Current Events > Are people ACTUALLY upset that Horny-Posting is banned?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
SilvosForever 04/18/24 8:19:54 AM #1:	Are you upset that Horny-Posting is banned? - Results (203 votes) I really don't care 28.08% (57 votes) 57 I'm glad it's gone 19.7% (40 votes) 40 Yes, I'm actually upset about it 52.22% (106 votes) 106 Like......why? There's like a billion porn sites out there and even subreddits to that type of thing? I just don't get it. --- All your favorite RPGs: http://www.youtube.com/user/silvosforever http://i996.photobucket.com/albums/af84/silvosforever/funnygif.gif <cite>SilvosForever posted [p:979974732] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote> Are you upset that Horny-Posting is banned? - Results (203 votes) I really don't care 28.08% (57 votes) 57 I'm glad it's gone 19.7% (40 votes) 40 Yes, I'm actually upset about it 52.22% (106 votes) 106 Show Voting Form Like......why?There's like a billion porn sites out there and even subreddits to that type of thing? I just don't get it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ToteAll 04/18/24 8:20:28 AM #2:	I dunno but it's hilarious. <cite>ToteAll posted [p:979974736] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>I dunno but it's hilarious.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
radical_rhino 04/18/24 8:21:32 AM #3:	Yes, its a slippery slope. --- .____ [____]===0 . . . . Ye olde beating stick. <cite>radical_rhino posted [p:979974751] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>Yes, its a slippery slope. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hyena_Of_Ice 04/18/24 8:22:31 AM #4:	The problem is that the definition is overly broad (and vague) and includes "sexualization" of fictional characters (it's now against the ToU to assert that Samus is hot or sexy) <cite>Hyena_Of_Ice posted [p:979974763] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>The problem is that the definition is overly broad (and vague) and includes "sexualization" of fictional characters (it's now against the ToU to assert that Samus is hot or sexy)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sad_Face 04/18/24 8:28:12 AM #5:	radical_rhino posted... Yes, its a slippery slope. This. What was considered reasonable to discuss 10 years ago on this board is asking for trouble if you attempt to talk about it now. The angle of "hornyposting", I worry about what's considered "horny", and consequently off limits to discuss, expanding. You really want to take this risk with how the board's access is setup? --- https://i.imgur.com/WmIB016.jpg https://i.imgur.com/53FGj6K.gif <cite>Sad_Face posted [p:979974807] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>radical_rhino posted... </cite><quote>Yes, its a slippery slope.</quote>This. What was considered reasonable to discuss 10 years ago on this board is asking for trouble if you attempt to talk about it now. The angle of "hornyposting", I worry about what's considered "horny", and consequently off limits to discuss, expanding. You really want to take this risk with how the board's access is setup? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cjsdowg 04/18/24 8:30:16 AM #6:	I'm upset, not because I liked those posts in fact, I disliked the breeding post intensely. Just the mention sickened me. However with the wide reaching crack down on post I am worried about the site in general. Also I am not holier than thou, a good post with a fine foxgirl lady in it, has been something I have enjoyed personally. But just the framing of these things were very questionable. But at the same time, there could be an over correct . --- Biden is the greatest President ever. <cite>cjsdowg posted [p:979974822] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>I'm upset, not because I liked those posts in fact, I disliked the breeding post intensely. Just the mention sickened me. However with the wide reaching crack down on post I am worried about the site in general. Also I am not holier than thou, a good post with a fine foxgirl lady in it, has been something I have enjoyed personally. But just the framing of these things were very questionable. But at the same time, there could be an over correct . </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheSavageDragon 04/18/24 8:32:18 AM #7:	Hyena_Of_Ice posted... The problem is that the definition is overly broad (and vague) and includes "sexualization" of fictional characters (it's now against the ToU to assert that Samus is hot or sexy) This. I personally care little about the fact those topics are gone despite enjoying their content from time to time. But if you're going to enforce something at least give a clearly defined rule, especially when we're all basically on our last life here with no continues left. It feels deliberate even if it isn't. <cite>TheSavageDragon posted [p:979974841] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>Hyena_Of_Ice posted... </cite><quote>The problem is that the definition is overly broad (and vague) and includes "sexualization" of fictional characters (it's now against the ToU to assert that Samus is hot or sexy)</quote>This. I personally care little about the fact those topics are gone despite enjoying their content from time to time. But if you're going to enforce something at least give a clearly defined rule, especially when we're all basically on our last life here with no continues left.It feels deliberate even if it isn't.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 04/18/24 8:32:19 AM #8:	radical_rhino posted... Yes, its a slippery slope. This I legit don't even know what I am allowed to post anymore. I don't care about "hornyposting" it's that it's clearly more needless censorship inline with destroying the boards/site so they can turn it into one giant ad --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:979974842] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>radical_rhino posted... </cite><quote>Yes, its a slippery slope.</quote>ThisI legit don't even know what I am allowed to post anymore.I don't care about "hornyposting" it's that it's clearly more needless censorship inline with destroying the boards/site so they can turn it into one giant ad </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
