Current Events > Body cam of police shooting that killed 14 year old.

(+) Yeah! (+)

You're the one justifying the killing of innocent bystanders. I'm not the misguided one here.

Sorted that out for you.

Where was the 14 year old in the video?

She isn't seen. She was on the other side of a wall in a dressing room. A bullet went through the wall and hit her. This is why you don't use guns inside a mall

Explain to me a better method to combat an armed suspect in a mall.

Explain to me a better method to combat an armed suspect in a mall.

The reply coming from people who probably skipped the mile in high school is they shouldve manned up and unarmed fought a man who has a woman bloodied down to the ground they describe as minor injuries in this topic

Cops should know martial arts. Them only knowing how to use a gun is why shit like this happens

Then pay more taxes for martial arts training. Because that honestly wouldnt matter. Security, police, military, are all taught, you do try unarmed against someone with a higher level of force/weapon against you

Cops should know martial arts. Them only knowing how to use a gun is why shit like this happens

The reply coming from people who probably skipped the mile in high school is they shouldve manned up and unarmed fought a man who has a woman bloodied down to the ground they describe as minor injuries in this topic

Not true. Police are taught shitty Combat Techniques in the academy and then never again.

There really should be monthly training/seminars with consenquences for not attending or keeping ones skill up.

Yeah, killing this girl was clearly the sensible and safe option

Not true. Police are taught shitty Combat Techniques in the academy and then never again.

There really should be monthly training/seminars with consenquences for not attending or keeping ones skill up to par.

For instance, if you get too fat to perform the techniques you are suspended until further notice.

This I'll argue against. Being effective with martial arts takes a lot ot training.

I mean youre assuming something you dont know. We have training days every other Friday. We have quarterly qualifications with hand to hand tactics and firearms. We have a yearly week long instruction of all that

Yes what I was saying. We get refreshers on SOME of it once a year. They don't wanna pay what it would cost to properly train

Sure is a lot of hindsight posts in this topic. You do realize the cops were operating under the assumption the suspect was armed AND shots were fired, right? What you're suggesting is that the cops should attempt to apprehend an ARMED suspect with their bare hands? Be real.

I think most people would simply suggest he not start blasting immediately at a suspect without a gun in their hands, and then proceed from there...

Also. Sterolizer. Everything you say is a lie.which is why I tried to stop responding to your posts. For example, earlier in this topic you said

I witnessed a tiny female cop actually draw her weapon on a crazy homeless man armed with a f***ing tree branch, a f***ing tree branch. I couldnt even blame her, as she had no other option to protect herself. So I walked over, took the tree branch away and told the guy to scram.

but in 2020 you said the same story, but this time the
cop shot this homeless man several times

A female police officer showed up. She was by herself (big no no) was about 5'3, and fat. The crazy guy tore a small branch off a tree and began swinginh it towards her. She shot him. He lived, but like, it was two to the chest. She also missed a few times and shot through the cafe's window.

The officer was fearing for her life. Because of course she was. What else could she have done? Absolutely nothing. She had no other option but to shoot him. Meanwhile had it been a male officer he would have taken the branch away and told him to get lost. Their wouldn't even have been a report made. Easy stuff.

theres also several inconsistencies in your occupations since 2019

I think most people would simply suggest he not start blasting immediately at a suspect without a gun in their hands, and then proceed from there...

The suspect was supposedly armed.

Supposedly is doing a lot of lifting in this sentence

https://twitter.com/shanermurph/status/1475636394529800195?s=20

minor injuries right? Dragged by her hair, thrown to the ground, look at him slam her head with that thing. Just a measly bike lock?

Not true. It depends on the art. Three months if jiu jitsu from a credible source and you should be able to disarm an untrained perpetrator fairly easily as long as it isnt a gross mismatch like pitting a woman against a man or something.

The sad reality of the matter is that police forces higher both the physical & mentally weak on purpose. Because the city wants sheep it can control, not good cops who will risk their own well being to serve and protect the community. That would just make everyone else look bad and hurt the bottom line.

3 months of true is still more than they are willing to pay for. All my training was done in 6 weeks and that included classroom stuff along with the physical

darkprince45 posted...
https://twitter.com/shanermurph/status/1475636394529800195?s=20

minor injuries right? Dragged by her hair, thrown to the ground, look at him slam her head with that thing. Just a measly bike lock?

I know this brother. It would be out of your own pocket to go get it. I still highly recommend it.

If it's required of the job for training. The job should pay it. And give me the time to do it. I work on average 6 days a week 12.25 hours a day. Not happening

Yea, I feel that. Id still recommend it regardless. Would probably be less than 100 a month, you can go whenever you feel like it.

Even if you just go twice a month, itll all catch up to you eventually.

Brutal, more people should have rushed and tackled this guy before the situation escalated anymore.

The suspect was supposedly armed. The officers called out to the guy to surrender and the suspect attempted to duck behind cover. What you're suggesting is the officers allow the suspect to roam free and potentially harm more people. You say don't go around blasting, but what exactly do you expect an officer to do when an individual is armed with a weapon and has already harmed people?

Looking at the footage prior to the shooting I would say it's justified

Guy was a nut. He was vandalising and pushed someone down the escalators which looked unprovoked

He could of killed the person he was hitting. One swing to the head would of been lights out and he hit the victim multiple times

On top of that the dispatcher was told the guy had a gun. Police entered thinking he was armed and was about to flee

You have to make a quick decision in some cases. Shame about the innocent girl

I feel like you guys twist it to this fit this narrative. As if he knew the girl was there and just started blasting. He shot twice and both hit. One round went through him, bounced off the ground, and into a wall. Thats like nightmare worst case scenario of a life time

As if he knew the girl was there and just started blasting.