Board 8 > When will game journos stop LYING to gamers?! (Zelda)

(+) Yeah! (+)

Vlado posted...

If we lived on the sun

I'd love to be able to fly
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

TheRock1525 posted...

So why does gay sex occur in animals if it's not a natural thing?

wi-fi signals turn them gay

No it's stuff in the water!

But that might be just frogs.
---

Peace___Frog posted...

Vlado posted...

If we lived on the sun

I'd love to be able to fly

I mean... "on" implying a solid surface...
---

TheRock1525 posted...

MoogleKupo141 posted...

TheRock1525 posted...

So why does gay sex occur in animals if it's not a natural thing?

wi-fi signals turn them gay

No it's stuff in the water!

But that might be just frogs.

frogs aren't gay. I mean some species are trans, but that's just to keep gender numbers even...
---

Is it normal, is it part of healthy society? If not, it's probably harmful. For an example liberals would be less offended about - that fad of teenagers licking door knobs in Japan a while ago? Also harmful.

Globalists have already crushed free speech in some places (in the UK, you can go to jail over freaking twitter). We mustn't let them determine anything if we want to be free.

Basically, by wanting the government to be able to censor children's media, you want the government to be allowed to determine what is harmful and then block it. Globalists are presumably powerful enough to influence the government. Basically, by giving the government that power, you give the globalists that power. You are handing the globalists control over all media children consume. Do you disagree with any of this?
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

are you suggesting we'd all be gay if we lived on the sun

it's not gay if it's in space
---

Kenri posted...

MoogleKupo141 posted...

are you suggesting we'd all be gay if we lived on the sun

it's not gay if it's in space

that's a good point. space is outside of globalism's jurisdiction because it's not earth anymore.
---

We actually know very little about human sexuality in space, because only small mammals have ever had space sex. 538 recently put out an article about it!
---

vlado, what do you think is the best strategy of establishing space government?
---

JeffreyRaze posted...

Basically, by wanting the government to be able to censor children's media, you want the government to be allowed to determine what is harmful and then block it. Globalists are presumably powerful enough to influence the government. Basically, by giving the government that power, you give the globalists that power. You are handing the globalists control over all media children consume. Do you disagree with any of this?

You are like 4 levels deeper than Vlado's brain has ever gone and will ever go
---

https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/5geol2/what_the_hell_is_fully_automated_gay_luxury_space/
---

foolm0r0n posted...

JeffreyRaze posted...

Basically, by wanting the government to be able to censor children's media, you want the government to be allowed to determine what is harmful and then block it. Globalists are presumably powerful enough to influence the government. Basically, by giving the government that power, you give the globalists that power. You are handing the globalists control over all media children consume. Do you disagree with any of this?

You are like 4 levels deeper than Vlado's brain has ever gone and will ever go

yeah he gets stuck in loops in the outer levels a lot.
---

jeff is right here and vlado is wrong. you cannot, for any reason, give the government the power of censorship. it is one of the most dangerous weapons they can wield. this is the entire reason why the first amendment is the very first one.
---

MariaTaylor posted...

jeff is right here and vlado is wrong. you cannot, for any reason, give the government the power of censorship. it is one of the most dangerous weapons they can wield. this is the entire reason why the first amendment is the very first one.

yeah but gays
---

MariaTaylor posted...

vlado is wrong

You don't say
---

trdl23 posted...

This bait isn't even unlimited.

http://i.imgur.com/ik7Iveo.jpg

---

trdl please post the bigger pic
---

In the US, seeing gay couples is scientifically proven to improve your health and mental capabilities.
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

are you suggesting we'd all be gay if we lived on the sun

Sun beings would be flaming after all
---

TheRock1525 posted...

So why does gay sex occur in animals if it's not a natural thing?

Animals will hump inanimate objects, too. They follow urges, impulses.

MariaTaylor posted...

jeff is right here and vlado is wrong. you cannot, for any reason, give the government the power of censorship. it is one of the most dangerous weapons they can wield. this is the entire reason why the first amendment is the very first one.

Except it's not censorship when it's material targeting children. Children are not developed yet and cannot sufficiently handle all speech. Same goes for most adults, as we see in this very topic, but children are particularly vulnerable. It's society's duty to protect them from harmful material.
---

Vlado posted...

Animals will hump inanimate objects, too.

