Current Events > Men shouldn't be making laws about women's bodies

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Paragon21XX 05/17/19 11:52:48 AM #51:	_Rinku_ posted... BilalPowell posted... Date out of stomach is kind of an arbitrary point in time to decide a child can no longer be murdered. People can't live independently until we're 18. Maybe that should be the legal abortion limit. It's less arbitrary than "when there's a detectable heartbeat" as if that has some spiritual meaning and isn't literally just a group of cells doing their specialized task. Some could successfully argue that about your own existence. --- Hmm... <cite>Paragon21XX posted [p:922017196] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BilalPowell posted...</cite> <quote> Date out of stomach is kind of an arbitrary point in time to decide a child can no longer be murdered. People can't live independently until we're 18. Maybe that should be the legal abortion limit.</quote> It's less arbitrary than "when there's a detectable heartbeat" as if that has some spiritual meaning and isn't literally just a group of cells doing their specialized task.</quote> Some could successfully argue that about your own existence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
burritosatan 05/17/19 11:53:33 AM #52:	BilalPowell posted... Date out of stomach is kind of an arbitrary point in time to decide a child can no longer be murdered. People can't live independently until we're 18. Maybe that should be the legal abortion limit. Baby develop in the stomach? --- Same sex marriage is not gay privilege, its equal rights. Privilege would be something like gay people not paying taxes. Like churches don't <cite>burritosatan posted [p:922017231] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>BilalPowell posted...</cite> <quote>Date out of stomach is kind of an arbitrary point in time to decide a child can no longer be murdered. People can't live independently until we're 18. Maybe that should be the legal abortion limit.</quote> Baby develop in the stomach?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
tennisdude818 05/17/19 11:54:18 AM #53:	It is very annoying to hear big government feminists trying to sound libertarian. My body, your wallet is a weak position to be doing that from. --- "I have never understood why it is greed to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money." Thomas Sowell <cite>tennisdude818 posted [p:922017258] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>It is very annoying to hear big government feminists trying to sound libertarian. My body, your wallet is a weak position to be doing that from.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nidhoggr 05/17/19 11:56:55 AM #54:	It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me. <cite>Nidhoggr posted [p:922017361] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 05/17/19 11:56:58 AM #55:	tennisdude818 posted... It is very annoying to hear big government feminists trying to sound libertarian. My body, your wallet is a weak position to be doing that from. As opposed to 'my body, my choice,' you mean. I agree. Their chosen position on bodily autonomy and reproductive justice is much more defensible. --- Ignorance is a choice https://imgtc.com/i/7UnK3hx.jpg <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:922017364] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>tennisdude818 posted...</cite> <quote>It is very annoying to hear big government feminists trying to sound libertarian. My body, your wallet is a weak position to be doing that from.</quote> As opposed to 'my body, my choice,' you mean. I agree. Their chosen position on bodily autonomy and reproductive justice is much more defensible.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thanosibe 05/17/19 11:59:44 AM #56:	GasMonkey posted... A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25). The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31). God enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53). Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12). King Menahem of Israel destroyed Tiphsah (also called Tappuah) and the surrounding towns, killing all residents and ripping open pregnant women with the sword (2 Kings 15:16). Isaiah prophesied doom for Babylon, including the murder of unborn children: "They will have no pity on the fruit of the womb" (Isaiah 13:18). For worshiping idols, God declared that not one of his people would live, not a man, woman or child (not even babies in arms), again confuting assertions about the sanctity of life (Jeremiah 44:7-8). God will punish the Israelites by destroying their unborn children, who will die at birth, or perish in the womb, or never even be conceived (Hosea 9:10-16). For rebelling against God, Samaria's people will be killed, their babies will be dashed to death against the ground, and their pregnant women will be ripped open with a sword (Hosea 13:16). Jesus did not express any special concern for unborn children during the anticipated end times: "Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing" (Matthew 24:19). I like how all your examples but one are from the Old Testament, a defunct covenant between God and his people with Jesus sacrifice and a new covenant was made. And then the one example you do take out of the New Testament is completely taken out of context and Jesus' words in that scripture have zero to do with abortion. To be honest, the shit posting extremist on both sides of this controversy make actual discussion almost indistinguishable. So most people that want actual conversation just give up. --- I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski <cite>thanosibe posted [p:922017484] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>GasMonkey posted...</cite> <quote> A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25). The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31). God enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53). Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12). King Menahem of Israel destroyed Tiphsah (also called Tappuah) and the surrounding towns, killing all residents and ripping open pregnant women with the sword (2 Kings 15:16). Isaiah prophesied doom for Babylon, including the murder of unborn children: "They will have no pity on the fruit of the womb" (Isaiah 13:18). For worshiping idols, God declared that not one of his people would live, not a man, woman or child (not even babies in arms), again confuting assertions about the sanctity of life (Jeremiah 44:7-8). God will punish the Israelites by destroying their unborn children, who will die at birth, or perish in the womb, or never even be conceived (Hosea 9:10-16). For rebelling against God, Samaria's people will be killed, their babies will be dashed to death against the ground, and their pregnant women will be ripped open with a sword (Hosea 13:16). Jesus did not express any special concern for unborn children during the anticipated end times: "Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing" (Matthew 24:19).</quote>I like how all your examples but one are from the Old Testament, a defunct covenant between God and his people with Jesus sacrifice and a new covenant was made. And then the one example you do take out of the New Testament is completely taken out of context and Jesus' words in that scripture have zero to do with abortion. To be honest, the shit posting extremist on both sides of this controversy make actual discussion almost indistinguishable. So most people that want actual conversation just give up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jborgan 05/17/19 12:00:48 PM #57:	Nidhoggr posted... It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me. "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda. --- http://www.last.fm/user/jborgan <cite>jborgan posted [p:922017522] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote>It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me.</quote> "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BilalPowell 05/17/19 12:02:37 PM #58:	jborgan posted... Nidhoggr posted... It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me. "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda. Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides. --- Former #1 Birmingham Iron Fan. RIP AAF <cite>BilalPowell posted [p:922017613] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>jborgan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote>It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me.</quote> "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda.</quote> Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Rinku_ 05/17/19 12:02:57 PM #59:	thanosibe posted... GasMonkey posted... A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25). The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31). God enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53). Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12). King Menahem of Israel destroyed Tiphsah (also called Tappuah) and the surrounding towns, killing all residents and ripping open pregnant women with the sword (2 Kings 15:16). Isaiah prophesied doom for Babylon, including the murder of unborn children: "They will have no pity on the fruit of the womb" (Isaiah 13:18). For worshiping idols, God declared that not one of his people would live, not a man, woman or child (not even babies in arms), again confuting assertions about the sanctity of life (Jeremiah 44:7-8). God will punish the Israelites by destroying their unborn children, who will die at birth, or perish in the womb, or never even be conceived (Hosea 9:10-16). For rebelling against God, Samaria's people will be killed, their babies will be dashed to death against the ground, and their pregnant women will be ripped open with a sword (Hosea 13:16). Jesus did not express any special concern for unborn children during the anticipated end times: "Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing" (Matthew 24:19). I like how all your examples but one are from the Old Testament, a defunct covenant between God and his people with Jesus sacrifice and a new covenant was made. And then the one example you do take out of the New Testament is completely taken out of context and Jesus' words in that scripture have zero to do with abortion. To be honest, the shit posting extremist on both sides of this controversy make actual discussion almost indistinguishable. So most people that want actual conversation just give up. Pretty sure Jesus literally says he did not come to abolish the old laws. <cite>_Rinku_ posted [p:922017627] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>thanosibe posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GasMonkey posted...</cite> <quote> A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25). The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31). God enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53). Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12). King Menahem of Israel destroyed Tiphsah (also called Tappuah) and the surrounding towns, killing all residents and ripping open pregnant women with the sword (2 Kings 15:16). Isaiah prophesied doom for Babylon, including the murder of unborn children: "They will have no pity on the fruit of the womb" (Isaiah 13:18). For worshiping idols, God declared that not one of his people would live, not a man, woman or child (not even babies in arms), again confuting assertions about the sanctity of life (Jeremiah 44:7-8). God will punish the Israelites by destroying their unborn children, who will die at birth, or perish in the womb, or never even be conceived (Hosea 9:10-16). For rebelling against God, Samaria's people will be killed, their babies will be dashed to death against the ground, and their pregnant women will be ripped open with a sword (Hosea 13:16). Jesus did not express any special concern for unborn children during the anticipated end times: "Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing" (Matthew 24:19).</quote>I like how all your examples but one are from the Old Testament, a defunct covenant between God and his people with Jesus sacrifice and a new covenant was made. And then the one example you do take out of the New Testament is completely taken out of context and Jesus' words in that scripture have zero to do with abortion. To be honest, the shit posting extremist on both sides of this controversy make actual discussion almost indistinguishable. So most people that want actual conversation just give up.</quote> Pretty sure Jesus literally says he did not come to abolish the old laws.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
burritosatan 05/17/19 12:03:20 PM #60:	GasMonkey posted... A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25). The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31). God enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53). Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12). King Menahem of Israel destroyed Tiphsah (also called Tappuah) and the surrounding towns, killing all residents and ripping open pregnant women with the sword (2 Kings 15:16). Isaiah prophesied doom for Babylon, including the murder of unborn children: "They will have no pity on the fruit of the womb" (Isaiah 13:18). For worshiping idols, God declared that not one of his people would live, not a man, woman or child (not even babies in arms), again confuting assertions about the sanctity of life (Jeremiah 44:7-8). God will punish the Israelites by destroying their unborn children, who will die at birth, or perish in the womb, or never even be conceived (Hosea 9:10-16). For rebelling against God, Samaria's people will be killed, their babies will be dashed to death against the ground, and their pregnant women will be ripped open with a sword (Hosea 13:16). Jesus did not express any special concern for unborn children during the anticipated end times: "Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing" (Matthew 24:19). Numbers 31:17 (Moses) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every women that hath known man by lying with him. Hosea 9:11-16 Hosea prays for Gods intervention. Ephraim shall bring forth his children to the murderer. Give them, 0 Lord: what wilt thou give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts. . .Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit: yea though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb. Judges 11:30-40 Jephthah killed his young daughter (his only child) by burning her alive as a burnt sacrifice to the lord for he commanded it. Psalms 137:8-9 Prayer/song of vengeance 0 daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy shall he be that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us. Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones. The list is endless for both sides --- Same sex marriage is not gay privilege, its equal rights. Privilege would be something like gay people not paying taxes. Like churches don't <cite>burritosatan posted [p:922017641] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>GasMonkey posted...</cite> <quote> A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25). The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31). God enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53). Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12). King Menahem of Israel destroyed Tiphsah (also called Tappuah) and the surrounding towns, killing all residents and ripping open pregnant women with the sword (2 Kings 15:16). Isaiah prophesied doom for Babylon, including the murder of unborn children: "They will have no pity on the fruit of the womb" (Isaiah 13:18). For worshiping idols, God declared that not one of his people would live, not a man, woman or child (not even babies in arms), again confuting assertions about the sanctity of life (Jeremiah 44:7-8). God will punish the Israelites by destroying their unborn children, who will die at birth, or perish in the womb, or never even be conceived (Hosea 9:10-16). For rebelling against God, Samaria's people will be killed, their babies will be dashed to death against the ground, and their pregnant women will be ripped open with a sword (Hosea 13:16). Jesus did not express any special concern for unborn children during the anticipated end times: "Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing" (Matthew 24:19).