Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 194: Dislike a Virgin

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10
scarletspeed7 09/25/18 11:48:50 PM #152:	Jakyl25 posted... Narrator voice: They werent. Most underrated post in this thread. --- "It is too easy being monsters. Let us try to be human." ~Victor Frankenstein, Penny Dreadful <cite>scarletspeed7 posted [p:909457397] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Narrator voice: They werent.</quote> Most underrated post in this thread.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 09/25/18 11:59:27 PM #153:	UltimaterializerX posted... The GOP has a live stream with HUNDREDS of women defending Kavanaugh. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqS7mrdCkdg" data-time=" You guys do think all women should be believed, right? Does this include women defending the man? I certainly believe their accounts that he didnt sexually assault them. --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:909457849] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>UltimaterializerX posted...</cite> <quote>The GOP has a live stream with HUNDREDS of women defending Kavanaugh. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqS7mrdCkdg" data-time=" You guys do think all women should be believed, right? Does this include women defending the man?</quote> I certainly believe their accounts that he didnt sexually assault them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#154	Post #154 was unavailable or deleted.
Eddv 09/26/18 12:11:34 AM #155:	It looks like the Judiciary Committee is pushing through to have a vote Friday,regardless of how the hearing Thursday goes. So I guess there's that. --- Board 8's Voice of Reason https://imgur.com/chXIw06 <cite>Eddv posted [p:909458417] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>It looks like the Judiciary Committee is pushing through to have a vote Friday,regardless of how the hearing Thursday goes. So I guess there's that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xp1337 09/26/18 12:21:11 AM #156:	Eddv posted... It looks like the Judiciary Committee is pushing through to have a vote Friday,regardless of how the hearing Thursday goes. So I guess there's that. Yeah. One of the GOP Senators (Corker? Don't feel like looking it back up right now.) said that they may not vote that day but ~regular order~ requires a 3 day advance notice so they scheduled it today ~just in case~ they're ready to vote.) I dunno, I still feel like this is all part of some kind of maximum pressure campaign by McConnell/Grassley/GOP leadership on the handful of Senators that might waffle on this. I do think Murkowski sounds like a no - though she did walk back one of her stronger statements a bit a while ago - but the others? I don't trust them to actually vote no if a vote is forced. Not yet at least. I've written Collins off completely. She's absolutely a yes vote and has said some absurd BS in support of that. The scales in my mind are tipping back towards "Vote held and confirmed" but I don't know if it's crossed over to the other side of 50/50 yet. I just don't know how the hearing doesn't make things worse for them. They even went and hired outside counsel to handle the questioning instead of doing it themselves. Like, wow. --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:909458808] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>Eddv posted...</cite> <quote>It looks like the Judiciary Committee is pushing through to have a vote Friday,regardless of how the hearing Thursday goes. So I guess there's that.</quote> Yeah. One of the GOP Senators (Corker? Don't feel like looking it back up right now.) said that they may not vote that day but ~regular order~ requires a 3 day advance notice so they scheduled it today ~just in case~ they're ready to vote.) I dunno, I still feel like this is all part of some kind of maximum pressure campaign by McConnell/Grassley/GOP leadership on the handful of Senators that might waffle on this. I do think Murkowski sounds like a no - though she did walk back one of her stronger statements a bit a while ago - but the others? I don't trust them to actually vote no if a vote is forced. Not yet at least. I've written Collins off completely. She's absolutely a yes vote and has said some absurd BS in support of that. The scales in my mind are tipping back towards "Vote held and confirmed" but I don't know if it's crossed over to the other side of 50/50 yet. I just don't know how the hearing doesn't make things worse for them. They even went and hired outside counsel to handle the questioning instead of doing it themselves. Like, wow.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 09/26/18 12:26:09 AM #157:	Yeah, Murkowski definitely seems like the most likely GOP no vote. Manchin made some comments that made me concerned that he might vote for him; I think theres plenty of reasons for every Dem to vote against him anyway (e.g. his views on whether a president can do whatever the fuck they want without consequence), but its possible that Manchin doesnt see it that way. --- Congrats to BKSheikah for winning the BYIG Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:909459036] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, Murkowski definitely seems like the most likely GOP no vote. Manchin made some comments that made me concerned that he might vote for him; I think theres plenty of reasons for every Dem to vote against him anyway (e.g. his views on whether a president can do whatever the fuck they want without consequence), but its possible that Manchin doesnt see it that way.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Surskit 09/26/18 12:26:40 AM #158:	UltimaterializerX posted... UltimaterializerX posted... You guys do think all women should be believed, right? Does this include women defending the man? This is a real question I want answered, by the way. Maybe you can answer the question as to how these are necessarily mutually exclusive. You're not stupid, you know they aren't. You can believe both. --- .