Poll of the Day > The Supreme Court is back Oct 3rd

Topic List	Page List: 1
BUMPED2002 10/02/22 10:27:40 AM #1:	Well, in other news, the Supreme Court gets back at it Oct 3rd and up next on the stripping the US Constitutional rights of the American people will be Voting Rights and Affirmative Action clearly in their sights. The super ultra conservative supermajority all the way right SC gets back to abolishing other US Constitutional Freedoms starting tomorrow. Roe v Wade was just a warm up to what's coming. --- SpankageBros <cite>BUMPED2002 posted [p:968434688] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Well, in other news, the Supreme Court gets back at it Oct 3rd and up next on the stripping the US Constitutional rights of the American people will be Voting Rights and Affirmative Action clearly in their sights.The super ultra conservative supermajority all the way right SC gets back to abolishing other US Constitutional Freedoms starting tomorrow.Roe v Wade was just a warm up to what's coming.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 10/02/22 10:41:26 AM #2:	"we want states rights to ban abortion" ehhh, ok "now we want federal abortion ban!" ...... you can't have it both ways, nerds --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:968434882] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>"we want states rights to ban abortion"ehhh, ok"now we want federal abortion ban!"...... you can't have it both ways, nerds</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/02/22 8:55:36 PM #3:	Oh boy wonder what the fascist court will do next. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:968447621] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Oh boy wonder what the fascist court will do next. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 10/02/22 10:35:49 PM #4:	Lokarin posted... "we want states rights to ban abortion" ehhh, ok "now we want federal abortion ban!" ...... you can't have it both ways, nerds You mean the whole "states' rights" thing was just a Trojan Horse used to conceal the true agenda of banning abortion completely? Who could possibly have seen this coming? --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:968449455] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Lokarin posted... </cite><quote>"we want states rights to ban abortion"ehhh, ok"now we want federal abortion ban!"...... you can't have it both ways, nerds</quote>You mean the whole "states' rights" thing was just a Trojan Horse used to conceal the true agenda of banning abortion completely? Who could possibly have seen this coming?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 10/02/22 10:57:24 PM #5:	Lokarin posted... "we want states rights to ban abortion" ehhh, ok "now we want federal abortion ban!" ...... you can't have it both ways, nerds That's what the Supreme Court justices always do. They originally decided gay marriage was a state matter to decide on. Then they said it was a federal matter and states had to fall in line. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:968449803] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Lokarin posted... </cite><quote>"we want states rights to ban abortion"ehhh, ok"now we want federal abortion ban!"...... you can't have it both ways, nerds</quote>That's what the Supreme Court justices always do.They originally decided gay marriage was a state matter to decide on.Then they said it was a federal matter and states had to fall in line.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 10/02/22 11:04:10 PM #6:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... That's what the Supreme Court justices always do. They originally decided gay marriage was a state matter to decide on. Then they said it was a federal matter and states had to fall in line. Tell me you don't understand what's going on without telling me you don't understand what's going on. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:968449932] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite><quote>That's what the Supreme Court justices always do.They originally decided gay marriage was a state matter to decide on.Then they said it was a federal matter and states had to fall in line.</quote>Tell me you don't understand what's going on without telling me you don't understand what's going on.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 10/02/22 11:26:43 PM #7:	adjl posted... Tell me you don't understand what's going on without telling me you don't understand what's going on. Well, since I don't understand why don't you demonstrate that you do by helping me out with that deficiency? --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:968450332] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite><quote>Tell me you don't understand what's going on without telling me you don't understand what's going on.</quote>Well, since I don't understand why don't you demonstrate that you do by helping me out with that deficiency?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VampireCoyote 10/02/22 11:55:27 PM #8:	Boo I was hoping they were gonna cancel that show --- She/her <cite>VampireCoyote posted [p:968450713] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Boo I was hoping they were gonna cancel that show</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/03/22 12:23:16 AM #9:	adjl posted... Tell me you don't understand what's going on without telling me you don't understand what's going on. He knows what is going on, he just agrees with the current course of the illegitimate court. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:968451049] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite><quote>Tell me you don't understand what's going on without telling me you don't understand what's going on.