Board 8 > Me too

(+) Yeah! (+)

JetJaguar posted...

thundersheep posted...

Anyway, I had no idea the types of monsters we had here.

I love how quickly SJWs resort to ad hominem

why is the phrase "ad hominem" exclusively used by people who suck ass

was it suggested in one of your ass sucker newsletters or something
---

It was in Milo's book.

We didn't get our copies from Rush, so...
---

ExThaNemesis posted...

Again if I cared enough or had time I'm sure I could make daily topics about feminism's BS and you'd go right back to hating me because we don't agree about that.

You just came into a topic screaming about feminazis (sexual assault victims) and made several posts that were not only empathetic to the victims, but also were calm and de-escalating, unlike everyone else who is just throwing gas onto the flames for lulz
---

foolm0r0n posted...

ExThaNemesis posted...

Again if I cared enough or had time I'm sure I could make daily topics about feminism's BS and you'd go right back to hating me because we don't agree about that.

You just came into a topic screaming about feminazis (sexual assault victims) and made several posts that were not only empathetic to the victims, but also were calm and de-escalating, unlike everyone else who is just throwing gas onto the flames for lulz

It's kind of insane to me that he doesn't realize it himself.
---

I guess I'm less antagonistic because I don't have the energy for these fights anymore.
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

JetJaguar posted...

thundersheep posted...

Anyway, I had no idea the types of monsters we had here.

I love how quickly SJWs resort to ad hominem

why is the phrase "ad hominem" exclusively used by people who suck ass

was it suggested in one of your ass sucker newsletters or something

It's not even used properly here
---

I mean I mostly agree with SephG here. I definitely think this is part of Feminism's end game goal of "Everything we don't like can be labeled sexual assault/harassment at any time"

But in the wake of the Weinstein revelation and considering how benign the whole online hashtag thing is, this is just a genuinely bad time to die on this hill. Especially if some victims can find some solidarity, like I said.
---

Even if that's what you believe, there's a difference between agreeing with him and acting like him.
---

ExThaNemesis posted...

I guess I'm less antagonistic because I don't have the energy for these fights anymore.

But in the wake of the Weinstein revelation and considering how benign the whole online hashtag thing is, this is just a genuinely bad time to die on this hill. Especially if some victims can find some solidarity, like I said.

You're describing it as not a big change, and it's not, but this is really all it takes to improve quality of life and quality of disagreements/arguments and quality of being around other people in general

Just don't fight to the death on every single hill you can find
---

Saw...maybe 4-5 people use it the entire day, never more than once from the same person (I follow about 200 people on Twitter, a number of them feminists). Thought about using the hashtag myself, since hey, I have gotten some mild sexual harassment. Didn't--think work got busy and I forgot about tweeting.

I really don't understand why anyone would be upset about this though. The point is to say that there is a widespread problem where a lot of women have experienced sexual harassment. (Which...there are, yes). This really shouldn't be news to anyone anymore.
---

I saw it used about 10x as much on FB than Twitter, for obvious reasons
---

JetJaguar posted...

Gmun posted...

women: "I had a bad experience where a man did this to me"
b8: "shut up"

well of course you would sympathize with someone being taken advantage of sexually by a man lol

lmaoooo
---

Jakyl25 posted...

MoogleKupo141 posted...

JetJaguar posted...

thundersheep posted...

Anyway, I had no idea the types of monsters we had here.

I love how quickly SJWs resort to ad hominem

why is the phrase "ad hominem" exclusively used by people who suck ass

was it suggested in one of your ass sucker newsletters or something

It's not even used properly here

yes it is
---

Nope
---

It's only ad hominem if Tim is admitting he self identifies as a monster.
---

also the reason it appears to you that only people who "suck ass" use the term ad hominem is because it's mostly conservatives that use the term. obviously, this is because they're usually arguing (since liberals are incapable of debate) with a liberal who is utilizing the technique.

if ever the conservatives of the board lose the ability to win literally every argument that occurs on the board, you and your buddies will get an opportunity to use the term.
---

timjob's use of ad hominem is literally quoted in the post above his last one

which happens to be his go-to every single topic he's in with me
---

Sure seems like you're using some ad hominem there.
---

ad homiception
---

Is TimJab the actual most conservative person on this board?