-#Elements of Water#-. <cite>Surskit posted [p:909459066] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>UltimaterializerX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UltimaterializerX posted...</cite> <quote> You guys do think all women should be believed, right? Does this include women defending the man?</quote> This is a real question I want answered, by the way.</quote> Maybe you can answer the question as to how these are necessarily mutually exclusive. You're not stupid, you know they aren't. You can believe both.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StealThisSheen 09/26/18 12:28:11 AM #159:	xp1337 posted... I don't trust them to actually vote no if a vote is forced. Not yet at least. I've written Collins off completely. She's absolutely a yes vote and has said some absurd BS in support of that. I forget who said it, but the "hero Republicans" don't have any morals further than you can throw 'em, either. They only hold out if they're not getting what they personally want. --- Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996 Step FOUR! Get Paid! <cite>StealThisSheen posted [p:909459127] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>xp1337 posted...</cite> <quote>I don't trust them to actually vote no if a vote is forced. Not yet at least. I've written Collins off completely. She's absolutely a yes vote and has said some absurd BS in support of that.</quote> I forget who said it, but the "hero Republicans" don't have any morals further than you can throw 'em, either. They only hold out if they're not getting what they personally want.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xp1337 09/26/18 12:34:00 AM #160:	Murkowski is facing a lot of local pressure to reject Kavanaugh and early today issued by far the strongest statements on the subject by any Republican. She rebuked Trump and seemed to imply we should believe victims. She also - though walked this back a bit later - basically said there should be an FBI Investigation. And, as always, she literally won a write-in campaign after she was primaried so she is uniquely resistant to any pressure from GOP leadership. I really do think she's a no vote at least based on the current information. It's the others who I have a hard time seeing them getting to a no vote. At least right now. Might change post hearing. Plus even if individually I have a hard time seeing the path, if Murkowski is a no you only need one more. --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:909459387] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>Murkowski is facing a lot of local pressure to reject Kavanaugh and early today issued by far the strongest statements on the subject by any Republican. She rebuked Trump and seemed to imply we should believe victims. She also - though walked this back a bit later - basically said there should be an FBI Investigation. And, as always, she literally won a write-in campaign after she was primaried so she is uniquely resistant to any pressure from GOP leadership. I really do think she's a no vote at least based on the current information. It's the others who I have a hard time seeing them getting to a no vote. At least right now. Might change post hearing. Plus even if individually I have a hard time seeing the path, if Murkowski is a no you only need one more.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HaRRicH 09/26/18 12:58:19 AM #161:	If Flake drops a big thumbs-down, I predict lots of shittalk toward Arizona. --- Nominate METAL MAN for 20XX! https://imgur.com/Dr4NAeq <cite>HaRRicH posted [p:909460307] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>If Flake drops a big thumbs-down, I predict lots of shittalk toward Arizona.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 09/26/18 1:16:30 AM #162:	xp1337 posted... Eddv posted... It looks like the Judiciary Committee is pushing through to have a vote Friday,regardless of how the hearing Thursday goes. So I guess there's that. Yeah. One of the GOP Senators (Corker? Don't feel like looking it back up right now.) said that they may not vote that day but ~regular order~ requires a 3 day advance notice so they scheduled it today ~just in case~ they're ready to vote.) I dunno, I still feel like this is all part of some kind of maximum pressure campaign by McConnell/Grassley/GOP leadership on the handful of Senators that might waffle on this. I do think Murkowski sounds like a no - though she did walk back one of her stronger statements a bit a while ago - but the others? I don't trust them to actually vote no if a vote is forced. Not yet at least. I've written Collins off completely. She's absolutely a yes vote and has said some absurd BS in support of that. The scales in my mind are tipping back towards "Vote held and confirmed" but I don't know if it's crossed over to the other side of 50/50 yet. I just don't know how the hearing doesn't make things worse for them. They even went and hired outside counsel to handle the questioning instead of doing it themselves. Like, wow. You think Jones and Manchin are gonna vote no? --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:909460993] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>xp1337 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Eddv posted...</cite> <quote>It looks like the Judiciary Committee is pushing through to have a vote Friday,regardless of how the hearing Thursday goes. So I guess there's that.