</quote>He knows what is going on, he just agrees with the current course of the illegitimate court. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 10/03/22 1:02:03 AM #10:	BlackScythe0 posted... He knows what is going on, he just agrees with the current course of the illegitimate court. What is it about disagreeing with their rulings that says I approve of the course they're on? --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:968451409] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite><quote>He knows what is going on, he just agrees with the current course of the illegitimate court.</quote>What is it about disagreeing with their rulings that says I approve of the course they're on?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 10/03/22 10:22:00 AM #11:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Well, since I don't understand why don't you demonstrate that you do by helping me out with that deficiency? Well, for starters, it's not the Supreme Court pushing for a federal abortion ban, nor were states' rights actually the basis for overturning Roe v. Wade (as much as many proponents liked to bring them up). On the matter of gay marriage, it wasn't that the Supreme Court decided it was a federal matter (there's ample reason to say anything related to marriage should be handled federally, given how complicated taxes can get if somebody is married in one state but not another, but that's a separate discussion), it's that the constitution guarantees a right to marital privacy that laws against gay marriage violate (the same justification is the basis for protecting interracial marriage and access to contraception). It was, in fact, always a federal matter. Some states just chose to ignore the constitution. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:968456598] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite><quote>Well, since I don't understand why don't you demonstrate that you do by helping me out with that deficiency?</quote>Well, for starters, it's not the Supreme Court pushing for a federal abortion ban, nor were states' rights actually the basis for overturning Roe v. Wade (as much as many proponents liked to bring them up). On the matter of gay marriage, it wasn't that the Supreme Court decided it was a federal matter (there's ample reason to say anything related to marriage should be handled federally, given how complicated taxes can get if somebody is married in one state but not another, but that's a separate discussion), it's that the constitution guarantees a right to marital privacy that laws against gay marriage violate (the same justification is the basis for protecting interracial marriage and access to contraception). It was, in fact, always a federal matter. Some states just chose to ignore the constitution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Z6980 10/03/22 7:08:43 PM #12:	BlackScythe0 posted... He knows what is going on, he just agrees with the current course of the illegitimate court. The Court isn't Illegenmite. The Presidents used official methods to nominate each justice that everyone agreed on. Just because the Court ruled in a way that you don't like doesn't make it illegitimate. Just as how President Biden isn't an illegitimate President because Republicans don't like when he won, using official methods that everyone has agreed upon. They screwed up with Roe v. Wade, but it isn't like they used underhanded methods to do it; they just wrongly viewed that the 14th Amendment doesn't cover abortions. --- "A delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad." -Shigeru Miyamoto <cite>Z6980 posted [p:968467920] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite><quote>He knows what is going on, he just agrees with the current course of the illegitimate court.</quote>The Court isn't Illegenmite. The Presidents used official methods to nominate each justice that everyone agreed on. Just because the Court ruled in a way that you don't like doesn't make it illegitimate. Just as how President Biden isn't an illegitimate President because Republicans don't like when he won, using official methods that everyone has agreed upon.They screwed up with Roe v. Wade, but it isn't like they used underhanded methods to do it; they just wrongly viewed that the 14th Amendment doesn't cover abortions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zenithian_Legend 10/03/22 7:42:03 PM #13:	Hopefully the 19th ammendment is next to go! --- FFRK ID: 24F2 - Tyro DVG <cite>Zenithian_Legend posted [p:968468728] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Hopefully the 19th ammendment is next to go!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 10/03/22 7:43:26 PM #14:	adjl posted... Well, for starters, it's not the Supreme Court pushing for a federal abortion ban, nor were states' rights actually the basis for overturning Roe v. Wade In both regards I never said it was. I expect cases are brought before them and the justices decide based on what the laws say. Just like any court is suppose to. adjl posted... it wasn't that the Supreme Court decided it was a federal matter This is a distinction in characterization. They may not have stated that as their ruling but it is the result. adjl posted... it's that the constitution guarantees a right to marital privacy that laws against gay marriage violate In that case I expect any document asking for marital status would be a violation of privacy as well. Including the complication to taxes that you mentioned. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:968468766] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite><quote>Well, for starters, it's not the Supreme Court pushing for a federal abortion ban, nor were states' rights actually the basis for overturning Roe v. Wade</quote>In both regards I never said it was. I expect cases are brought before them and the justices decide based on what the laws say. Just like any court is suppose to.adjl posted... </cite><quote>it wasn't that the Supreme Court decided it was a federal matter</quote>This is a distinction in characterization. They may not have stated that as their ruling but it is the result.adjl posted... </cite><quote>it's that the constitution guarantees a right to marital privacy that laws against gay marriage violate</quote>In that case I expect any document asking for marital status would be a violation of privacy as well. Including the complication to taxes that you mentioned.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 10/04/22 10:34:12 AM #15:	Zenithian_Legend posted... Hopefully the 19th ammendment is next to go! Nah let's repeal the 21st amendment. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:968480955] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Zenithian_Legend posted...</cite><quote>Hopefully the 19th ammendment is next to go!</quote>Nah let's repeal the 21st amendment.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/04/22 11:56:24 AM #16:	Z6980 posted... The Court isn't Illegenmite. The Presidents used official methods to nominate each justice that everyone agreed on. Just because the Court ruled in a way that you don't like doesn't make it illegitimate. Just as how President Biden isn't an illegitimate President because Republicans don't like when he won, using official methods that everyone has agreed upon. They screwed up with Roe v. Wade, but it isn't like they used underhanded methods to do it; they just wrongly viewed that the 14th Amendment doesn't cover abortions. I can say whatever I want about that horse shit court. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:968482568] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Z6980 posted... </cite><quote>The Court isn't Illegenmite. The Presidents used official methods to nominate each justice that everyone agreed on. Just because the Court ruled in a way that you don't like doesn't make it illegitimate. Just as how President Biden isn't an illegitimate President because Republicans don't like when he won, using official methods that everyone has agreed upon.They screwed up with Roe v. Wade, but it isn't like they used underhanded methods to do it; they just wrongly viewed that the 14th Amendment doesn't cover abortions.</quote>I can say whatever I want about that horse shit court. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 10/04/22 12:56:43 PM #17:	The 13th ammendment could use some adjustment, since prison slavery should be banned... although Arizona did publicly state that if prison slavery was banned their entire economy would collapse --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:968483876] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>The 13th ammendment could use some adjustment, since prison slavery should be banned...although Arizona did publicly state that if prison slavery was banned their entire economy would collapse</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hera 10/04/22 1:25:17 PM #18:	Z6980 posted... The Court isn't Illegenmite. The Presidents used official methods to nominate each justice that everyone agreed on. Just because the Court ruled in a way that you don't like doesn't make it illegitimate. Just as how President Biden isn't an illegitimate President because Republicans don't like when he won, using official methods that everyone has agreed upon. They screwed up with Roe v. Wade, but it isn't like they used underhanded methods to do it; they just wrongly viewed that the 14th Amendment doesn't cover abortions. no the court is illegitimate because you have justices voting against things they said they wouldn't vote against during their confirmation hearings. just like how manchin and sinema are actual Republicans but have a d next to their name. --- send you my love on a wire <cite>hera posted [p:968484568] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Z6980 posted...</cite><quote>The Court isn't Illegenmite. The Presidents used official methods to nominate each justice that everyone agreed on. Just because the Court ruled in a way that you don't like doesn't make it illegitimate. Just as how President Biden isn't an illegitimate President because Republicans don't like when he won, using official methods that everyone has agreed upon.They screwed up with Roe v. Wade, but it isn't like they used underhanded methods to do it; they just wrongly viewed that the 14th Amendment doesn't cover abortions.</quote>nothe court is illegitimate because you have justices voting against things they said they wouldn't vote against during their confirmation hearings.just like how manchin and sinema are actual Republicans but have a d next to their name.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HarbingerofHope 10/04/22 2:11:33 PM #19:	Z6980 posted... The Court isn't Illegenmite. The Presidents used official methods to nominate each justice that everyone agreed on. I guess we're just pretending Obama didn't nominate a judge that Republicans refused to even acknowledge? A nomination was stolen from Obama and given to Trump. The court is illegitimate. --- Ya boy GanonsSpirit <cite>HarbingerofHope posted [p:968485576] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Z6980 posted... </cite><quote>The Court isn't Illegenmite. The Presidents used official methods to nominate each justice that everyone agreed on.