Current Events > HD Time-synced bodycam video from December 3rd arrest.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Villain posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

There was a news media link with regards to this incident and it can be found here - ( http://www.heraldmailmedia.com/news/local/hagerstown-man-guilty-of-disorderly-conduct-in-police-dispute/article_6f3941d8-163e-11e7-b4f3-5f71e8ff7b41.html ) - The only editing I did to this video was blurring out my social security number when they showed my social security card as well as muting out people's names and phone numbers who had provided them to the police. At various points I flip between Officer Parks' and Officer Molineux's bodycam based on what is going on, especially since Molineux's fell off for a good period of time but they are time synced and nothing is cut out other than the names and phone numbers, as mentioned before. Whatever they gave me a shot of (I think it was Haldol) I had parkinson's like symptoms for like 3 days and could never get comfortable or stop moving. It was horrible. People wonder why I need medical cannabis...well now you know. It keeps crap like this from happening."


last two posts are the video's description since apparently most didn't read it.

This has your attorney's name posted

Dude has literally been on CNN and other news outlets numerous times.
---

Dash_Harber posted...

Bio1590 posted...

I legitimately think he doesn't have any. When his Dawkins account is warned or in Purg he legitimately disappears and always makes a topic his first day back.

I thought so too, but it's weird how randomly, the same posters come in, agree with him, and are never seen again.

What posters are these? Funny you would make a blanket statement without providing any examples.
---

deanshow posted...

He's still going on about this, after his lawyer told him to stop talking about it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki6xi3KReSA

From the get go I said the lawyer said not to talk about anything NOT IN MY VIDEO. People inventing shit because they don't read is someone annoying at times. Also this went to court already so it doesn't matter anymore.
---

DelianSK posted...

Seriously?

Topics (including mine) are getting deleted because DawkinsNumber "doesn't know any better" but yet he gets to keep posting his asinine bullshit.

Is that why he keeps getting warned? *smh* Lying for no reason...
---

JACKBUTTMOMMY posted...

DamageDealerz posted...

There comes a point where mental illness stops becoming an excuse and is used as a crutch.

Pretty much this. It's really sad. He says he knows so much about the English language and following and understanding it, but then relies on marijuana to meditate, says he can't do things in the video (I mean, the self harm is evidence enough that he lacks self-control), calls the police doing their job terrorists (showing a clear lack of understanding of the term and showcasing possible conspiracy theory rhetoric), and so, so much more.

I'm not even gonna make fun of him anymore. Not really sure if I did to begin with, besides asking questions and pointing out flaws in his logic. Having seen all of this video and doing some digging myself now, I truly hope he gets the help he needs. Because, "I have autism," is no excuse for the behavior portrayed. To be quite honest, outside of some of the social issues, I wouldn't even say it's autism or just autism. There are obvious control issues at hand here, in addition to narcissistic tendencies.

Executive functioning issues are common with autism but when you have armchair CE doctors talking you wouldn't think so.
---

Dash_Harber posted...

Cornmuffins posted...

I'm not a suck up, I just think it's wrong to shit on a guy who clearly has some issues to sort out. I don't agree with what he did here and haven't defended it, but to openly mock the guy and make topics gleeful about the shit he's going through is fucked up.

I mean, I started out trying to be helpful, but after the insane amount of hostility I received, I just started laughing at him. Your response is pretty standard, but after three or four topics, it's hard to feel any sympathy for him.

You never tried to be helpful lol.
---

Kitt posted...

Cornmuffins posted...

Maybe you should mind your own business then

The motherfucker posts this shit 24/7 for everyone to see. It's clear that he gets off on other people seeing this stuff about him somehow. Pretty bold to tell someone to "mind their own business" when he's actively going out of his way to put this stuff out there for everybody. After all, you're in this topic too, are you not?