</quote> Yeah. One of the GOP Senators (Corker? Don't feel like looking it back up right now.) said that they may not vote that day but ~regular order~ requires a 3 day advance notice so they scheduled it today ~just in case~ they're ready to vote.) I dunno, I still feel like this is all part of some kind of maximum pressure campaign by McConnell/Grassley/GOP leadership on the handful of Senators that might waffle on this. I do think Murkowski sounds like a no - though she did walk back one of her stronger statements a bit a while ago - but the others? I don't trust them to actually vote no if a vote is forced. Not yet at least. I've written Collins off completely. She's absolutely a yes vote and has said some absurd BS in support of that. The scales in my mind are tipping back towards "Vote held and confirmed" but I don't know if it's crossed over to the other side of 50/50 yet. I just don't know how the hearing doesn't make things worse for them. They even went and hired outside counsel to handle the questioning instead of doing it themselves. Like, wow.</quote> You think Jones and Manchin are gonna vote no?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Eddv 09/26/18 1:19:12 AM #163:	Jones and Manchin are both on the record being pro-investigation, which PRESUMABLY means they're nos in the absence of one, but really who knows. --- Board 8's Voice of Reason https://imgur.com/chXIw06 <cite>Eddv posted [p:909461083] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>Jones and Manchin are both on the record being pro-investigation, which PRESUMABLY means they're nos in the absence of one, but really who knows.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 09/26/18 1:22:21 AM #164:	Eddv posted... Jones and Manchin are both on the record being pro-investigation, which PRESUMABLY means they're nos in the absence of one, but really who knows. I feel like that would be a death sentence for either (moreso probably Jones) as far as their seat goes. Manchin, however, ran specifically a lot of his campaign of being pro-trump. Then again Jones might not be able to win his seat versus a normal conservative candidate anyways. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:909461184] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>Eddv posted...</cite> <quote>Jones and Manchin are both on the record being pro-investigation, which PRESUMABLY means they're nos in the absence of one, but really who knows.</quote> I feel like that would be a death sentence for either (moreso probably Jones) as far as their seat goes. Manchin, however, ran specifically a lot of his campaign of being pro-trump. Then again Jones might not be able to win his seat versus a normal conservative candidate anyways.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xp1337 09/26/18 1:25:09 AM #165:	Corrik posted... You think Jones and Manchin are gonna vote no? Yes. Higher confidence on Jones than Manchin but I believe the Democrats will be united on this. McCaskill even found a way to reach a public declaration of a no vote without citing the allegations as the reason for her decision. Edit: Also, lol at voting no costing Manchin his election. He's probably the safest of the "vulnerable" Democratic seats. --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:909461265] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>You think Jones and Manchin are gonna vote no?</quote> Yes. Higher confidence on Jones than Manchin but I believe the Democrats will be united on this. McCaskill even found a way to reach a public declaration of a no vote without citing the allegations as the reason for her decision. Edit: Also, lol at voting no costing Manchin his election. He's probably the safest of the "vulnerable" Democratic seats.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 09/26/18 1:41:47 AM #166:	xp1337 posted... Corrik posted... You think Jones and Manchin are gonna vote no? Yes. Higher confidence on Jones than Manchin but I believe the Democrats will be united on this. McCaskill even found a way to reach a public declaration of a no vote without citing the allegations as the reason for her decision. Edit: Also, lol at voting no costing Manchin his election. He's probably the safest of the "vulnerable" Democratic seats. I think lying to the voters of West Virginia of being Pro-Trump when Trump is extremely popular there and with his competitor trying to ding Manchin on not really supporting Trump. Then backing up that with betraying Trump in a vote in which Manchin's vote finally matters would definitely do some damage and prove those attacks right. Where Manchin is now versus where he will be after could be different. He is likely too seeded to lose, but it will definitely have an effect. How much of one though? Jones already may be dead in water in 2020. That said, a lot of Dem senators in red States have some decisions cut out for them if a couple of Republicans flip. (Which I think won't happen anyways) --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:909461856] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>xp1337 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>You think Jones and Manchin are gonna vote no?</quote> Yes. Higher confidence on Jones than Manchin but I believe the Democrats will be united on this. McCaskill even found a way to reach a public declaration of a no vote without citing the allegations as the reason for her decision. Edit: Also, lol at voting no costing Manchin his election. He's probably the safest of the "vulnerable" Democratic seats.