</quote>I guess we're just pretending Obama didn't nominate a judge that Republicans refused to even acknowledge? A nomination was stolen from Obama and given to Trump. The court is illegitimate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 10/04/22 2:14:06 PM #20:	hera posted... no the court is illegitimate because you have justices voting against things they said they wouldn't vote against during their confirmation hearings. just like how manchin and sinema are actual Republicans but have a d next to their name. illegitimate adjective Save Word To save this word, you'll need to log in. Log In il le git i mate \| \ i-li-ji-t-mt \ Definition of illegitimate 2a: not sanctioned by law : ILLEGAL Lying is a politician's trait. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:968485633] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>hera posted...</cite><quote>nothe court is illegitimate because you have justices voting against things they said they wouldn't vote against during their confirmation hearings.just like how manchin and sinema are actual Republicans but have a d next to their name.</quote>illegitimate adjectiveSave WordTo save this word, you'll need to log in.Log In il le git i mate \| \ i-li-ji-t-mt \Definition of illegitimate2a: not sanctioned by law : ILLEGALLying is a politician's trait.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 10/04/22 2:15:00 PM #21:	Revelation34 posted... illegitimate adjective Save Word To save this word, you'll need to log in. Log In il le git i mate \| \ i-li-ji-t-mt \ Definition of illegitimate 2a: not sanctioned by law : ILLEGAL Lying is a politician's trait. And what was definition #1 that you rather conspicuously left out? --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:968485660] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite><quote>illegitimate adjectiveSave WordTo save this word, you'll need to log in.Log In il le git i mate \| \ i-li-ji-t-mt \Definition of illegitimate2a: not sanctioned by law : ILLEGALLying is a politician's trait.</quote>And what was definition #1 that you rather conspicuously left out?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zenithian_Legend 10/04/22 2:19:56 PM #22:	Revelation34 posted... Nah let's repeal the 21st amendment. You want to repeal a repeal!? Almost as absurd as my suggestion. --- FFRK ID: 24F2 - Tyro DVG <cite>Zenithian_Legend posted [p:968485802] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite><quote>Nah let's repeal the 21st amendment.</quote>You want to repeal a repeal!? Almost as absurd as my suggestion. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hera 10/04/22 2:33:47 PM #23:	was probably the one covering illegitimate children --- send you my love on a wire <cite>hera posted [p:968486131] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>was probably the one covering illegitimate children</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/04/22 2:40:40 PM #24:	Revelation34 posted... Lying is a politician's trait. A judge isn't supposed to be a politician. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:968486319] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite><quote>Lying is a politician's trait.</quote>A judge isn't supposed to be a politician. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yellow 10/04/22 2:51:28 PM #25:	Well it's clear they are interested in just being Conservative monarchs, overruling things that were incredibly popular soley because they have circumcised dicks and dragging their fanboys back to the stone ages to rationalize it If you think that's bad, wait until they strike down checks against gerrymandering. If you think Democracy is bad now. "Whoops that was unconstitutional too" <cite>Yellow posted [p:968486568] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Well it's clear they are interested in just being Conservative monarchs, overruling things that were incredibly popular soley because they have circumcised dicks and dragging their fanboys back to the stone ages to rationalize itIf you think that's bad, wait until they strike down checks against gerrymandering. If you think Democracy is bad now. "Whoops that was unconstitutional too"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zedonra 10/04/22 5:55:30 PM #26:	Next up, if you're not a homeowner you are not allowed to vote -_- Next up, pay $100 to be able to vote HMM I WONDER WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO WITH THIS DOG WHISTLING SHIT --- Playing: XB3, TotA, MHR:SB, MHW: IB \| MR329+/HR 561+ \| LS/CB/GS/BOW "The imagination is a weapon, those who don't use it, die first" <cite>Zedonra posted [p:968490710] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Next up, if you're not a homeowner you are not allowed to vote -_-Next up, pay $100 to be able to voteHMM I WONDER WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO WITH THIS DOG WHISTLING SHIT</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 10/04/22 6:23:35 PM #27:	Zedonra posted... Next up, if you're not a homeowner you are not allowed to vote -_- Next up, pay $100 to be able to vote HMM I WONDER WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO WITH THIS DOG WHISTLING SHIT since banks own thousands of homes they should get thousands of votes, right? --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:968491314] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Zedonra posted... </cite><quote>Next up, if you're not a homeowner you are not allowed to vote -_-Next up, pay $100 to be able to voteHMM I WONDER WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO WITH THIS DOG WHISTLING SHIT</quote>since banks own thousands of homes they should get thousands of votes, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 10/05/22 12:11:07 AM #28:	adjl posted... And what was definition #1 that you rather conspicuously left out? A bastard. Which is completely irrelevant. BlackScythe0 posted... A judge isn't supposed to be a politician. All judges are politicians since they belong to a political party. When you vote to retain one they either have a D or an R next to their name. For that matter that system should be eliminated since it makes no sense that we can only vote to retain a judge but not vote them in. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:968498114] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted...</cite><quote>And what was definition #1 that you rather conspicuously left out?</quote>A bastard. Which is completely irrelevant. BlackScythe0 posted...</cite><quote>A judge isn't supposed to be a politician. </quote>All judges are politicians since they belong to a political party. When you vote to retain one they either have a D or an R next to their name. For that matter that system should be eliminated since it makes no sense that we can only vote to retain a judge but not vote them in.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/05/22 12:21:06 AM #29:	lol he brings up votes when we have 4 "justices" appointed by presidents that lost the popular vote. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:968498255] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>lol he brings up votes when we have 4 "justices" appointed by presidents that lost the popular vote. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 10/05/22 2:42:26 AM #30:	BlackScythe0 posted... lol he brings up votes when we have 4 "justices" appointed by presidents that lost the popular vote. The Supreme Court judges also have a D or an R by their name. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:968499753] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite><quote>lol he brings up votes when we have 4 "justices" appointed by presidents that lost the popular vote. </quote>The Supreme Court judges also have a D or an R by their name.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GGuirao13 10/05/22 4:45:57 AM #31:	Let me guess; they're going to take away women's voting rights next? --- Donald J. Trump--proof against government intelligence. <cite>GGuirao13 posted [p:968500582] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Let me guess; they're going to take away women's voting rights next?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ZangsBeard 10/05/22 5:33:40 AM #32:	Rev is again just trolling. And hes not even good at it. --- Fear the http://img.pestilenceware.com/Zangulus/Beard.jpg <cite>ZangsBeard posted [p:968500889] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Rev is again just trolling. And hes not even good at it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hera 10/05/22 6:10:11 AM #33:	Revelation34 posted... The Supreme Court judges also have a D or an R by their name. and which letter is hellbent on stripping away human rights, rev which letter --- send you my love on a wire <cite>hera posted [p:968501141] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted...</cite><quote>The Supreme Court judges also have a D or an R by their name.</quote>and which letter is hellbent on stripping away human rights, revwhich letter</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/05/22 2:26:45 PM #34:	GGuirao13 posted... Let me guess; they're going to take away women's voting rights next? I think they are supposed to go after gay marriage and interracial marriage next. Maybe contraception before womens voting rights too. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:968508928] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>GGuirao13 posted... </cite><quote>Let me guess; they're going to take away women's voting rights next?</quote>I think they are supposed to go after gay marriage and interracial marriage next. Maybe contraception before womens voting rights too.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 10/05/22 2:35:47 PM #35:	The specific rulings that they've announced to be on the chopping block are those that protect contraception, gay marriage, and sodomy. Interracial marriage is notably absent from the list, which I'm sure has nothing to do with one of the judges pushing for these changes being a black man married to a white woman. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:968509101] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>The specific rulings that they've announced to be on the chopping block are those that protect contraception, gay marriage, and sodomy. Interracial marriage is notably absent from the list, which I'm sure has nothing to do with one of the judges pushing for these changes being a black man married to a white woman.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 10/05/22 2:59:39 PM #36:	Man the corruption is getting crazy. Trump filed a nonsense claim to get the 11th circuit appeal overturned for no reason. It goes to Thomas who should recuse himself because his wife was one of the leaders of Trumps effort to over throw the constitution and instead he orders the DOJ to respond to a completely nonsense emergency appeal that should be rejected out of hand. It's just on it's face corruption, this court is illegitimate. How long do we need to keep playing soft ball with cheaters? <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:968509622] in The Suprem... [t:80184941]...</cite> <quote>Man the corruption is getting crazy. Trump filed a nonsense claim to get the 11th circuit appeal overturned for no reason. It goes to Thomas who should recuse himself because his wife was one of the leaders of Trumps effort to over throw the constitution and instead he orders the DOJ to respond to a completely nonsense emergency appeal that should be rejected out of hand. It's just on it's face corruption, this court is illegitimate. How long do we need to keep playing soft ball with cheaters? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > The Supreme Court is back Oct 3rd (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > The Supreme Court is back Oct 3rd