</quote> Numbers 31:17 (Moses) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every women that hath known man by lying with him. Hosea 9:11-16 Hosea prays for Gods intervention. Ephraim shall bring forth his children to the murderer. Give them, 0 Lord: what wilt thou give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts. . .Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit: yea though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb. Judges 11:30-40 Jephthah killed his young daughter (his only child) by burning her alive as a burnt sacrifice to the lord for he commanded it. Psalms 137:8-9 Prayer/song of vengeance 0 daughter of Babylon, who art to be destroyed; happy shall he be that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us. Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones. The list is endless for both sides</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jborgan 05/17/19 12:07:56 PM #61:	BilalPowell posted... jborgan posted... Nidhoggr posted... It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me. "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda. Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides. Nope. Pro-choice people don't care if a woman has a baby or not. They care if she has the choice. Pro-lifers want to take that choice away. Anti-choice is accurate. --- http://www.last.fm/user/jborgan <cite>jborgan posted [p:922017817] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>BilalPowell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jborgan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote>It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me.</quote> "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda.</quote> Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides.</quote> Nope. Pro-choice people don't care if a woman has a baby or not. They care if she has the choice. Pro-lifers want to take that choice away. Anti-choice is accurate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Rinku_ 05/17/19 12:09:35 PM #62:	jborgan posted... BilalPowell posted... jborgan posted... Nidhoggr posted... It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me. "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda. Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides. Nope. Pro-choice people don't care if a woman has a baby or not. They care if she has the choice. Pro-lifers want to take that choice away. Anti-choice is accurate. Was about to say just that. <cite>_Rinku_ posted [p:922017880] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>jborgan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BilalPowell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jborgan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote>It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me.</quote> "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda.</quote> Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides.</quote> Nope. Pro-choice people don't care if a woman has a baby or not. They care if she has the choice. Pro-lifers want to take that choice away. Anti-choice is accurate.</quote> Was about to say just that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 05/17/19 12:09:44 PM #63:	While I'm all for more representation making its way into political offices, I'm less concerned about their demographics and more about their shitty policies. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:922017884] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>While I'm all for more representation making its way into political offices, I'm less concerned about their demographics and more about their shitty policies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BilalPowell 05/17/19 12:11:39 PM #64:	jborgan posted... BilalPowell posted... jborgan posted... Nidhoggr posted... It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me. "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda. Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides. Nope. Pro-choice people don't care if a woman has a baby or not. They care if she has the choice. Pro-lifers want to take that choice away. Anti-choice is accurate. I'm sure if it's a pregnant 14 year old they're very anti-life. --- Former #1 Birmingham Iron Fan. RIP AAF <cite>BilalPowell posted [p:922017963] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>jborgan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BilalPowell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jborgan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote>It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me.</quote> "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda.</quote> Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides.</quote> Nope. Pro-choice people don't care if a woman has a baby or not. They care if she has the choice. Pro-lifers want to take that choice away. Anti-choice is accurate.</quote> I'm sure if it's a pregnant 14 year old they're very anti-life.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 05/17/19 12:11:43 PM #65:	Regarding the Bible, since women are primarily the property of men, its views surrounding abortion fall in line with that (typically, unacceptable if it's the husband's child, more acceptable if it isn't). <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:922017969] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>Regarding the Bible, since women are primarily the property of men, its views surrounding abortion fall in line with that (typically, unacceptable if it's the husband's child, more acceptable if it isn't).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jborgan 05/17/19 12:18:01 PM #66:	BilalPowell posted... jborgan posted... BilalPowell posted... jborgan posted... Nidhoggr posted... It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me. "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda. Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides. Nope. Pro-choice people don't care if a woman has a baby or not. They care if she has the choice. Pro-lifers want to take that choice away. Anti-choice is accurate. I'm sure if it's a pregnant 14 year old they're very anti-life. Mainly because pregnancy, and giving birth specifically, is a very stressful experience that many fully developed, adult women have trouble going through, let alone a 14 year old. But if the 14 year old wanted to have the baby, I would be okay with that...because it's her choice, as long as she knows the risks involved. Pro-lifers don't understand that pregnancy is not easy and would force, let's say an 11 year old to give birth, even though it would probably kill her. Kind of defeats the purpose of being pro-life. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ohio-abortion-heartbeat-bill-pregnant-11-year-old-rape-victim-barred-abortion-after-new-ohio-abortion-bill-2019-05-13/ --- http://www.last.fm/user/jborgan <cite>jborgan posted [p:922018245] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>BilalPowell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jborgan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BilalPowell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jborgan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote>It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me.</quote> "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda.</quote> Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides.</quote> Nope. Pro-choice people don't care if a woman has a baby or not. They care if she has the choice. Pro-lifers want to take that choice away. Anti-choice is accurate.</quote> I'm sure if it's a pregnant 14 year old they're very anti-life.</quote> Mainly because pregnancy, and giving birth specifically, is a very stressful experience that many fully developed, adult women have trouble going through, let alone a 14 year old. But if the 14 year old wanted to have the baby, I would be okay with that...because it's her choice, as long as she knows the risks involved. Pro-lifers don't understand that pregnancy is not easy and would force, let's say an 11 year old to give birth, even though it would probably kill her. Kind of defeats the purpose of being pro-life. