Lurker > andel

Smashingpmkns posted...

Mf MJ has a multiple easily identifiable Michael Jordan ass silhouette logos of him dancing. He didn't sell albums solely from his dancing but he sure as hell sold out stadiums cuz his dancing made him the full package.

definitely not, he was the top popstar on the planet because he was an amazing singer/vocalist. his dancing was iconic but was just more of an interesting addition, definitely wasn't what made him popular in the least

Sufferedphoneix posted...

Ciggs are like 6 bucks at the most expensive where I live. I smoke pall malls. Which is like 5 bucks and some change.

jesus christ what state do you live in? marlboro's/newport are like 8 bucks with tax in mississippi and i thought they were cheaper or as cheap here as anywhere

Sufferedphoneix posted...

Like 3 bucks. I was shocked I just came back from vacation in Detroit and it wasn't that much more expensive there. Cigarettes though... God damn.

cigarettes are like $8 with tax here and it is one of the cheapest places in the country i think. when i was 18 they were like 2.99 for name brands like marlboro lol

duke was solid last season on both sides of the ball and brought back their veteran qb. clemson hasn't had a good or even serviceable qb since lawrence went pro and honestly even their defense looked rough last year and in the 2nd half tonight

like 3.45 or something when i got gas like friday

being able to dance isn't really anywhere near as impressive as being an amazing singer/vocalist which brown is not. mj didn't sell albums because he could dance lol that shit doesn't matter. brown is a mediocre singer and his popularity isn't even a fraction of what mj had

obv the biggest person in pop by far is taylor swift but she can't be the king of pop. that crown will be unused for now because there isn't currently a worthy successor

catesdb posted...

off-the-cuff class vii rankings

top tier - laura, fie, juna, rean
great tier - emma, jusis, kurt
good tier - machias, sara, alisa, crow, musse, millium, altina
ok tier - gaius, ash, elliott

this is p good as far as just as characters i definitely think gaius and elliot are the most lacking along with probably machias. in combat i really like elliot because his healing/regen craft is super useful, especially in early game. jusis has an op craft but i just rarely tend to use him for whatever reason. when i do my second playthrough of reverie after i replay the crossbell games i will probably focus on using characters i rarely used in the games my other playthroughs.

i definitely have rean/fie/laura top tier for combat and as characters, especially fie. i would have musse in the top tier also because her character arc is really good and interesting to me and i tend to use her in combat a lot. in reverie it is tough towards the end to pick a party because you have like 50 available characters and many of them can be really good and useful

if you like cold steel i def think you will like reverie. kurt and juna both but especially kurt get some early game character development and the new characters in reverie are excellent and quirky and fun while being compelling imo

also cedric is going in an interesting direction imo and he gets a much needed mini chapter in the post game of reverie that was really cool imo

if you go into a rage if someone asks your pronouns you might be a karen. it has never happened to me irl so people that make it seem like some common dystopian loss of christian theocracy is fooling themselves and pining for a world the nation and the courts have rejected in modern america anyway

make sure you check out the true ending in cs4 as it is relevant in reverie

i am a huge legend of heroes trails fan but i loved all the cold steel games and definitely the sky and crossbell games as well. reverie was really phenomenal imo even if it is shorter than the cold steel games

Arti posted...

I don't even know what a Cream Collon is

this. it looks ok but idk what it even is really

https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/8998874/smash-mouth-singer-steve-harwell-son-presley/

according to that article his son got sick and was rushed to hospital and died only a few days later. i can't imagine the death of a child at all, but especially a baby you just got to know who was seemingly healthy and all that happening in just days

UltimaterializerX posted...

No parent should outlive their child. This is awful news.

yeah it really is. apparently the kid was only 6 months old and died from leukemia in '01 and harwell basically started drinking all the time after that. i read an article that said he stepped away from the band in '19 due to being visibly drunk at a show and vaguely threatening fans and had been in assisted living since '21. terrible that he had to shoulder a burden like his only kid dying so young, i don't want to imagine what that could drive a person to do.

astro lounge was also one of the first cd's i ever had.

level 1: ravens

bonus: no

apparently he started drinking all day everyday after his kid died of cancer which is just awful.

dilateDChemist posted...

Honestly, I dont agree with blocking people. Thats just my opinion. The NFL Pickem League on B8 should be all-inclusive, because at the end of the day, its just about football and should be a place where a truce would be the high ground. Maybe allowing someone else to post his picks couldve been a middle-ground here instead of making it you vs him because it made things difficult for you. I also dont agree with giving the reigns to Ulti so Im glad Chris stepped up. I try to look at things from both sides nowadays, empathy goes a long way, but like I said I dont know the whole story between you two and I dont need to know. Im not trying to take sides here despite how this may sound.

