Board 8 > English Literature Mafia Topic 3: Is the prologue over yet?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Lea3Lea posted...

Corrik, like English Literature, must oftentimes be interpreted figuratively instead of literally

---

red13n posted...

topic 1 is a lot of fluff.

But you still have to read it anyway. There's real content there and maybe your fresh eyes will see something we haven't.
---

Hbthebattle posted...

red13n posted...

topic 1 is a lot of fluff.

But you still have to read it anyway. There's real content there and maybe your fresh eyes will see something we haven't.

So either hb is town. Or him and Lolo are scum together.

For the record. Still think he's town.
---

Camarija posted...

Hbthebattle posted...

Camarija posted...

Hbthebattle posted...

Camarija posted...

I think it's pretty straight forward

Someone having such a level of certainty over another's alignment to the point of *shudders* in game betting is playing with an ace up their sleeve

puns hit the nail on the head

Cam, I wasn't actually planning to bet with Chris.
I'm asking him how sure he is of Lopen being Town, and he continues to avoid the question.

I do appreciate the pandering and level headedness here

Who should we go for then good sir?

Lopen, Puns, or Lea, probably in that order.

I'd be most interested in Lea3Lea of those three

There's still a bunch of peeps I don't have reads on yet

I'm uncertain on Ulti and Lea3Lea (and you, Hbthebattle)

I don't have reads on: SBell, eaedwards, Luis_Sera, Lolo_Guru

I have a wolf lean on dowolf

i c wut u did there
---

Corrik7 posted...

It is absurd that scum would not look at posts the same as town and come to conclusions on them subconsciously based on their goals of the game? "Okay".

Hey two guys are fighting. I am gonna see if a clue comes out to help figure out their alignment or comment on this because I think this might shine some light somewhere.

Vs

Hey two guys fighting. I know they are both town. I'll just let them go and ignore it because no point getting involved and maybe letting the focus off of them or drawing attention to something that actually does matter.

"Absurdist".

Mafia to Cam is..."Hey, do you think I am scum?".

I agree with your assertion that players of varying alignments may look and respond to certain situations with unique takes

Where I disagree with you is being able to make a read on something that literally doesn't exist

Again: Corrik hasn't commented on the invisible pink elephant, therefore he is X alignment

It's entirely absurdist

The good news is that I won't be very active after 6am EST tonight. Until probably Sunday, if my life remains intact.

The bad news is that we must find scum before then, Sir Chris.
---

dowolf posted...

Camarija posted...

Hbthebattle posted...

Camarija posted...

Hbthebattle posted...

Camarija posted...

I think it's pretty straight forward

Someone having such a level of certainty over another's alignment to the point of *shudders* in game betting is playing with an ace up their sleeve

puns hit the nail on the head

Cam, I wasn't actually planning to bet with Chris.
I'm asking him how sure he is of Lopen being Town, and he continues to avoid the question.

I do appreciate the pandering and level headedness here

Who should we go for then good sir?

Lopen, Puns, or Lea, probably in that order.

I'd be most interested in Lea3Lea of those three

There's still a bunch of peeps I don't have reads on yet

I'm uncertain on Ulti and Lea3Lea (and you, Hbthebattle)

I don't have reads on: SBell, eaedwards, Luis_Sera, Lolo_Guru

I have a wolf lean on dowolf

i c wut u did there

I don't bahahaha :D

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

It is absurd that scum would not look at posts the same as town and come to conclusions on them subconsciously based on their goals of the game? "Okay".

Hey two guys are fighting. I am gonna see if a clue comes out to help figure out their alignment or comment on this because I think this might shine some light somewhere.

Vs

Hey two guys fighting. I know they are both town. I'll just let them go and ignore it because no point getting involved and maybe letting the focus off of them or drawing attention to something that actually does matter.

"Absurdist".

Mafia to Cam is..."Hey, do you think I am scum?".