So do humans...
---

And your point is? That we should marry inanimate objects, or maybe have that in children's cartoons?
---

... Inanimate objects can't, y'know, say the "I do" part.
---

Not an argument.
---

I'm not sure why you're trying to argue with him. This is just one big "I hate gay people" from Vlado and you're never going to change his mind, so why bother?
---

agree with SEP. vlado's argument is "gay is bad" and his reasoning is "the bible sez so," so there's no point in arguing with him.
---

What is said is not "gay is bad," it's "homosexual propaganda is harmful to children."
---

What is "homosexual propaganda"
---

Anything that makes children consider the gays as real people and not monsters
---

Vlado posted...

Not an argument.

How is it not? "Inanimate objects" isn't an argument, anything without an actual thought process and common language cannot "marry". Can't marry -> zero argument to marry. If you wanna talk about a distant future where robots have have their own free will and unique sense of existence you can have that argument.

*note however this argument would have absolutely zero relation to same sex relationships because same sex couples are in fact human beings already
---

All I was pointing out to Rock was that "gay sex" is as natural as humping an inanimate object is.
---

and masturbation is indeed natural
---

(if you want an example of something that is unnatural, marriage would actually be a correct answer!)
---

Vlado posted...

And your point is? That we should marry inanimate objects, or maybe have that in children's cartoons?

You would seriously be concerned for the wellbeing of children if someone was married to a chair in a cartoon.
---

When Mr. Krabs shows how much he loves money, it harms children.
---

scarletspeed7 posted...

trdl please post the bigger pic

Vlado has to earn the big pic now. I'm not letting him free load on it anymore.
---

I distinctly remember an episode in which Squidward fantasized about marrying and having children with a burger.
---

That was also censored in bulgaria
---

Vlado posted...

Except it's not censorship when it's material targeting children. Children are not developed yet and cannot sufficiently handle all speech. Same goes for most adults, as we see in this very topic, but children are particularly vulnerable. It's society's duty to protect them from harmful material.

it is the responsibility of parents to protect their own children. why should the government be raising your children for you?
---

and why would you want to give them that power?
---

MariaTaylor posted...

it is the responsibility of parents to protect their own children. why should the government be raising your children for you?

I agree, most responsibility lies with the parents. Government can help, in a supporting role, not take the main role away from parents. A good government will.

MariaTaylor posted...

and why would you want to give them that power?

I would certainly not support government getting the main role in raising children over parents, no.
---

Showing children that homosexuals exist and are, in fact, normal human beings, is not propaganda.
---

Vlado just say you hate gay people so we can never have this discussion again. Cause you clearly do.
---

Vlado posted...

I would certainly not support government getting the main role in raising children over parents, no.

So parents can show their kids Steven Universe if they want to?
---

Espeon posted...

Showing children that homosexuals exist and are, in fact, normal human beings, is not propaganda.

Weird definition of "normal human being" that includes one of the most basic and fundamental human biological urges, necessary for the propagation of the species, being 100% reversed, in a trait that only exists in about 2% of the population
---

SmartMuffin posted...

Weird definition of "normal human being" that includes one of the most basic and fundamental human biological urges, necessary for the propagation of the species, being 100% reversed, in a trait that only exists in about 2% of the population

A far greater than 2% of humans do not reproduce
---

Vlado posted...

good government

http://i.imgur.com/xqaviaG.gif
---

SmartMuffin posted...

Espeon posted...

Showing children that homosexuals exist and are, in fact, normal human beings, is not propaganda.

Weird definition of "normal human being" that includes one of the most basic and fundamental human biological urges, necessary for the propagation of the species, being 100% reversed, in a trait that only exists in about 2% of the population

So we should tell people with Downs that they aren't normal people?
---

SmartMuffin posted...

Espeon posted...

Showing children that homosexuals exist and are, in fact, normal human beings, is not propaganda.

Weird definition of "normal human being" that includes one of the most basic and fundamental human biological urges, necessary for the propagation of the species, being 100% reversed, in a trait that only exists in about 2% of the population

Aren't you in that 2%, Muffin?
---

3.8% is the number I'm seeing, which is not a small number given the overall size of the population. Furthermore, it seems as though homosexuals make up a larger percentage of the population than say, Jewish people. Would you say Jewish people are abnormal, Smuffin? 'Cause I sure as hell wouldn't say that.
---