Football is just something that brings me and a whole lot of others back to b8, and it pains me to see it causing this much strife.

football is basically what brings me back at all anymore since there are no more contests. i tend to drop in every month or so and lurk because people make good topics about videogames sometimes too or big brother/survivor

Kansas City Chiefs
Atlanta Falcons
Cincinnati Bengals
Jacksonville Jaguars
Minnesota Vikings
New Orleans Saints
San Francisco 49ers
Washington Commanders
Baltimore Ravens
Chicago Bears
Denver Broncos
Philadelphia Eagles
Los Angeles Chargers
Seattle Seahawks
Dallas Cowboys
Buffalo Bills

i think these picks are the same as my picks in the other topic but if not i will go with these

idc who runs the topic as long as i can make the playoffs with a mediocre record and go out in the first or second round of the playoffs like usual

also emerald did a fantastic job the last couple years. there used to be an other picks league i was in but i think it disappeared last year or the year before

this topic is great and is inspiring me to play through zero again when i finish xenoblade 2 since zero and azure are the only ones released in the west i have just played once

both the ys and trails series are right up there with xenoblade as my favorite modern games with the trails series probably my favorite game series of all time. glad they are coming to ps5 tbh. i have played the most recent ones on switch since they seem to run better on it recently and tend to be rarer on switch for whatever reason (at least the crossbell games are)

i only really show up back to b8 for nfl related stuff since there doesn't seem to be a contest anymore. i guess there is still b8 drama like on ce and lue tho

1NfamousACE_2 posted...

if you felt transwomen were women, then you should feel Like they shouldnt have to disclose to their partner that they are transwomen.

so its okay, you cant refute my point, so you run away

this isn't a gotcha. cis women would probably eventually need to disclose stuff like infertility or other issues to a prospective partner. if you are in a relationship you will need to eventually disclose personal aspects about yourself provided your aren't a shady person, that time just isn't usually on a first date.

hell nah i haven't played baseball since middle school and never faced anyone that can throw 90+ anyway, much less with multiple different pitches

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


you showed up shitposting with an obvious alt itt. of course no one is going to take you seriously fyi

demand to be ceo and if they don't give you that position call them all idiotmachines

i heard the mods all have crabs

trc and rancid milk are the only ones i remember

not surprising a giant douche accused of rape would be doing tucker carlson interviews, that seems to be common now

tc doesn't read articles and instead just reads what randos on x say and repeats it without question

gates has done shady stuff like sexually harassing employees so i don't tend to think he is that great. his image has really taken a hit the last few years

Krojen posted...

Buffet just sits around jacking up our car insurance rates and donates those profits to dismantling safety codes in schools and fake charities.

But hey, he eats McDonalds and drinks Coke which is so relatable, we love him.

do you have a link showing this? because i have never heard this and googled each accusation without any results

indica posted...

It's actually pretty accurate. In fact, one of the SEALs involved in taking him out, who wrote a book about it, clearly stated they committed a war crime:

By the authors own admission, bin Laden was wounded but not yet dead when he and his fellow SEAL fired several rounds into his chest. He and his fellow SEAL thus intentionally killed bin Laden while he was otherwise incapacitated by wounds and hors de combat. That was a war crime the war crime of wilful killing.
I imagine some readers will respond by pointing out that bin Laden was already fatally wounded when the SEALs shot him. There are two problems with that response. To begin with, the author is not a doctor; bin Laden might not have actually been fatally wounded. More importantly, though, it makes no difference if he was dying he was still alive when the author and his fellow SEAL shot him, and that is all the war crime of wilful killing requires. That is not a controversial idea; no domestic criminal-law system would consider shooting a person dying of a fatal heart attack to be anything but murder. If your actions deprive someone of even one second of life, you are both the factual and legal cause of their death.
There is no chance, of course, that the two SEALs will ever be prosecuted for killing bin Laden. But that doesnt mean, assuming the authors account is accurate, that what they did was legal. It wasnt it was a war crime, pure and simple.

shooting an enemy combatant is not a war crime and quoting a blog post doesn't mitigate that fact. it's kinda weird that you just copy/pasted that post from a blog and didn't source it tho

warren buffett is a benevolent billionaire. there are very few that aren't shitheels but he is p decent

InfinityMonster posted...

I'm gonna start marking you for harassment if you keep lying about me being some kind of Trump supporter just because you were wrong.

There was no murder fantasy. You're too hyperpartisan to think rationally and logically. Get the dissonance checked.

if you want to get suspended for repeatedly marking nonviolations go for it. the murder fantasy was linked itt, rittenhouse expressing the desire to murder people 15 days before he murdered people. you didn't respond to that because it directly debunks your weird defense of a neonazi killer

InfinityMonster posted...

As I said, get help. I voted for Hillary and Biden.

Nothing I've said has been wrong. Everything you've said is wrong or misinformed and it's pretty clear that you're not operating in good faith by accusing anybody that disagrees with you of being a Trump supporter. This is what being terminally online looks like.

i guess that's why you dropped the line about the murder fantasy eh? stop making things up and stop posting right wing propaganda and maybe you won't get called out for it tbh. it's really not hard to spot a trumper, you all regurgitate the same buzzwords you were indoctrinated to repeat

Tenlaar posted...

