I think you're a little harsh on Sting, for that matter. Guy seemed fine out there tonight. Didn't seem out of shape to me-- he even did some flying stuff. I'd also disagree he's particularly stale... Sting's kind of timeless as a "legend" character at this point. Unless you just mean "old" instead of stale. But if a guy can still wrestle at 52 I say let him do his thing. It's not like Sting's burying Roode or anything-- and I'd be shocked if Sting won this exchange in the end. Feud probably ends after this PPV and Sting... I dunno what Sting moves onto but yeah.
-- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love!
He's this abomination of character traits he's amassed over the years that do not work when mixed together at all and make him come across like a massive tool.
And just like Cena he dresses like an idiot. <_<
I don't think Sting is "burying" Roode, in that I don't think it's his choice to go out there and pick up clean wins over the Champion, but the BOOKING is harming Roode.
It would be one thing if Roode hadn't already beaten Sting, but he has!
Angle and Anderson are both indeed much better choices, and Angle would bring a ton of symmetry to the Roode reign considering how the heel turn began.
--
Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. http://www.wwe.com/f/styles/photo_large/public/photo/image/2012/04/33_Moscow_04112012jg_02128.jpg
Donst vs. Hallowicked Kingston/Jigsaw/Colony vs. GEKIDO Cabana/Archie vs. Throwbacks UMB vs. Ophidian F.I.S.T. vs. Young Bucks SDR/Saturyne vs. The Batiri Gran Akuma vs. Icarus
BE THERE!
--
Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. http://www.wwe.com/f/styles/photo_large/public/photo/image/2012/04/33_Moscow_04112012jg_02128.jpg
I disagree the booking is harming Roode, because Sting is still presented as a threat.
Your perception is that Sting is washed up and over 50 and therefore shouldn't be relevant or a threat-- I think that's skewing your perception of the harm done by the losses. (I also think that's skewing your perception of his performance in the ring but I digress) That's not the real of the situation though-- that's not how it's presented. It's presented that "this is a Sting who has refocused himself and is stronger than he's been in years"-- so that Sting is a threat Roode has not yet faced. Thusly it makes sense for him to first get the better of him, despite Roode's previous win.
Honestly you kinda remind me of those people who thought OMG ROCK BEATING CENA KILLS CENA'S MOMENTUM AND POPULARITY because their perception was that Rock was an actor and not involved with the business but that's not how WWE presented it at all. It was "super power vs super power" and one super power won-- no harm done. Now it's "persistent champion vs reinvigorated challenger" and in that case it's all about who wins the war, not the battles.
-- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love!
I'm willing to stay out of the Gut Check thing, because I feel there's no winning that argument, but Sting? Sting is done. That match at the top of the card was bad even ignoring the questionable booking decision.
-- Ace Detective in Sir Chris' Police http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/8528/secretariat.gif
That match was perfectly serviceable. Sting wasn't sucking wind. He was doing enough moves that the match didn't boil down to "punch punch punch." Didn't look stiff. Was there something specific that was wrong or can I just assume you guys are both just projecting "50 years old" onto your perception of Sting's ring work.
I mean don't get me wrong I'm not saying "Sting is just as good as he was 15 years ago" I'm just saying "Sting is still good enough to have a good match with a guy who doesn't suck (ie Roode)"
-- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love!
Well I agree lumberjacks were overused to the point where they hurt the match but I thought Sting actually did look like he was in better shape than he'd been in a while.
-- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love!
CM Punk defeated Kane, Mark Henry (with Tony Atlas), Montel Vontavious Porter, Shelton Benjamin, Kofi Kingston, Christian and Finlay (with Hornswoggle)[22]
time for another wellness scandal!
-- Boko United - Geriatric Titanium Mustache Guru Taken Miraculously by SuperNiceDog
BTW I dunno if anyone else saw the lengthy Heyman rant/motivational speech on Twitter tonight but here goes:
Paul Heyman @HeymanHustle I look at some of these pics, and I realize how blessed I was in my career. Some guys have to wait forever for a lucky break.
I managed @AustinIdolLive and Tommy Rich at the age of 21. Also The Orig Midnights, which I got to do on @ESPN.
Got to book Windy City at 22 years old. Eddie Gilbert's assistant booker at same age.
So I was @JRsBBQ color commentator at 23 years old. NO ONE IS GIVEN THAT OPPORTUNITY IN TODAY'S ENVIRONMENT!
I will admit, with all modesty, I #Hustled my ass off, and GOT MYSELF the opportunity with ambition, politics, and pure assertiveness.
Even "down periods" would give me the chance 2 work w/ people like Mean Mark. U know him as "The Undertaker" @WWE http://pic.twitter.com/zC1uUZnH
At 26, I managed @SteveAustinBSR, Rick Rude,Arn,Eaton, Zbyszko ... The Dangerous Alliance (didn't forget @Madusa_Rocks) http://pic.twitter.com/j5vvMfgU
I'm working with these legends, these giants of the industry, these absolute top guys in my 20s ...
