Current Events > HD Time-synced bodycam video from December 3rd arrest.

(+) Yeah! (+)

TC, after watching a small chunk of that I hope you get the professional help you need.

Someone like you is going to have a real hard time in prison.
---

Akagami_Shanks posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Akagami_Shanks posted...

-Gavirulax- posted...

Uh, I can't say I understand why the people at the end of the video got in trouble, at all.

he was making a scene, just like Squader, and even took off his jacket after saying "make me", if that isn't escalating the situation I don't know what is

Well the better question is why they were telling him to leave the area to begin with considering his girlfriend lived there and he hadn't actually done anything. They can't just go around telling people to leave whenever they feel like it. That's the crap they don't get and I will make sure they find out before all is said and done.

Then you and him can contest that during your criminal trial and see how much of the law you know

"Then you can go in front of an equally redneck lawyer turned judge and expect to get a fair trial even though the rest of the state doesn't act like the Constitution doesn't exist but here they do.".
---

then appeal it, get denied in the appellate court, and appeal it again
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

The officer agreed to this statement in court while I cross-examined him

Wait....you defended yourself?
---

This just keeps getting better and better.
---

Akagami_Shanks posted...

then appeal it, get denied in the appellate court, and appeal it again

Obviously, shit just takes forever. Usually it only takes 1 appeal to fix the local fuck-ups.
---

1NfamousACE_2 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

The officer agreed to this statement in court while I cross-examined him

Wait....you defended yourself?

No, I had an eviction hearing and they testified. I defended myself in that and used the opportunity to do what my attorney should have done days ago. They didn't give him the bodycam until the last minute though so he was not at all prepared.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Akagami_Shanks posted...

then appeal it, get denied in the appellate court, and appeal it again

Obviously, shit just takes forever. Usually it only takes 1 appeal to fix the local fuck-ups.

No need to be so hard on yourself.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

And again, you are overconfident based exclusively on your supposed reading ability.

No "supposed" to it. It is important to properly understand what one is reading. I can do that better than most and this has been factually proven. I also figured as much prior to it being factually proven after noticing for much of my life that people have no clue what the fuck they are reading more times than one would expect.

It is most definitely "supposed." What you have is a test in which you scored within a very high percentile. Taking that result and assuming you are always right about something on the sole basis that you were the person interpreting the information is being classically overconfident.
---

Dragonblade01 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

And again, you are overconfident based exclusively on your supposed reading ability.

No "supposed" to it. It is important to properly understand what one is reading. I can do that better than most and this has been factually proven. I also figured as much prior to it being factually proven after noticing for much of my life that people have no clue what the fuck they are reading more times than one would expect.

It is most definitely "supposed." What you have is a test in which you scored within a very high percentile. Taking that result and assuming you are always right about something on the sole basis that you were the person interpreting the information is being classically overconfident.

If my sentence comprehension tested in the 97th percentile just recently here in January, and I have been WTFing my whole life at how people comprehend shit, and if I am in the 97th percentile (that roughly means out of every 100 people I comprehend what I read better than all but 3 of them) then what does that tell you? let me remind you the average IQ in the US is only 98, not 100. The location with the highest average IQ is Hong Kong with an average IQ of 108. Taking all of this information into effect it becomes more likely that 3 out of 100 comprehending better becomes less than that (however less that may be, if it goes along with total IQ [not saying it does] then that would be 1 out of every 100 or less.) It makes a lot of sense honestly. I always go back and re-read just in case but no if I am reading incorrectly then it should be simple enough to explain the actual meaning but if one cannot then it means it is not likely that person is correct, however there is always the fallacy fallacy.
---

Your IQ is under 100 xsquader.
---

Tc you need to drop this and get help. If you act like this in jail you are going to be killed or put into isolation permanently. You know how the stereotype is a nut job babbling to themselves incoherently and smearing feces over the wall? That's gonna become you if you don't come to terms with reality.
---

lmao what a loser!
---

Can someone turn the part where he smashes his face into the ground into a gif?
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

And again, you are overconfident based exclusively on your supposed reading ability.

