Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 310: Kanye Believe It?

(+) Yeah! (+)

stop i want off this ride

---

no joke, when I first read this news and saw the dudes picture I was like I bet this guy posts in gamefaqs

shit is wild

---

Actually I remember thinking he was an asshole when he used to post here too, though I think he was generally well-liked?

---

LordoftheMorons posted...

Actually I remember thinking he was an asshole when he used to post here too, though I think he was generally well-liked?

Uoty

---

Was this dude who wrote for Tucker seriously a past b8er?

Man. I need a shower.

---

Corrik7 posted...

It's funny seeing these posts back to back showing a damned no matter what he did mentality by you all. Lol.

nobody is saying trump not commuting stone's sentence would have been wrong you dipshit

also, you quoted two people

---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

nobody is saying trump not commuting stone's sentence would have been wrong you dipshit

also, you quoted two people

Learn how to read.

---

take your own advice shitsack

---

See you are as hostile as ever. I can only imagine someone finding you as a delight to deal with.

---

Ah the good old civility police, what would we do without you getting in the way of everything :)

---

Corrik7 posted...

See you are as hostile as ever. I can only imagine someone finding you as a delight to deal with.

corrik: you all are so inconsistent about trump! lol! i'm laughing my ass off about your posts!
also corrik: man you are really hostile.

fuck off.

---

Corrik7 posted...

Uoty

i am calling for a complete and total shutdown of uoty until we find out what the hell is going on

---

wow I can't believe the left cancelled uoty

---

https://twitter.com/mittromney/status/1281937795616067586?s=21

---

LordoftheMorons posted...

https://twitter.com/mittromney/status/1281937795616067586?s=21

but if trump hadn't commuted stone, you would have ALSO bashed him! so inconsistent! lol! lmao!

---

LordoftheMorons posted...

https://twitter.com/mittromney/status/1281937795616067586?s=21

He also hasn't yet appointed a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary. Maybe he really doesn't care about corruption, or that special prosecutor would have been in place long ago.

HeroicCrono posted...

He also hasn't yet appointed a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary. Maybe he really doesn't care about corruption, or that special prosecutor would have been in place long ago.

wow it's almost as if he's a fucking terrible president who's all talk but doesn't deliver on his promises

---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

corrik: you all are so inconsistent about trump! lol! i'm laughing my ass off about your posts!
also corrik: man you are really hostile.

fuck off.

What

---

Peace___Frog posted...

Ah the good old civility police, what would we do without you getting in the way of everything :)

It's okay. Moderators are biased. I get moderated if I might have implied something not being normal. This dude calls you straight up insults and swear words and will never get moderated. Lol.

---

Corrik7 posted...

What

what the fuck do you not get, you piece of shit

---

Corrik7 posted...

It's okay. Moderators are biased. I get moderated if I might have implied something not being normal. This dude calls you straight up insults and swear words and will never get moderated. Lol.

I know, I got modded a few weeks ago for implying that smuffin's fiance was sad even though he himself said so :( such unfair bias against the truth

---

Peace___Frog posted...

I know, I got modded a few weeks ago for implying that smuffin's fiance was sad even though he himself said so :( such unfair bias against the truth

Yeah, what can we do to fix it?

---

And this is what happens. They let Lasa continue getting away with shit no one else would so he goes further and further into it. If anyone made those 3 comments in succession to a user elsewhere, they would be warned. Harassment is allowed depending on who the mods are. Remember I got warned last month for implying! normal people won't want to support violence happening in riots.

---

Corrik7 posted...

And this is what happens. They let Lasa continue getting away with shit no one else would so he goes further and further into it. If anyone made those 3 comments in succession to a user elsewhere, they would be warned. Harassment is allowed depending on who the mods are. Remember I got warned last month for implying! normal people won't want to support violence happening in riots.

maybe if you stopped whining for a minute you'd notice that two of my posts have been modded

---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

maybe if you stopped whining for a minute you'd notice that two of my posts have been modded

And? They all 3 should have been moderated and not after I called out the hypocritical moderating and others in the topic marked you. You should be warned for your insults you hurl at people for no reason. You came out of nowhere to insult me because you didn't understand what I wrote. Like, okay.

---

Corrik7 posted...

And? They all 3 should have been moderated and not after I called out the hypocritical moderating and others in the topic marked you.

"others in the topic" yeah right lol

also, saying "fuck off," like "shut the fuck up," is not moddable.

You should be warned for your insults you hurl at people for no reason. You came out of nowhere to insult me because you didn't understand what I wrote. Like, okay.

i understood it perfectly. that's why i insulted you.

---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

"others in the topic" yeah right lol

also, saying "fuck off," like "shut the fuck up," is not moddable.

i understood it perfectly. that's why i insulted you.