I didn't tell people to mind their own business, I only ask they don't invent shit like morons. Especially shit that is on video or written. The fact modern authoritarians go as far as inventing shit when there is video and written evidence of the contrary and other authoritarians believe it when it is not based in reality is absolutely baffling to me.
---

You know you're completely capable of gathering your posts into a single post or two. Not every post you respond to needs it's own separate post. >_>
---

The great irony is that TC's personality disorder precludes his ability to have insight into why he's in trouble

It's the psychiatric equivalent of Dunning-Kruger. It's possible to have such poor insight about something that you actually lack the capacity to know how inept you are.
---

KeyBlade999 posted...

You know you're completely capable of gathering your posts into a single post or two. Not every post you respond to needs it's own separate post. >_>

GameFAQs has a very shitty system in place for quoting posts spanning multiple pages. It really should start loading entire topics at once rather than individual pages. This would allow a better system. It would also use more resources though so I am sure they are likely doing it to cut bandwidth costs.
---

I'm not sure why anyone is even taking the time to give advice here. As someone who has worked nights at liquor stores I've seen people like TC many times come in and start problems for no reason, just to be an annoyance and the same thing happens every time the cops are called.

Aka cops come, mentally disordered guy starts problems and acts too tough, cop does the usual SMH and has to arrest the guy who's being annoying.

Cut and dry, basic, easy.
---

evil_zombie11 posted...

I'm not sure why anyone is even taking the time to give advice here. As someone who has worked nights at liquor stores I've seen people like TC many times come in and start problems for no reason, just to be an annoyance and the same thing happens every time the cops are called.

Aka cops come, mentally disordered guy starts problems and acts too tough, cop does the usual SMH and has to arrest the guy who's being annoying.

Cut and dry, basic, easy.

You disproved your credibility right there considering I don't even drink. That being said I am assuming you know English? "Am I being detained OR am I free to go" is two options and two options only. When he said "Free to go" all he said was "You're not being detained" NOT "You have to leave" because if he were saying "You have to leave" that would not be FREE to go that would be "You HAVE to go" or "You MUST go". If you are STILL confused then just look up the definition of the word "free" within this context.

Basically the cop didn't know what the words he was using meant and expected others to misunderstand them as he did.
---

Conflict posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

DelianSK posted...

Seriously?

Topics (including mine) are getting deleted because DawkinsNumber "doesn't know any better" but yet he gets to keep posting his asinine bullshit.

Is that why he keeps getting warned? *smh* Lying for no reason...

Let's be frank though. This time you got warned for a mom joke

towards a guy who was trolling which made it even more ironic.
---

This is fucking embarrassing. I'm at a loss.

Like...

Why? Just... why?
---

TC, are you familiar with the term Pyrrhic Victory? Because that is the absolute best case scenario for you at this point.

This is a battle that shouldn't have been fought, with no real purpose and could've been avoided if had you not decided that semantics made you legally immune from punishment and therefore justified you being an annoying thorn in the side of law enforcement seemingly for no reason.

You escalated a situation and are now using third grade level semantics arguments as a legal defense. That's why you're losing.

It's no different than that annoying kid in elementary school who gets really close to you and screams "I'm not touching you!". It's still obnoxious, and it still gets the kid in trouble, even if technically it's accurate.

You were an obnoxious and obstructionist idiot to law enforcement for no legitimate reason. You were asked to leave in a manner that anyone with basic common sense would've interpreted as an order. Just because you're, to quote Bill Clinton, debating "what the meaning of the word "is" is", doesn't mean you've got a real case - because you don't.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

TC, are you familiar with the term Pyrrhic Victory? Because that is the absolute best case scenario for you at this point.

This is a battle that shouldn't have been fought, with no real purpose and could've been avoided if had you not decided that semantics made you legally immune from punishment and therefore justified you being an annoying thorn in the side of law enforcement seemingly for no reason.

You escalated a situation and are now using third grade level semantics arguments as a legal defense. That's why you're losing.

It's no different than that annoying kid in elementary school who gets really close to you and screams "I'm not touching you!". It's still obnoxious, and it still gets the kid in trouble, even if technically it's accurate.