No "supposed" to it. It is important to properly understand what one is reading. I can do that better than most and this has been factually proven. I also figured as much prior to it being factually proven after noticing for much of my life that people have no clue what the fuck they are reading more times than one would expect.

It is most definitely "supposed." What you have is a test in which you scored within a very high percentile. Taking that result and assuming you are always right about something on the sole basis that you were the person interpreting the information is being classically overconfident.

If my sentence comprehension tested in the 97th percentile just recently here in January, and I have been WTFing my whole life at how people comprehend shit, and if I am in the 97th percentile (that roughly means out of every 100 people I comprehend what I read better than all but 3 of them) then what does that tell you? let me remind you the average IQ in the US is only 98, not 100. The location with the highest average IQ is Hong Kong with an average IQ of 108. Taking all of this information into effect it becomes more likely that 3 out of 100 comprehending better becomes less than that (however less that may be, if it goes along with total IQ [not saying it does] then that would be 1 out of every 100 or less.) It makes a lot of sense honestly. I always go back and re-read just in case but no if I am reading incorrectly then it should be simple enough to explain the actual meaning but if one cannot then it means it is not likely that person is correct, however there is always the fallacy fallacy.

I can't help but picture him reciting this in the courtroom.
---

Tc you will literally be the worst human being on this board if you get two innocent cops fired or reprimanded because of your fucking temper tantrum throwing Baby Huey ass.

Make whatever stupid fucking snarrky remark you want and think you're witty. You're not. You're a goddam burden on society, and it brings me great joy to know you will be safely removed from my society and placed where you belong: in a cage, like a fucking animal.

The saddest part about all this is how you just won't stop and keep firing ba c k at people. Like, you really think you're "winning" don't you? Someone makes a cracked about you going to prison, you "correct" them in the most asinine way possible. Jokes on you, inmate. There's a reason we're ignorant of prison life: normal human beings font go there. Normal people don't have a meltdown temper tantrum, kick their own ass, and face decades there.

Oh and your "music" fucking sucks. No wonder you're homeless, get a fucking job, property.

Funny, this is actually what I think of when I think of a CEman. Suspicions confirmed.
---

I hope after his cellmate is, um, "done" with him he says "you're free to leave" every time XD

I'm not wrong, literally everyone else is wrong!
---

Mmmmlibtears posted...

Tc you will literally be the worst human being on this board if you get two innocent cops fired or reprimanded because of your fucking temper tantrum throwing Baby Huey ass.

Make whatever stupid fucking snarrky remark you want and think you're witty. You're not. You're a goddam burden on society, and it brings me great joy to know you will be safely removed from my society and placed where you belong: in a cage, like a fucking animal.

The saddest part about all this is how you just won't stop and keep firing ba c k at people. Like, you really think you're "winning" don't you? Someone makes a cracked about you going to prison, you "correct" them in the most asinine way possible. Jokes on you, inmate. There's a reason we're ignorant of prison life: normal human beings font go there. Normal people don't have a meltdown temper tantrum, kick their own ass, and face decades there.

Nice sentence fragments. You remind me of this study. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand . I notice the English abilities of the more extreme conservatives seem to suffer quite often. You very often see conservatives doing things like using "you're" and "your" wrong as well as just using our language in a manner that shows a strong misunderstanding of it in general.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Mmmmlibtears posted...

Tc you will literally be the worst human being on this board if you get two innocent cops fired or reprimanded because of your fucking temper tantrum throwing Baby Huey ass.

Make whatever stupid fucking snarrky remark you want and think you're witty. You're not. You're a goddam burden on society, and it brings me great joy to know you will be safely removed from my society and placed where you belong: in a cage, like a fucking animal.

The saddest part about all this is how you just won't stop and keep firing ba c k at people. Like, you really think you're "winning" don't you? Someone makes a cracked about you going to prison, you "correct" them in the most asinine way possible. Jokes on you, inmate. There's a reason we're ignorant of prison life: normal human beings font go there. Normal people don't have a meltdown temper tantrum, kick their own ass, and face decades there.