You put 3 moddable messages. You called me a "dipshit". Which is still there. A "shitbag" I believe. And a "piece of shit". Or something like that. All 3 are insults and abusive behavior and should have been moderated.

And, again, no you didn't understand my post apparently because you think I was trying to quote one person. Thus, maybe consider you don't know what you are talking about.

---

I'm glad to see this has become the corrik persecution complex topic again

---

Samurai7 posted...

I'm glad to see this has become the corrie persecution complex topic again

It happens. About a tenth as much as it becomes the try and dogpile Corrik topic. Y'kno

---

Corrik7 posted...

You put 3 moddable messages. You called me a "dipshit". Which is still there. A "shitbag" I believe. And a "piece of shit". Or something like that. All 3 are insults and abusive behavior and should have been moderated.

"shitbag" i didn't yet use, but that might change real fast if you keep it up with these inane posts.

And, again, no you didn't understand my post apparently because you think I was trying to quote one person. Thus, maybe consider you don't know what you are talking about.

that's not the point i was making at all. maybe you should try to understand what someone is saying before immediately hurling "LOL YOU CAN'T READ" insults at them.

you claimed that trump can do no good to "us all" because not_an_owl was saying that if trump didn't commute stone's sentence he's disloyal and LotM said that the fact that trump did commute stone's sentence is fucking disgusting and an impeachable offense. however, this would only make some semblance of sense if both of those quotes came from the same person. that's why i said "you quoted two people." sure, if LotM had first claimed that trump would never commute stone because he's disloyal and trump then DOES commute stone, LotM could have still found that fucking disgusting but he could also have added "huh, looks like i was wrong about trump never being loyal, though." but... LotM didn't say that, and possibly doesn't even think trump is not loyal. you're just putting words in his mouth and your point makes 0% sense.

this is literally the exact same thing muffin used to do all the time back in the days of the freedom topic. he'd link to a CNN opinion piece by one writer that said "obama is good" and link to a different CNN opinion piece by a different fucking writer that said "obama is bad" and then he'd go "LOL CNN THEY CAN'T EVEN MAKE UP THEIR MIND ABOUT OBAMA." it's like he didn't comprehend that CNN is a news organization with all kinds of different writers who have different opinions from each other (or more likely, he did realize this and didn't give a shit that his point was dumb because he just wanted to bash CNN).

and this has been a consistent problem with you ever since topic 1. you always treat the regulars in this topic as some homogenuous, unreasonable, far left blob. you completely disregard the fact that we're all individuals with different opinions. sure, there's some overlap among us (i personally agree with LTM most of the time, for example, though certainly not always) but there's plenty of disagreement as well. for instance, there's a ton of difference between someone like the aforementioned LotM, who likes biden, and tony, who fucking hates biden. but you always completely overlook this. it's always "you all" and "you guys" and "yinz" with you. and the fact that you do this is one thing, but people have pointed this out to you plenty of times. i accept that people say stupid shit - lord knows i say plenty of stupid shit fairly regularly. but one thing that really triggers me is if people say stupid shit, it gets pointed out to them that they said stupid shit, they absolutely refuse to listen, and they keep spouting the same stupid shit over and over again. so when you made that "trump is damned by you all no matter what he does lol!" comment, i got quickly triggered.

---

Corrik deserves every insult that has been directed towards him today imo

---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

"shitbag" i didn't yet use, but that might change real fast if you keep it up with these inane posts.

that's not the point i was making at all. maybe you should try to understand what someone is saying before immediately hurling "LOL YOU CAN'T READ" insults at them.

you claimed that trump can do no good to "us all" because not_an_owl was saying that if trump didn't commute stone's sentence he's disloyal and LotM said that the fact that trump did commute stone's sentence is fucking disgusting and an impeachable offense. however, this would only make some semblance of sense if both of those quotes came from the same person. that's why i said "you quoted two people." sure, if LotM had first claimed that trump would never commute stone because he's disloyal and trump then DOES commute stone, LotM could have still found that fucking disgusting but he could also have added "huh, looks like i was wrong about trump never being loyal, though." but... LotM didn't say that, and possibly doesn't even think trump is not loyal. you're just putting words in his mouth and your point makes 0% sense.

this is literally the exact same thing muffin used to do all the time back in the days of the freedom topic. he'd link to a CNN opinion piece by one writer that said "obama is good" and link to a different CNN opinion piece by a different fucking writer that said "obama is bad" and then he'd go "LOL CNN THEY CAN'T EVEN MAKE UP THEIR MIND ABOUT OBAMA." it's like he didn't comprehend that CNN is a news organization with all kinds of different writers who have different opinions from each other (or more likely, he did realize this and didn't give a shit that his point was dumb because he just wanted to bash CNN).