I agree with your assertion that players of varying alignments may look and respond to certain situations with unique takes

Where I disagree with you is being able to make a read on something that literally doesn't exist

Again: Corrik hasn't commented on the invisible pink elephant, therefore he is X alignment

It's entirely absurdist

Nobody said on something that doesn't exist. You are literally making no sense. We are talking about events happening in the game that if you are reading it, you will have seen. And, you either felt it was not worth your comments or you aren't actually reading the game, yet trying to act as if you have
---

dowolf posted...

Hbthebattle posted...

dowolf posted...

man nobody bats 100 d1

Does this imply you know Chris is in the wrong here?

it implies your arg is silly

were just going to have to disagree lea.

cam its been a wholistic thing. hard to build arg on phone

@dowolf

Unfortunately the onus is not on me to read your mind

I'd like if you were Town to do something jazzy and fun that would give me an a-ha moment

But thus far it feels to me that you've decided to be uncertain about me because I voted for you

I haven't really seen a bold response from you regarding my assertions about your play

In particular, I said that you demonstrated low-impact play with leading questions that didn't go anywhere

I gave two examples of this

Do you feel that my argument is invalid in any way?

Show me that you can look at the Mafia game from my point of view

Hbthebattle posted...

red13n posted...

topic 1 is a lot of fluff.

But you still have to read it anyway. There's real content there and maybe your fresh eyes will see something we haven't.

Didnt people say red would never skip stuff?
Ironic feedback then.
---

Hbthebattle posted...

Lopen, Puns, or Lea, probably in that order.

so just to be clear, you do think I made a fuckus by fake claiming immediately then just shifted into cruise control after that?

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

It is absurd that scum would not look at posts the same as town and come to conclusions on them subconsciously based on their goals of the game? "Okay".

Hey two guys are fighting. I am gonna see if a clue comes out to help figure out their alignment or comment on this because I think this might shine some light somewhere.

Vs

Hey two guys fighting. I know they are both town. I'll just let them go and ignore it because no point getting involved and maybe letting the focus off of them or drawing attention to something that actually does matter.

"Absurdist".

Mafia to Cam is..."Hey, do you think I am scum?".

I agree with your assertion that players of varying alignments may look and respond to certain situations with unique takes

Where I disagree with you is being able to make a read on something that literally doesn't exist

Again: Corrik hasn't commented on the invisible pink elephant, therefore he is X alignment

It's entirely absurdist

Nobody said on something that doesn't exist. You are literally making no sense. We are talking about events happening in the game that if you are reading it, you will have seen. And, you either felt it was not worth your comments or you aren't actually reading the game, yet trying to act as if you have

I hope you are Town because I don't want this have been a waste of time

I agree that:

varying alignments MAY respond to certain situations in unique ways

I DISAGREE that:

varying aligns WON'T respond to certain situations at all

-----------------

The only compromise I could make here is this:

If a player comments on a scenario and focuses on something in particular, it may demonstrate insight into that player's priorities. Those priorities may be alignment indicative.

This only works if the player in questions has commented on the scenario in question

Otherwise, again, you're making arguments about invisible dragons in tutus singing somewhere over the rainbow being alignment indicative

RUCKUS

made a ruckus

lollllll I just bust out a snort at work

i consider your arguments against me to be trite

which is to say, thats how ive always played early to mid d1 and someone always tries to call me out on it and ive stopped caring
---

granted i usually make more such feeler questions but screw typing on phones tbh
---

dowolf posted...

i consider your arguments against me to be trite

which is to say, thats how ive always played early to mid d1 and someone always tries to call me out on it and ive stopped caring

As we don't know each other, and apparently this criticism about you has been made abundantly clear to you in the past, I think it's certainly odd that you would find significance in my logic showing up here

If anything, it sounds as though you've come to accept this criticism

One thing doesn't match the other and I'm concerned about your logic break here

trite = insignificant
---

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

It is absurd that scum would not look at posts the same as town and come to conclusions on them subconsciously based on their goals of the game? "Okay".

Hey two guys are fighting. I am gonna see if a clue comes out to help figure out their alignment or comment on this because I think this might shine some light somewhere.

