Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 175: Caution, This Topic Contains

(+) Yeah! (+)

Corrik posted...

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Lol Corrik you literally don't know what you're talking about

Sure I don't.

When is your teaching experience from, again?
---

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Corrik posted...

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Lol Corrik you literally don't know what you're talking about

Sure I don't.

When is your teaching experience from, again?

What?

When as in what years?
---

LapisLazuli posted...

Corrik is uninformed about many things

There's nothing being added to the conversation here that isnt covered by this statement.
---

*Insert Pulp Fiction Video Link Here*
---

Eddv posted...

LapisLazuli posted...

Corrik is uninformed about many things

---

Corrik posted...

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Corrik posted...

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Lol Corrik you literally don't know what you're talking about

Sure I don't.

When is your teaching experience from, again?

What?

When as in what years?

Yes.
---

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Corrik posted...

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Corrik posted...

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Lol Corrik you literally don't know what you're talking about

Sure I don't.

When is your teaching experience from, again?

What?

When as in what years?

Yes.

I thought we covered this before, but I student taught and subbed for a few years. Then I decided the field was not for me and left it for a more preferable job.

Teaching is a landmine job that doesn't pay you enough.

No offense to you, but one of my biggest regrets in life was settling on that degree choice.

(Though teaching has relatively little to do with the subject at hand).

Years wise- something like 08 - 11
---

Corrik posted...

Thus, there is a situation in which you are rendered helpless and why should said parent be held responsible for that?

lol, wtf is this? "why should the parents be held responsible for their kid being a pain the ass"?

i don't know, maybe because they're the parents and they did a crappy job raising the kid?
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

Corrik posted...

Thus, there is a situation in which you are rendered helpless and why should said parent be held responsible for that?

lol, wtf is this? "why should the parents be held responsible for their kid being a pain the ass"?

i don't know, maybe because they're the parents and they did a crappy job raising the kid?

Parenting doesn't always have to do with it. It could though and maybe usually does.

Do we hold the parent responsible if their child burglarizes a home and shoots the home owner? No, we try them as either adults or juveniles.
---

Peace___Frog posted...

dunning kruger effect.

This is the gist of it, really. It always has been.
---

And we were doing so well too

Thanks Lasa and Han.
---

I tried.

I always do.
---

Corrik posted...

Do we hold the parent responsible if their child burglarizes a home and shoots the home owner?

depends on what age the child is. if it's a grown adult, no. if it's a 12 year old you bet your ass people are going to look at the parents and go "how the fuck did they allow their child to do this," though.
---

Eddv posted...

And we were doing so well too

Thanks Lasa and Han.

jakyl was literally asking corrik for his opinions out of the blue in this topic.

i'll stop responding to corrik when everyone else does, but when people like jakyl are still going "CORRIK PLEASE GIVE ME YOUR OPINIONS THEY'RE SO INTERESTING" i'll continue, thank you.
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

Corrik posted...

Do we hold the parent responsible if their child burglarizes a home and shoots the home owner?

depends on what age the child is. if it's a grown adult, no. if it's a 12 year old you bet your ass people are going to look at the parents and go "how the fuck did they allow their child to do this," though.

I said like 14 or older. I said parents should be held accountable to a certain age.
---

Corrik posted...

Do we hold the parent responsible if their child burglarizes a home and shoots the home owner? No, we try them as either adults or juveniles.

Did they use the parent's gun? If so, then I think yes, the parents should be charged. They aren't, but they absolutely should be. People should be held responsible for their weapons (Unless reported stolen).
---

What would you charge them with?
---

Negligence
---

https://twitter.com/NPR/status/998576678363435008

This is fine.
---

I assume this is Neil "Piece of Shit" Gorsuch's doing?
---

Not_an_Owl posted...

https://twitter.com/NPR/status/998576678363435008

This is fine.

Thank fuck.

If this is FINALLY the start of dismantling of the powers Unions have, thank god.

The time had well come past that we don't need Unions anymore.
They long long long stepped their bounds of what they were created to do. Kids aren't dying in mines anymore, there are now labor laws for all this, don't need Unions. Now all Unions do is protect awful (and sometimes dangerous) workers.

Kenri posted...

I assume this is Neil "Piece of Shit" Gorsuch's doing?

More accurate to say it's Mitch McConnell's doing, tbqh.
---

UInstinctGogeta posted...

Not_an_Owl posted...

https://twitter.com/NPR/status/998576678363435008

This is fine.