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ohio-abortion-heartbeat-bill-pregnant-11-year-old-rape-victim-barred-abortion-after-new-ohio-abortion-bill-2019-05-13/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Rinku_ 05/17/19 12:18:22 PM #67:	BilalPowell posted... jborgan posted... BilalPowell posted... jborgan posted... Nidhoggr posted... It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me. "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda. Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides. Nope. Pro-choice people don't care if a woman has a baby or not. They care if she has the choice. Pro-lifers want to take that choice away. Anti-choice is accurate. I'm sure if it's a pregnant 14 year old they're very anti-life. Why do you think that? Pro-choice people want that girl to have the choice of what to do. <cite>_Rinku_ posted [p:922018266] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>BilalPowell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jborgan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BilalPowell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jborgan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nidhoggr posted...</cite> <quote>It's a lost cause. Anti-lifers continually go out of their way to dehumanize unborn babies to convince themselves and others that it isn't the taking of a life. They want to virtue signal and be "progressive" to the point that they are fine with cold-blooded murder. Honestly sickens me.</quote> "Anti-life" That's a new one. The trolls are coming up with new ways to lie to fit their agenda.</quote> Pro-choice people like to call pro-life people anti-choice. Same thing both sides.</quote> Nope. Pro-choice people don't care if a woman has a baby or not. They care if she has the choice. Pro-lifers want to take that choice away. Anti-choice is accurate.</quote> I'm sure if it's a pregnant 14 year old they're very anti-life.</quote> Why do you think that? Pro-choice people want that girl to have the choice of what to do.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 05/17/19 12:19:46 PM #68:	burritosatan posted... Question - how do you feel about the killing of animals? I'm gonna stop you right here, because if you're trying to compare a human child to a wild/farm animal, it's not gonna hold any water. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:922018331] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote> Question - how do you feel about the killing of animals?</quote> I'm gonna stop you right here, because if you're trying to compare a human child to a wild/farm animal, it's not gonna hold any water.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 05/17/19 12:21:35 PM #69:	You see, what pro-choice people apparently aren't telling you is that we're all actually just worshipers of Darkseid, and if abortion access is completely democratized, Thanos will snap and Omega Beams will jump out of every cell phone and start deleting unborn children from their wombs. So we can see this "anti-life" verbiage is actually spot on. Have a good morning and remember. Darkseid is. --- Ignorance is a choice https://imgtc.com/i/7UnK3hx.jpg <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:922018415] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>You see, what pro-choice people apparently aren't telling you is that we're all actually just worshipers of Darkseid, and if abortion access is completely democratized, Thanos will snap and Omega Beams will jump out of every cell phone and start deleting unborn children from their wombs. So we can see this "anti-life" verbiage is actually spot on. Have a good morning and remember. Darkseid is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Top Crusader 05/17/19 12:22:32 PM #70:	CableZL posted... No one should be writing legislation based on religious beliefs. I realize that a lot of pro-life groups are religion based but I never understood that. The recent laws everyone is talking about are pretty crazy, but I'm generally against abortion because I think murdering babies is usually not cool, not because of God or Jesus or Moses or something. shrugs --- https://imgur.com/09qFfLV <cite>The Top Crusader posted [p:922018450] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote>No one should be writing legislation based on religious beliefs.</quote> I realize that a lot of pro-life groups are religion based but I never understood that. The recent laws everyone is talking about are pretty crazy, but I'm generally against abortion because I think murdering babies is usually not cool, not because of God or Jesus or Moses or something. shrugs</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Rinku_ 05/17/19 12:23:37 PM #71:	The Top Crusader posted... CableZL posted... No one should be writing legislation based on religious beliefs. I realize that a lot of pro-life groups are religion based but I never understood that. The recent laws everyone is talking about are pretty crazy, but I'm generally against abortion because I think murdering babies is usually not cool, not because of God or Jesus or Moses or something. shrugs I'm sorry you think abortion involves murdering a baby. <cite>_Rinku_ posted [p:922018484] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Top Crusader posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote>No one should be writing legislation based on religious beliefs.</quote> I realize that a lot of pro-life groups are religion based but I never understood that. The recent laws everyone is talking about are pretty crazy, but I'm generally against abortion because I think murdering babies is usually not cool, not because of God or Jesus or Moses or something. shrugs</quote> I'm sorry you think abortion involves murdering a baby.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gobstoppers12 05/17/19 12:28:18 PM #72:	_Rinku_ posted... I'm sorry you think abortion involves murdering a baby. It does. That is its sole purpose. Abortion does nothing other than end the life of a growing child inside its mother's womb. It kills a baby. It's not like gun ownership, where ~95% of people who own a gun have never shot/killed anything with it. 100% of abortions have been performed with the intention of purposely slaying a growing baby. --- I write Naruto Fanfiction. <cite>Gobstoppers12 posted [p:922018663] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote>I'm sorry you think abortion involves murdering a baby.</quote> It does. That is its sole purpose. Abortion does nothing other than end the life of a growing child inside its mother's womb. It kills a baby. It's not like gun ownership, where ~95% of people who own a gun have never shot/killed anything with it. 100% of abortions have been performed with the intention of purposely slaying a growing baby.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Duncanwii 05/17/19 12:31:07 PM #73:	The 11 year old needs to just get the abortion anyway. Her life overshadows the "life" of the thing the rapist put inside her. --- Hello, I like video games and comedies. Let's be friends. :) <cite>Duncanwii posted [p:922018765] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>The 11 year old needs to just get the abortion anyway. Her life overshadows the "life" of the thing the rapist put inside her.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Rinku_ 05/17/19 12:32:54 PM #74:	Gobstoppers12 posted... _Rinku_ posted... I'm sorry you think abortion involves murdering a baby. It does. That is its sole purpose. Abortion does nothing other than end the life of a growing child inside its mother's womb. It kills a baby. It's not like gun ownership, where ~95% of people who own a gun have never shot/killed anything with it. 100% of abortions have been performed with the intention of purposely slaying a growing baby. It's not a baby. <cite>_Rinku_ posted [p:922018844] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gobstoppers12 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote>I'm sorry you think abortion involves murdering a baby.</quote> It does. That is its sole purpose. Abortion does nothing other than end the life of a growing child inside its mother's womb. It kills a baby. It's not like gun ownership, where ~95% of people who own a gun have never shot/killed anything with it. 100% of abortions have been performed with the intention of purposely slaying a growing baby.</quote> It's not a baby.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