and this has been a consistent problem with you ever since topic 1. you always treat the regulars in this topic as some homogenuous, unreasonable, far left blob. you completely disregard the fact that we're all individuals with different opinions. sure, there's some overlap among us (i personally agree with LTM most of the time, for example, though certainly not always) but there's plenty of disagreement as well. for instance, there's a ton of difference between someone like the aforementioned LotM, who likes biden, and tony, who fucking hates biden. but you always completely overlook this. it's always "you all" and "you guys" and "yinz" with you. and the fact that you do this is one thing, but people have pointed this out to you plenty of times. i accept that people say stupid shit - lord knows i say plenty of stupid shit fairly regularly. but one thing that really triggers me is if people say stupid shit, it gets pointed out to them that they said stupid shit, they absolutely refuse to listen, and they keep spouting the same stupid shit over and over again. so when you made that "trump is damned by you all no matter what he does lol!" comment, i got quickly triggered.

Correct. I am glad you finally get it. I was talking about how the collective in this topic "you all" are going to criticize him regardless of what he does.

He is either a spineless disloyal person that it is laughable to expect him to look out for you in return or he is a criminal and a crook for doing so.

He is either a xenophobe for instituting a Chinese travel ban early on or he is a piece of shit president who waited too long to act.

No matter what he does he will be criticized by the group here. It doesn't really matter what it is. That's why it is ironic, and I was lolling at it happening in back to back posts.

Just because you all don't mention the same criticisms as others at times doesn't change the point of my post, which apparently you didn't understand.

---

Corrik7 posted...

Correct. I am glad you finally get it. I was talking about how the collective in this topic "you all" are going to criticize him regardless of what he does.

He is either a spineless disloyal person that it is laughable to expect him to look out for you in return or he is a criminal and a crook for doing so.

He is either a xenophobe for instituting a Chinese travel ban early on or he is a piece of s*** president who waited too long to act.

No matter what he does he will be criticized by the group here. It doesn't really matter what it is. That's why it is ironic, and I was lolling at it happening in back to back posts.

Just because you all don't mention the same criticisms as others at times doesn't change the point of my post, which apparently you didn't understand.

Just chiming in to say that I got the irony and humor of your original post, but I dont think it demonstrates a true issue of Trump Derangement Syndrome unless you see the same person making the contradictory statements.
---

It seems you people have once again allowed Corrik to steer this topic into being about him, or at least I assume so do to the minimal scraps of posts I can see.

I imploy you once again to stop paying attention to this worthless nobody and realize how much time you are wasting.

---

Jakyl25 posted...

Just chiming in to say that I got the irony and humor of your original post, but I dont think it demonstrates a true issue of Trump Derangement Syndrome unless you see the same person making the contradictory statements.

Well, I wasn't making a TDS argument. It was moreso on the lines that the other spectrum can't agree on what makes him so terrible to the point that no matter what he does makes him terrible which is kind of funny. You usually don't see it in literal back to back posts though.

I mean, I am flat out against pardons and commutations because they are bastardizing of the law. But, I mean, it is definitely a little baffling seeing someone argued as being terrible from literally every angle that could possibly be taken also.

---

Corrik7 posted...

No matter what he does he will be criticized by the group here. It doesn't really matter what it is. That's why it is ironic, and I was lolling at it happening in back to back posts.

so your point was "no matter what trump does, there's always going to be people who are going to criticize what he does"? that's like... duh, of course? why is this ironic or hilarious to the point that you're laughing out loud about it?

this is like if you said "with every video game that comes out, there are always SOME people who dislike it! fortnite gets criticized for being too casual while celeste gets criticized for being a boring indie game! how ironic! lol!" again, as long as these criticisms aren't coming from the same people, there's really nothing ironic or lolworthy about this. this is just how this shit always goes.

also, you conveniently ignore that "the group" also says GOOD things about trump. probably not so much with this roger stone thing as that's so undeniably bad that even red sox thinks it's bad. but just last topic, red sox was saying he's glad that trump is president because he's adequate at playing "4D chess" with putin. i myself have praised trump before (if you want an example, i've stated that i appreciate how he's a republican president who's not a religious fanatic). if trump does something good, i'll say so. unfortunately, this just doesn't happen all that often.

---

Jakyl25 posted...

Just chiming in to say that I got the irony and humor of your original post,

could you explain it to me? because i still don't get it, as outlined in my previous post.