I'm starting to think so.
---

Jakyl25 posted...

Nope

look, jakyl, i know you're not very smart but...

making no effort to factually refute a person's argument, and dismissing their opinion by attacking their character is the definition of ad hominem.

obviously, normally it would require an unrelated reference like "X's opinion on abortion is invalid because he cheats on his wife", but liberals have become so reliant on a perceived moral highground that the definition has been adapted like basically every other term in the english language

a more interesting question however: would it be ad hominem to say your opinion on this matter holds no water because you sexually objectify women and lure them into unwanted sexual relations with the promise of paying them? seems pretty relevant to the topic


---

JetJaguar posted...

also the reason it appears to you that only people who "suck ass" use the term ad hominem is because it's mostly conservatives that use the term. obviously, this is because they're usually arguing (since liberals are incapable of debate) with a liberal who is utilizing the technique.

if ever the conservatives of the board lose the ability to win literally every argument that occurs on the board, you and your buddies will get an opportunity to use the term.

thundersheep wasn't calling you guys monsters as part of an argument, he was just insulting you. There was no debate involved.
---

CelesMyUserName posted...

timjob's use of ad hominem is literally quoted in the post above his last one

which happens to be his go-to every single topic he's in with me

don't you have some pictures to draw lmao
---

Jakyl25 posted...

Is TimJab the actual most conservative person on this board?

I'm starting to think so.

Maybe

i'm certainly the most intelligent, which isn't saying much i suppose

all that education liberals get isn't worth much it seems
---

Vlado does this all the time too. Someone shows up in his topic and calls him a dumbass or something and he's like "lol nice ad hom"
---

whoever just replied is on ignore
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

Vlado does this all the time too. Someone shows up in his topic and calls him a dumbass or something and he's like "lol nice ad hom"

---

JetJaguar posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Nope

look, jakyl, i know you're not very smart but...

making no effort to factually refute a person's argument, and dismissing their opinion by attacking their character is the definition of ad hominem.

obviously, normally it would require an unrelated reference like "X's opinion on abortion is invalid because he cheats on his wife", but liberals have become so reliant on a perceived moral highground that the definition has been adapted like basically every other term in the english language

a more interesting question however: would it be ad hominem to say your opinion on this matter holds no water because you sexually objectify women and lure them into unwanted sexual relations with the promise of paying them? seems pretty relevant to the topic

I never offered an opinion on this matter
---

JetJaguar posted...

whoever just replied is on ignore

total ad hominid thing to do
---

Woooooow Tim is looking pretty pathetic right now.

I mean that's not strange but he's really losing it, yeesh.
---

CelesMyUserName posted...

MoogleKupo141 posted...

Vlado does this all the time too. Someone shows up in his topic and calls him a dumbass or something and he's like "lol nice ad hom"

different things, but sure

btw, pretending i'm dumb to avoid actually refuting my points is also ad hominem

that would be clever if your idiocy were intentional
---

you're an ad hominem
---

JetJaguar posted...

CelesMyUserName posted...

MoogleKupo141 posted...