You were an obnoxious and obstructionist idiot to law enforcement for no legitimate reason. You were asked to leave in a manner that anyone with basic common sense would've interpreted as an order. Just because you're, to quote Bill Clinton, debating "what the meaning of the word "is" is", doesn't mean you've got a real case - because you don't.

Not specifically, no. Anyways there was no request to leave until after the left officer threatened and the other office invented a disturbance. He has testified to all of this in a separate court hearing and his testimony will be impeached upon during appeals. That being said, you do not understand words, I do, he did not, I do, free to go doesn't mean "you must go" or "you have to go" it means you have the choice to go if you so wish. Illiteracy in America should be consequential to no one but the illiterate themselves as they cannot blame their inability to comprehend their own word usage on those they state them to.
---

Not specifically, no.

Pyrrhic victory
noun
1.
a victory in which the victor's losses are as great as those of the defeated Also called Cadmean victory

Word Origin
named after Pyrrhus, who defeated the Romans at Asculum in 279 bc but suffered heavy losses

Wikipedia:

A Pyrrhic victory (English pronunciation: peer-ik vik-tree) is a victory that inflicts such a devastating toll on the victor that it is tantamount to defeat. Someone who wins a Pyrrhic victory has been victorious in some way. However, the heavy toll negates any sense of achievement or profit.
---

Don't fight a battle in which the only winning move is not to fight
---

Conflict posted...

What the real headscratcher is why you initially wanted to file a complaint in the first place. Couldn't have been because of Mikash's blunder because that happened after you started asking for the badge numbers.

Was it because he said "oh, he's recording again"? Or that they were supposedly misinformed about the disturbance when you were following that lady because she flicked you off?

Like, this whole thing could've been so easily avoided in many different ways. I get it; your brain couldn't handle that guy not giving you the proper identifier so you could file a complaint, but even that conundrum could've been sidestepped.

It's not a headscratcher at all. He literally started the interaction by making a smartass comment about me recording (my first amendment right). it was escalating and unnecessary.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NU55qVTMj0


^ Might have been butthurt about that, but that's no excuse to start all future interactions by being a prick from the get go, especially as it relates to Constitutionally protected activity.
---

And along with the Pyrrhic Victory analogy, this is the end result:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cutting_off_the_nose_to_spite_the_face

"Cutting off the nose to spite the face" is an expression used to describe a needlessly self-destructive over-reaction to a problem: "Don't cut off your nose to spite your face" is a warning against acting out of pique, or against pursuing revenge in a way that would damage oneself more than the object of one's anger.[1]
---

It's not a headscratcher at all. He literally started the interaction by making a smartass comment about me recording (my first amendment right). it was escalating and unnecessary.

It is not your first amendment right to record someone else without your permission. In your state, consent must be mutual for a recording to occur. But you already knew that and are choosing to ignore it because you're waging a battle against common sense.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

It's not a headscratcher at all. He literally started the interaction by making a smartass comment about me recording (my first amendment right). it was escalating and unnecessary.

It is not your first amendment right to record someone else without your permission. In your state, consent must be mutual for a recording to occur. But you already knew that and are choosing to ignore it because you're waging a battle against common sense.

Incorrect. In my state a reasonable expectation of privacy is required but do go on showing how much you don't know.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

It's not a headscratcher at all. He literally started the interaction by making a smartass comment about me recording (my first amendment right). it was escalating and unnecessary.

It is not your first amendment right to record someone else without your permission. In your state, consent must be mutual for a recording to occur. But you already knew that and are choosing to ignore it because you're waging a battle against common sense.

Incorrect. In my state a reasonable expectation of privacy is required but do go on showing how much you don't know.

Says the guy likely going to jail.
---

http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frmStatutesText.aspx?article=gcj§ion=10-402&ext=html&session=2017RS&tab=subject5

The terms are defined in 10-401.

"(13) (i) “Oral communication” means any conversation or words spoken to or by any person in private conversation."


"private conversation".


Smith Vs. Maryland


http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/442/735.html

"The telephone company, at police request, installed at its central offices a pen register to record the numbers dialed from the telephone at petitioner's home. Prior to his robbery trial, petitioner moved to suppress "all fruits derived from" the pen register. The Maryland trial court denied this motion, holding that the warrantless installation of the pen register did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Petitioner was convicted, and the Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed.