Nice sentence fragments.

Whatever, property. You think you're so fucking smart huh? Pretty arrogant for a homeless, unemployed, unbalanced felon who cannot even take care of themselves. Literally your only use on this earth is filling quotas lmfao.
Like I'm gonna bother with spellchecker to address a fucking piece of property lol.
It's okay squad, prison is full of innocent men, armchair lawyers, and intelligent people. You'll fit right in.

>superior intellect and reading comprehension
>can't figure out how to lodge a complaint against a police officer

Xsquader, everyone

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

If my sentence comprehension tested in the 97th percentile just recently here in January, and I have been WTFing my whole life at how people comprehend shit, and if I am in the 97th percentile (that roughly means out of every 100 people I comprehend what I read better than all but 3 of them) then what does that tell you?

It tells me hat you already felt like you were right from the beginning and gladly used the test results as affirmation that you must be right; resulting in, as I said, overconfidence.
---

Dragonblade01 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

If my sentence comprehension tested in the 97th percentile just recently here in January, and I have been WTFing my whole life at how people comprehend shit, and if I am in the 97th percentile (that roughly means out of every 100 people I comprehend what I read better than all but 3 of them) then what does that tell you?

It tells me hat you already felt like you were right from the beginning and gladly used the test results as affirmation that you must be right; resulting in, as I said, overconfidence.

I was right though and the officer testified to that in court.
---

treewojima posted...

>superior intellect and reading comprehension
>can't figure out how to lodge a complaint against a police officer

Xsquader, everyone

You cannot complain without an identifier. Only one officer's name was on that police report. Go figure it would be the one that actually gave it up to begin with.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

If my sentence comprehension tested in the 97th percentile just recently here in January, and I have been WTFing my whole life at how people comprehend shit, and if I am in the 97th percentile (that roughly means out of every 100 people I comprehend what I read better than all but 3 of them) then what does that tell you?

It tells me hat you already felt like you were right from the beginning and gladly used the test results as affirmation that you must be right; resulting in, as I said, overconfidence.

I was right though and the officer testified to that in court.

I give it about 4 nights before your cellmate is sick to death of hearing that and just beats the ever loving shit out of you.
Post that footage, plz

I also asked the officer on the stand if he was familiar with the first amendment. He said "Yeah, that's the one that lets you say whatever you want to me" and I then asked "Does it grant citizens the right to petition the Government to redress grievances?" and he said "Not to my knowledge."
---

Why do you insist on posting topics?

Everyone ridicules you. The ones that actually try to offer serious advice? Well, they're wrong and you're right. The police who are doing their jobs? They're wrong and you're right. The lawyer representing you? He's wrong and you're right. The judge? Unqualified for sure. Your inmates when you meet them? Definitely not right.

At first I thought most were correct saying medication is needed. Now I think you're beyond help. You enjoy attention and have convinced the most important person, yourself, that you know everything and are always right.

Dangerous combo. Life will be tough.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

If my sentence comprehension tested in the 97th percentile just recently here in January, and I have been WTFing my whole life at how people comprehend shit, and if I am in the 97th percentile (that roughly means out of every 100 people I comprehend what I read better than all but 3 of them) then what does that tell you?

It tells me hat you already felt like you were right from the beginning and gladly used the test results as affirmation that you must be right; resulting in, as I said, overconfidence.

I was right though and the officer testified to that in court.

I did not say that you must always be wrong about everything, did I? Nor did I say that you can never be right if your are generally overconfident.
---

ScrantonPA posted...

Why do you insist on posting topics?

Our entertainment

ScrantonPA posted...

Why do you insist on posting topics?

Everyone ridicules you. The ones that actually try to offer serious advice? Well, they're wrong and you're right. The police who are doing their jobs? They're wrong and you're right. The lawyer representing you? He's wrong and you're right. The judge? Unqualified for sure. Your inmates when you meet them? Definitely not right.

