Current Events > Illinois town bans ARs. Citizens forced to surrender weapons or face fines.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
JeanAmpteau 04/06/18 12:37:09 PM #101:	Caution999 posted... The silent majority will make their voices known. Hahahaha That's a funny way of saying the "dying minority" The uneducated were given the chance to control the ship, and fucked it up. --- Amp / Cocteau <cite>JeanAmpteau posted [p:899163087] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Caution999 posted...</cite> <quote>The silent majority will make their voices known.</quote> Hahahaha That's a funny way of saying the "dying minority" The uneducated were given the chance to control the ship, and fucked it up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 04/06/18 12:37:56 PM #102:	Nice. Conservatives in that town will get both triggered and salty about this. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:899163124] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote>Nice. Conservatives in that town will get both triggered and salty about this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JeanAmpteau 04/06/18 12:38:08 PM #103:	fenderbender321 posted... JeanAmpteau posted... fenderbender321 posted... "We're not banning these guns, we're just making it completely illegal to ever even come close to using one" lol, same effect on responsible owners. Sad and disgusting bullshit. "Responsible owner of an AR-15" is an oxymoron lol you need to get out of the house more. What does my comment have in common with being in a house too long? I don't get the connection. --- Amp / Cocteau <cite>JeanAmpteau posted [p:899163138] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JeanAmpteau posted...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote>"We're not banning these guns, we're just making it completely illegal to ever even come close to using one" lol, same effect on responsible owners. Sad and disgusting bullshit.</quote> "Responsible owner of an AR-15" is an oxymoron</quote> lol you need to get out of the house more.</quote> What does my comment have in common with being in a house too long? I don't get the connection.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#104	Post #104 was unavailable or deleted.
KillSocialism 04/06/18 12:41:32 PM #105:	weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog posted... Good, I want this to happen all over the United States. Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon? Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period. You realize the only people who will have guns once all the legal owners have theirs confiscated are the criminals, and not just cops, right? Guns exist. Guns are prolific. And because of that fact, we cannot ban guns. It's like wanting to get rid of nukes. It's a nice idea, and in ideal world, nukes wouldn't exist. But they do exist, and so because they do, we can't just disable ours. We have to be at the top to make sure no other country with nukes, or aspirations to create them, decides to try to take us out, that means having more nukes, and making them more powerful so that we don't have to use them. In a world where survival by any means is the law of the land, you can't handicap yourself and expect great success. Taking away the populace's weapons is a great way to handicap us in the event of catastrophe, and to make us vulnerable. Your little fantasy world hinges on all of humanity being on the same page. That's a near impossibility until you can solve the little problem of finite resources. If you can't 100% guarantee my safety without my owning firearms, then you aren't taking away a tool with which I can increase my odds of survival. You really won't, and if you try, then it won't end well for anyone except Americans. This is the sort of thing that starts civil wars. You people are playing with fire, and you gun-less bleeding hearts won't win. You think the military will be on your side? At the very least, there will be great division and a great many soldiers will defect to America and leave your little commie regime. You people have no idea what you're doing... <cite>KillSocialism posted [p:899163319] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>Good, I want this to happen all over the United States.</quote> Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon?</quote> Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period.</quote> You realize the only people who will have guns once all the legal owners have theirs confiscated are the criminals, and not just cops, right? Guns exist. Guns are prolific. And because of that fact, we cannot ban guns. It's like wanting to get rid of nukes. It's a nice idea, and in ideal world, nukes wouldn't exist. But they do exist, and so because they do, we can't just disable ours. We have to be at the top to make sure no other country with nukes, or aspirations to create them, decides to try to take us out, that means having more nukes, and making them more powerful so that we don't have to use them. In a world where survival by any means is the law of the land, you can't handicap yourself and expect great success. Taking away the populace's weapons is a great way to handicap us in the event of catastrophe, and to make us vulnerable. Your little fantasy world hinges on all of humanity being on the same page. That's a near impossibility until you can solve the little problem of finite resources. If you can't 100% guarantee my safety without my owning firearms, then you aren't taking away a tool with which I can increase my odds of survival. You really won't, and if you try, then it won't end well for anyone except Americans. This is the sort of thing that starts civil wars. You people are playing with fire, and you gun-less bleeding hearts won't win. You think the military will be on your side? At the very least, there will be great division and a great many soldiers will defect to America and leave your little commie regime. You people have no idea what you're doing...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jiek_Fafn 04/06/18 12:43:14 PM #106:	How many people in Deerfield does this even effect? It's a tiny ass fairly well off town. Are they even collecting any of these guns there? --- PSN: Jiek FFRK: Tyro God Wall KZcv <cite>Jiek_Fafn posted [p:899163423] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote>How many people in Deerfield does this even effect? It's a tiny ass fairly well off town. Are they even collecting any of these guns there?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weekoldhotdog 04/06/18 12:45:03 PM #107:	KillSocialism posted... weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog posted... Good, I want this to happen all over the United States. Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon? Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period. You realize the only people who will have guns once all the legal owners have theirs confiscated are the criminals, and not just cops, right? Guns exist. Guns are prolific. And because of that fact, we cannot ban guns. It's like wanting to get rid of nukes. It's a nice idea, and in ideal world, nukes wouldn't exist. But they do exist, and so because they do, we can't just disable ours. We have to be at the top to make sure no other country with nukes, or aspirations to create them, decides to try to take us out, that means having more nukes, and making them more powerful so that we don't have to use them. In a world where survival by any means is the law of the land, you can't handicap yourself and expect great success. Taking away the populace's weapons is a great way to handicap us in the event of catastrophe, and to make us vulnerable. Your little fantasy world hinges on all of humanity being on the same page. That's a near impossibility until you can solve the little problem of finite resources. If you can't 100% guarantee my safety without my owning firearms, then you aren't taking away a tool with which I can increase my odds of survival. You really won't, and if you try, then it won't end well for anyone except Americans. This is the sort of thing that starts civil wars. You people are playing with fire, and you gun-less bleeding hearts won't win. You think the military will be on your side? At the very least, there will be great division and a great many soldiers will defect to America and leave your little commie regime. You people have no idea what you're doing... Get over yourself and your inflated ego. Let's see you inflate that big when your guns get taken away. --- Ba da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada... What is love? Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more. <cite>weekoldhotdog posted [p:899163524] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>KillSocialism posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>Good, I want this to happen all over the United States.</quote> Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon?</quote> Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period.</quote> You realize the only people who will have guns once all the legal owners have theirs confiscated are the criminals, and not just cops, right? Guns exist. Guns are prolific. And because of that fact, we cannot ban guns. It's like wanting to get rid of nukes. It's a nice idea, and in ideal world, nukes wouldn't exist. But they do exist, and so because they do, we can't just disable ours. We have to be at the top to make sure no other country with nukes, or aspirations to create them, decides to try to take us out, that means having more nukes, and making them more powerful so that we don't have to use them. In a world where survival by any means is the law of the land, you can't handicap yourself and expect great success. Taking away the populace's weapons is a great way to handicap us in the event of catastrophe, and to make us vulnerable. Your little fantasy world hinges on all of humanity being on the same page. That's a near impossibility until you can solve the little problem of finite resources. If you can't 100% guarantee my safety without my owning firearms, then you aren't taking away a tool with which I can increase my odds of survival. You really won't, and if you try, then it won't end well for anyone except Americans. This is the sort of thing that starts civil wars. You people are playing with fire, and you gun-less bleeding hearts won't win. You think the military will be on your side? At the very least, there will be great division and a great many soldiers will defect to America and leave your little commie regime. You people have no idea what you're doing...</quote> Get over yourself and your inflated ego. Let's see you inflate that big when your guns get taken away.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Caution999 04/06/18 12:46:31 PM #108:	weekoldhotdog posted... KillSocialism posted... weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog posted... Good, I want this to happen all over the United States. Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon? Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period. You realize the only people who will have guns once all the legal owners have theirs confiscated are the criminals, and not just cops, right? Guns exist. Guns are prolific. And because of that fact, we cannot ban guns. It's like wanting to get rid of nukes. It's a nice idea, and in ideal world, nukes wouldn't exist. But they do exist, and so because they do, we can't just disable ours. We have to be at the top to make sure no other country with nukes, or aspirations to create them, decides to try to take us out, that means having more nukes, and making them more powerful so that we don't have to use them. In a world where survival by any means is the law of the land, you can't handicap yourself and expect great success. Taking away the populace's weapons is a great way to handicap us in the event of catastrophe, and to make us vulnerable. Your little fantasy world hinges on all of humanity being on the same page. That's a near impossibility until you can solve the little problem of finite resources. If you can't 100% guarantee my safety without my owning firearms, then you aren't taking away a tool with which I can increase my odds of survival. You really won't, and if you try, then it won't end well for anyone except Americans. This is the sort of thing that starts civil wars. You people are playing with fire, and you gun-less bleeding hearts won't win. You think the military will be on your side? At the very least, there will be great division and a great many soldiers will defect to America and leave your little commie regime. You people have no idea what you're doing... Get over yourself and your inflated ego. Let's see you inflate that big when your guns get taken away. you guys aren't even trying to hide it anymore, huh? --- "Impossible is just a word to let people feel good about themselves when they quit." - Vyse, Skies of Arcadia <cite>Caution999 posted [p:899163597] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KillSocialism posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>Good, I want this to happen all over the United States.</quote> Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon?</quote> Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period.</quote> You realize the only people who will have guns once all the legal owners have theirs confiscated are the criminals, and not just cops, right? Guns exist. Guns are prolific. And because of that fact, we cannot ban guns. It's like wanting to get rid of nukes. It's a nice idea, and in ideal world, nukes wouldn't exist. But they do exist, and so because they do, we can't just disable ours. We have to be at the top to make sure no other country with nukes, or aspirations to create them, decides to try to take us out, that means having more nukes, and making them more powerful so that we don't have to use them. In a world where survival by any means is the law of the land, you can't handicap yourself and expect great success. Taking away the populace's weapons is a great way to handicap us in the event of catastrophe, and to make us vulnerable. Your little fantasy world hinges on all of humanity being on the same page. That's a near impossibility until you can solve the little problem of finite resources. If you can't 100% guarantee my safety without my owning firearms, then you aren't taking away a tool with which I can increase my odds of survival. You really won't, and if you try, then it won't end well for anyone except Americans. This is the sort of thing that starts civil wars. You people are playing with fire, and you gun-less bleeding hearts won't win. You think the military will be on your side? At the very least, there will be great division and a great many soldiers will defect to America and leave your little commie regime. You people have no idea what you're doing...</quote> Get over yourself and your inflated ego. Let's see you inflate that big when your guns get taken away.</quote> you guys aren't even trying to hide it anymore, huh?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#109	Post #109 was unavailable or deleted.