</quote> I think lying to the voters of West Virginia of being Pro-Trump when Trump is extremely popular there and with his competitor trying to ding Manchin on not really supporting Trump. Then backing up that with betraying Trump in a vote in which Manchin's vote finally matters would definitely do some damage and prove those attacks right. Where Manchin is now versus where he will be after could be different. He is likely too seeded to lose, but it will definitely have an effect. How much of one though? Jones already may be dead in water in 2020. That said, a lot of Dem senators in red States have some decisions cut out for them if a couple of Republicans flip. (Which I think won't happen anyways)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Eddv 09/26/18 1:43:10 AM #167:	I think coming out and saying "I do not support there being a vote without an investigation" and then voting yes without one makes both look like pussies which hurts their brand more imo. --- Board 8's Voice of Reason https://imgur.com/chXIw06 <cite>Eddv posted [p:909461909] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>I think coming out and saying "I do not support there being a vote without an investigation" and then voting yes without one makes both look like pussies which hurts their brand more imo.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Suprak the Stud 09/26/18 1:45:37 AM #168:	Corrik posted... Eddv posted... Jones and Manchin are both on the record being pro-investigation, which PRESUMABLY means they're nos in the absence of one, but really who knows. I feel like that would be a death sentence for either (moreso probably Jones) as far as their seat goes. Manchin, however, ran specifically a lot of his campaign of being pro-trump. Then again Jones might not be able to win his seat versus a normal conservative candidate anyways. Jones is 100% losing in 2020. He's a great candidate but as long as Alabama put up "not a pedophile" for Republicans, Jones is toast. Manchin is surprisingly like the most safe red state den right now. He's not even in the toss-up range at the moment. That being said, he's pro-life so I doubt he would hesitate to vote for whoever Trump puts up in most circumstances. He's pretty openly supportive of Trump more than any other Democrat, except maybe Heitkamp. I could see him going either way, honestly, depending on Thursday. --- Moops? "I thought you were making up diseases? That's spontaneous dental hydroplosion." <cite>Suprak the Stud posted [p:909461984] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Eddv posted...</cite> <quote>Jones and Manchin are both on the record being pro-investigation, which PRESUMABLY means they're nos in the absence of one, but really who knows.</quote> I feel like that would be a death sentence for either (moreso probably Jones) as far as their seat goes. Manchin, however, ran specifically a lot of his campaign of being pro-trump. Then again Jones might not be able to win his seat versus a normal conservative candidate anyways.</quote> Jones is 100% losing in 2020. He's a great candidate but as long as Alabama put up "not a pedophile" for Republicans, Jones is toast. Manchin is surprisingly like the most safe red state den right now. He's not even in the toss-up range at the moment. That being said, he's pro-life so I doubt he would hesitate to vote for whoever Trump puts up in most circumstances. He's pretty openly supportive of Trump more than any other Democrat, except maybe Heitkamp. I could see him going either way, honestly, depending on Thursday.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
red13n 09/26/18 1:47:55 AM #169:	Eddv posted... I think coming out and saying "I do not support there being a vote without an investigation" and then voting yes without one makes both look like pussies which hurts their brand more imo. no way. The way politics has turned pure black and white they just argue the alternative is potentially letting the dems have a decision on a future nominee and they chose the lesser of two evils. Voters arent smart enough to see beyond that. --- "First thing that crosses my mind: I didn't get any GameFAQs Karma yesterday." Math Murderer after getting his appendix removed. <cite>red13n posted [p:909462053] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>Eddv posted...</cite> <quote>I think coming out and saying "I do not support there being a vote without an investigation" and then voting yes without one makes both look like pussies which hurts their brand more imo.</quote> no way. The way politics has turned pure black and white they just argue the alternative is potentially letting the dems have a decision on a future nominee and they chose the lesser of two evils. Voters arent smart enough to see beyond that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xp1337 09/26/18 1:48:55 AM #170:	Jones was never going to hold that seat in 2020 unless the Republicans ran Moore again lol. I mean he barely beat Moore lmao. Manchin will be fine. By your logic he should have taken damage for saving the ACA. This isn't really a hard call for even the vulnerable Democrats. It might have been before the allegations and I think in the alternate universe where they never surfaced you might have had one or two of them switch over and confirm... but we're not in that universe. McCaskill already has declared herself a no vote, and based it on Kavanaugh's views on executive power and dark money. Jones has been a harsh critic on how the Republicans are running this hearing, so if nothing else he can object on process. Manchin is pretty much always with the Democrats when it counts. Which leaves Heitkamp, Tester, and Donnelly but I expect them to come on board too. (Tester voted against Gorsuch so it'd be really weird for him to vote for Kavanaugh now) --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:909462081] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>Jones was never going to hold that seat in 2020 unless the Republicans ran Moore again lol. I mean he barely beat Moore lmao. Manchin will be fine. By your logic he should have taken damage for saving the ACA. This isn't really a hard call for even the vulnerable Democrats. It might have been before the allegations and I think in the alternate universe where they never surfaced you might have had one or two of them switch over and confirm... but we're not in that universe. McCaskill already has declared herself a no vote, and based it on Kavanaugh's views on executive power and dark money. Jones has