Vs

Hey two guys fighting. I know they are both town. I'll just let them go and ignore it because no point getting involved and maybe letting the focus off of them or drawing attention to something that actually does matter.

"Absurdist".

Mafia to Cam is..."Hey, do you think I am scum?".

I agree with your assertion that players of varying alignments may look and respond to certain situations with unique takes

Where I disagree with you is being able to make a read on something that literally doesn't exist

Again: Corrik hasn't commented on the invisible pink elephant, therefore he is X alignment

It's entirely absurdist

Nobody said on something that doesn't exist. You are literally making no sense. We are talking about events happening in the game that if you are reading it, you will have seen. And, you either felt it was not worth your comments or you aren't actually reading the game, yet trying to act as if you have

I hope you are Town because I don't want this have been a waste of time

I agree that:

varying alignments MAY respond to certain situations in unique ways

I DISAGREE that:

varying aligns WON'T respond to certain situations at all

-----------------

The only compromise I could make here is this:

If a player comments on a scenario and focuses on something in particular, it may demonstrate insight into that player's priorities. Those priorities may be alignment indicative.

This only works if the player in questions has commented on the scenario in question

Otherwise, again, you're making arguments about invisible dragons in tutus singing somewhere over the rainbow being alignment indicative

You are being disingenuous. So, there is no purpose to continue this discussion with you going forward.

"if I choose to ignore a huge part of the game it is because it is invisible dragons on Jupiter drinking wine in tutus".

Yep. That argument just happened.
---

dowolf posted...

trite = insignificant

Unfortunately we learned different definitions of the word trite

Overused to the point of unoriginal

Often this word is used in criticizing art

Eaed and Lolo sure are averse to reading this hugely in demand mafia game they signed up for for some reason.
---

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

It is absurd that scum would not look at posts the same as town and come to conclusions on them subconsciously based on their goals of the game? "Okay".

Hey two guys are fighting. I am gonna see if a clue comes out to help figure out their alignment or comment on this because I think this might shine some light somewhere.

Vs

Hey two guys fighting. I know they are both town. I'll just let them go and ignore it because no point getting involved and maybe letting the focus off of them or drawing attention to something that actually does matter.

"Absurdist".

Mafia to Cam is..."Hey, do you think I am scum?".

I agree with your assertion that players of varying alignments may look and respond to certain situations with unique takes

Where I disagree with you is being able to make a read on something that literally doesn't exist

Again: Corrik hasn't commented on the invisible pink elephant, therefore he is X alignment

It's entirely absurdist

Nobody said on something that doesn't exist. You are literally making no sense. We are talking about events happening in the game that if you are reading it, you will have seen. And, you either felt it was not worth your comments or you aren't actually reading the game, yet trying to act as if you have

I hope you are Town because I don't want this have been a waste of time

I agree that:

varying alignments MAY respond to certain situations in unique ways

I DISAGREE that:

varying aligns WON'T respond to certain situations at all

-----------------

The only compromise I could make here is this:

If a player comments on a scenario and focuses on something in particular, it may demonstrate insight into that player's priorities. Those priorities may be alignment indicative.

This only works if the player in questions has commented on the scenario in question

Otherwise, again, you're making arguments about invisible dragons in tutus singing somewhere over the rainbow being alignment indicative

You are being disingenuous. So, there is no purpose to continue this discussion with you going forward.

"if I choose to ignore a huge part of the game it is because it is invisible dragons on Jupiter drinking wine in tutus".

Yep. That argument just happened.

You didn't comment about the the green gorillas I was thinking about

Only mafia wouldn't comment about the green gorillas I was thinking about

Therefore content you don't comment about is alignment indicative

I'm not being disingenuous, I'm pointing out the breaks in your logic

It quite literally doesn't work

i mean i felt there was some dishonedty in yellimg at the guy who said he wss busy and would be more active the next day for not being active enough

was really the main tbing there
---

turbopuns3 posted...

Hbthebattle posted...