GaryGaryGary 04/06/18 12:51:20 PM #110:	You Americans have bigger fish to fry than worrying about your guns. How about you tell the government to stop arresting people for crossing the road for a start. Get some of your freedoms back and then worry about your hobbies. <cite>GaryGaryGary posted [p:899163864] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote>You Americans have bigger fish to fry than worrying about your guns. How about you tell the government to stop arresting people for crossing the road for a start. Get some of your freedoms back and then worry about your hobbies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 04/06/18 12:51:54 PM #111:	weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog posted... Good, I want this to happen all over the United States. Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon? Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period. So I should just hand over a rifle worth $900-1500, that I bought and paid for, with zero compensation? Thats fucking stupid. Youre more likely to die in a car wreck than you are to get shot, unless you fancy hanging out in rough areas in town. And school shootings are isolated incidents, not a pandemic. Hunting exists to control animal populations. Do you really want animals running out of food and starving to death? Or how about increasing the likelihood that a deer runs out in traffic? And how do you intend to collect 300 million firearms from citizens? Youd be violating the 4th amendment trying search and seizure. Keep your fascism to yourself...no one wants any of it. --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Darksiders series(PS3) <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:899163898] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>Good, I want this to happen all over the United States.</quote> Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon?</quote> Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period.</quote> So I should just hand over a rifle worth $900-1500, that I bought and paid for, with zero compensation? Thats fucking stupid. Youre more likely to die in a car wreck than you are to get shot, unless you fancy hanging out in rough areas in town. And school shootings are isolated incidents, not a pandemic. Hunting exists to control animal populations. Do you really want animals running out of food and starving to death? Or how about increasing the likelihood that a deer runs out in traffic? And how do you intend to collect 300 million firearms from citizens? Youd be violating the 4th amendment trying search and seizure. Keep your fascism to yourself...no one wants any of it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Caution999 04/06/18 12:52:04 PM #112:	GaryGaryGary posted... You Americans have bigger fish to fry than worrying about your guns. How about you tell the government to stop arresting people for crossing the road for a start. Get some of your freedoms back and then worry about your hobbies. Please someone tell me this guy is from England. --- "Impossible is just a word to let people feel good about themselves when they quit." - Vyse, Skies of Arcadia <cite>Caution999 posted [p:899163907] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>GaryGaryGary posted...</cite> <quote>You Americans have bigger fish to fry than worrying about your guns. How about you tell the government to stop arresting people for crossing the road for a start. Get some of your freedoms back and then worry about your hobbies.</quote> Please someone tell me this guy is from England.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weekoldhotdog 04/06/18 12:55:08 PM #113:	Nobody is afraid of your civil war. The first time you or your friends get shot, you'll hand over your guns like the good little boys that you are. You talk big, until you guns run out of rounds or you see that you are outgunned and outmatched. --- Ba da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada... What is love? Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more. <cite>weekoldhotdog posted [p:899164101] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote>Nobody is afraid of your civil war. The first time you or your friends get shot, you'll hand over your guns like the good little boys that you are. You talk big, until you guns run out of rounds or you see that you are outgunned and outmatched.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#114	Post #114 was unavailable or deleted.
Nomadic View 04/06/18 12:58:01 PM #115:	Johnny_Nutcase posted... Chicken posted... Kombucha posted... this is the first step, disarming the population. once the village leadership has gathered all of the guns they will begin the process of consolidating power and enslaving the residents. SAD! lmao do you really think the average citizen with a gun would be able to fight off a military takeover? This. Even if every citizen in that town had an AR. The military would wipe them out in seconds. It's the most idiotic argument for guns i've ever heard. You think the military is going to gun down American civilians even if ordered to? --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:899164244] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Johnny_Nutcase posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Chicken posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kombucha posted...</cite> <quote>this is the first step, disarming the population. once the village leadership has gathered all of the guns they will begin the process of consolidating power and enslaving the residents. SAD!</quote> lmao do you really think the average citizen with a gun would be able to fight off a military takeover?</quote> This. Even if every citizen in that town had an AR. The military would wipe them out in seconds. It's the most idiotic argument for guns i've ever heard.</quote> You think the military is going to gun down American civilians even if ordered to?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 04/06/18 12:58:49 PM #116:	scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog posted... Good, I want this to happen all over the United States. Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon? Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period. So I should just hand over a rifle worth $900-1500, that I bought and paid for, with zero compensation? Thats fucking stupid. Youre more likely to die in a car wreck than you are to get shot, unless you fancy hanging out in rough areas in town. And school shootings are isolated incidents, not a pandemic. Hunting exists to control animal populations. Do you really want animals running out of food and starving to death? Or how about increasing the likelihood that a deer runs out in traffic? And how do you intend to collect 300 million firearms from citizens? Youd be violating the 4th amendment trying search and seizure. Keep your fascism to yourself...no one wants any of it. Oh, and don't forget that doctors kill over 7 times the number of Americans than guns. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:899164289] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>Good, I want this to happen all over the United States.</quote> Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon?</quote> Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period.