is the 30-6 sign), if you want to carry do business elsewhere.

Mibahlzitch posted...

They can't even leave to take a shit.

well if they cant give a shit, why should we care?

There is my weekend watch thank you!