burritosatan 05/17/19 12:33:21 PM #75:	Gobstoppers12 posted... burritosatan posted... Question - how do you feel about the killing of animals? I'm gonna stop you right here, because if you're trying to compare a human child to a wild/farm animal, it's not gonna hold any water. Woah - I asked about how you feel about the killings of innocent animals. Are you insinuating that all life is sacred? Or are some animals more important than others to you? Who gets to make that call? --- Same sex marriage is not gay privilege, its equal rights. Privilege would be something like gay people not paying taxes. Like churches don't <cite>burritosatan posted [p:922018869] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gobstoppers12 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote> Question - how do you feel about the killing of animals?</quote> I'm gonna stop you right here, because if you're trying to compare a human child to a wild/farm animal, it's not gonna hold any water.</quote> Woah - I asked about how you feel about the killings of innocent animals. Are you insinuating that all life is sacred? Or are some animals more important than others to you? Who gets to make that call?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 05/17/19 12:35:21 PM #76:	The purpose of abortion is not to kill the fetus. The purpose of abortion is to remove the fetus from the mother. The fact that the former follows the latter in the vast majority of cases does not alter the purpose of abortion. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:922018943] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>The purpose of abortion is not to kill the fetus. The purpose of abortion is to remove the fetus from the mother. The fact that the former follows the latter in the vast majority of cases does not alter the purpose of abortion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 05/17/19 12:37:02 PM #77:	When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Darksiders series(PS3) <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:922019019] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Rinku_ 05/17/19 12:40:14 PM #78:	scorpion41 posted... When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be viable. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them. <cite>_Rinku_ posted [p:922019156] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be viable. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pikachupwnage 05/17/19 12:41:05 PM #79:	burritosatan posted... No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman. Except when it affects others. We shame, shun or expel those who are filthy and unhygienic. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Flu outbreaks would be worse. Various diseases would be more common. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed. Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources. --- https://imgur.com/cfZmEFd Even In sigs FOE! http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/665/328/d75.gif <cite>pikachupwnage posted [p:922019188] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote>No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman.</quote> Except when it affects others. We shame, shun or expel those who are filthy and unhygienic. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Flu outbreaks would be worse. Various diseases would be more common. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed. Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Were_Wyrm 05/17/19 12:45:47 PM #80:	What if the man making the law has a vagina? --- I was a God, Valeria. I found it...beneath me. - Dr. Doom https://imgur.com/FKDXbHs <cite>Were_Wyrm posted [p:922019361] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>What if the man making the law has a vagina?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kami_no_Kami 05/17/19 12:52:48 PM #81:	Gobstoppers12 posted... _Rinku_ posted... Nah. It's potential to be a human at best as a fetus. I remember being an edgy kid about abortion when I was in high school through my early twenties. I used some of the exact same terminology and justifications that you're using right now... thank God I'm not a monster anymore. I'm ashamed of the person I used to be. You still sound like an edgy kid to me... <cite>Kami_no_Kami posted [p:922019643] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gobstoppers12 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote>Nah. It's potential to be a human at best as a fetus.</quote> I remember being an edgy kid about abortion when I was in high school through my early twenties. I used some of the exact same terminology and justifications that you're using right now... thank God I'm not a monster anymore. I'm ashamed of the person I used to be.</quote> You still sound like an edgy kid to me...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
burritosatan 05/17/19 12:54:42 PM #82:	pikachupwnage posted... burritosatan posted... No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman. Except when it affects others. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed. 1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about 2. Sure second hand smoke is bad I agree, but you cant ban smoking entirely. Just force people to do it on their own property. Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources. I've been saying forever we need a mandatory fat tax unless you get a physical from your doctor starting you are not in the obese category. --- Same sex marriage is not gay privilege, its equal rights. Privilege would be something like gay people not paying taxes. Like churches don't <cite>burritosatan posted [p:922019700] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>pikachupwnage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote>No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman.</quote></quote> <quote>Except when it affects others. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed.</quote> 1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about 2. Sure second hand smoke is bad I agree, but you cant ban smoking entirely. Just force people to do it on their own property. <quote>Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources.</quote> I've been saying forever we need a mandatory fat tax unless you get a physical from your doctor starting you are not in the obese category.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 05/17/19 12:55:59 PM #83:	pikachupwnage posted... burritosatan posted... No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman. Except when it affects others. We shame, shun or expel those who are filthy and unhygienic. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Flu outbreaks would be worse. Various diseases would be more common. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed. Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources. We do indeed give up some degree of control when allowing what goes in our bodies. But not regarding what is taken from our bodies. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:922019746] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>pikachupwnage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote>No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman.</quote> Except when it affects others. We shame, shun or expel those who are filthy and unhygienic. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Flu outbreaks would be worse. Various diseases would be more common. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed. Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources.</quote> We do indeed give up some degree of control when allowing what goes in our bodies. But not regarding what is taken from our bodies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pikachupwnage 05/17/19 1:00:38 PM #84:	1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about Because those with compromised immune systems(Those with cancer, AIDS, the extremely young/old etc.) often cant get them or the effectiveness is lost. And because vaccines are not 100% assurances you cant get that disease. Its highly unlikely but a vaccinated person can still catch that disease. Herd immunity is important. 2. Only allowable if no other non smokers live in the same property/you can regularly prove you smoke in place/manner that allows no-negligible amounts of smoke to be exposed to non smokers. Also still the issue with state funded/universal healthcare. --- https://imgur.com/cfZmEFd Even In sigs FOE! http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/665/328/d75.gif <cite>pikachupwnage posted [p:922019937] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about Because those with compromised immune systems(Those with cancer, AIDS, the extremely young/old etc.) often cant get them or the effectiveness is lost. And because vaccines are not 100% assurances you cant get that disease. Its highly unlikely but a vaccinated person can still catch that disease. Herd immunity is important. 2. Only allowable if no other non smokers live in the same property/you can regularly prove you smoke in place/manner that allows no-negligible amounts of smoke to be exposed to non smokers. Also still the issue with state funded/universal healthcare.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 05/17/19 1:19:16 PM #85:	_Rinku_ posted... scorpion41 posted... When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them. If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother. --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Darksiders series(PS3) <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:922020622] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them.</quote> If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
burritosatan 05/17/19 1:25:42 PM #86:	scorpion41 posted... _Rinku_ posted... scorpion41 posted... When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them. If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother. Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??... --- Same sex marriage is not gay privilege, its equal rights. Privilege would be something like gay people not paying taxes. Like churches don't <cite>burritosatan posted [p:922020882] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them.</quote> If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother.</quote> Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 05/17/19 1:27:42 PM #87:	burritosatan posted... scorpion41 posted... _Rinku_ posted... scorpion41 posted... When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them. If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother. Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??... Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself. --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Darksiders series(PS3) <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:922020965] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them.</quote> If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother.</quote> Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??...</quote> Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Rinku_ 05/17/19 1:45:50 PM #88:	scorpion41 posted... burritosatan posted... scorpion41 posted... _Rinku_ posted... scorpion41 posted... When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them. If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother. Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??... Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself. Holy shit no it doesn't. You need to learn before you run your mouth. <cite>_Rinku_ posted [p:922021734] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them.</quote> If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother.</quote> Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??...</quote> Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself.</quote> Holy shit no it doesn't. You need to learn before you run your mouth.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
burritosatan 05/17/19 1:46:04 PM #89:	scorpion41 posted... burritosatan posted... scorpion41 posted... _Rinku_ posted... scorpion41 posted... When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them. If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother. Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??... Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself. Yaaa... the same way it can literally fail and die during a natural childbirth to a healthy baby... the body isnt infallible --- Same sex marriage is not gay privilege, its equal rights. Privilege would be something like gay people not paying taxes. Like churches don't <cite>burritosatan posted [p:922021743] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them.</quote> If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother.</quote> Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??...</quote> Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself.</quote> Yaaa... the same way it can literally fail and die during a natural childbirth to a healthy baby... the body isnt infallible</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Duncanwii 05/17/19 1:47:53 PM #90:	scorpion41 posted... burritosatan posted... scorpion41 posted... _Rinku_ posted... scorpion41 posted... When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them. If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother. Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??... Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself. Remember the guy who said that rapes are consensual because the body would have ways of shutting "legitimate" rapes down? You sound just like that guy right now. --- Hello, I like video games and comedies. Let's be friends. :) <cite>Duncanwii posted [p:922021807] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them.</quote> If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother.</quote> Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??...</quote> Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself.</quote> Remember the guy who said that rapes are consensual because the body would have ways of shutting "legitimate" rapes down? You sound just like that guy right now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 05/17/19 1:48:24 PM #91:	Perhaps women should vote in some more females into those kind of positions? --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:922021830] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>Perhaps women should vote in some more females into those kind of positions?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro 05/17/19 1:49:27 PM #92:	burritosatan posted... pikachupwnage posted... burritosatan posted... No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman. Except when it affects others. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed. 1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about 2. Sure second hand smoke is bad I agree, but you cant ban smoking entirely. Just force people to do it on their own property. Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources. I've been saying forever we need a mandatory fat tax unless you get a physical from your doctor starting you are not in the obese category. That's a whole lot of people getting a fat tax. It's amazing how few people realize what a borderline case looks like. --- 53 LIII 0b110101 p16 0x35 <cite>DevsBro posted [p:922021878] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pikachupwnage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote>No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman.</quote></quote> <quote>Except when it affects others. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed.</quote> 1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about 2. Sure second hand smoke is bad I agree, but you cant ban smoking entirely. Just force people to do it on their own property. <quote>Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources.</quote> I've been saying forever we need a mandatory fat tax unless you get a physical from your doctor starting you are not in the obese category.</quote> That's a whole lot of people getting a fat tax. It's amazing how few people realize what a borderline case looks like.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