---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

so your point was "no matter what trump does, there's always going to be people who are going to criticize what he does"? that's like... duh, of course? why is this ironic or hilarious to the point that you're laughing out loud about it?

this is like if you said "with every video game that comes out, there are always SOME people who dislike it! fortnite gets criticized for being too casual while celeste gets criticized for being a boring indie game! how ironic! lol!" again, as long as these criticisms aren't coming from the same people, there's really nothing ironic or lolworthy about this. this is just how this shit always goes.

also, you conveniently ignore that "the group" also says GOOD things about trump. probably not so much with this roger stone thing as that's so undeniably bad that even red sox thinks it's bad. but just last topic, red sox was saying he's glad that trump is president because he's adequate at playing "4D chess" with putin. i myself have praised trump before (if you want an example, i've stated that i appreciate how he's a republican president who's not a religious fanatic). if trump does something good, i'll say so. unfortunately, this just doesn't happen all that often.

Why are you so defensive about me finding it funny back to back posts illustrated the let's propensity to attack Trump no matter what he does (that I also said the right does also with certain targets)? Lol.

Like, why? I don't get it why you are so personally outraged that you came in here throwing insults and fuck yous and everything else regarding it.

---

I can see the humor in those posts being back-to-back in a kind of gilligan cut "Like X'll ever happen" *smash cut to X happening* way.

But trying to tie it to "see he gets attacked no matter what he does!!!" is just eye-roll worthy.

---

Corrik7 posted...

Why are you so defensive about me finding it funny back to back posts illustrated the let's propensity to attack Trump no matter what he does (that I also said the right does also with certain targets)? Lol.

Like, why? I don't get it why you are so personally outraged that you came in here throwing insults and fuck yous and everything else regarding it.

i was outraged because it seemed to me like you were being condescending and belittling to the regulars with the "lol" shit.

on its own, your post probably didn't warrant the reaction i gave it, but you ALWAYS act like this and i was done with it.

---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

i was outraged because it seemed to me like you were being condescending and belittling to the regulars with the "lol" shit.

on its own, your post probably didn't warrant the reaction i gave it, but you ALWAYS act like this and i was done with it.

Lol is probably my most typed thing in the English language. I don't know if I ever send two consecutive texts without a lol in it at some point. Sometimes multiple ones.

---

yinz lol anymore

---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

could you explain it to me? because i still don't get it, as outlined in my previous post.

A post that is saying Trump does not reciprocate loyalty, what a heartless loser followed by a different post that says Trump will do this bad thing purely because of loyalty with no respect for the law is kind of humorous
---

If Trump bails someone out, it's probably because they're still useful to him. At the very least it can be a way to keep someone's mouth shut.

If they aren't useful, under the bus they go!

---

To me, it seems simple.

Trump has repeatedly been shown to throw his allies, and people who has otherwise tanked their careers in order to defend him, under the bus in order to distance himself from any potential fallout from their capture and arrest or whatever. The original post is finding it humorous that anyone would instinctively believe that Trump will feel a sense of loyalty towards them, given how sparse his displays of overt loyalty have been. How many times have there been statements of "I never knew him" from Trump, when someone in his circle was busted for crimes? That's what that first post is referring to.

Meanwhile, LotM's post finds it disgusting that the president has the authority to commute the sentence of a person convicted of crimes that directly benefited said president. Yeah, the president has that authority, but it's still a fucked up perversion of justice.

While I won't deny that there is very little Trump could do that would not result in him being maligned by this board--which, mind you, is not a result of Trump Derangement Syndrome, but rather the fact that he is an openly stupid and malignant asshole who has proven time and time again to be incapable of basic human decency unless it somehow benefits him to demonstrate it--but the thing Corrik is missing in this whole argument is that, while the two statements are contradictory on paper, they're also referring to two different subjects.

The first post is critical of Trump's toadies and lackies who have been consistently thrown under the bus by Trump, and it's basically calling them morons for believing themselves the chosen few to whom Trump will demonstrate his benevolence. Yeah, it's calling Trump disloyal, but for every Roger Stone, there are a dozen or more randos who he distances himself from the second they get into hot water.

The second post is critical of Trump himself for abusing the power of his office. Thus, two different criticisms for two different subjects.

---

Jakyl25 posted...

A post that is saying Trump does not reciprocate loyalty, what a heartless loser followed by a different post that says Trump will do this bad thing purely because of loyalty with no respect for the law is kind of humorous

first of all, that's not what LotM said.

second of all, WHY is it humurous? you didn't actually explain anything. you just described what happened and said "yup this is funny."

---

I dont think Trump pardoned Stone primarily out of a sense of loyalty. Stone basically said earlier that day that he had incriminating info on Trump that he could have said but didnt; its quid pro quo. He also sees doing this (similar to with Flynn, who didnt have anything on him) as a way of feeding his base and striking back against the evil deep state.

In any case, even if it was actually out of loyalty, getting your criminal friends off the hook out of loyalty is not virtuous at all.

---

https://twitter.com/JesseLehrich/status/1282089662023176192

---

"i get it, you want to be politically correct"

---

https://twitter.com/jillboard/status/1281966285731983361?s=21

---