Vlado does this all the time too. Someone shows up in his topic and calls him a dumbass or something and he's like "lol nice ad hom"

different things, but sure

btw, pretending i'm dumb to avoid actually refuting my points is also ad hominem

that would be clever if your idiocy were intentional

who's pretending
---

also i love how gmun has literally every political opinion you would expect from a manchild who lives in a fantasy world for the first 20 something years of his life before randomly venturing out into the real world. it makes him really predictable.

still, as much as i would like to ignore him, i can't because i literally laugh out loud every time he tries to be tough and i can't deprive myself of that
---

Reminder that Tim is actually a cop lol.
---

JetJaguar posted...

but liberals have become so reliant on a perceived moral highground that the definition has been adapted like basically every other term in the english language

Ad hominem isn't a term in the English language
---

JetJaguar posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Nope

look, jakyl, i know you're not very smart but...

making no effort to factually refute a person's argument, and dismissing their opinion by attacking their character is the definition of ad hominem.

obviously, normally it would require an unrelated reference like "X's opinion on abortion is invalid because he cheats on his wife", but liberals have become so reliant on a perceived moral highground that the definition has been adapted like basically every other term in the english language

a more interesting question however: would it be ad hominem to say your opinion on this matter holds no water because you sexually objectify women and lure them into unwanted sexual relations with the promise of paying them? seems pretty relevant to the topic

Being a cop is a job that literally tests hiring prospects intellectual capacity to make sure they are dumb enough to adequately perform the job

JetJaguar posted...

making no effort to factually refute a person's argument, and dismissing their opinion by attacking their character is the definition of ad hominem.

Saying your argument is wrong because you're a fucking idiot, is ad hominem

Saying your argument is wrong, and, incidentally, you're a fucking idiot, has nothing to do with ad hominem

Also, ad hominem requires an actual argument to be taking place, which does not include "omg rape victims are sooo annoying aren't they???"
---

reminder that timjab is the one whining about ad hominems
---

oh wow this topic is full of really gross people
---

I don't know if the topic went other places but to respond to the original question of this topic-
Some woman here decided to make a lecture about Harry Potter and how it supports the "Rape Culture"
And women agreed with her
---

CelesMyUserName posted...

reminder that timjab is the one whining about ad hominems

The original post is accusing people of being SJWs while complaining about ad hominem so it speaks for itself

But it is really shocking how many people don't understand ad hominem
---

Nanis23 posted...

I don't know if the topic went other places but to respond to the original question of this topic-
Some woman here decided to make a lecture about Harry Potter and how it supports the "Rape Culture"
And women agreed with her

This is why only men should write books
---

I installed ad hominem block on my browser years ago so they don't bother me so much unless I'm on mobile
---

Chrome won't support Ad HomNoMore, apparently Google claims people want Ad Hominem even if they don't know they want it. First no menu bar, now this. Nyehhhhhh.
---

Hi Board 8
I just wanted to say...the reason I am so negative in ny life is because...
And I am not obliged to tell you when it happened, how, where, why, by whom, for how long, I don't need to tell you anything, just know that #metoo

And this is totally not a lie whatsoever to show how easy it is to write this without meaning shit

#mewtwo is better let's do this
---

UltimaterializerX posted...

They're going for the full radical feminism route in hopes it convinces the public to turn on Trump, which thankfully won't work. We're wise to this trash now.

It won't work because Trump himself, his family, and dozens of victims have openly been talking about his abuses for DECADES and no one gave, gives, or will give a shit.

In fact, no one really gives a shit about Weinstein's abuses either. This latest movement is only criticizing the feigned surprise that everyone showed at the "reveal" of his abuses. It's not saying that abusing women is bad, just that you shouldn't be surprised when it happens because it's normal and well-accepted in society. It's just so easy for everyone to dismiss/justify abuses as a necessary part of modern society.

Also it won't work because only 25% of the public still supports Trump so the public can't really turn "turn" much farther than that.
---

Nanis23 posted...

And this is totally not a lie whatsoever to show how easy it is to write this without meaning shit

Post it somewhere where more than 4 people will read it you colossal coward
---

Ad Hominems are bandied around by both sides so much, and lambasted that I'm pretty sure it's all parody at this point.

Also finding it funny people are coming in and going man this topics full of evil people! When there's only like two alts and Tim Jab saying anything shitty.
---