theft!

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
I4NRulez 06/28/19 9:46:06 PM #101:	Good on her. I hope she gets off scott free. If she didn't all that would have happened was she would have been killed and people would be like "OMG we need to figure out how to stop things like this from happening" --- The night brims with defiled scum,and is permeated by their rotten stench. Just think. Now you're all set to hunt and kill to your heart's content. <cite>I4NRulez posted [p:923991776] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote>Good on her. I hope she gets off scott free. If she didn't all that would have happened was she would have been killed and people would be like "OMG we need to figure out how to stop things like this from happening"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ruvan22 06/29/19 1:46:02 PM #102:	The Admiral posted... If you're at the point of turning in your husband's guns because you fear he might kill you, it's probably time to move out and leave him. Did you not read the OP/article? <cite>Ruvan22 posted [p:924014186] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>If you're at the point of turning in your husband's guns because you fear he might kill you, it's probably time to move out and leave him.</quote> Did you not read the OP/article?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#103	Post #103 was unavailable or deleted.
FarFromFields 06/30/19 8:34:41 PM #104:	ArmieBuff posted... There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened. I know this comparison is a stretch, but if I disarm an attacker, it's not considered theft. --- Just because this life ain't easy, doesn't make it bad... <cite>FarFromFields posted [p:924072637] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>ArmieBuff posted...</cite> <quote>There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened.</quote> I know this comparison is a stretch, but if I disarm an attacker, it's not considered theft.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#105	Post #105 was unavailable or deleted.
darkjedilink 07/02/19 8:24:37 AM #106:	ArmieBuff posted... There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened. There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:924136705] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>ArmieBuff posted...</cite> <quote>There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened.</quote> There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ruvan22 07/02/19 10:59:50 AM #107:	darkjedilink posted... ArmieBuff posted... There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened. There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally. Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time. <cite>Ruvan22 posted [p:924141306] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ArmieBuff posted...</cite> <quote>There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened.</quote> There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally.</quote> Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 07/02/19 11:06:52 AM #108:	Ruvan22 posted... darkjedilink posted... ArmieBuff posted... There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened. There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally. Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time. Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:924141562] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ArmieBuff posted...</cite> <quote>There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened.</quote> There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally.</quote> Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time.</quote> Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Matchabuu_ 07/02/19 11:16:37 AM #109:	I4NRulez posted... Good on her. I hope she gets off scott free. If she didn't all that would have happened was she would have been killed and people would be like "OMG we need to figure out how to stop things like this from happening" Yup. --- uwu SW-0239-3946-8686 <cite>_Matchabuu_ posted [p:924141931] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>I4NRulez posted...</cite> <quote>Good on her. I hope she gets off scott free. If she didn't all that would have happened was she would have been killed and people would be like "OMG we need to figure out how to stop things like this from happening"</quote> Yup.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FarFromFields 07/02/19 12:33:04 PM #110:	darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... darkjedilink posted... ArmieBuff posted... There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened. There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally. Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time. Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail. >reading comprehension --- Just because this life ain't easy, doesn't make it bad... <cite>FarFromFields posted [p:924144861] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ArmieBuff posted...</cite> <quote>There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened.</quote> There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally.</quote> Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time.</quote> Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail.</quote> >reading comprehension</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 07/02/19 12:48:15 PM #111:	FarFromFields posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... darkjedilink posted... ArmieBuff posted... There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened. There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally. Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time. Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail. >reading comprehension No, I read it perfectly. I'm trying to figure out how him being released the day after she busted into his house and stole his stuff means she had a right to bust into his house and steal his stuff. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:924145496] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ArmieBuff posted...</cite> <quote>There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened.</quote> There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally.</quote> Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time.</quote> Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail.</quote> >reading comprehension</quote> No, I read it perfectly. I'm trying to figure out how him being released the day after she busted into his house and stole his stuff means she had a right to bust into his house and steal his stuff.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ruvan22 07/02/19 1:13:15 PM #112:	darkjedilink posted... FarFromFields posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... darkjedilink posted... ArmieBuff posted... There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened. There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally. Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time. Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail. >reading comprehension No, I read it perfectly. I'm trying to figure out how him being released the day after she busted into his house and stole his stuff means she had a right to bust into his house and steal his stuff. Because as a rational person, you think "He's detained right now.. but tomorrow he will be released, and has already tried to hurt me.. he could do a lot more with his guns that without them, especially as the guns might not immediately be surrendered". Do you genuinely only operate on "today" mentality? I would imagine you'd have trouble functioning if all you ever thought about is "what's true today". For example, if your driver's license was expiring tomorrow... would you wait till tomorrow to get it renewed? <cite>Ruvan22 posted [p:924146587] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ArmieBuff posted...</cite> <quote>There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened.</quote> There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally.</quote> Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time.</quote> Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail.</quote> >reading comprehension</quote> No, I read it perfectly. I'm trying to figure out how him being released the day after she busted into his house and stole his stuff means she had a right to bust into his house and steal his stuff.</quote> Because as a rational person, you think "He's detained right now.. but tomorrow he will be released, and has already tried to hurt me.. he could do a lot more with his guns that without them, especially as the guns might not immediately be surrendered". Do you genuinely only operate on "today" mentality? I would imagine you'd have trouble functioning if all you ever thought about is "what's true today". For example, if your driver's license was expiring tomorrow... would you wait till tomorrow to get it renewed?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 07/02/19 5:34:57 PM #113:	Ruvan22 posted... darkjedilink posted... FarFromFields posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... darkjedilink posted... ArmieBuff posted... There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened. There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally. Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time. Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail. >reading comprehension No, I read it perfectly. I'm trying to figure out how him being released the day after she busted into his house and stole his stuff means she had a right to bust into his house and steal his stuff. Because as a rational person, you think "He's detained right now.. but tomorrow he will be released, and has already tried to hurt me.. he could do a lot more with his guns that without them, especially as the guns might not immediately be surrendered". Do you genuinely only operate on "today" mentality? I would imagine you'd have trouble functioning if all you ever thought about is "what's true today". For example, if your driver's license was expiring tomorrow... would you wait till tomorrow to get it renewed? Rational people don't break into their ex's house and steal their shit. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:924157764] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ArmieBuff posted...</cite> <quote>There should be kind of exemption for stuff like this when you feel your life or others are threatened.</quote> There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally.</quote> Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time.</quote> Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail.</quote> >reading comprehension</quote> No, I read it perfectly. I'm trying to figure out how him being released the day after she busted into his house and stole his stuff means she had a right to bust into his house and steal his stuff.</quote> Because as a rational person, you think "He's detained right now.. but tomorrow he will be released, and has already tried to hurt me.. he could do a lot more with his guns that without them, especially as the guns might not immediately be surrendered". Do you genuinely only operate on "today" mentality? I would imagine you'd have trouble functioning if all you ever thought about is "what's true today". For example, if your driver's license was expiring tomorrow... would you wait till tomorrow to get it renewed?</quote> Rational people don't break into their ex's house and steal their shit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ving_Rhames 07/02/19 5:46:03 PM #114:	Rational people also know how to read --- the real Irving Rameses https://imgur.com/A7f6F9h <cite>Ving_Rhames posted [p:924158211] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote>Rational people also know how to read</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ruvan22 07/02/19 7:21:40 PM #115:	darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... darkjedilink posted... FarFromFields posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... darkjedilink posted... There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally. Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time. Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail. >reading comprehension No, I read it perfectly. I'm trying to figure out how him being released the day after she busted into his house and stole his stuff means she had a right to bust into his house and steal his stuff. Because as a rational person, you think "He's detained right now.. but tomorrow he will be released, and has already tried to hurt me.. he could do a lot more with his guns that without them, especially as the guns might not immediately be surrendered". Do you genuinely only operate on "today" mentality? I would imagine you'd have trouble functioning if all you ever thought about is "what's true today". For example, if your driver's license was expiring tomorrow... would you wait till tomorrow to get it renewed? Rational people don't break into their ex's house and steal their shit. Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement? <cite>Ruvan22 posted [p:924162109] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> There is no reason for her to feel threatened, though. The dude is literally in jail, and the cops were going to be taking his guns legally.</quote> Again, he was being released the next day (Joseph Irby was spending one day in jail at the time, accused of ramming into her car after a June 14 divorce hearing) and had already rammed her car with his. You genuinely think there "is no reason for to feel threatened"? On top of this the article states "Federal law prohibits people under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing guns, but it's up to local law enforcement to enforce it" - the guns may not have been taken/surrendered for some time.</quote> Yes, I genuinely feel that there is no way to feel threatened by a guy who is in jail.</quote> >reading comprehension</quote> No, I read it perfectly. I'm trying to figure out how him being released the day after she busted into his house and stole his stuff means she had a right to bust into his house and steal his stuff.</quote> Because as a rational person, you think "He's detained right now.. but tomorrow he will be released, and has already tried to hurt me.. he could do a lot more with his guns that without them, especially as the guns might not immediately be surrendered". Do you genuinely only operate on "today" mentality? I would imagine you'd have trouble functioning if all you ever thought about is "what's true today". For example, if your driver's license was expiring tomorrow... would you wait till tomorrow to get it renewed?</quote> Rational people don't break into their ex's house and steal their shit.</quote> Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 07/02/19 8:21:58 PM #116:	Ruvan22 posted... Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement? Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:924164614] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote>Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement?</quote> Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FarFromFields 07/02/19 9:14:54 PM #117:	darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement? Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies. So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you? --- Just because this life ain't easy, doesn't make it bad... <cite>FarFromFields posted [p:924166969] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote>Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement?</quote> Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies.</quote> So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ruvan22 07/03/19 10:50:25 AM #118:	FarFromFields posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement? Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies. So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you? <cite>Ruvan22 posted [p:924187729] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote>Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement?</quote> Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies.</quote> So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you?</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 07/03/19 1:38:01 PM #119:	Ruvan22 posted... FarFromFields posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement? Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies. So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you? At least at that point you could argue he was a threat to her. She's still a multiple felon, and would likely die for breaking into the house of an armed man, but her fear is at least logical at that point. Then again, novel idea - how about, instead of her commiting multiple felonies, she gets the cops to do their job, as the law dictates? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:924194383] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote>Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement?</quote> Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies.</quote> So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you?</quote></quote> At least at that point you could argue he was a threat to her. She's still a multiple felon, and would likely die for breaking into the house of an armed man, but her fear is at least logical at that point. Then again, novel idea - how about, instead of her commiting multiple felonies, she gets the cops to do their job, as the law dictates?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ruvan22 07/03/19 4:36:18 PM #120:	darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... FarFromFields posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement? Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies. So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you? At least at that point you could argue he was a threat to her. She's still a multiple felon, and would likely die for breaking into the house of an armed man, but her fear is at least logical at that point. Then again, novel idea - how about, instead of her commiting multiple felonies, she gets the cops to do their job, as the law dictates? Because (as has been stated many times in this thread), there is often a waiting period, and sometimes guns are never confiscated. You've often advocated being armed and acting before something happens..why don't you apply the same logic here? (getting his guns BEFORE he is armed, especially given past physical attacks on her) <cite>Ruvan22 posted [p:924202281] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote>Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement?</quote> Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies.</quote> So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you?