Youre getting way too riled up about this and just flinging shit with wild abandon. I think Rittenhouse is a shit awful person too, I just dont think having terrible beliefs or a hero fantasy strip somebody of the right to self defense when they are shown to have been attacked by the evidence in their trial.

expressing a desire to murder people shortly before showing up to a powder keg with a gun and shooting people should absolutely be negligent homicide/manslaughter at the very least. rittenhouse showed up with the express intent of shooting people and his violent past and murder fantasies clearly show that. really weird you would call his murder fantasy a hero fantasy, that's p gross honestly

Razor posted...

I never understood why they killed Bin Laden instead of capturing him. They had him totally cornered , they could have easily taken him into custody and the prestige would have been even more. The whole situation is fishy

this sounds like you believe the qanon line eh?

indica posted...

Yes, capturing him and having him stand trial, if only to show that the most powerful country in the world honors its own judicial system as a standard of human rights. His death is technically a war crime as are all the targeted drone killings.

this is not accurate. judicial process doesn't exist for terrorist enemy combatants. he wasn't a us citizen and he wasn't the leader of a state so assassinating him was absolutely not a war crime.

Tenlaar posted...

Thats not a semantic difference and Im just pointing out that youre going on about the facts while getting some of the facts wrong.

it's absolutely a semantic argument, especially from someone who defends a neo nazi killer and won't comment on him expressing the desire to murder people in cold blood 15 days before he showed up with an illegally obtained gun and gunned down multiple people

InfinityMonster posted...

Lmao, these are straight up delusions at this point. It's like y'all don't even read.

I clearly answered TC's weird gotcha immediately in my OP to AI123 and Torgo where I said people who lie or are straight misinformed about this case are no different than election deniers who also deny reality.

And that somehow turned into me supporting 1/6 and supporting killers?

Get help bro.

at least you stopped pretending you can argue the facts of the case lol next time maybe you shouldn't try and deny the murder fantasy that was extremely well publicized. if you actually watched the trial you would have heard the motion to include that evidence.

you aren't fooling anyone, you are a trump cultist and election denier

Tenlaar posted...

The link in your post says that he was talking about people stealing from a drug store, not protestors. Kind of weird to keep going on about the facts and then post something that shows what youre saying isnt true.

and what was he talking about doing to them? and to be clear you are trying to argue semantics instead of addressing that he expressed a desire to murder people in cold blood 15 days before he showed up to a powder keg with an illegally obtained rifle and gunned down multiple people?

InfinityMonster posted...

"A person may employ deadly force against another, if the person reasonably believes that force is necessary to protect a third-person or one's self from imminent death or great bodily harm, without incurring civil liability for injury to the other. Clark v. Ziedonis, 513 F.2d 79 (1975)."

Are you just not paying attention? They weren't protestors and he attacked the girl because his sister was fighting with her. Why the fuck would some high school brawl where there's another family member involved be used in a murder trial?

a jury will hear the civil case against him and decide. you quoting something you clearly don't understand is irrelevant, the criminal trial has no bearing on the civil trial.

seems like you are ignorant of how character evidence works too. sucker punching a girl unprovoked shows a violent tendency.

i see you didn't respond to the fact that rittenhouse expressed a clear murder fantasy and you were laughably wrong about that. the fact that you didn't even know that basic information means you probably shouldn't comment on the case since you clearly don't understand it. not surprising an election denier and 1/6 insurrection supporter would also support a white nationalist killer though tbf

amazing that trump cultists that think fat donald won in 2020 are also itt lying about easily verifiable information like the well documented rittenhouse murder fantasy. it's easy to shut those types down every time lol

InfinityMonster posted...

I was talking about the criminal trial. And those weren't protestors.

The civil trial will likely not go anywhere because

"A person may employ deadly force against another, if the person reasonably believes that force is necessary to protect a third-person or one's self from imminent death or great bodily harm, without incurring civil liability for injury to the other. Clark v. Ziedonis, 513 F.2d 79 (1975)."

you are ignorant of civil liability. if a jury rules he acted in a way that a reasonable person wouldn't (like showing up after expressing a desire to murder protestors) he will be found liable in a civil case. a judge already threw out his lawyers attempt to dismiss the case.

InfinityMonster posted...

More misinformation. He didn't attack someone unprovoked. His sister and the girl got in fight and he jumped in.

And there was zero evidence of any murder fantasy.

Try going with the facts then.

https://www.wisn.com/article/new-video-appears-to-show-kyle-rittenhouse-before-kenosha-killings/37351942

at least learn the facts before talking about the issue. he threatened to murder protestors 15 days before he murdered protestors.

he attacked the girl unprovoked. only a real piece of shit would sucker punch a girl unprovoked