Lopen, Puns, or Lea, probably in that order.

so just to be clear, you do think I made a fuckus by fake claiming immediately then just shifted into cruise control after that?

I'm not even really considering your claim here- it could go either way and is frankly a null tell.
---

RogueNoble posted...

Eaed and Lolo sure are averse to reading this hugely in demand mafia game they signed up for for some reason.

Tbh, I am having toruble just reading this current page because of the whole Cam/Corrik banter
---

in any event corrik, I fundamentally disagree with your approach

It's absurd logic

You may agree to disagree, but I hope you understand my belief in your logic being flawed is genuine

It doesn't really matter to me, as I have a tow read on you

I'm fine with letting this tired conversation topic draw down

Camarija posted...

dowolf posted...

trite = insignificant

Unfortunately we learned different definitions of the word trite

Overused to the point of unoriginal

Often this word is used in criticizing art

yes. which makes its usage insignificant
---

dowolf posted...

i mean i felt there was some dishonedty in yellimg at the guy who said he wss busy and would be more active the next day for not being active enough

was really the main tbing there

As I understand, your first post said something to the effect that you would be leaving the thread (to sleep?) soon

However, you produced content thereafter

The content you DID produce was underwhelming and low impact

I'm not reading you in a negative light for being absent

I'm reading you in a negative light for the content you DID present

htaeD posted...

RogueNoble posted...

Eaed and Lolo sure are averse to reading this hugely in demand mafia game they signed up for for some reason.

Tbh, I am having toruble just reading this current page because of the whole Cam/Corrik banter

Why does it seem Corrik always gets himself involved in activities that distract the game?
---

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

It is absurd that scum would not look at posts the same as town and come to conclusions on them subconsciously based on their goals of the game? "Okay".

Hey two guys are fighting. I am gonna see if a clue comes out to help figure out their alignment or comment on this because I think this might shine some light somewhere.

Vs

Hey two guys fighting. I know they are both town. I'll just let them go and ignore it because no point getting involved and maybe letting the focus off of them or drawing attention to something that actually does matter.

"Absurdist".

Mafia to Cam is..."Hey, do you think I am scum?".

I agree with your assertion that players of varying alignments may look and respond to certain situations with unique takes

Where I disagree with you is being able to make a read on something that literally doesn't exist

Again: Corrik hasn't commented on the invisible pink elephant, therefore he is X alignment

It's entirely absurdist

Nobody said on something that doesn't exist. You are literally making no sense. We are talking about events happening in the game that if you are reading it, you will have seen. And, you either felt it was not worth your comments or you aren't actually reading the game, yet trying to act as if you have

I hope you are Town because I don't want this have been a waste of time

I agree that:

varying alignments MAY respond to certain situations in unique ways

I DISAGREE that:

varying aligns WON'T respond to certain situations at all

-----------------

The only compromise I could make here is this:

If a player comments on a scenario and focuses on something in particular, it may demonstrate insight into that player's priorities. Those priorities may be alignment indicative.

This only works if the player in questions has commented on the scenario in question

Otherwise, again, you're making arguments about invisible dragons in tutus singing somewhere over the rainbow being alignment indicative

You are being disingenuous. So, there is no purpose to continue this discussion with you going forward.

"if I choose to ignore a huge part of the game it is because it is invisible dragons on Jupiter drinking wine in tutus".

Yep. That argument just happened.

You didn't comment about the the green gorillas I was thinking about

Only mafia wouldn't comment about the green gorillas I was thinking about

Therefore content you don't comment about is alignment indicative

I'm not being disingenuous, I'm pointing out the breaks in your logic

It quite literally doesn't work

You are literally making stuff up to create an outlandish argument.

LMFAO like wtf

"I think people who are ignoring, not commenting on it, or finding no issue with me following Chris may be more likely to be scum than those who are questioning it because it doesn't affect them"

"Green gorillas pink hippos dancing dragons rawr".