</quote></quote> At least at that point you could argue he was a threat to her. She's still a multiple felon, and would likely die for breaking into the house of an armed man, but her fear is at least logical at that point. Then again, novel idea - how about, instead of her commiting multiple felonies, she gets the cops to do their job, as the law dictates?</quote> Because (as has been stated many times in this thread), there is often a waiting period, and sometimes guns are never confiscated. You've often advocated being armed and acting before something happens..why don't you apply the same logic here? (getting his guns BEFORE he is armed, especially given past physical attacks on her)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 07/03/19 4:59:34 PM #121:	Ruvan22 posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... FarFromFields posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement? Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies. So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you? At least at that point you could argue he was a threat to her. She's still a multiple felon, and would likely die for breaking into the house of an armed man, but her fear is at least logical at that point. Then again, novel idea - how about, instead of her commiting multiple felonies, she gets the cops to do their job, as the law dictates? Because (as has been stated many times in this thread), there is often a waiting period, and sometimes guns are never confiscated. You've often advocated being armed and acting before something happens..why don't you apply the same logic here? (getting his guns BEFORE he is armed, especially given past physical attacks on her) When have I advocating shooting someone before they do anything threatening? I've literally never done that. You're the one advocating shooting someone who literally cannot be a threat. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:924203312] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote>Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement?</quote> Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies.</quote> So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you?</quote></quote> At least at that point you could argue he was a threat to her. She's still a multiple felon, and would likely die for breaking into the house of an armed man, but her fear is at least logical at that point. Then again, novel idea - how about, instead of her commiting multiple felonies, she gets the cops to do their job, as the law dictates?</quote> Because (as has been stated many times in this thread), there is often a waiting period, and sometimes guns are never confiscated. You've often advocated being armed and acting before something happens..why don't you apply the same logic here? (getting his guns BEFORE he is armed, especially given past physical attacks on her)</quote> When have I advocating shooting someone before they do anything threatening? I've literally never done that. You're the one advocating shooting someone who literally cannot be a threat.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ruvan22 07/05/19 1:32:56 AM #122:	darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... FarFromFields posted... darkjedilink posted... Ruvan22 posted... Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement? Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies. So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you? At least at that point you could argue he was a threat to her. She's still a multiple felon, and would likely die for breaking into the house of an armed man, but her fear is at least logical at that point. Then again, novel idea - how about, instead of her commiting multiple felonies, she gets the cops to do their job, as the law dictates? Because (as has been stated many times in this thread), there is often a waiting period, and sometimes guns are never confiscated. You've often advocated being armed and acting before something happens..why don't you apply the same logic here? (getting his guns BEFORE he is armed, especially given past physical attacks on her) When have I advocating shooting someone before they do anything threatening? I've literally never done that. You're the one advocating shooting someone who literally cannot be a threat. In another topic on suspicion activity outside your house. Where did I advocate "shooting someone"? <cite>Ruvan22 posted [p:924265055] in Battered w... [t:77816155]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote>Whether rational people "break into their ex's house and steal their shit." is beside the point, since you were stating you couldn't see why she (or anybody) would feel threatened. Do you still stand by that statement?</quote> Yes, I do, because there is no reason to be so afraid of someone CURRENTLY IN JAIL that you commit multiple felonies.</quote> So if she waited until the next day when he was released, and then broke into his house while he was there, it would somehow make more sense to you?</quote></quote> At least at that point you could argue he was a threat to her. She's still a multiple felon, and would likely die for breaking into the house of an armed man, but her fear is at least logical at that point. Then again, novel idea - how about, instead of her commiting multiple felonies, she gets the cops to do their job, as the law dictates?</quote> Because (as has been stated many times in this thread), there is often a waiting period, and sometimes guns are never confiscated. You've often advocated being armed and acting before something happens..why don't you apply the same logic here? (getting his guns BEFORE he is armed, especially given past physical attacks on her)</quote> When have I advocating shooting someone before they do anything threatening? I've literally never done that. You're the one advocating shooting someone who literally cannot be a threat.</quote> In another topic on suspicion activity outside your house. Where did I advocate "shooting someone"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > Battered wife turns in hubby's guns after he's arrested. She's charged w/ theft! (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Battered wife turns in hubby's guns after he's arrested. She's charged w/ theft!