burritosatan 05/17/19 1:51:39 PM #93:	DevsBro posted... burritosatan posted... pikachupwnage posted... burritosatan posted... No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman. Except when it affects others. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed. 1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about 2. Sure second hand smoke is bad I agree, but you cant ban smoking entirely. Just force people to do it on their own property. Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources. I've been saying forever we need a mandatory fat tax unless you get a physical from your doctor starting you are not in the obese category. That's a whole lot of people getting a fat tax. It's amazing how few people realize what a borderline case looks like. Overweight and obese are different, but if that many peoples are borderline obese then the fat tax makes sense. Besides, it's the same as smoking cigarettes. You can literally change anytime you want to --- Same sex marriage is not gay privilege, its equal rights. Privilege would be something like gay people not paying taxes. Like churches don't <cite>burritosatan posted [p:922021979] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pikachupwnage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote>No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman.</quote></quote> <quote>Except when it affects others. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed.</quote> 1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about 2. Sure second hand smoke is bad I agree, but you cant ban smoking entirely. Just force people to do it on their own property. <quote>Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources.</quote> I've been saying forever we need a mandatory fat tax unless you get a physical from your doctor starting you are not in the obese category.</quote> That's a whole lot of people getting a fat tax. It's amazing how few people realize what a borderline case looks like.</quote> Overweight and obese are different, but if that many peoples are borderline obese then the fat tax makes sense. Besides, it's the same as smoking cigarettes. You can literally change anytime you want to</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jborgan 05/17/19 2:01:24 PM #94:	scorpion41 posted... burritosatan posted... scorpion41 posted... _Rinku_ posted... scorpion41 posted... When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them. If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother. Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??... Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself. The human body does not just take care of a dead fetus inside the body. This type of misinformation is exactly why the US has the highest number of pregnancy related mortality rates regarding first world countries. The dead fetus needs to come out via a medical procedure, which is why you have liberals "advocating" for late term abortions. It's so she doesn't die, not because she decided she didn't want a baby at the last minute. --- http://www.last.fm/user/jborgan <cite>jborgan posted [p:922022412] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them.</quote> If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother.</quote> Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??...</quote> Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself.</quote> The human body does not just take care of a dead fetus inside the body. This type of misinformation is exactly why the US has the highest number of pregnancy related mortality rates regarding first world countries. The dead fetus needs to come out via a medical procedure, which is why you have liberals "advocating" for late term abortions. It's so she doesn't die, not because she decided she didn't want a baby at the last minute.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro 05/17/19 2:05:30 PM #95:	burritosatan posted... DevsBro posted... burritosatan posted... pikachupwnage posted... burritosatan posted... No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman. Except when it affects others. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed. 1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about 2. Sure second hand smoke is bad I agree, but you cant ban smoking entirely. Just force people to do it on their own property. Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources. I've been saying forever we need a mandatory fat tax unless you get a physical from your doctor starting you are not in the obese category. That's a whole lot of people getting a fat tax. It's amazing how few people realize what a borderline case looks like. Overweight and obese are different, but if that many peoples are borderline obese then the fat tax makes sense. Besides, it's the same as smoking cigarettes. You can literally change anytime you want to I know. And here's what a case that is borderline between overweight and obese looks like: --- 53 LIII 0b110101 p16 0x35 <cite>DevsBro posted [p:922022568] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pikachupwnage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote>No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman.</quote></quote> <quote>Except when it affects others. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed.</quote> 1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about 2. Sure second hand smoke is bad I agree, but you cant ban smoking entirely. Just force people to do it on their own property. <quote>Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources.</quote> I've been saying forever we need a mandatory fat tax unless you get a physical from your doctor starting you are not in the obese category.</quote> That's a whole lot of people getting a fat tax. It's amazing how few people realize what a borderline case looks like.</quote> Overweight and obese are different, but if that many peoples are borderline obese then the fat tax makes sense. Besides, it's the same as smoking cigarettes. You can literally change anytime you want to</quote> I know. And here's what a case that is borderline between overweight and obese looks like: </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scorpion41 05/17/19 2:11:54 PM #96:	_Rinku_ posted...Duncanwii posted... You really need to learn how the human body works before calling someone out. Makes you look less stupid. burritosatan posted... scorpion41 posted... burritosatan posted... scorpion41 posted... _Rinku_ posted... scorpion41 posted... When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them. If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother. Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??... Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself. Yaaa... the same way it can literally fail and die during a natural childbirth to a healthy baby... the body isnt infallible Never said the body was infallible. If that were the case thered be hardly any reason for doctors and specialists. But, the odds of the body not ejecting the dead fetus before infection sets in is slim to none. --- PSN: scorpion_4160 Currently Playing: NCAA 14, Darksiders series(PS3) <cite>scorpion41 posted [p:922022834] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite><cite>Duncanwii posted...</cite> You really need to learn how the human body works before calling someone out. Makes you look less stupid. <cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them.