Starmer is trash. Tell me why he's the leader of Labor again?
Starmer is trash. Tell me why he's the leader of Labor again?
Starmer is trash. Tell me why he's the leader of Labor again?
This is just common sense
you may want to calm down because this is ce
This is just common sense so many people can't grasp these days. The woman's ward of the hospital is for biological women. The men's ward is for biological males. Simple.
The woman's ward of the hospital is for biological women.
@SHRlKE
I'm not sure what you mean by that. Trans women are living people - they're as biological as anyone else.They don't see us as people.
In most circumstances, however, a trans woman (as presented in this case) will in fact have many similarities to an assigned female at birth patient (whereas assigned male at birth would apply for trans women, or AFAB and AMAB, respectively). This comes down to their biology in terms of hormones, physical bodies in many or all areas depending, and brain makeup.Yeah, a lot of people don't realize that after a sustained period of HRT, the body behaves a lot like a cis woman's (or the case of T, a cis man's). Which itself isn't really saying much, since there's such an insanely broad amount of variations even within a single sex's biology.
Transphobic bigots continue to be worthless and ridiculously absurd.I continue to run out of ways to tell them to go fuck themselves
https://novaramedia.com/2023/10/04/there-were-no-complaints-about-trans-women-on-hospital-wards-investigation-finds/Hmmm, so there wasn't an actual, legitimate, concern and this is a "solution" to a "problem" created by shitheels.
I don't think I need to spell out what this article says.
Hmmm, so there wasn't an actual, legitimate, concern and this is a "solution" to a "problem" created by shitheels.It's being used (incredibly successfully) by the Tories as a way to move the conversation away from their 20 years of failure
I'm shocked.
Yeah, a lot of people don't realize that after a sustained period of HRT, the body behaves a lot like a cis woman's (or the case of T, a cis man's).I actually just learned about this myself a week or less ago and it's actually really interesting the things that change, for better or worse.
https://novaramedia.com/2023/10/04/there-were-no-complaints-about-trans-women-on-hospital-wards-investigation-finds/And I'll leave this here.
I don't think I need to spell out what this article says.
And I'll leave this here.Why?
It's being used (incredibly successfully) by the Tories as a way to move the conversation away from their 20 years of failure
Same as the Rwanda policy
Someone just unironically linked The Cass Review and then just dipped out.I assumed it was left to illustrate current UK attitudes towards trans issues.
Even if the Cass Review was anything more than a waste of perfectly good time, what the fuck does that have to do with this topic?
Someone just unironically linked The Cass Review and then just dipped out.
Even if the Cass Review was anything more than a waste of perfectly good time, what the fuck does that have to do with this topic?
Why?I suppose I should have elaborated on the link so my bad. My point was that there's a difference between what your average Joe's experience is and what is reported in the media. Dislike the report all you want, both the Conservatives and Labour say they're going to act on it's recommendations.
I assumed it was left to illustrate current UK attitudes towards trans issues.More than a few people seem to think it's legitimate or want to treat it as something worth consideration. This is why they dress up their transphobia as some kind of report in the first place.
I did not detect any implied comment on it.
dislike the report all you wantIt's not a legitimate piece of work. Doesn't matter if you like or dislike it, that's not how science works. It's already been deconstructed as it's numerous flaws and transphobic bias, and the author has even had to walk parts of it back.
More than a few people seem to think it's legitimate or want to treat it as something worth consideration. This is why they dress up their transphobia as some kind of report in the first place.It's standard procedure in UK politics to give this kind of issue to an 'independent' inquiry. It gets it off the table for a long time, and then everyone can say, 'Hey, I'm not being transphobic. We had a proper report done by experts. We're just doing what they said. Do you really want us to ignore our own experts?'.
I continue to run out of ways to tell them to go fuck themselvesWe will just have to get creative, consult the kama sutra if you must
It's standard procedure in UK politics to give this kind of issue to an 'independent' inquiry. It gets it off the table for a long time, and then everyone can say, 'Hey, I'm not being transphobic. We had a proper report done by experts. We're just doing what they said. Do you really want us to ignore our own experts?'.'Dont listen to experts listen to those you voted for. Fyi we'll ignore you're