been a harsh critic on how the Republicans are running this hearing, so if nothing else he can object on process. Manchin is pretty much always with the Democrats when it counts. Which leaves Heitkamp, Tester, and Donnelly but I expect them to come on board too. (Tester voted against Gorsuch so it'd be really weird for him to vote for Kavanaugh now)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Eddv 09/26/18 1:57:56 AM #171:	red13n posted... Eddv posted... I think coming out and saying "I do not support there being a vote without an investigation" and then voting yes without one makes both look like pussies which hurts their brand more imo. no way. The way politics has turned pure black and white they just argue the alternative is potentially letting the dems have a decision on a future nominee and they chose the lesser of two evils. Voters arent smart enough to see beyond that. It doesn't make them look like wusses? I mean you're just wrong. If these last 2 years have held any lessons for you let it be that candidate quality matters --- Board 8's Voice of Reason https://imgur.com/chXIw06 <cite>Eddv posted [p:909462394] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>red13n posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Eddv posted...</cite> <quote>I think coming out and saying "I do not support there being a vote without an investigation" and then voting yes without one makes both look like pussies which hurts their brand more imo.</quote> no way. The way politics has turned pure black and white they just argue the alternative is potentially letting the dems have a decision on a future nominee and they chose the lesser of two evils. Voters arent smart enough to see beyond that.</quote> It doesn't make them look like wusses? I mean you're just wrong. If these last 2 years have held any lessons for you let it be that candidate quality matters</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xp1337 09/26/18 2:07:44 AM #172:	tbqh, if I were one of the red state Dems I'd be more worried that voting to confirm at this point would demotivate my base. I have a really hard time imagining they somehow net more than they lose. --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:909462715] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>tbqh, if I were one of the red state Dems I'd be more worried that voting to confirm at this point would demotivate my base. I have a really hard time imagining they somehow net more than they lose.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 09/26/18 3:02:32 AM #173:	More corroboration that Ford had told others about her attempted rape before Kavanaugh was nominated: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/09/25/brett-kavanaugh-ford-has-4-people-corroborate-sexual-assault-claims/1429270002/ In particular: In another declaration, Keith Koegler said Ford revealed the alleged assault to him in 2016, when the two parents were watching their children play in a public place and discussing the light sentencing of Stanford University student Brock Turner. Christine expressed anger at Mr. Turners lenient sentence, stating that she was particularly bothered by it because she was assaulted in high school by a man who was now a federal judge in Washington, D.C., Koegler said. Christine did not mention the assault to me again until June 29, 2018, two days after Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his resignation from the Supreme Court of the United States, he said. On that day, Koegler said Ford revealed to him in an email that the person who had assaulted her in high school was President Donald Trumps favorite for SCOTUS. In his response email, Koegler wrote, I remember you telling me about him, but I dont remember his name. Do you mind telling me so I can read about him? Fords emailed response: Brett Kavanaugh. --- Congrats to BKSheikah for winning the BYIG Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:909464190] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>More corroboration that Ford had told others about her attempted rape before Kavanaugh was nominated: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/09/25/brett-kavanaugh-ford-has-4-people-corroborate-sexual-assault-claims/1429270002/ In particular: <quote>In another declaration, Keith Koegler said Ford revealed the alleged assault to him in 2016, when the two parents were watching their children play in a public place and discussing the light sentencing of Stanford University student Brock Turner. Christine expressed anger at Mr. Turners lenient sentence, stating that she was particularly bothered by it because she was assaulted in high school by a man who was now a federal judge in Washington, D.C., Koegler said. Christine did not mention the assault to me again until June 29, 2018, two days after Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his resignation from the Supreme Court of the United States, he said. On that day, Koegler said Ford revealed to him in an email that the person who had assaulted her in high school was President Donald Trumps favorite for SCOTUS. In his response email, Koegler wrote, I remember you telling me about him, but I dont remember his name. Do you mind telling me so I can read about him? Fords emailed response: Brett Kavanaugh.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 09/26/18 4:58:01 AM #174:	Not sure why she supposedly told no one and now all the sudden she told a bunch of people, but that email should be good evidence. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:909466599] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>Not sure why she supposedly told no one and now all the sudden she told a bunch of people, but that email should be good evidence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 09/26/18 5:06:46 AM #175:	I think I had read about one or two of the other people earlier. Not the one with the email naming him, though. --- Congrats to BKSheikah for winning the BYIG Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:909466748] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>I think I had read about one or two of the other people earlier. Not the one with the email naming him, though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 09/26/18 5:10:02 AM #176:	If they cannot reproduce that email, and all 3 of these corroborators turn out to be anti-trump marching democrats (as Ford is)... Then, I am going to be suspicious. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:909466797] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>If they cannot reproduce that email, and all 3 of these corroborators turn out to be anti-trump marching democrats (as Ford is)... Then, I am going to be suspicious.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TotallyNotMI 09/26/18 7:03:13 AM #177:	Isn't Ford super apolitical and the Trump marching democrat was a rumor spread by trolls? --- I'm not sure who this MI guy is but he sounds sexy. <cite>TotallyNotMI posted [p:909468915] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>Isn't Ford super apolitical and the Trump marching democrat was a rumor spread by trolls?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HanOfTheNekos 09/26/18 7:31:25 AM #178:	UltiCalledIt posted... Yes, it's called Proprietary Information Are you saying that's the name of the company/check or are you trying to claim that your source is a company secret? --- "Bordate is a pretty shady place, what with the gangs, casinos, evil corporations and water park." - FAHtastic <cite>HanOfTheNekos posted [p:909469525] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>UltiCalledIt posted...</cite> <quote> Yes, it's called Proprietary Information</quote> Are you saying that's the name of the company/check or are you trying to claim that your source is a company secret?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr Lasastryke 09/26/18 8:22:56 AM #179:	TotallyNotMI posted... Isn't Ford super apolitical and the Trump marching democrat was a rumor spread by trolls? i watched what stefan molyneux had to say about ford and he just went "well she's a psychologist and she got her phd in california so OF COURSE she's a leftist!!" apparently he had no actual evidence of her political leanings or else he absolutely would have talked about it. --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta <cite>Mr Lasastryke posted [p:909470763] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>TotallyNotMI posted...</cite> <quote>Isn't Ford super apolitical and the Trump marching democrat was a rumor spread by trolls?</quote> i watched what stefan molyneux had to say about ford and he just went "well she's a psychologist and she got her phd in california so OF COURSE she's a leftist!!" apparently he had no actual evidence of her political leanings or else he absolutely would have talked about it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
metroid composite 09/26/18 8:35:12 AM #180:	Mr Lasastryke posted... "well she's a psychologist and she got her phd in california so OF COURSE she's a leftist!!" Being in California definitely does not make you a leftist. I live in a red district these days. Being an educated professional in California also does not make you a leftist. My dentist is pretty republican, which I know cause he likes to ramble about politics while poking metal instruments in my mouth. (I mean, he's California Republican. He was shocked and appalled when I told him that people could be legally fired for being gay in several states. But he did have a generally positive view of Trump last I spoke with him). Hey, hey, you know who else was from California? Ronald Reagan. And he was an actor. Total leftist right? lololol --- Cats land on their feet. Toast lands peanut butter side down. A cat with toast strapped to its back will hover above the ground in a state of quantum indecision <cite>metroid composite posted [p:909471062] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mr Lasastryke posted...</cite> <quote>"well she's a psychologist and she got her phd in california so OF COURSE she's a leftist!!"</quote> Being in California definitely does not make you a leftist. I live in a red district these days. Being an educated professional in California also does not make you a leftist. My dentist is pretty republican, which I know cause he likes to ramble about politics while poking metal instruments in my mouth. (I mean, he's California Republican. He was shocked and appalled when I told him that people could be legally fired for being gay in several states. But he did have a generally positive view of Trump last I spoke with him). Hey, hey, you know who else was from California? Ronald Reagan. And he was an actor. Total leftist right? lololol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr Lasastryke 09/26/18 8:42:27 AM #181:	https://twitter.com/robertjeffress/status/1044608785900277760 a speech where the UN was laughing at trump was somehow "the strongest speech to the united nations of any president in history." ok. --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta <cite>Mr Lasastryke posted [p:909471281] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/robertjeffress/status/1044608785900277760 a speech where the UN was laughing at trump was somehow "the strongest speech to the united nations of any president in history." ok.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr Lasastryke 09/26/18 8:43:48 AM #182:	https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1044782444321361920 Pray for Brett Kavanaugh and his family! why do we need to pray for him if it's absolutely certain that he's innocent? --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta <cite>Mr Lasastryke posted [p:909471333] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1044782444321361920 <quote>Pray for Brett Kavanaugh and his family!