R_Jackal 04/18/24 8:33:15 AM #9:	I really honestly don't care, but I really care about vague ill defined rules. <cite>R_Jackal posted [p:979974850] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>I really honestly don't care, but I really care about vague ill defined rules.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
viewmaster_pi 04/18/24 8:35:23 AM #10:	radical_rhino posted... Yes, its a slippery slope. Hyena_Of_Ice posted... The problem is that the definition is overly broad (and vague) and includes "sexualization" of fictional characters (it's now against the ToU to assert that Samus is hot or sexy) these i don't miss the ass topics, or dudes saying shit like "i'd blow her back out," but if i got suspended for drawing a character with cleavage, and it was to "protect" users here (on a private board that can not get new users) that's just absurd, and a further reach than i can measure --- Do the cedar trees still standing next to the ocean still grow? <cite>viewmaster_pi posted [p:979974868] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>radical_rhino posted... </cite><quote>Yes, its a slippery slope.</quote>Hyena_Of_Ice posted... </cite><quote>The problem is that the definition is overly broad (and vague) and includes "sexualization" of fictional characters (it's now against the ToU to assert that Samus is hot or sexy)</quote>thesei don't miss the ass topics, or dudes saying shit like "i'd blow her back out," but if i got suspended for drawing a character with cleavage, and it was to "protect" users here (on a private board that can not get new users) that's just absurd, and a further reach than i can measure </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sufferedphoenix 04/18/24 8:35:28 AM #11:	Makes me wonder if you can even post pics of say ivy from soul calibur. She is far more sexualized than most of the real women posted in certain topics. --- I put my heart and soul into my work and I fear I have lost my mind in the process <cite>Sufferedphoenix posted [p:979974870] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>Makes me wonder if you can even post pics of say ivy from soul calibur. She is far more sexualized than most of the real women posted in certain topics. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CSCA33 04/18/24 8:38:37 AM #12:	viewmaster_pi posted... these i don't miss the ass topics, or dudes saying shit like "i'd blow her back out," but if i got suspended for drawing a character with cleavage, and it was to "protect" users here (on a private board that can not get new users) that's just absurd, and a further reach than i can measure Those drawings definitely violate the TOS --- [click here] pronouns incoming SHE HAS PRONOUNS!>(She/Her)<CHECK OUT my PRONOUNS <cite>CSCA33 posted [p:979974893] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>viewmaster_pi posted... </cite><quote>thesei don't miss the ass topics, or dudes saying shit like "i'd blow her back out," but if i got suspended for drawing a character with cleavage, and it was to "protect" users here (on a private board that can not get new users) that's just absurd, and a further reach than i can measure</quote>Those drawings definitely violate the TOS </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 04/18/24 8:40:03 AM #13:	I'm very glad it's gone. I've always found the spam of "hot girl" topics to be a waste of space. --- (He/Him) I write Naruto Fanfiction. But I am definitely not a furry. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:979974904] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>I'm very glad it's gone. I've always found the spam of "hot girl" topics to be a waste of space. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Goldenguy 04/18/24 8:40:04 AM #14:	I've never cared. In the few times that I actually checked out some of the topics, I really wasn't impressed anyway --- Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand. Ignorance, prejudice, and fear walk hand in hand. <cite>Goldenguy posted [p:979974905] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>I've never cared. In the few times that I actually checked out some of the topics, I really wasn't impressed anyway </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sufferedphoenix 04/18/24 8:42:05 AM #15:	Goldenguy posted... I've never cared. In the few times that I actually checked out some of the topics, I really wasn't impressed anyway I did discover a porn star I really like now in one. I'd view the topic but never contribute or comment on the women. Some of the comments would make me roll my eyes. --- I put my heart and soul into my work and I fear I have lost my mind in the process <cite>Sufferedphoenix posted [p:979974917] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>Goldenguy posted... </cite><quote>I've never cared. In the few times that I actually checked out some of the topics, I really wasn't impressed anyway </quote>I did discover a porn star I really like now in one. I'd view the topic but never contribute or comment on the women. Some of the comments would make me roll my eyes. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