</quote> If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother.</quote> Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??...</quote> Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself.</quote> Yaaa... the same way it can literally fail and die during a natural childbirth to a healthy baby... the body isnt infallible</quote> Never said the body was infallible. If that were the case thered be hardly any reason for doctors and specialists. But, the odds of the body not ejecting the dead fetus before infection sets in is slim to none.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Rinku_ 05/17/19 2:18:28 PM #97:	scorpion41 posted... _Rinku_ posted...Duncanwii posted... You really need to learn how the human body works before calling someone out. Makes you look less stupid. burritosatan posted... scorpion41 posted... burritosatan posted... scorpion41 posted... _Rinku_ posted... scorpion41 posted... When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming. "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them. If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother. Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??... Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself. Yaaa... the same way it can literally fail and die during a natural childbirth to a healthy baby... the body isnt infallible Never said the body was infallible. If that were the case thered be hardly any reason for doctors and specialists. But, the odds of the body not ejecting the dead fetus before infection sets in is slim to none. Yeah, that's why maternal mortality is so high in this country, because the body just almost always does that. Seriously, actually listen to the multiple people telling you how dead wrong you are. You are actively making society worse by spreading your misinformation. <cite>_Rinku_ posted [p:922023109] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite><cite>Duncanwii posted...</cite> You really need to learn how the human body works before calling someone out. Makes you look less stupid. <cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Rinku_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scorpion41 posted...</cite> <quote>When you have liberals advocating for late term abortions, like in New York, youre going to have conservatives pushing to the other extreme, which is a ban on the procedure almost entirely. I dont know why people didnt foresee this coming.</quote> "Liberals" weren't advocating for late term abortions in New York. When you say that, you are spreading a lie. New York simply wanted it to be legal for non-viable late term pregnancies to be terminated. That way women aren't dying of sepsis due to a literal rotting corpse inside of them.</quote> If thats the reason they gave, then its bullshit because you can go up to a month before the corpse causes an infection. Two things will happen depending on the month, preterm labor if its before 39 weeks and term delivery after 39 weeks. Theres almost no reason to justify a third trimester abortion unless its something that will immediately affect the mother.</quote> Would you be cool with a dead corpse inside you fornan entire month??...</quote> Im saying the human body takes care of the issue itself.</quote> Yaaa... the same way it can literally fail and die during a natural childbirth to a healthy baby... the body isnt infallible</quote> Never said the body was infallible. If that were the case thered be hardly any reason for doctors and specialists. But, the odds of the body not ejecting the dead fetus before infection sets in is slim to none.</quote> Yeah, that's why maternal mortality is so high in this country, because the body just almost always does that. Seriously, actually listen to the multiple people telling you how dead wrong you are. You are actively making society worse by spreading your misinformation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Catgirl Fondler 05/17/19 2:59:34 PM #98:	Pro-lifers proving once again to be shit-tier people? Huh, must be another day ending in "y". --- N/A <cite>The Catgirl Fondler posted [p:922024728] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>Pro-lifers proving once again to be shit-tier people? Huh, must be another day ending in "y".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sackgurl 05/17/19 3:08:22 PM #99:	The bigger lie is the idea that anything liberals do is driving the conservative push for total abortion bans; it's been explicitly stated by the AL bill author that her motivation is to be the one to force a new SCOTUS case on Roe v Wade. Same is true for the others. This is happening now because there's a clear conservative majority. --- LittleBigPlanet is like merging dress-up with a real game. <cite>Sackgurl posted [p:922025085] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote>The bigger lie is the idea that anything liberals do is driving the conservative push for total abortion bans; it's been explicitly stated by the AL bill author that her motivation is to be the one to force a new SCOTUS case on Roe v Wade. Same is true for the others. This is happening now because there's a clear conservative majority.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IfGodCouldDie 05/17/19 3:08:54 PM #100:	burritosatan posted... DevsBro posted... burritosatan posted... pikachupwnage posted... burritosatan posted... No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman. Except when it affects others. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed. 1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about 2. Sure second hand smoke is bad I agree, but you cant ban smoking entirely. Just force people to do it on their own property. Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources. I've been saying forever we need a mandatory fat tax unless you get a physical from your doctor starting you are not in the obese category. That's a whole lot of people getting a fat tax. It's amazing how few people realize what a borderline case looks like. Overweight and obese are different, but if that many peoples are borderline obese then the fat tax makes sense. Besides, it's the same as smoking cigarettes. You can literally change anytime you want to You realize you can fall into the obese category even, with minimal body fat, right? --- Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:IfGodCouldDie IGN:SuperPattyCakes FC: SW-1615-6159-5504 <cite>IfGodCouldDie posted [p:922025106] in Men should... [t:77721579]...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pikachupwnage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote>No one should have the right to tell anyone what they can or cant do with their own body. Man or woman.</quote></quote> <quote>Except when it affects others. Like Vaccines. If we gave a fuck whether people wanted Vaccines or not we might still have smallpox going around. Or smoking. It expels harmful smoke and thus its not just about your body. Those around you can be harmed.</quote> 1. If you get the vaccine then what's there to worry about 2. Sure second hand smoke is bad I agree, but you cant ban smoking entirely. Just force people to do it on their own property. <quote>Also this is quite problematic for universal health care because you effectively foot the bill for someone disregarding their own health and strain overall medical resources.</quote> I've been saying forever we need a mandatory fat tax unless you get a physical from your doctor starting you are not in the obese category.</quote> That's a whole lot of people getting a fat tax. It's amazing how few people realize what a borderline case looks like.</quote> Overweight and obese are different, but if that many peoples are borderline obese then the fat tax makes sense. Besides, it's the same as smoking cigarettes. You can literally change anytime you want to</quote> You realize you can fall into the obese category even, with minimal body fat, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Current Events > Men shouldn't be making laws about women's bodies (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Men shouldn't be making laws about women's bodies