"(a) Application of the Fourth Amendment depends on whether the person invoking its protection can claim a "legitimate expectation of privacy" that has been invaded by government action. This inquiry normally embraces two questions: first, whether the individual has exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy; and second, whether his expectation is one that society is prepared to recognize as "reasonable." Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 . Pp. 739-741."


When in public or earshot of a location that is openly accessible to the public you do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OU5Tij2dtHU


The sheriff's office validates my claims over and over in this phone call.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

It's not a headscratcher at all. He literally started the interaction by making a smartass comment about me recording (my first amendment right). it was escalating and unnecessary.

It is not your first amendment right to record someone else without your permission. In your state, consent must be mutual for a recording to occur. But you already knew that and are choosing to ignore it because you're waging a battle against common sense.

Incorrect. In my state a reasonable expectation of privacy is required but do go on showing how much you don't know.

Says the guy likely going to jail.

Incorrect. If it was likely it would have happened already. Anyways, stay on topic and do not deflect when you have no argument or you are wasting my time.
---

Dawkins, I highly suggest you watch the movie WarGames

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WarGames#Influence

This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios. WOPR obtains the missile code, but before launching, it cycles through all the nuclear war scenarios it has devised, finding they, too, all result in stalemates. Having discovered the concept of Mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play."

You could've won this battle by not fighting it.
---

Conflict posted...

Well, think about the situation you're in because you wanted to file a complaint over the cop making a smartass comment.

Was it worth it?

irrelevant. Also, since it's ongoing and has not reached any conclusion that is not even a question capable of being answered.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

Dawkins, I highly suggest you watch the movie WarGames

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WarGames#Influence

This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios. WOPR obtains the missile code, but before launching, it cycles through all the nuclear war scenarios it has devised, finding they, too, all result in stalemates. Having discovered the concept of Mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play."

You could've won this battle by not fighting it.

I don't watch movies or TV. For good reason. That way I don't go getting ideas from fictional movies.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Bio1590 posted...

I legitimately think he doesn't have any. When his Dawkins account is warned or in Purg he legitimately disappears and always makes a topic his first day back.

I thought so too, but it's weird how randomly, the same posters come in, agree with him, and are never seen again.

What posters are these? Funny you would make a blanket statement without providing any examples.

I don't have any off-hand. I may be wrong. No way to tell though, since unlike some people, I don't record every single thing that happens in my life on my cellphone.

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Bio1590 posted...

I legitimately think he doesn't have any. When his Dawkins account is warned or in Purg he legitimately disappears and always makes a topic his first day back.

I thought so too, but it's weird how randomly, the same posters come in, agree with him, and are never seen again.

What posters are these? Funny you would make a blanket statement without providing any examples.

I don't have any off-hand. I may be wrong. No way to tell though, since unlike some people, I don't record every single thing that happens in my life on my cellphone.

We are talking about GameFAQs. You would think you would have at least one example lined up.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Bio1590 posted...

I legitimately think he doesn't have any. When his Dawkins account is warned or in Purg he legitimately disappears and always makes a topic his first day back.

I thought so too, but it's weird how randomly, the same posters come in, agree with him, and are never seen again.

What posters are these? Funny you would make a blanket statement without providing any examples.

I don't have any off-hand. I may be wrong. No way to tell though, since unlike some people, I don't record every single thing that happens in my life on my cellphone.

We are talking about GameFAQs. You would think you would have at least one example lined up.

How? You locked and purged all the topics you posted.

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Bio1590 posted...

I legitimately think he doesn't have any. When his Dawkins account is warned or in Purg he legitimately disappears and always makes a topic his first day back.

I thought so too, but it's weird how randomly, the same posters come in, agree with him, and are never seen again.

What posters are these? Funny you would make a blanket statement without providing any examples.

I don't have any off-hand. I may be wrong. No way to tell though, since unlike some people, I don't record every single thing that happens in my life on my cellphone.