At first I thought most were correct saying medication is needed. Now I think you're beyond help. You enjoy attention and have convinced the most important person, yourself, that you know everything and are always right.

Dangerous combo. Life will be tough.

Because we all know how it's the police's job to create a disturbance when they spend 5 minutes trying to find the disturbance and then violating the 1st amendment right to petition the government to redress grievances.
---

TC is such a morally upstanding and smart citizen though, that he bites cops, illegally records convos, and doesn't understand what an arrest or "free to go" means!
---

Akagami_Shanks posted...

TC is such a morally upstanding and smart citizen though, that he bites cops, illegally records convos, and doesn't understand what an arrest or "free to go" means!

The officer testified in court when asked "When I was free to go being that I was free that means I had the choice right?" and he said "Yes". Therefore he agreed with me on the stand.
---

And you used your choice to come back and continue to antagonize everyone, which is why you're now in the situation you're in.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

The officer testified in court when asked "When I was free to go being that I was free that means I had the choice right?" and he said "Yes". Therefore he agreed with me on the stand.

"Officer, do we breathe air?"
"Yes."
"Let the records show that the officer agrees we breathe air."

Mmmmlibtears posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dragonblade01 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

If my sentence comprehension tested in the 97th percentile just recently here in January, and I have been WTFing my whole life at how people comprehend shit, and if I am in the 97th percentile (that roughly means out of every 100 people I comprehend what I read better than all but 3 of them) then what does that tell you?

It tells me hat you already felt like you were right from the beginning and gladly used the test results as affirmation that you must be right; resulting in, as I said, overconfidence.

I was right though and the officer testified to that in court.

I give it about 4 nights before your cellmate is sick to death of hearing that and just beats the ever loving shit out of you.
Post that footage, plz

He's gonna be roomies w newport
---

Akagami_Shanks posted...

And you used your choice to come back and continue to antagonize everyone, which is why you're now in the situation you're in.

I used my choice to try to inquire into obtaining the information necessary to exercise my first amendment right to "Petition the Government to redress grievances". They denied me that right.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Akagami_Shanks posted...

And you used your choice to come back and continue to antagonize everyone, which is why you're now in the situation you're in.

I used my choice to try to inquire into obtaining the information necessary to exercise my first amendment right to "Petition the Government to redress grievances". They denied me that right.

And then you slammed yourself
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Akagami_Shanks posted...

TC is such a morally upstanding and smart citizen though, that he bites cops, illegally records convos, and doesn't understand what an arrest or "free to go" means!

The officer testified in court when asked "When I was free to go being that I was free that means I had the choice right?" and he said "Yes". Therefore he agreed with me on the stand.

Yes, you had the choice to leave, or to remain and continue to be disruptive.

Kim Kusanagi posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Akagami_Shanks posted...

And you used your choice to come back and continue to antagonize everyone, which is why you're now in the situation you're in.

I used my choice to try to inquire into obtaining the information necessary to exercise my first amendment right to "Petition the Government to redress grievances". They denied me that right.

And then you slammed yourself

Yeah well everyone has a breaking point.
---

treewojima posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Akagami_Shanks posted...

TC is such a morally upstanding and smart citizen though, that he bites cops, illegally records convos, and doesn't understand what an arrest or "free to go" means!

The officer testified in court when asked "When I was free to go being that I was free that means I had the choice right?" and he said "Yes". Therefore he agreed with me on the stand.

Yes, you had the choice to leave, or to remain and continue to be disruptive.

They literally didn't know where I was when they got there and asked like 3 different people if it was them the person was talking about. They created the disturbance themselves. The officer even testified in court that there was no disturbance at all until after the officer on the left threatened me for my ID.
---

I don't have a boiling point where I will hit myself against a police car.

No one but you does.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

I used my choice to try to inquire into obtaining the information necessary to exercise my first amendment right to "Petition the Government to redress grievances". They denied me that right.