</quote> So I should just hand over a rifle worth $900-1500, that I bought and paid for, with zero compensation? Thats fucking stupid. Youre more likely to die in a car wreck than you are to get shot, unless you fancy hanging out in rough areas in town. And school shootings are isolated incidents, not a pandemic. Hunting exists to control animal populations. Do you really want animals running out of food and starving to death? Or how about increasing the likelihood that a deer runs out in traffic? And how do you intend to collect 300 million firearms from citizens? Youd be violating the 4th amendment trying search and seizure. Keep your fascism to yourself...no one wants any of it.</quote> Oh, and don't forget that doctors kill over 7 times the number of Americans than guns.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weekoldhotdog 04/06/18 1:01:14 PM #117:	Yeah, scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog posted... Good, I want this to happen all over the United States. Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon? Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period. So I should just hand over a rifle worth $900-1500, that I bought and paid for, with zero compensation? Thats fucking stupid. Youre more likely to die in a car wreck than you are to get shot, unless you fancy hanging out in rough areas in town. And school shootings are isolated incidents, not a pandemic. Hunting exists to control animal populations. Do you really want animals running out of food and starving to death? Or how about increasing the likelihood that a deer runs out in traffic? And how do you intend to collect 300 million firearms from citizens? Youd be violating the 4th amendment trying search and seizure. Keep your fascism to yourself...no one wants any of it. That's your fault for spending $900 on a gun you can't even kill a deer with --- Ba da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada... What is love? Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more. <cite>weekoldhotdog posted [p:899164396] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, <cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>Good, I want this to happen all over the United States.</quote> Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon?</quote> Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period.</quote> So I should just hand over a rifle worth $900-1500, that I bought and paid for, with zero compensation? Thats fucking stupid. Youre more likely to die in a car wreck than you are to get shot, unless you fancy hanging out in rough areas in town. And school shootings are isolated incidents, not a pandemic. Hunting exists to control animal populations. Do you really want animals running out of food and starving to death? Or how about increasing the likelihood that a deer runs out in traffic? And how do you intend to collect 300 million firearms from citizens? Youd be violating the 4th amendment trying search and seizure. Keep your fascism to yourself...no one wants any of it.</quote> That's your fault for spending $900 on a gun you can't even kill a deer with</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StucklnMyPants 04/06/18 1:02:06 PM #118:	weekoldhotdog posted... Nobody is afraid of your civil war. The first time you or your friends get shot, you'll hand over your guns like the good little boys that you are. You talk big, until you guns run out of rounds or you see that you are outgunned and outmatched. Outgunned with what? If a Civil War starts over guns, it'll be people who want guns vs. people who don't. Now call me crazy, but my money is on the side that has the guns. --- Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes. <cite>StucklnMyPants posted [p:899164442] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>Nobody is afraid of your civil war. The first time you or your friends get shot, you'll hand over your guns like the good little boys that you are. You talk big, until you guns run out of rounds or you see that you are outgunned and outmatched.</quote> Outgunned with what? If a Civil War starts over guns, it'll be people who want guns vs. people who don't. Now call me crazy, but my money is on the side that has the guns.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weekoldhotdog 04/06/18 1:02:15 PM #119:	lol at the southern redneck hicks in this topic --- Ba da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada... What is love? Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more. <cite>weekoldhotdog posted [p:899164446] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote>lol at the southern redneck hicks in this topic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weekoldhotdog 04/06/18 1:03:02 PM #120:	StucklnMyPants posted... weekoldhotdog posted... Nobody is afraid of your civil war. The first time you or your friends get shot, you'll hand over your guns like the good little boys that you are. You talk big, until you guns run out of rounds or you see that you are outgunned and outmatched. Outgunned with what? If a Civil War starts over guns, it'll be people who want guns vs. people who don't. Now call me crazy, but my money is on the side that has the guns. This is an idiotic response. Why would the people without guns be fighting? The civil war will be between the people with guns that don't want to give them up versus the The United States of America. --- Ba da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada... What is love? Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more. <cite>weekoldhotdog posted [p:899164493] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>StucklnMyPants posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>Nobody is afraid of your civil war. The first time you or your friends get shot, you'll hand over your guns like the good little boys that you are. You talk big, until you guns run out of rounds or you see that you are outgunned and outmatched.</quote> Outgunned with what? If a Civil War starts over guns, it'll be people who want guns vs. people who don't. Now call me crazy, but my money is on the side that has the guns.</quote> This is an idiotic response. Why would the people without guns be fighting? The civil war will be between the people with guns that don't want to give them up versus the The United States of America.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 04/06/18 1:03:46 PM #121:	weekoldhotdog Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks. --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Darksiders series(PS3) <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:899164524] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog</cite> Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weekoldhotdog 04/06/18 1:05:25 PM #122:	scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks. Need a MP-15 to do what a Muzzleloader could do on it's own? Sad. Apparently you lack the skill to even operate a firearm. --- Ba da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada... What is love? Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more. <cite>weekoldhotdog posted [p:899164605] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog</cite> Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks.</quote> Need a MP-15 to do what a Muzzleloader could do on it's own? Sad. Apparently you lack the skill to even operate a firearm.