Lurker > ChocoboMogALT

Yeah this is what I did. I didn't regret buying it but I only played I think 30 hours or so before getting the true ending. Biggest issue is the lack of content. Other roguelites have way more shit to do.

Also, we very much so are ok with animals that can feel pain being put through suffering, and the vast majority of people are participants. Unless I'm speaking to a vegan.

I feel like it's rather telling that they used examples of 30 and 100 years, as opposed to the much more common timeframes of... 30 days and 3 months. There have been numerous stories where squatters attempted to take over a property that was left empty for less than three months, usually after somebody died.

what did he mean he made it public that he was going to squat?

Did he actually sign the papers and contact the owner or their family? or did he just post the deed on social media and lived there for free for 7 years. once he gets the title does that mean he has to start paying rent/mortgage and have all the responsibilities of owning a property?

While we cant rule out the possibility that the observed decline in Strategy is due to a change over time in one of countless demographic variables among the gamers we sample, we can rule out this possibility in terms of the most likely culprits. The charts below show our gamer sample has been mostly stable in terms of gender, age, and gamer type (i.e., identification as casual, core, hardcore gamer).
While there has been a slight decline in age in the sampled gamers (and this could have been a likely confound), the correlation between age and Strategy is small (r=.06, r-squared = .004) and could not have resulted in the observed decline in Strategy.
The other reason why the decline in Strategy is unlikely to be due to a demographic sampling confound is because we know, from previous examinations of age and gender differences in gaming motivations, that other motivations (like Competition) are far stronger correlated with gender and age. Thus, any demographic confounds in sampling would have resulted in larger effects on those motivations rather than Strategy.

So their complaint is there are secrets in the game, and that makes it bad?

Example?

=( Aww sorry if something I said in the past stuck with you for this long and now you're coming here being so upset.

So billionaires now pay less than $10-30k in taxes? Wow, that's messed up.

In 2007, Jeff Bezos, then a multibillionaire and now the worlds richest man, did not pay a penny in federal income taxes. He achieved the feat again in 2011. In 2018, Tesla founder Elon Musk, the second-richest person in the world, also paid no federal income taxes.

You've fallen for the misdirection in the OP. For any one person taking one or more trips on the plane, the number of other passengers is completely irrelevant.

The number of passengers only matters for questions like "What's the expected number of deaths in this fact pattern?"

What tropes? Re:Zero doesn't have the overpowered protag that most Isekais have. It also doesn't really have the harem trope going for it as the MC likes one girl and another girl likes him which isn't a harem.

Keanu Reeves did enough firearms training for John Wick that I imagine he's a pretty good shot

Being radical in anything isnt very beneficial and that goes for everything including politics. Everything is better with nuance for moderation.

Controller is better for fighting games

If I dont have to see woke used by the chuds of chuds at least thats a silver lining of sorts. But seriously, this just reminds me of the people who have terrible opinions saying no politics when they know that their own politics wont hold up to scrutiny.