Lol....

This is the bodycam footage received after I put in a public information request for bodycam from this incident. I put my video up and I only find it appropriate to complete the story by also uploading the bodycam footage. Sadly this footage makes me look a bit insane and makes an ass out of myself, however embarrassing this may be, I find it still appropriate for reasons of transparency, understanding (this is a real meltdown, this isn't something that happens every day, all the time, or even normally at all but it has been known to happen...), and completeness as my video I had up created confusion about the arrest. In this video I think Molineux was just trying to do his job after looking back at it. He seriously injured my foot when he was standing on it and tried to put me in the car (my ankle specifically), but I don't think that was intentional. I do think Officer Mikash should not have threatened me because there was no disturbance when they came and no disturbance until AFTER he had threatened me but he cited "disturbances" in his threat even though they hadn't been proven to have happened yet. I maintain when I said "Am I being detained or am I free to go?" that I honestly perceived that as meaning I wasn't being detained and I was free. I never perceived it as a command to leave, only a statement that I was no longer being investigated and detained. I do apologize to all of the folk watching me make an ass of myself though for having to witness that. I really wish they just left when they realized there was no disturbance after they had gotten there and walked right past me. I also wish Mikash had given his identifier. Right as the situation started and I had started recording he made a statement "Oh here we go with this already" it sounded like and that upset me right from the get go because it was an escalatory and unnecessary statement. As we continued Molineux sort of condescended and said "Does this make sense to anyone else?" like I was stupid and that further bothered me and you can even see on my video I started to shake when this happened. Had they not condescended and just said "please stop arguing with that lady" and left there would have been no issue on my behalf. I get that I could also have done things differently and made mistakes and probably should have left but you have to understand to me I could NOT go anywhere until I got at least Mikash's badge number. My brain told me I HAD to file that complaint and I HAD to have that information to do so. The 1st amendment grants the right for citizens to petition the Government to redress grievances and the 14th amendment grants the right to due process on the state level. I do maintain still that these rights were violated with solely Officer Mikash's actions. Officer Molineux later claimed that it wasn't a right to ask for a badge number but I believe that was due to unwillful ignorance not willful ignorance so I can forgive that. In this situation I thank Officer Molineux for protecting me from further harm, however I must persist my qualms with Officer Mikash for his performance and behavior during this event which did cause me anxiety and stress and somewhat helped induce the ensuing meltdowns. I also believe Officer Parks is a real class act and a great addition to the Hagerstown Police Department because I found not one thing he did wrong in any of his actions or behaviors and he was very polite to both myself and the other citizens in the area. I have the utmost respect for Officer Parks and believe that he truly reflects the type of behavior that should be performed by those wearing the badge. He even stood up proud in my video with no shame in his public display, and rightly so, again I found not one issue in how he performed, not even an iota of a flaw.
---

There was a news media link with regards to this incident and it can be found here - ( http://www.heraldmailmedia.com/news/local/hagerstown-man-guilty-of-disorderly-conduct-in-police-dispute/article_6f3941d8-163e-11e7-b4f3-5f71e8ff7b41.html ) - The only editing I did to this video was blurring out my social security number when they showed my social security card as well as muting out people's names and phone numbers who had provided them to the police. At various points I flip between Officer Parks' and Officer Molineux's bodycam based on what is going on, especially since Molineux's fell off for a good period of time but they are time synced and nothing is cut out other than the names and phone numbers, as mentioned before. Whatever they gave me a shot of (I think it was Haldol) I had parkinson's like symptoms for like 3 days and could never get comfortable or stop moving. It was horrible. People wonder why I need medical cannabis...well now you know. It keeps crap like this from happening."


last two posts are the video's description since apparently most didn't read it.
---

rhklce posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

I used my choice to try to inquire into obtaining the information necessary to exercise my first amendment right to "Petition the Government to redress grievances". They denied me that right.

Lol....

It's true.
---

Lol thinking that wall of text will justify anyone.
---