Thank fuck.

If this is FINALLY the start of dismantling of the powers Unions have, thank god.

The time had well come past that we don't need Unions anymore.
They long long long stepped their bounds of what they were created to do. Kids aren't dying in mines anymore, there are now labor laws for all this, don't need Unions. Now all Unions do is protect awful (and sometimes dangerous) workers.

I do not think it hurts unions, if I saw correctly. I think it is about supporting arbitration over major lawsuits for individuals.
---

Corrik posted...

UInstinctGogeta posted...

Not_an_Owl posted...

https://twitter.com/NPR/status/998576678363435008

This is fine.

Thank fuck.

If this is FINALLY the start of dismantling of the powers Unions have, thank god.

The time had well come past that we don't need Unions anymore.
They long long long stepped their bounds of what they were created to do. Kids aren't dying in mines anymore, there are now labor laws for all this, don't need Unions. Now all Unions do is protect awful (and sometimes dangerous) workers.

I do not think it hurts unions, if I saw correctly. I think it is about supporting arbitration over major lawsuits for individuals.

Damn.... that sucks. Was so hyped to watch Unions power fucking die.

Corrik

I thought we covered this before, but I student taught and subbed for a few years. Then I decided the field was not for me and left it for a more preferable job.

Teaching is a landmine job that doesn't pay you enough.

No offense to you, but one of my biggest regrets in life was settling on that degree choice.

(Though teaching has relatively little to do with the subject at hand).

Years wise- something like 08 - 11

So right before the smartphone boom.

Like I said - you would be surprised. Obviously it doesn't apply to everyone. But even delinquents and truants are very attached to their pocket computers. Everyone wants to stay linked in - take away what a kid wants, they'll do what they need to to get it back.

And Eddv - if you want to complain, at least take me off of ignore instead of doing this baby-fit thing you've been doing for the past two months. You can't pretend to be some paragon of meaningful discussion if you lack the ability to express your problems in a mature manner.
---

UInstinctGogeta posted...

Corrik posted...

UInstinctGogeta posted...

Not_an_Owl posted...

https://twitter.com/NPR/status/998576678363435008

This is fine.

Thank fuck.

If this is FINALLY the start of dismantling of the powers Unions have, thank god.

The time had well come past that we don't need Unions anymore.
They long long long stepped their bounds of what they were created to do. Kids aren't dying in mines anymore, there are now labor laws for all this, don't need Unions. Now all Unions do is protect awful (and sometimes dangerous) workers.

I do not think it hurts unions, if I saw correctly. I think it is about supporting arbitration over major lawsuits for individuals.

Damn.... that sucks. Was so hyped to watch Unions power fucking die.

Unions are good and bad. Kind of are what they are. Blanket removing them would likely be bad.
---

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Corrik

I thought we covered this before, but I student taught and subbed for a few years. Then I decided the field was not for me and left it for a more preferable job.

Teaching is a landmine job that doesn't pay you enough.

No offense to you, but one of my biggest regrets in life was settling on that degree choice.

(Though teaching has relatively little to do with the subject at hand).

Years wise- something like 08 - 11

So right before the smartphone boom.

Like I said - you would be surprised. Obviously it doesn't apply to everyone. But even delinquents and truants are very attached to their pocket computers. Everyone wants to stay linked in - take away what a kid wants, they'll do what they need to to get it back.

And Eddv - if you want to complain, at least take me off of ignore instead of doing this baby-fit thing you've been doing for the past two months. You can't pretend to be some paragon of meaningful discussion if you lack the ability to express your problems in a mature manner.

He was complaining in regards to me, not you.
---

Nah, Eddv got mad at me talking about a game in discord a couple months back and eventually attacked my character in an incredibly rude and vicious way out of nowhere.

Since then, he's complained about me a lot, but also put me on ignore, so I can't even ask why he's actually mad. I really have no idea.
---

Corrik posted...

What would you charge them with?

I don't know, some new law. I think we should start holding gun owners responsible if they don't keep their guns secured.

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Like I said - you would be surprised. Obviously it doesn't apply to everyone. But even delinquents and truants are very attached to their pocket computers. Everyone wants to stay linked in - take away what a kid wants, they'll do what they need to to get it back.

I considered dropping out of school when I was 16. My mom set me straight pretty quick with "No Car"
---

HanOfTheNekos posted...

Nah, Eddv got mad at me talking about a game in discord a couple months back and eventually attacked my character in an incredibly rude and vicious way out of nowhere.