</quote> why do we need to pray for him if it's absolutely certain that he's innocent?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Peace___Frog 09/26/18 9:41:40 AM #183:	His released calendar looks photo shopped to hell lmao --- ~Peaf~ <cite>Peace___Frog posted [p:909473367] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>His released calendar looks photo shopped to hell lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Mana Sword 09/26/18 9:52:53 AM #184:	Not entirely sure what the calendar is supposed to prove but now Im dying to know what he got grounded for in May --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/Gylgamesh501.png <cite>The Mana Sword posted [p:909473807] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>Not entirely sure what the calendar is supposed to prove but now Im dying to know what he got grounded for in May</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Obellisk 09/26/18 9:54:31 AM #185:	I've decided that the President should be allowed to nominate Supreme Court Justices however it should be left to the people of the United States to elect them. You should need to receive x percentage of votes of the American people in order to be confirmed. Senate Commitee still does the hearing, but then the people vote on if the person is appropriate to sit on the highest court for life. --- (\____/) ( SBell ) <cite>Obellisk posted [p:909473880] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>I've decided that the President should be allowed to nominate Supreme Court Justices however it should be left to the people of the United States to elect them. You should need to receive x percentage of votes of the American people in order to be confirmed. Senate Commitee still does the hearing, but then the people vote on if the person is appropriate to sit on the highest court for life.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NFUN 09/26/18 9:57:15 AM #186:	metroid composite posted... Mr Lasastryke posted... "well she's a psychologist and she got her phd in california so OF COURSE she's a leftist!!" Being in California definitely does not make you a leftist. I live in a red district these days. Being an educated professional in California also does not make you a leftist. My dentist is pretty republican, which I know cause he likes to ramble about politics while poking metal instruments in my mouth. (I mean, he's California Republican. He was shocked and appalled when I told him that people could be legally fired for being gay in several states. But he did have a generally positive view of Trump last I spoke with him). Hey, hey, you know who else was from California? Ronald Reagan. And he was an actor. Total leftist right? lololol its joke --- Life before death. Strength before weakness. Journey before destination. <cite>NFUN posted [p:909474004] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>metroid composite posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mr Lasastryke posted...</cite> <quote>"well she's a psychologist and she got her phd in california so OF COURSE she's a leftist!!"</quote> Being in California definitely does not make you a leftist. I live in a red district these days. Being an educated professional in California also does not make you a leftist. My dentist is pretty republican, which I know cause he likes to ramble about politics while poking metal instruments in my mouth. (I mean, he's California Republican. He was shocked and appalled when I told him that people could be legally fired for being gay in several states. But he did have a generally positive view of Trump last I spoke with him). Hey, hey, you know who else was from California? Ronald Reagan. And he was an actor. Total leftist right? lololol</quote> its joke</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dancedreamer 09/26/18 10:05:08 AM #187:	If Republicans confirm Kavanaugh, they lose all right to ever call out Bill Clinton again tbqh. --- This isn't funny Dean, the voice says I'm almost out of minutes! ~Alexandra <cite>Dancedreamer posted [p:909474332] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>If Republicans confirm Kavanaugh, they lose all right to ever call out Bill Clinton again tbqh.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Reg 09/26/18 10:13:12 AM #188:	Dancedreamer posted... If Republicans confirm Kavanaugh, they lose all right to ever call out Bill Clinton again tbqh. They didn't lose that with the election of Trump or the nomination of Moore? <cite>Reg posted [p:909474662] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dancedreamer posted...</cite> <quote>If Republicans confirm Kavanaugh, they lose all right to ever call out Bill Clinton again tbqh.</quote> They didn't lose that with the election of Trump or the nomination of Moore?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Peace___Frog 09/26/18 10:24:39 AM #189:	Reg posted... Dancedreamer posted... If Republicans confirm Kavanaugh, they lose all right to ever call out Bill Clinton again tbqh. They didn't lose that with the election of Trump or the nomination of Moore? I have a feeling that in 20 years, no one will want to claim that they voted for trump. --- ~Peaf~ <cite>Peace___Frog posted [p:909475230] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>Reg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dancedreamer posted...</cite> <quote>If Republicans confirm Kavanaugh, they lose all right to ever call out Bill Clinton again tbqh.</quote> They didn't lose that with the election of Trump or the nomination of Moore?</quote> I have a feeling that in 20 years, no one will want to claim that they voted for trump.