Poll of the Day > #MeToo ALERT: Hooter Girls complains about new Outfits being 'Too Skimpy'...

(+) Yeah! (+)

VioletMassacre posted...

How is she less "flat" (god how I hate the fat ass trend) than the first one?

Because she is. Also, the 2nd girl doesn't even really have that big of an ass. She's just way more toned. The first girl's looks like flapjacks though. If you're into flapjacks, you do you buddy

VioletMassacre posted...

Ah, the good ol' "because" argument. I'm not even sure we're looking at the same pictures.

Because I have eyes. Clearly you don't

adjl posted...

*Shrug* All I know is that my first thought on seeing her face was that I was looking at a young teenager. Actually considering it leads to the conclusion that a minor wouldn't be working at Hooters and it's probably fine, but that first impression was not at all "that's an adult," even beyond the consideration that 18-year-olds are actually pretty young-looking.

Yet you're the one who thinks it's a Chris Hansen situation.
---

VioletMassacre posted...

Ah, the good ol' "because" argument. I'm not even sure we're looking at the same pictures.

Uhh... you might need glasses or a lot thicker ones if you already have glasses. The first girl's ass is flat as fuck, while the 2nd one is definitely not as flat.
---

Decoy77 posted...

They know exactly what they are getting into when applying for a job there.

But that's the thing: What they were getting into when applying for the job isn't what they're facing now. Nobody should be assuming that somebody who's okay with the old uniform would be okay with a skimpier one, any more than they should be assuming that they'd be okay to work topless.

Decoy77 posted...

If they don't like it, they can leave, they aren't being held by gunpoint to work there.

So you'd be okay with showing up at work tomorrow and being told that you're no longer allowed to wear anything but a Speedo around the office? After all, you aren't being held at gunpoint to work there. Sure, that'd mean you'd be forced to choose between compromising your livelihood and whoring yourself out to a greater extent than you're comfortable doing, but that's fine because you aren't being held at gunpoint, right?

OhhhJa posted...

First off, you can barely see her face in that pic. But looking closely at her mouth, I'm getting the exact opposite. Looks like a lady probably in her 30s judging the crease by her mouth.

Again, I didn't look too closely, that was just my first impression.

---

that is clearly not an age line.

it's a smile line
---

Krazy_Kirby posted...

that is clearly not an age line.

it's a smile line

I don't think anybody should take somebody serious who thinks she's underaged and working at Hooters.
---

Revelation34 posted...

I don't think anybody should take somebody serious who thinks she's underaged and working at Hooters.

adjl posted...

Actually considering it leads to the conclusion that a minor wouldn't be working at Hooters and it's probably fine, but that first impression was not at all "that's an adult," even beyond the consideration that 18-year-olds are actually pretty young-looking.

---