Since then, he's complained about me a lot, but also put me on ignore, so I can't even ask why he's actually mad. I really have no idea.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it, bud.
---

Kenri posted...

I assume this is Neil "Piece of Shit" Gorsuch's doing?

I mean Scalia would have voted the same way most likely.

So really mostly just blame your fellow americans for voting the way they did in 2016
---

Eddv posted...

Kenri posted...

I assume this is Neil "Piece of Shit" Gorsuch's doing?

I mean Scalia would have voted the same way most likely.

So really mostly just blame your fellow americans for voting the way they did in 2016

Wouldn't have mattered if Mitch McConnell wasn't such an obstructionist piece of shit.
---

Yeah but let's assume McConnell as a fixed constant in this scenario.

He only gets away with it because voters didnt care enough to punish the Republican Party for it.

Ergo the responsibility is on the voters.
---

Also, Mitch was elected and re-elected. I know it's easier to blame Kentuckians in this angle than Americans, but either way you look at it big swaths of people put the dominoes in place.
---

Not_an_Owl posted...

Wouldn't have mattered if Mitch McConnell wasn't such an obstructionist piece of shit.

Sure it would. Ruth Ginsberg isn't getting any younger.
---

Eddv posted...

Kenri posted...

I assume this is Neil "Piece of Shit" Gorsuch's doing?

I mean Scalia would have voted the same way most likely.

So really mostly just blame your fellow americans for voting the way they did in 2016

I already do blame my fellow Americans for that, almost constantly.

And Scalia was a real piece of shit too. Gorsuch just inherited his nickname!
---

Dancedreamer posted...

Not_an_Owl posted...

Wouldn't have mattered if Mitch McConnell wasn't such an obstructionist piece of shit.

Sure it would. Ruth Ginsberg isn't getting any younger.

Amen to this...

Really hoping Trump part 2 is what takes her over the edge.

Hopefully Trump costs the Republicans the house, the senate, and congress for the next 16 years. Then we can get a fully liberal supreme court, as well as some good legislation passed that doesn't favor corporations over people. Maybe even force Republicans to rebrand from the corporations first party they've become.
---

Dancedreamer posted...

Hopefully Trump costs the Republicans the house, the senate, and congress for the next 16 years. Then we can get a fully liberal supreme court, as well as some good legislation passed that doesn't favor corporations over people. Maybe even force Republicans to rebrand from the corporations first party they've become.

Keep dreaming....

Feel free to really enjoy life and delusion till November (and especially 2020). I quite look forward to hearing your new whining and excuses when you get trounced again. Always a fun time.

Of course it's a fun time for you. You're a sociopath who values corporations over human beings.
---

Dancedreamer posted...

Of course it's a fun time for you. You're a sociopath who values corporations over human beings.

Winning is fun.... yes.

You should get to experience it again nationally around 2032 or so.

Dancedreamer posted...

Of course it's a fun time for you. You're a sociopath who values corporations over human beings.

Agreeing with the ruling hardly makes anyone a sociopath.
---

UInstinctGogeta posted...

Winning is fun.... yes.

this isn't a sports match, asshole. this is about human beings.
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

UInstinctGogeta posted...

Winning is fun.... yes.

this isn't a sports match, asshole. this is about human beings.

?????
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

UInstinctGogeta posted...

Winning is fun.... yes.

this isn't a sports match, asshole. this is about human beings.

Yes I know.

Only one of the parties hasn't allowed murdering them by the millions I side with that one.

Christ, you people.
---

Both sides arguing are here completely off the wall. Checking out.
---

UInstinctGogeta posted...

You should get to experience it again nationally around 2032 or so. By then you'll probably talk issues and have a platform again.

Keep telling yourself this if it helps. Trump won't win a second term. He barely beat Hillary Clinton. He's not going to beat a candidate with less baggage.
---

Corrik posted...

Both sides arguing are here completely off the wall. Checking out.

now if only we can get MWC to get the fuck out of here we can have a sort of normal politics containment topic again.
---

Dancedreamer posted...

UInstinctGogeta posted...

You should get to experience it again nationally around 2032 or so. By then you'll probably talk issues and have a platform again.

Keep telling yourself this if it helps. Trump won't win a second term. He barely beat Hillary Clinton. He's not going to beat a candidate with less baggage.

Thinking Trump can't win again is dangerous. He very much can.

I doubt his odds are above 50, but above 10? Absolutely.
---