Like holy crap you make the most inane and obtuse arguments of all time that are so outlandish and ridiculous that it is no wonder why your game falls apart upon scrutiny. This is worse than your Town Vanilla arguments. Gee Louise.
---

Corrik is just doing a satirical performance art piece, once you understand this you can just ignore or enjoy the silliness. His alignment is inscrutable because he's very good scum and he must be dealt with in other ways than mere conversation.
---

And for the record, I think this makes Camarija SCUM not TOWN. Because this argument is a ridiculous argument made in defense of himself. Not in the process of trying to find scum.
---

Hbthebattle posted...

I'm not even really considering your claim here- it could go either way and is frankly a null tell.

You should be considering my claim because whether I'm scum or town definitely informs the motivations for doing it which correspond to my play style this game in general.

You have to determine whether the Scum Puns who opened the game like that then shifts to just sheeping chris. I mean at some point or another you have to consider it.

Hbthebattle posted...

htaeD posted...

RogueNoble posted...

Eaed and Lolo sure are averse to reading this hugely in demand mafia game they signed up for for some reason.

Tbh, I am having toruble just reading this current page because of the whole Cam/Corrik banter

Why does it seem Corrik always gets himself involved in activities that distract the game?

Because I drive activity and help expose scum while most town are content to twiddle their fingers and not post and allow scum to do so also and blend in.
---

Corrik7 posted...

Speaking of, Cam has been a ghost. That is not his normal town playstyle.

This is an example, @dowolf , of flawed logic

I'm NOT saying: "Hey, dowolf isn't here right now, that's fishy!"

That would be asburd

I'm commenting on the content you DID produce, because I'm sane

turbopuns3 posted...

Hbthebattle posted...

I'm not even really considering your claim here- it could go either way and is frankly a null tell.

You should be considering my claim because whether I'm scum or town definitely informs the motivations for doing it which correspond to my play style this game in general.

You have to determine whether the Scum Puns who opened the game like that then shifts to just sheeping chris. I mean at some point or another you have to consider it.

No pink elephants, puns. Jupiter singing dragons. To not care about things in the game is green gorillas growing greatly gigantuan.
---

oh no i was literally working for two hours while skimming the topic on the side.

hence, busy
---

We all know Ben is the scum for not playing during work
---

Corrik7 posted...

And for the record, I think this makes Camarija SCUM not TOWN. Because this argument is a ridiculous argument made in defense of himself. Not in the process of trying to find scum.

I'm dropping the argument because it's clear you have chosen to embrace absurdism

That's fine

You do you

However, I do take issue with your assertion that the purpose of that argument was to defend myself

First of all, there was no pressure or indication of pressure to me whatsoever

Second of all, the crux of my arguments was to point out the flaw in your logic, not to defend myself, but to help you build logical worlds

If you would walk away with anything from that argument, it would be that you should believe that I believe my method is logical and yours is illogical

Whether or not you agree with my assertions is a different matter

But again, you are conflating issues that do not exist

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

Speaking of, Cam has been a ghost. That is not his normal town playstyle.

This is an example, @dowolf , of flawed logic

I'm NOT saying: "Hey, dowolf isn't here right now, that's fishy!"

That would be asburd

I'm commenting on the content you DID produce, because I'm sane

Dude literally produced a bar graph talking about how town is more active and scum is less active in numbers of posts per day. Then says this also.

Hoo boy. You are literally all over the place. Direct contradiction.
---

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

And for the record, I think this makes Camarija SCUM not TOWN. Because this argument is a ridiculous argument made in defense of himself. Not in the process of trying to find scum.

I'm dropping the argument because it's clear you have chosen to embrace absurdism

That's fine

You do you

However, I do take issue with your assertion that the purpose of that argument was to defend myself

First of all, there was no pressure or indication of pressure to me whatsoever

Second of all, the crux of my arguments was to point out the flaw in your logic, not to defend myself, but to help you build logical worlds

If you would walk away with anything from that argument, it would be that you should believe that I believe my method is logical and yours is illogical

Whether or not you agree with my assertions is a different matter

But again, you are conflating issues that do not exist

I hope Chris decides to lynch you today.
---

Making a big move and using it to coast until "town confirmation" via the death of a cop or gf or whatever is exactly what Ulti did during Endgame, so it's possible you're doing it as well.
---

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

Speaking of, Cam has been a ghost. That is not his normal town playstyle.