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jumi 04/06/18 1:05:59 PM #123:	DifferentialEquation posted... creativerealms posted... The Admiral posted... Ah, yes, the things liberals always accused conservatives of being paranoid about is finally happening. I'm truly shocked that pushing this agenda was their goal. A small town willingly banning ARs which most citizens agreed with? This isn't the nightmare conservative gun nuts say it is. So you're okay with it as long as "most citizens" agree with it? "Most citizens" wanting something banned is a sufficient threshold in order for the government to ban something in your eyes? It was good enough for conservatives with gay marriage. Shoe's on the other foot now. --- XBL Gamertag: Rob Thorsman Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/robertvsilvers <cite>jumi posted [p:899164637] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>Ah, yes, the things liberals always accused conservatives of being paranoid about is finally happening. I'm truly shocked that pushing this agenda was their goal.</quote> A small town willingly banning ARs which most citizens agreed with? This isn't the nightmare conservative gun nuts say it is.</quote> So you're okay with it as long as "most citizens" agree with it? "Most citizens" wanting something banned is a sufficient threshold in order for the government to ban something in your eyes?</quote> It was good enough for conservatives with gay marriage. Shoe's on the other foot now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 04/06/18 1:08:33 PM #124:	jumi posted... It was good enough for conservatives with gay marriage. Shoe's on the other foot now. Gay marriage was not banned nor was it criminalized. <cite>Thatuser posted [p:899164755] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>It was good enough for conservatives with gay marriage. Shoe's on the other foot now.</quote> Gay marriage was not banned nor was it criminalized.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 04/06/18 1:10:00 PM #125:	weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks. Need a MP-15 to do what a Muzzleloader could do on it's own? Sad. Apparently you lack the skill to even operate a firearm. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cNtduI3aRA" data-time=" >B-but Ian-dono, I thought repeating rifles were invented hundreds of years after the constitution --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:899164828] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog</cite> Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks.</quote> Need a MP-15 to do what a Muzzleloader could do on it's own? Sad. Apparently you lack the skill to even operate a firearm.</quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cNtduI3aRA" data-time=" >B-but Ian-dono, I thought repeating rifles were invented hundreds of years after the constitution</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 04/06/18 1:11:10 PM #126:	weekoldhotdog posted... That's your fault for spending $900 on a gun you can't even kill a deer with ITP - the AR-15 is a weak weapon that needs to be banned because it's so dangerous. Also, deer are the only animals anyone hunts. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:899164880] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>That's your fault for spending $900 on a gun you can't even kill a deer with</quote> ITP - the AR-15 is a weak weapon that needs to be banned because it's so dangerous. Also, deer are the only animals anyone hunts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 04/06/18 1:11:18 PM #127:	I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work. --- http://i.imgur.com/BBcZDLJ.png <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:899164885] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote>I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SideshowBob311 04/06/18 1:12:32 PM #128:	There's no way they're going to be able to implement any of this for years. This will have to go all the way up to the supreme court. --- "Whether or not you can handle it, you have just heard another statement of the TRUTH." [WoT] - [Evil Republican] <cite>SideshowBob311 posted [p:899164951] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote>There's no way they're going to be able to implement any of this for years. This will have to go all the way up to the supreme court.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weekoldhotdog 04/06/18 1:13:30 PM #129:	Tropicalwood posted... weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks. Need a MP-15 to do what a Muzzleloader could do on it's own? Sad. Apparently you lack the skill to even operate a firearm. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cNtduI3aRA" data-time=" >B-but Ian-dono, I thought repeating rifles were invented hundreds of years after the constitution Now that is a nice weapon. Minus the engraving, I wouldn't mind Americans owning something like that. I know that the repeating part is pretty unique considering the Rifle was owned by a King, so I wouldn't expect everyone to have that. Rifles I'm cool with, ARs I'm not. --- Ba da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada, da da da dada... What is love? Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more. <cite>weekoldhotdog posted [p:899165026] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog</cite> Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks.</quote> Need a MP-15 to do what a Muzzleloader could do on it's own? Sad. Apparently you lack the skill to even operate a firearm.</quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cNtduI3aRA" data-time=" >B-but Ian-dono, I thought repeating rifles were invented hundreds of years after the constitution</quote> Now that is a nice weapon. Minus the engraving, I wouldn't mind Americans owning something like that. I know that the repeating part is pretty unique considering the Rifle was owned by a King, so I wouldn't expect everyone to have that. Rifles I'm cool with, ARs I'm not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 04/06/18 1:13:34 PM #130:	Tmaster148 posted... I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work. So then why do you shitpost when the citizens of all those towns in red states want shitty laws regarding gay marriage and whatnot? The point is that citizens of a town are not allowed to legislate things that strip people of their rights. --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:899165032] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work.</quote> So then why do you shitpost when the citizens of all those towns in red states want shitty laws regarding gay marriage and whatnot? The point is that citizens of a town are not allowed to legislate things that strip people of their rights.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 04/06/18 1:14:17 PM #131:	darkjedilink posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog posted... Good, I want this to happen all over the United States. Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon? Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period. So I should just hand over a rifle worth $900-1500, that I bought and paid for, with zero compensation? That?s fucking stupid. You?re more likely to die in a car wreck than you are to get shot, unless you fancy hanging out in rough areas in town. And school shootings are isolated incidents, not a pandemic. Hunting exists to control animal populations. Do you really want animals running out of food and starving to death? Or how about increasing the likelihood that a deer runs out in traffic? And how do you intend to collect 300 million firearms from citizens? You?d be violating the 4th amendment trying search and seizure. Keep your fascism to yourself...no one wants any of it. Oh, and don't forget that doctors kill over 7 times the number of Americans than guns. Doctors and guns are literally the same thing though. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:899165080] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>Good, I want this to happen all over the United States.</quote> Why? What purpose does it serve other than to make people criminals for simply owning a weapon?</quote> Just turn in your weapon and you won't be a criminal. Why? So I don't have to get shot or my kids don't get shot while they are in school. We don't need guns. We don't need hunting. The United States is better off without guns. Period.</quote> So I should just hand over a rifle worth $900-1500, that I bought and paid for, with zero compensation? That?s fucking stupid. You?re more likely to die in a car wreck than you are to get shot, unless you fancy hanging out in rough areas in town. And school shootings are isolated incidents, not a pandemic. Hunting exists to control animal populations. Do you really want animals running out of food and starving to death? Or how about increasing the likelihood that a deer runs out in traffic? And how do you intend to collect 300 million firearms from citizens? You?d be violating the 4th amendment trying search and seizure. Keep your fascism to yourself...no one wants any of it.</quote> Oh, and don't forget that doctors kill over 7 times the number of Americans than guns.</quote> Doctors and guns are literally the same thing though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 04/06/18 1:14:35 PM #132:	Tmaster148 posted... I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work. There's still the matter of whether what the citizens of the town asked for is constitutional. --- http://i.imgur.com/ByKGlJb.gif http://i.imgur.com/nZdaA8D.gif http://i.imgur.com/VBLBILg.jpg <cite>CableZL posted [p:899165100] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work.</quote> There's still the matter of whether what the citizens of the town asked for is constitutional.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 04/06/18 1:14:44 PM #133:	FLUFFYGERM posted... Tmaster148 posted... I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work. So then why do you shitpost when the citizens of all those towns in red states want shitty laws regarding gay marriage and whatnot? The point is that citizens of a town are not allowed to legislate things that strip people of their rights. I didn't realize I even shitpost about gay marriage. --- http://i.imgur.com/BBcZDLJ.png <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:899165105] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work.</quote> So then why do you shitpost when the citizens of all those towns in red states want shitty laws regarding gay marriage and whatnot? The point is that citizens of a town are not allowed to legislate things that strip people of their rights.</quote> I didn't realize I even shitpost about gay marriage.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 04/06/18 1:15:17 PM #134:	Tmaster148 posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... Tmaster148 posted... I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work. So then why do you shitpost when the citizens of all those towns in red states want shitty laws regarding gay marriage and whatnot? The point is that citizens of a town are not allowed to legislate things that strip people of their rights. I didn't realize I even shitpost about gay marriage. Pretty sure I've seen you running your mouth in those "Georgia does this" and "Alabama does that" threads lol. But maybe I'm remembering wrong. --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:899165133] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work.</quote> So then why do you shitpost when the citizens of all those towns in red states want shitty laws regarding gay marriage and whatnot? The point is that citizens of a town are not allowed to legislate things that strip people of their rights.</quote> I didn't realize I even shitpost about gay marriage.</quote> Pretty sure I've seen you running your mouth in those "Georgia does this" and "Alabama does that" threads lol. But maybe I'm remembering wrong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 04/06/18 1:15:24 PM #135:	weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks. Need a MP-15 to do what a Muzzleloader could do on it's own? Sad. Apparently you lack the skill to even operate a firearm. So I can put down large game with an 55 grain bullet, but I lack skill? Do you think before you post? --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Darksiders series(PS3) <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:899165141] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog</cite> Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks.</quote> Need a MP-15 to do what a Muzzleloader could do on it's own? Sad. Apparently you lack the skill to even operate a firearm.</quote> So I can put down large game with an 55 grain bullet, but I lack skill? Do you think before you post?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 04/06/18 1:16:10 PM #136:	CableZL posted... Tmaster148 posted... I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work. There's still the matter of whether what the citizens of the town asked for is constitutional. Sure. Though you need someone to fight it and if the entire town is fine with it, you won't see a court case. I just think it's weird to jump on the everyone is trying to ban my guns from this. --- http://i.imgur.com/BBcZDLJ.png <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:899165182] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work.</quote> There's still the matter of whether what the citizens of the town asked for is constitutional.</quote> Sure. Though you need someone to fight it and if the entire town is fine with it, you won't see a court case. I just think it's weird to jump on the everyone is trying to ban my guns from this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PrettyBoyFloyd 04/06/18 1:16:21 PM #137:	It's going to get to the point where average civilians will have to know hand to hand combat or guerrilla warfare. --- The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT [Government Destabilizing Branch] <cite>PrettyBoyFloyd posted [p:899165190] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote>It's going to get to the point where average civilians will have to know hand to hand combat or guerrilla warfare.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
southcoast09 04/06/18 1:16:28 PM #138:	So, one of the most dangerous places on the planet just quit letting citizens protect themselves? --- Stand for the anthem or sit for the game! <cite>southcoast09 posted [p:899165202] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote>So, one of the most dangerous places on the planet just quit letting citizens protect themselves?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#139	Post #139 was unavailable or deleted.