We are talking about GameFAQs. You would think you would have at least one example lined up.

How? You locked and purged all the topics you posted.

Actually the mods locked them. I have locked not one topic. I actually even got warned for bitching about them (RaptorLC) locking them. I also cannot "purge" topics.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Bio1590 posted...

I legitimately think he doesn't have any. When his Dawkins account is warned or in Purg he legitimately disappears and always makes a topic his first day back.

I thought so too, but it's weird how randomly, the same posters come in, agree with him, and are never seen again.

What posters are these? Funny you would make a blanket statement without providing any examples.

I don't have any off-hand. I may be wrong. No way to tell though, since unlike some people, I don't record every single thing that happens in my life on my cellphone.

We are talking about GameFAQs. You would think you would have at least one example lined up.

How? You locked and purged all the topics you posted.

Actually the mods locked them. I have locked not one topic. I actually even got warned for bitching about them (RaptorLC) locking them. I also cannot "purge" topics.

I thought it was pretty clear that by "lock and purge" I was saying "the topics are locked and then go into purge". Either way though, I still can't bring up topics that don't exist anymore.

Dash_Harber posted...

I thought it was pretty clear that by "lock and purge" I was saying "the topics are locked and then go into purge". Either way though, I still can't bring up topics that don't exist anymore.

But you can bring up examples you don't even know about? You were making that claim up by the way. Literally the only person I see doing what you claim is Hoth and you know we are not the same.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

I thought it was pretty clear that by "lock and purge" I was saying "the topics are locked and then go into purge". Either way though, I still can't bring up topics that don't exist anymore.

But you can bring up examples you don't even know about? You were making that claim up by the way.

What ... ? The buses don't go where you are, do they? You realize this is the internet right? Maybe you should lay off the Law & Order reruns.

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

I thought it was pretty clear that by "lock and purge" I was saying "the topics are locked and then go into purge". Either way though, I still can't bring up topics that don't exist anymore.

But you can bring up examples you don't even know about? You were making that claim up by the way.

What ... ? The buses don't go where you are, do they? You realize this is the internet right? Maybe you should lay off the Law & Order reruns.

I am saying no one other than Hoth does what you claim. I have no alts. This place is not worth my time to make those.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

I thought it was pretty clear that by "lock and purge" I was saying "the topics are locked and then go into purge". Either way though, I still can't bring up topics that don't exist anymore.

But you can bring up examples you don't even know about? You were making that claim up by the way.

What ... ? The buses don't go where you are, do they? You realize this is the internet right? Maybe you should lay off the Law & Order reruns.

I am saying no one other than Hoth does what you claim. I have no alts. This place is not worth my time to make those.

What part of "I may be wrong" are you having trouble understanding?

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

I thought it was pretty clear that by "lock and purge" I was saying "the topics are locked and then go into purge". Either way though, I still can't bring up topics that don't exist anymore.

But you can bring up examples you don't even know about? You were making that claim up by the way.

What ... ? The buses don't go where you are, do they? You realize this is the internet right? Maybe you should lay off the Law & Order reruns.

I am saying no one other than Hoth does what you claim. I have no alts. This place is not worth my time to make those.

What part of "I may be wrong" are you having trouble understanding?

I understood it, I am clarifying that you are wrong.
---

Jesus Christ someone fucking ban him already.
---

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/55949375.jpg
---

Forgot what topic I was in.
---

Lol
---

What's this doing down here? Up.

Squader what is your end-game here? What are you hoping to achieve? Are you hoping to not be evicted and/or go to prison? Are you trying to achieve changes to the legal systems that you're now caught in? I am just trying to see how you've thought things through here.
---

I wonder what Squaders family thinks about this.
---

DirkDiggles posted...

I wonder what Squaders family thinks about this.

My father is locked up for being insane and my aunt stabbed a girl in the throat when she was young for bullying her. Most others I don't really know well or are dead. What do you think they think? You think this shit started with me? LMAO
---

By that logic, your daughter will follow in your path. Nice.
---