tripleh213 04/18/24 9:14:00 AM #16:	Cant do shit anymore --- Bucks World Champions 2021 PS4 looks great <cite>tripleh213 posted [p:979975231] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>Cant do shit anymore </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spriga 04/18/24 9:17:26 AM #17:	radical_rhino posted... Yes, its a slippery slope. <cite>spriga posted [p:979975273] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>radical_rhino posted... </cite><quote>Yes, its a slippery slope.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jupiter 04/18/24 9:20:45 AM #18:	I honestly didn't mind the hornyposting too much, but I didn't like that some users made it their entire personality. I don't won't necessarily miss hornyposting, but I do think the rule change is a net negative overall. Especially with how broad it is. And that whole thing about commenting on a person's clothes being moddable even if they are fully dressed. --- Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/kid_prodigy23 <cite>Jupiter posted [p:979975308] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>I honestly didn't mind the hornyposting too much, but I didn't like that some users made it their entire personality. I don't won't necessarily miss hornyposting, but I do think the rule change is a net negative overall. Especially with how broad it is. And that whole thing about commenting on a person's clothes being moddable even if they are fully dressed. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MisterPengy 04/18/24 9:41:19 AM #19:	Hyena_Of_Ice posted... (it's now against the ToU to assert that Samus is hot or sexy) Is there an actual Terms of Use or Terms of Service? All I could find was "User Content Moderation - Rules" which was last updated in fucking *2021* --- Bosses are immune to the eat command so it won't be possible to end the final boss fight of the game by eating it. -VeghEsther <cite>MisterPengy posted [p:979975554] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>Hyena_Of_Ice posted... </cite><quote>(it's now against the ToU to assert that Samus is hot or sexy)</quote>Is there an actual Terms of Use or Terms of Service? All I could find was "User Content Moderation - Rules" which was last updated in fucking 2021 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ToteAll 04/18/24 1:36:35 PM #20:	radical_rhino posted... Yes, its a slippery slope. Exactly, if "hornyposting" is allowed, it's a slippery slope towards digital sexual harassment and really opens up new debates about consent, specially considering the mob mentality that surrounds these topics. Good riddance. <cite>ToteAll posted [p:979979060] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>radical_rhino posted... </cite><quote>Yes, its a slippery slope.</quote>Exactly, if "hornyposting" is allowed, it's a slippery slope towards digital sexual harassment and really opens up new debates about consent, specially considering the mob mentality that surrounds these topics.Good riddance.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 04/18/24 1:39:15 PM #21:	ToteAll posted... Exactly, if "hornyposting" is allowed, it's a slippery slope towards digital sexual harassment and really opens up new debates about consent, specially considering the mob mentality that surrounds these topics. Good riddance. I agree about actual sexual explicit posts. But I got warned for posting a joke about the naked chipmunks in the chipmunk movie. So now obvious jokes get the boot too <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:979979099] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>ToteAll posted...</cite><quote>Exactly, if "hornyposting" is allowed, it's a slippery slope towards digital sexual harassment and really opens up new debates about consent, specially considering the mob mentality that surrounds these topics.Good riddance.</quote>I agree about actual sexual explicit posts. But I got warned for posting a joke about the naked chipmunks in the chipmunk movie. So now obvious jokes get the boot too</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TwoDoorPC 04/18/24 1:39:30 PM #22:	there are ppl here with porn addictions and they need help --- This post is brought to you by ExpressVPN <cite>TwoDoorPC posted [p:979979103] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>there are ppl here with porn addictions and they need help </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ToteAll 04/18/24 2:00:49 PM #23:	CruelBuffalo posted... I agree about actual sexual explicit posts. There's a lot of sexually implicit posts too. CruelBuffalo posted... But I got warned for posting a joke about the naked chipmunks in the chipmunk movie. So now obvious jokes get the boot too This is silly tho. <cite>ToteAll posted [p:979979432] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted... </cite><quote>I agree about actual sexual explicit posts.</quote>There's a lot of sexually implicit posts too.CruelBuffalo posted... </cite><quote>But I got warned for posting a joke about the naked chipmunks in the chipmunk movie. So now obvious jokes get the boot too</quote>This is silly tho.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The-19th-Sparta 04/18/24 2:08:00 PM #24:	Im devastated, how else am I going to relieve my feral urges? Now I got to go out into society full of repressed sexual energy. Fandom ruined my life. --- Remembering the EPICNESS one GameFAQs post at a time. <cite>The-19th-Sparta posted [p:979979538] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>Im devastated, how else am I going to relieve my feral urges? Now I got to go out into society full of repressed sexual energy.Fandom ruined my life. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hyena_Of_Ice 04/18/24 5:52:26 PM #25:	MisterPengy posted... Is there an actual Terms of Use or Terms of Service? All I could find was "User Content Moderation - Rules" which was last updated in fucking *2021* No, there is not, and the mods have no idea when it will be updated. I doubt that D_Toast even has any idea. Not to mention that the current ToU is so ridiculously bare bones and literally only a few sentences long. Gamefaqs at one time had a very lengthy ToU (too lengthy, TBH) that covered things like masturbation, ASCII images, and knowingly posting misleading information. Not to mention it gives next to no examples on what Gamefaqs considers to be "offensive" posting-- a word that has almost as subjective a meaning as "political" For example, posting photos of animal feces (even something like a cow patty in a field) is, AFAIK, still against the ToU, but you would have no idea this was the case simply by reading the ToU. A large swathe of the population do not find such photos to be offensive so long as it doesn't appear during dinner conversation. And if we were to ban anything that large percentages of people find offensive while eating, we'd get warned or purged for even acknowledging that bugs/spiders, reptiles, diseases, cuts/burns/injuries/healing scabs, autopsies, manmade pollution, and dirty shoes/socks exist (not to mention food contamination.) It would also be against the ToU to discuss zombies and zombie-related media. <cite>Hyena_Of_Ice posted [p:979983157] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>MisterPengy posted... </cite><quote>Is there an actual Terms of Use or Terms of Service? All I could find was "User Content Moderation - Rules" which was last updated in fucking 2021</quote>No, there is not, and the mods have no idea when it will be updated. I doubt that D_Toast even has any idea. Not to mention that the current ToU is so ridiculously bare bones and literally only a few sentences long. Gamefaqs at one time had a very lengthy ToU (too lengthy, TBH) that covered things like masturbation, ASCII images, and knowingly posting misleading information. Not to mention it gives next to no examples on what Gamefaqs considers to be "offensive" posting-- a word that has almost as subjective a meaning as "political" For example, posting photos of animal feces (even something like a cow patty in a field) is, AFAIK, still against the ToU, but you would have no idea this was the case simply by reading the ToU. A large swathe of the population do not find such photos to be offensive so long as it doesn't appear during dinner conversation. And if we were to ban anything that large percentages of people find offensive while eating, we'd get warned or purged for even acknowledging that bugs/spiders, reptiles, diseases, cuts/burns/injuries/healing scabs, autopsies, manmade pollution, and dirty shoes/socks exist (not to mention food contamination.) It would also be against the ToU to discuss zombies and zombie-related media.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
angeleyes94 04/18/24 6:03:50 PM #26:	The-19th-Sparta posted... Im devastated, how else am I going to relieve my feral urges? Now I got to go out into society full of repressed sexual energy. Fandom ruined my life. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-j6muYHRX90 --- You aren't even really reading my posts; you're just staring at your e-mail client and fondly reminiscing about that hobo you stabbed to death. :P <cite>angeleyes94 posted [p:979983340] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>The-19th-Sparta posted...</cite><quote>Im devastated, how else am I going to relieve my feral urges? Now I got to go out into society full of repressed sexual energy.Fandom ruined my life.</quote>https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-j6muYHRX90 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lord_Shadow 04/18/24 6:09:08 PM #27:	How will be able to discuss Dead or alive beach volleyball under these anti free speech rules --- GT My Lord Shadow "Your Grace, please, the people have surrendered..." "I didn't offer surrender." <cite>Lord_Shadow posted [p:979983420] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>How will be able to discuss Dead or alive beach volleyball under these anti free speech rules </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 04/18/24 6:10:05 PM #28:	I'm more upset by there being no actual metric to decide what is and isn't allowed. a topic full of ass pics that the women themselves uploaded to instagram? who exactly is that offensive to on CE? maybe some individual comments should be modded more often but banning entire topics is an overreaction --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:979983429] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>I'm more upset by there being no actual metric to decide what is and isn't allowed. a topic full of ass pics that the women themselves uploaded to instagram? who exactly is that offensive to on CE?maybe some individual comments should be modded more often but banning entire topics is an overreaction </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mad-Dogg 04/18/24 6:12:26 PM #29:	I'm just not trying to get my account nuked if I ever post another picture of velvet from tales of berseria whenever those "favorite video game females" or "cristina vee is one of my favorite jp dub game actresses" opportunities pop up. The rules definitely got to be more clear on this whole thing. --- GTag:MadDogg730 PSN:lMadDogg NNID:xMadDoggx NS friend code:5313-0564-0819 Go buy cyber shadow like right now. <cite>Mad-Dogg posted [p:979983457] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>I'm just not trying to get my account nuked if I ever post another picture of velvet from tales of berseria whenever those "favorite video game females" or "cristina vee is one of my favorite jp dub game actresses" opportunities pop up. The rules definitely got to be more clear on this whole thing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cynrascal 04/18/24 6:19:01 PM #30:	It is ridiculous. Fandom claimed that it is an attempt to be "inclusive" and gain new blood? What new blood? Most of those folks already built their camp at places like Reddit. --- Asocial, not introverted. Know the difference. Maybe those JRPGs villains were on to something about humanity being trash. <cite>Cynrascal posted [p:979983545] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>It is ridiculous. Fandom claimed that it is an attempt to be "inclusive" and gain new blood? What new blood? Most of those folks already built their camp at places like Reddit. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LightningThief 04/18/24 6:20:33 PM #31:	For the most part I don't care. But if you are looking for someone to blame, look at the user's who made it their desire personality to be horny on the board and posted on the regular. Something like that is going to catch attention. <cite>LightningThief posted [p:979983570] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>For the most part I don't care.But if you are looking for someone to blame, look at the user's who made it their desire personality to be horny on the board and posted on the regular. Something like that is going to catch attention.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Arcanine2009 04/18/24 6:22:26 PM #32:	More upset about the snitches here. --- Less is more. Everything you want, isn't everything you need. <cite>Arcanine2009 posted [p:979983590] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>More upset about the snitches here. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CSCA33 04/18/24 6:22:36 PM #33:	thronedfire2 posted... I'm more upset by there being no actual metric to decide what is and isn't allowed. a topic full of ass pics that the women themselves uploaded to instagram? who exactly is that offensive to on CE? maybe some individual comments should be modded more often but banning entire topics is an overreaction How many days has it been now, and some folks here are still grappling with objectification and oversexualization of women? Its not exactly rocket science, put in the work to understand these concepts and its really not too much to ask of grown adult men. its starting to be embarrassing with asinine rationalizations like saying anime is not real depictions of people and shouldnt count Just because you draw a picture, doesnt mean it is in some other dimension outside of reality and can not exist in our own reality If you want to make an Instagram and post photos of shaking your money maker, thats your prerogative. Men going around collecting all these individuals who are not famous people to make a 500 page collection of adult material is not the same thing as the woman who made her own page --- [click here] pronouns incoming SHE HAS PRONOUNS!>(She/Her)<CHECK OUT my PRONOUNS <cite>CSCA33 posted [p:979983592] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>thronedfire2 posted... </cite><quote>I'm more upset by there being no actual metric to decide what is and isn't allowed. a topic full of ass pics that the women themselves uploaded to instagram? who exactly is that offensive to on CE?maybe some individual comments should be modded more often but banning entire topics is an overreaction</quote>How many days has it been now, and some folks here are still grappling with objectification and oversexualization of women? Its not exactly rocket science, put in the work to understand these concepts and its really not too much to ask of grown adult men.its starting to be embarrassing with asinine rationalizations like saying anime is not real depictions of people and shouldnt count Just because you draw a picture, doesnt mean it is in some other dimension outside of reality and can not exist in our own reality If you want to make an Instagram and post photos of shaking your money maker, thats your prerogative. Men going around collecting all these individuals who are not famous people to make a 500 page collection of adult material is not the same thing as the woman who made her own page </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 04/18/24 6:28:33 PM #34:	CSCA33 posted... How many days has it been now, and some folks here are still grappling with objectification and oversexualization of women? Its not exactly rocket science, put in the work to understand these concepts and its really not too much to ask of grown adult men. its starting to be embarrassing with asinine rationalizations like saying anime is not real depictions of people and shouldnt count Just because you draw a picture, doesnt mean it is in some other dimension outside of reality and can not exist in our own reality If you want to make an Instagram and post photos of shaking your money maker, thats your prerogative. Men going around collecting all these individuals who are not famous people to make a 500 page collection of adult material is not the same thing as the woman who made her own page that's why I said individual posts that go too far should be modded and not entire topics. CE has had plenty of topics about hot men in its history. I don't click on them because I don't like that, but it's not offensive either. and anime portrays men unrealistically and sexualizes them too. I don't know what you're talking about there. and it isn't real so it shouldn't count. but loli should still be banned honestly it kind of sounds like you just want to put 100% of the blame on men/men who post on CE, which in itself is offensive. --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:979983662] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>CSCA33 posted... </cite><quote>How many days has it been now, and some folks here are still grappling with objectification and oversexualization of women? Its not exactly rocket science, put in the work to understand these concepts and its really not too much to ask of grown adult men.its starting to be embarrassing with asinine rationalizations like saying anime is not real depictions of people and shouldnt count Just because you draw a picture, doesnt mean it is in some other dimension outside of reality and can not exist in our own reality If you want to make an Instagram and post photos of shaking your money maker, thats your prerogative. Men going around collecting all these individuals who are not famous people to make a 500 page collection of adult material is not the same thing as the woman who made her own page</quote>that's why I said individual posts that go too far should be modded and not entire topics. CE has had plenty of topics about hot men in its history. I don't click on them because I don't like that, but it's not offensive either. and anime portrays men unrealistically and sexualizes them too. I don't know what you're talking about there. and it isn't real so it shouldn't count. but loli should still be bannedhonestly it kind of sounds like you just want to put 100% of the blame on men/men who post on CE, which in itself is offensive. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ForsakenHermit 04/18/24 6:29:15 PM #35:	A little. I get banning sexualized underage characters that's a no brainer. When it comes to adults I'm fucking sick of people acting like sex negative prudishness is progressive when it's Puritanical bullshit. --- Beware the fanatic! Too often his cure is deadlier by far than the evil he denounces!-Stan Lee RIP Make Arcades Great Again! <cite>ForsakenHermit posted [p:979983676] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>A little.I get banning sexualized underage characters that's a no brainer. When it comes to adults I'm fucking sick of people acting like sex negative prudishness is progressive when it's Puritanical bullshit. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
itcheyness 04/18/24 6:29:48 PM #36:	I'm not really upset about the hornyposting being banned, I am upset about how broad and ill-defined the rules are, since you can not comment on someone's clothing apparently. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/5134d1af.jpg --- Seattle Sounders 1-3-2 5 points 261 Refugee <cite>itcheyness posted [p:979983679] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>I'm not really upset about the hornyposting being banned, I am upset about how broad and ill-defined the rules are, since you can not comment on someone's clothing apparently.https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/5134d1af.jpg </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
viewmaster_pi 04/18/24 6:31:23 PM #37:	CSCA33 posted... If you want to make an Instagram and post photos of shaking your money maker, thats your prerogative. of course instagram models, influencers, camgirls, etc get a handwave from you. i'm sure you think only men are dangerous and nothing else could possibly be responsible for contributing to damaging beauty standards. "thirst trap egirl" is a straight up career path on social media, but nah, dudes and anime are the real problem, especially at gamefaqs dot gamespot dot fandom dot com slash current events --- Do the cedar trees still standing next to the ocean still grow? <cite>viewmaster_pi posted [p:979983693] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>CSCA33 posted... </cite><quote>If you want to make an Instagram and post photos of shaking your money maker, thats your prerogative.</quote>of course instagram models, influencers, camgirls, etc get a handwave from you. i'm sure you think only men are dangerous and nothing else could possibly be responsible for contributing to damaging beauty standards. "thirst trap egirl" is a straight up career path on social media, but nah, dudes and anime are the real problem, especially at gamefaqs dot gamespot dot fandom dot com slash current events </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CSCA33 04/18/24 6:36:25 PM #38:	ForsakenHermit posted... A little. I get banning sexualized underage characters that's a no brainer. When it comes to adults I'm fucking sick of people acting like sex negative prudishness is progressive when it's Puritanical bullshit. This has literally nothing to do with being sex negative, prudish, or puritanical. A public forum does not get to be your personal fap box just because thats what you personally prefer to use it for. Have some dignity dude. Women are supposed to be welcome here, too. Nobody is stopping you from making a chat room where you and your other buddies can do what you want together. --- [click here] pronouns incoming SHE HAS PRONOUNS!>(She/Her)<CHECK OUT my PRONOUNS <cite>CSCA33 posted [p:979983761] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>ForsakenHermit posted... </cite><quote>A little.I get banning sexualized underage characters that's a no brainer. When it comes to adults I'm fucking sick of people acting like sex negative prudishness is progressive when it's Puritanical bullshit.</quote>This has literally nothing to do with being sex negative, prudish, or puritanical. A public forum does not get to be your personal fap box just because thats what you personally prefer to use it for. Have some dignity dude. Women are supposed to be welcome here, too. Nobody is stopping you from making a chat room where you and your other buddies can do what you want together. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
viewmaster_pi 04/18/24 6:39:33 PM #39:	not to mention the amount of women persuing careers in vtuber...ing. guess what? all their models or rigs or avatars or whatever are anime girls showing skin and curves, and that shit's huge right now all over youtube and twitch. but nah, it's waifu threads here that are really causing damage and dangerous messages, because male gaze unless that male gaze can be exploited for money on pay sites, then it's good, according to you --- Do the cedar trees still standing next to the ocean still grow? <cite>viewmaster_pi posted [p:979983812] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>not to mention the amount of women persuing careers in vtuber...ing. guess what? all their models or rigs or avatars or whatever are anime girls showing skin and curves, and that shit's huge right now all over youtube and twitch. but nah, it's waifu threads here that are really causing damage and dangerous messages, because male gazeunless that male gaze can be exploited for money on pay sites, then it's good, according to you </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Baphometa 04/18/24 6:43:10 PM #40:	cjsdowg posted... I'm upset, not because I liked those posts in fact, I disliked the breeding post intensely. Just the mention sickened me. However with the wide reaching crack down on post I am worried about the site in general. Also I am not holier than thou, a good post with a fine foxgirl lady in it, has been something I have enjoyed personally. But just the framing of these things were very questionable. But at the same time, there could be an over correct . This is a good post, IMO. Don't agree with 100%, but speaks to the issues. I think, I hope in a few weeks or so it just won't be a problem. Probably 90% of the issues were just obvious topics that would be well over the line. The other 10% are edge cases and the ones we're seeing now are people purposefully trying to push boundaries. --- He/Them "Am I a butterfly dreaming I'm a man... Or a bowling ball dreaming I'm a plate of sashimi? Never assume that what you see and feel is real!" <cite>Baphometa posted [p:979983867] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>cjsdowg posted... </cite><quote>I'm upset, not because I liked those posts in fact, I disliked the breeding post intensely. Just the mention sickened me. However with the wide reaching crack down on post I am worried about the site in general. Also I am not holier than thou, a good post with a fine foxgirl lady in it, has been something I have enjoyed personally. But just the framing of these things were very questionable. But at the same time, there could be an over correct .</quote>This is a good post, IMO. Don't agree with 100%, but speaks to the issues.I think, I hope in a few weeks or so it just won't be a problem. Probably 90% of the issues were just obvious topics that would be well over the line. The other 10% are edge cases and the ones we're seeing now are people purposefully trying to push boundaries. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ForsakenHermit 04/18/24 6:43:49 PM #41:	CSCA33 posted... This has literally nothing to do with being sex negative, prudish, or puritanical. A public forum does not get to be your personal fap box just because thats what you personally prefer to use it for. Have some dignity dude. Women are supposed to be welcome here, too. Nobody is stopping you from making a chat room where you and your other buddies can do what you want together. I've never used this site as a "fapbox" so you can knock that shit off. It's one thing to ban outright pornography. It's another to say "nothing remotely sexual about women is allowed." And if sexualizing fictional characters offends your sensibilities you need to grow a thicker skin full stop. You support sex negative policies stop acting like you don't. --- Beware the fanatic! Too often his cure is deadlier by far than the evil he denounces!-Stan Lee RIP Make Arcades Great Again! <cite>ForsakenHermit posted [p:979983879] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>CSCA33 posted... </cite><quote>This has literally nothing to do with being sex negative, prudish, or puritanical. A public forum does not get to be your personal fap box just because thats what you personally prefer to use it for. Have some dignity dude. Women are supposed to be welcome here, too. Nobody is stopping you from making a chat room where you and your other buddies can do what you want together.</quote>I've never used this site as a "fapbox" so you can knock that shit off. It's one thing to ban outright pornography. It's another to say "nothing remotely sexual about women is allowed." And if sexualizing fictional characters offends your sensibilities you need to grow a thicker skin full stop. You support sex negative policies stop acting like you don't. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Humble_Novice 04/18/24 6:44:27 PM #42:	I initially read it as Harry Potter. --- Miss what the Current Events board used to be? Then come here to discuss it with us: https://discord.gg/ThGKk5UaK6 <cite>Humble_Novice posted [p:979983887] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>I initially read it as Harry Potter. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
viewmaster_pi 04/18/24 6:46:43 PM #43:	ForsakenHermit posted... You support sex negative policies stop acting like you don't. only if they apply to men, of course. according to her, female sexuality should be celebrated, male sexuality is dangerous. --- Do the cedar trees still standing next to the ocean still grow? <cite>viewmaster_pi posted [p:979983913] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>ForsakenHermit posted... </cite><quote>You support sex negative policies stop acting like you don't.</quote>only if they apply to men, of course. according to her, female sexuality should be celebrated, male sexuality is dangerous. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ForsakenHermit 04/18/24 6:48:55 PM #44:	viewmaster_pi posted... only if they apply to men, of course. according to her, female sexuality should be celebrated, male sexuality is dangerous. Yeah something tells me if someone was sexualizing male video game and anime characters and putting them in speedos they'd call it empowering for female otakus/nerds/geeks etc. --- Beware the fanatic! Too often his cure is deadlier by far than the evil he denounces!-Stan Lee RIP Make Arcades Great Again! <cite>ForsakenHermit posted [p:979983944] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>viewmaster_pi posted... </cite><quote>only if they apply to men, of course. according to her, female sexuality should be celebrated, male sexuality is dangerous.</quote>Yeah something tells me if someone was sexualizing male video game and anime characters and putting them in speedos they'd call it empowering for female otakus/nerds/geeks etc. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#45	Post #45 was unavailable or deleted.