In today's system, most super talented people spend a great portion of their 20's just trying to make it onto the main roster ...
Going back to Gut Check for a second, I have to insist that the quality of the opponent DOES matter. A lot.
My main complaint with the first guy getting signed after having lost to Robbie E is that they talk about potential. But what potential do you have if you just lost quickly and cleanly to the lowest guy on the card. If you can't beat Robbie E, exactly who ARE you going to beat?
Meanwhile, having a competitive match against Austin Aries instantly vaults you AT LEAST into same general category as the entire rest of the X-Division. Based on what we've seen so far, if either guy were to be put in a match against say, Zima Ion, the first guy would certainly be expected to lose, but the second guy could totally have a chance at winning.
--
SmartMuffin - Because anything less would be uncivilized - http://img.imgcake.com/smartmuffin/barkleyjpgde.jpg http://dudewheresmyfreedom.com/
From: Jakyl25 | #454 I think Sting is just as stale as Cena.
He's this abomination of character traits he's amassed over the years that do not work when mixed together at all and make him come across like a massive tool.
And just like Cena he dresses like an idiot. <_<
I don't think Sting is "burying" Roode, in that I don't think it's his choice to go out there and pick up clean wins over the Champion, but the BOOKING is harming Roode.
It would be one thing if Roode hadn't already beaten Sting, but he has!
Angle and Anderson are both indeed much better choices, and Angle would bring a ton of symmetry to the Roode reign considering how the heel turn began. There is one factor that makes Sting ok for the role even if they are obviously planning something different for storm in that Roode has to contend with this monster of his own creation. This isnt Victory Road Sting or the Sting he systematically destroyed, its Sting the beast.
The trouble is this now means Storm's return has to do something a bit different, but i think it had to anyway. Storm cant come back angry, thats why he lost to Roode in the first place. So booking mechanics-wise its fine. I still wouldve used Angle since Roode still hasnt actually beat the guy, but maybe thats next.
--
http://img.imgcake.com/nio/81edpngej.png The one and only Underdog Millionaire and UCA CORPORATE Champion
And I don't know if anyone at TNA will come out and say it, but I will.
Sting is done.
Sting is washed the f*** up.
Sting can't wrestle a good match anymore.
Sting should not be headlining PPVs.
Sting should not be getting World Title shots.
You wanna put him in a tag match and let him do his spots off the hot tag? Fine. You wanna use him as a nostalgia act against Hogan on the undercard to maybe sell a couple more PPVs and get the rising stars more spotlight? Fine.
But the guy just doesn't have it anymore.
It'll be by the thinnest of margins, but I would bet a small amount of money that Cena vs. Big Show will be the better of the two matches.
This is one of the biggest things that make me not want to watch TNA. I love Sting. He is my 2nd favorite wrestler of all time (HBK is #1). I cannot stand the idea of watching an over the hill washed up Sting in action. The idea hurts me. I remember watching Flair after he was washed up and I can't stand the thought of watching the Stinger like that. It would tarnish that legacy. I am happy to watch him do promos as a crazy GM or whatever but please don't make him get in the ring and wrestle a full match.
-- (Maniac64 at work) All the proteins, vitamins, and carbs of your grandma's best turkey dinner, plus 15% alcohol.
So, going back to gut check for a second. I've got a couple suggestions. If they want to be "real" they should go all the way and make it even more real.
1. In a REAL competition like this, you wouldn't have the guys compete against opponents of wildly different skill levels. The gut check guys should face the same guy each week. Preferably an experienced veteran. This would be a great role for Devon if he didn't have the TV title.
2. That guy should be one of the judges, so he can comment on their in-ring performance.
--
SmartMuffin - Because anything less would be uncivilized - http://img.imgcake.com/smartmuffin/barkleyjpgde.jpg http://dudewheresmyfreedom.com/
he was at the all star game as wwe champ one year (I think his first reign when he won on NYR) and he was there cheering for Brodeur Oh I was talking wrestling vs other sports because as stated earlier that wrestling ratings were down this week. lol
From: SmartMuffin | #485 So, going back to gut check for a second. I've got a couple suggestions. If they want to be "real" they should go all the way and make it even more real.
1. In a REAL competition like this, you wouldn't have the guys compete against opponents of wildly different skill levels. The gut check guys should face the same guy each week. Preferably an experienced veteran. This would be a great role for Devon if he didn't have the TV title.
2. That guy should be one of the judges, so he can comment on their in-ring performance.
It sounds like you're trying to take it in a more proper kayfabe direction, which is totally not what TNA is going for here.
They're trying to present it as REALLY real, as in "not fake like the rest of the show is fake" like Tough Enough, except that in reality (REALITY reality) it's still a work.
Lopen disagrees and thinks that Gut Check as it exists now still entirely exists within the regular kayfabe and doesn't expose the business at all, and maybe you do too, but I just cannot accept that personally.
--
Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. http://www.wwe.com/f/styles/photo_large/public/photo/image/2012/04/33_Moscow_04112012jg_02128.jpg