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TotallyNotMI 09/26/18 10:27:00 AM #190:	I think in 6-10 years we'll have Republicans running for office saying things like 'Well Trump wasn't REALLY a Republican'. --- I'm not sure who this MI guy is but he sounds sexy. <cite>TotallyNotMI posted [p:909475324] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>I think in 6-10 years we'll have Republicans running for office saying things like 'Well Trump wasn't REALLY a Republican'.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Espeon 09/26/18 10:27:55 AM #191:	Theyll call him a NeoCon --- Inviso's Most Adorabl-est Eeveelution Ever https://imgur.com/SSw6M9E <cite>Espeon posted [p:909475363] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>Theyll call him a NeoCon</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dancedreamer 09/26/18 10:48:29 AM #192:	TotallyNotMI posted... I think in 6-10 years we'll have Republicans running for office saying things like 'Well Trump wasn't REALLY a Republican'. They'll point out he was a Democrat at one time who dined with Hillary Clinton. --- This isn't funny Dean, the voice says I'm almost out of minutes! ~Alexandra <cite>Dancedreamer posted [p:909476376] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>TotallyNotMI posted...</cite> <quote>I think in 6-10 years we'll have Republicans running for office saying things like 'Well Trump wasn't REALLY a Republican'. </quote> They'll point out he was a Democrat at one time who dined with Hillary Clinton.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 09/26/18 10:55:22 AM #193:	I just hope hes still alive to throw a fit about it --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:909476717] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>I just hope hes still alive to throw a fit about it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Peace___Frog 09/26/18 10:59:43 AM #194:	Jakyl25 posted... I just hope hes still alive to throw a fit about it And i hope that said fits don't ever reach the news cycle. --- ~Peaf~ <cite>Peace___Frog posted [p:909476952] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>I just hope hes still alive to throw a fit about it</quote> And i hope that said fits don't ever reach the news cycle.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 09/26/18 11:02:20 AM #195:	The Mana Sword posted... Not entirely sure what the calendar is supposed to prove but now Im dying to know what he got grounded for in May Do we really want a hoarder on the Supreme Court? --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:909477083] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Mana Sword posted...</cite> <quote>Not entirely sure what the calendar is supposed to prove but now Im dying to know what he got grounded for in May</quote> Do we really want a hoarder on the Supreme Court?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheRock1525 09/26/18 11:03:33 AM #196:	Avenatti revealed the third accuser. --- TheRock ~ I had a name, my father called me Blues. <cite>TheRock1525 posted [p:909477141] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>Avenatti revealed the third accuser.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Obellisk 09/26/18 11:14:22 AM #197:	I think if the president wasn't also a sexual predator that the nom would have been pulled by now. --- (\____/) ( SBell ) <cite>Obellisk posted [p:909477677] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>I think if the president wasn't also a sexual predator that the nom would have been pulled by now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 09/26/18 11:23:46 AM #198:	TheRock1525 posted... Avenatti revealed the third accuser. Was it some guy from 4chan? --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRlKR5nU8AA_v_C?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:909478141] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheRock1525 posted...</cite> <quote>Avenatti revealed the third accuser.</quote> Was it some guy from 4chan?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TotallyNotMI 09/26/18 11:27:37 AM #199:	Third accuser is going further than 'attempted sexual assault' and claiming that she was raped by multiple people after being drugged, including Kavanaugh and Judge. --- I'm not sure who this MI guy is but he sounds sexy. <cite>TotallyNotMI posted [p:909478335] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>Third accuser is going further than 'attempted sexual assault' and claiming that she was raped by multiple people after being drugged, including Kavanaugh and Judge.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Obellisk 09/26/18 11:29:39 AM #200:	but ma'am, if you were drugged, how do you know? --- (\____/) ( SBell ) <cite>Obellisk posted [p:909478431] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote>but ma'am, if you were drugged, how do you know?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Reg 09/26/18 11:33:41 AM #201:	TotallyNotMI posted... Third accuser is going further than 'attempted sexual assault' and claiming that she was raped by multiple people after being drugged, including Kavanaugh and Judge. Also claiming it was a constant, recurring thing at parties Kavanaugh and Judge were at. She's literally claiming Brett Kavanaugh is a serial rapist in a sworn affidavit and has witnesses. <cite>Reg posted [p:909478650] in Politics C... [t:77036793]...</cite> <quote><cite>TotallyNotMI posted...</cite> <quote>Third accuser is going further than 'attempted sexual assault' and claiming that she was raped by multiple people after being drugged, including Kavanaugh and Judge.</quote> Also claiming it was a constant, recurring thing at parties Kavanaugh and Judge were at. She's literally claiming Brett Kavanaugh is a serial rapist in a sworn affidavit and has witnesses.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10

Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 194: Dislike a Virgin (+) Yeah! (+)

Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 194: Dislike a Virgin