runewalshPSiv 04/06/18 1:16:47 PM #140:	weekoldhotdog posted... Tropicalwood posted... weekoldhotdog posted... scorpion41 posted... weekoldhotdog Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks. Need a MP-15 to do what a Muzzleloader could do on it's own? Sad. Apparently you lack the skill to even operate a firearm. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cNtduI3aRA" data-time=" >B-but Ian-dono, I thought repeating rifles were invented hundreds of years after the constitution Now that is a nice weapon. Minus the engraving, I wouldn't mind Americans owning something like that. I know that the repeating part is pretty unique considering the Rifle was owned by a King, so I wouldn't expect everyone to have that. Rifles I'm cool with, ARs I'm not. TIL that an average citizen can buy a fully automatic rifle. --- RIP Casper 1997-2013 We love and miss you GT: Famed Mimic <cite>runewalshPSiv posted [p:899165221] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog</cite> Ive harvested plenty using my MP-15 thanks.</quote> Need a MP-15 to do what a Muzzleloader could do on it's own? Sad. Apparently you lack the skill to even operate a firearm.</quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cNtduI3aRA" data-time=" >B-but Ian-dono, I thought repeating rifles were invented hundreds of years after the constitution</quote> Now that is a nice weapon. Minus the engraving, I wouldn't mind Americans owning something like that. I know that the repeating part is pretty unique considering the Rifle was owned by a King, so I wouldn't expect everyone to have that. Rifles I'm cool with, ARs I'm not.</quote> TIL that an average citizen can buy a fully automatic rifle.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 04/06/18 1:17:28 PM #141:	Aeriis posted... StucklnMyPants posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. so... what's the issue? Besides the fact that it's violating a constitutional right? --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:899165257] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Aeriis posted...</cite> <quote><cite>StucklnMyPants posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted.</quote> so... what's the issue?</quote> Besides the fact that it's violating a constitutional right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jumi 04/06/18 1:18:07 PM #142:	Thatuser posted... jumi posted... It was good enough for conservatives with gay marriage. Shoe's on the other foot now. Gay marriage was not banned nor was it criminalized. Yeah, it was actually banned for quite some time. And every time a state legislature legalized it, conservatives trotted out the ol' "the people should vote on it directly," like that made it okay. --- XBL Gamertag: Rob Thorsman Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/robertvsilvers <cite>jumi posted [p:899165293] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Thatuser posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>It was good enough for conservatives with gay marriage. Shoe's on the other foot now.</quote> Gay marriage was not banned nor was it criminalized.</quote> Yeah, it was actually banned for quite some time. And every time a state legislature legalized it, conservatives trotted out the ol' "the people should vote on it directly," like that made it okay.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Thatuser 04/06/18 1:18:15 PM #143:	Aeriis posted... StucklnMyPants posted... According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted. so... what's the issue? "Assault Rifle" is a boogeyman term that isn't clearly defined. Edit: it says assault weapon, which is even looser. My mistake. <cite>Thatuser posted [p:899165299] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Aeriis posted...</cite> <quote><cite>StucklnMyPants posted...</cite> <quote>According to the ordinance, which the the Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved Monday night, it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card." Law enforcement officers, current and retired, are exempted.</quote> so... what's the issue?</quote> "Assault Rifle" is a boogeyman term that isn't clearly defined. Edit: it says assault weapon, which is even looser. My mistake.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 04/06/18 1:19:16 PM #144:	FLUFFYGERM posted... Tmaster148 posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... Tmaster148 posted... I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work. So then why do you shitpost when the citizens of all those towns in red states want shitty laws regarding gay marriage and whatnot? The point is that citizens of a town are not allowed to legislate things that strip people of their rights. I didn't realize I even shitpost about gay marriage. Pretty sure I've seen you running your mouth in those "Georgia does this" and "Alabama does that" threads lol. But maybe I'm remembering wrong. The most I can recall doing is posting some silly topics from r/nottheonion. And the only ones I can think of that involved specfic states are like when some of the southern states voted against child marriage laws. --- http://i.imgur.com/BBcZDLJ.png <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:899165355] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work.</quote> So then why do you shitpost when the citizens of all those towns in red states want shitty laws regarding gay marriage and whatnot? The point is that citizens of a town are not allowed to legislate things that strip people of their rights.</quote> I didn't realize I even shitpost about gay marriage.</quote> Pretty sure I've seen you running your mouth in those "Georgia does this" and "Alabama does that" threads lol. But maybe I'm remembering wrong.</quote> The most I can recall doing is posting some silly topics from r/nottheonion. And the only ones I can think of that involved specfic states are like when some of the southern states voted against child marriage laws.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#145	Post #145 was unavailable or deleted.