thronedfire2 04/18/24 6:51:31 PM #46:	honestly that account just feels like a troll because I've never seen them post here before the last 1-2 days I wonder if we can find out when the sig got changed to be about pronouns --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:979983972] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>honestly that account just feels like a troll because I've never seen them post here before the last 1-2 daysI wonder if we can find out when the sig got changed to be about pronouns </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 04/18/24 6:52:13 PM #47:	thronedfire2 posted... honestly that account just feels like a troll because I've never seen them post here before the last 1-2 days I wonder if we can find out when the sig got changed to be about pronouns That's on you, she's been here for a grip. --- He/Him http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://i.imgur.com/M8h2ATe.png https://i.imgur.com/6ezFwG1.png <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:979983984] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>thronedfire2 posted... </cite><quote>honestly that account just feels like a troll because I've never seen them post here before the last 1-2 daysI wonder if we can find out when the sig got changed to be about pronouns</quote>That's on you, she's been here for a grip. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 04/18/24 6:53:09 PM #48:	DrizztLink posted... That's on you, she's been here for a grip. I guess I've never seen her post before then but those are still questionable posts --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:979983997] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>DrizztLink posted... </cite><quote>That's on you, she's been here for a grip.</quote>I guess I've never seen her post before thenbut those are still questionable posts </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SugarFlakes 04/18/24 6:56:17 PM #49:	Its not that. The wording of what hornyposting itself is is so vague, you can pretty much get modded for anything. A person can be completely clothed and all you have to say is that person looks nice for it to be considered objectifying according to the wording and its stupid. --- Boop <cite>SugarFlakes posted [p:979984029] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>Its not that. The wording of what hornyposting itself is is so vague, you can pretty much get modded for anything. A person can be completely clothed and all you have to say is that person looks nice for it to be considered objectifying according to the wording and its stupid. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
viewmaster_pi 04/18/24 6:58:19 PM #50:	Baphometa posted... This is a good post, IMO. Don't agree with 100%, but speaks to the issues. I think, I hope in a few weeks or so it just won't be a problem. Probably 90% of the issues were just obvious topics that would be well over the line. The other 10% are edge cases and the ones we're seeing now are people purposefully trying to push boundaries. here's a question for you- and if you simply don't have the answer, that's fine- but i'm an artist, with a small group that enjoys tuning in. some of my characters are rather buxom, but i've had multiple 500-post threads here that were untouched by mods because i followed clear rules about nudity- no nips, no bare ass, nothing down there, obvious, reasonable stuff. are those still the rules? or now is it more strict? no cleavage, no exaggerated proportions? i have never had intentions of posting straight up smut here, but if i should post my drawings elsewhere, that's fine, i'd just like to know what the rules are before i break them without even knowing --- Do the cedar trees still standing next to the ocean still grow? <cite>viewmaster_pi posted [p:979984063] in Are people... [t:80750151]...</cite> <quote>Baphometa posted... </cite><quote>This is a good post, IMO. Don't agree with 100%, but speaks to the issues.I think, I hope in a few weeks or so it just won't be a problem. Probably 90% of the issues were just obvious topics that would be well over the line. The other 10% are edge cases and the ones we're seeing now are people purposefully trying to push boundaries.</quote>here's a question for you- and if you simply don't have the answer, that's fine- but i'm an artist, with a small group that enjoys tuning in. some of my characters are rather buxom, but i've had multiple 500-post threads here that were untouched by mods because i followed clear rules about nudity- no nips, no bare ass, nothing down there, obvious, reasonable stuff. are those still the rules? or now is it more strict? no cleavage, no exaggerated proportions? i have never had intentions of posting straight up smut here, but if i should post my drawings elsewhere, that's fine, i'd just like to know what the rules are before i break them without even knowing </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Are people ACTUALLY upset that Horny-Posting is banned? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Are people ACTUALLY upset that Horny-Posting is banned?