FLUFFYGERM 04/06/18 1:19:50 PM #146:	Tmaster148 posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... Tmaster148 posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... Tmaster148 posted... I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work. So then why do you shitpost when the citizens of all those towns in red states want shitty laws regarding gay marriage and whatnot? The point is that citizens of a town are not allowed to legislate things that strip people of their rights. I didn't realize I even shitpost about gay marriage. Pretty sure I've seen you running your mouth in those "Georgia does this" and "Alabama does that" threads lol. But maybe I'm remembering wrong. The most I can recall doing is posting some silly topics from r/nottheonion. And the only ones I can think of that involved specfic states are like when some of the southern states voted against child marriage laws. Would you be okay with a town in Alabama or Georgia banning gay marriage? --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:899165392] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work.</quote> So then why do you shitpost when the citizens of all those towns in red states want shitty laws regarding gay marriage and whatnot? The point is that citizens of a town are not allowed to legislate things that strip people of their rights.</quote> I didn't realize I even shitpost about gay marriage.</quote> Pretty sure I've seen you running your mouth in those "Georgia does this" and "Alabama does that" threads lol. But maybe I'm remembering wrong.</quote> The most I can recall doing is posting some silly topics from r/nottheonion. And the only ones I can think of that involved specfic states are like when some of the southern states voted against child marriage laws.</quote> Would you be okay with a town in Alabama or Georgia banning gay marriage?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 04/06/18 1:20:14 PM #147:	Tmaster148 posted... CableZL posted... Tmaster148 posted... I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work. There's still the matter of whether what the citizens of the town asked for is constitutional. Sure. Though you need someone to fight it and if the entire town is fine with it, you won't see a court case. I just think it's weird to jump on the everyone is trying to ban my guns from this. I don't know if it's fair to say that "the entire town is fine with it." I'm sure there are people there with differing opinions. --- http://i.imgur.com/ByKGlJb.gif http://i.imgur.com/nZdaA8D.gif http://i.imgur.com/VBLBILg.jpg <cite>CableZL posted [p:899165410] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work.</quote> There's still the matter of whether what the citizens of the town asked for is constitutional.</quote> Sure. Though you need someone to fight it and if the entire town is fine with it, you won't see a court case. I just think it's weird to jump on the everyone is trying to ban my guns from this.</quote> I don't know if it's fair to say that "the entire town is fine with it." I'm sure there are people there with differing opinions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 04/06/18 1:21:42 PM #148:	CableZL posted... Tmaster148 posted... CableZL posted... Tmaster148 posted... I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work. There's still the matter of whether what the citizens of the town asked for is constitutional. Sure. Though you need someone to fight it and if the entire town is fine with it, you won't see a court case. I just think it's weird to jump on the everyone is trying to ban my guns from this. I don't know if it's fair to say that "the entire town is fine with it." I'm sure there are people there with differing opinions. Well I did say "if". --- http://i.imgur.com/BBcZDLJ.png <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:899165498] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm kinda confused what the problem is. The citizens of the town asked for this and the town's government went with the public. That's kind of how governments are supposed to work.</quote> There's still the matter of whether what the citizens of the town asked for is constitutional.</quote> Sure. Though you need someone to fight it and if the entire town is fine with it, you won't see a court case. I just think it's weird to jump on the everyone is trying to ban my guns from this.</quote> I don't know if it's fair to say that "the entire town is fine with it." I'm sure there are people there with differing opinions.</quote> Well I did say "if".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 04/06/18 1:22:19 PM #149:	weekoldhotdog posted... Rifles I'm cool with, ARs I'm not. What, specifically, about the AR off3nds your liberal sensibilities? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:899165547] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>weekoldhotdog posted...</cite> <quote>Rifles I'm cool with, ARs I'm not.</quote> What, specifically, about the AR off3nds your liberal sensibilities?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JeanAmpteau 04/06/18 1:23:21 PM #150:	fenderbender321 posted... JeanAmpteau posted... fenderbender321 posted... JeanAmpteau posted... fenderbender321 posted... "We're not banning these guns, we're just making it completely illegal to ever even come close to using one" lol, same effect on responsible owners. Sad and disgusting bullshit. "Responsible owner of an AR-15" is an oxymoron lol you need to get out of the house more. What does my comment have in common with being in a house too long? I don't get the connection. You've never met somebody who owns an AR-15, have you? I've met tons. All great guys. Yes I have, and I wouldn't call him responsible by any measure of the word, lol. And anybody who fraternizes with you should automatically be deemed "irresponsible". --- Amp / Cocteau <cite>JeanAmpteau posted [p:899165602] in Illinois t... [t:76489965]...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JeanAmpteau posted...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JeanAmpteau posted...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote>"We're not banning these guns, we're just making it completely illegal to ever even come close to using one" lol, same effect on responsible owners. Sad and disgusting bullshit.</quote> "Responsible owner of an AR-15" is an oxymoron</quote> lol you need to get out of the house more.</quote> What does my comment have in common with being in a house too long? I don't get the connection.</quote> You've never met somebody who owns an AR-15, have you? I've met tons. All great guys.</quote> Yes I have, and I wouldn't call him responsible by any measure of the word, lol. And anybody who fraternizes with you should automatically be deemed "irresponsible".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Current Events > Illinois town bans ARs. Citizens forced to surrender weapons or face fines. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Illinois town bans ARs. Citizens forced to surrender weapons or face fines.