This is an example, @dowolf , of flawed logic

I'm NOT saying: "Hey, dowolf isn't here right now, that's fishy!"

That would be asburd

I'm commenting on the content you DID produce, because I'm sane

Dude literally produced a bar graph talking about how town is more active and scum is less active in numbers of posts per day. Then says this also.

Hoo boy. You are literally all over the place. Direct contradiction.

I have done no such thing this game my friend

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

And for the record, I think this makes Camarija SCUM not TOWN. Because this argument is a ridiculous argument made in defense of himself. Not in the process of trying to find scum.

I'm dropping the argument because it's clear you have chosen to embrace absurdism

That's fine

You do you

However, I do take issue with your assertion that the purpose of that argument was to defend myself

First of all, there was no pressure or indication of pressure to me whatsoever

Second of all, the crux of my arguments was to point out the flaw in your logic, not to defend myself, but to help you build logical worlds

If you would walk away with anything from that argument, it would be that you should believe that I believe my method is logical and yours is illogical

Whether or not you agree with my assertions is a different matter

But again, you are conflating issues that do not exist

I hope Chris decides to lynch you today.

If you want to lynch Cam, than do it with your own power, not chris's.
---

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

And for the record, I think this makes Camarija SCUM not TOWN. Because this argument is a ridiculous argument made in defense of himself. Not in the process of trying to find scum.

I'm dropping the argument because it's clear you have chosen to embrace absurdism

That's fine

You do you

However, I do take issue with your assertion that the purpose of that argument was to defend myself

First of all, there was no pressure or indication of pressure to me whatsoever

Second of all, the crux of my arguments was to point out the flaw in your logic, not to defend myself, but to help you build logical worlds

If you would walk away with anything from that argument, it would be that you should believe that I believe my method is logical and yours is illogical

Whether or not you agree with my assertions is a different matter

But again, you are conflating issues that do not exist

I hope Chris decides to lynch you today.

Did I jostle your jimmies Corrik? :)

I would like to submit evidence A that I cannot be aligned with Corrik :D

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

And for the record, I think this makes Camarija SCUM not TOWN. Because this argument is a ridiculous argument made in defense of himself. Not in the process of trying to find scum.

I'm dropping the argument because it's clear you have chosen to embrace absurdism

That's fine

You do you

However, I do take issue with your assertion that the purpose of that argument was to defend myself

First of all, there was no pressure or indication of pressure to me whatsoever

Second of all, the crux of my arguments was to point out the flaw in your logic, not to defend myself, but to help you build logical worlds

If you would walk away with anything from that argument, it would be that you should believe that I believe my method is logical and yours is illogical

Whether or not you agree with my assertions is a different matter

But again, you are conflating issues that do not exist

I hope Chris decides to lynch you today.

Did I jostle your jimmies Corrik? :)

Nope. You are just scum. I did have a small chance you just have such poor logical ability when playing as town to make competent arguments, but that comment to dowolf which is a contradiction to your professed love of your bar graphs of activity snuffing is pretty telling. You have this game alrdy said you are continuing to use it. You have alrdy said that your town reads are most based on those who posted more this game.

And, now you say that someone not being here doesn't matter to you or you find suspicious because it is their quality of their posts not their quantity.

It cannot literally be both ways and that is a direct contraction to your mantra and silly belief in that mafia are generally the least active players.
---

Camarija posted...

I would like to submit evidence A that I cannot be aligned with Corrik :D

This is a pointless comment, but this wouldn't even be in the top 50 scum-scum arguments of all time here. I would as scum seize on this argument on anyone in the game as any alignment because it is so awful that by seizing on it as scum it would make me look town, even if people didn't understand why I was right.
---

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

Camarija posted...

Corrik7 posted...

And for the record, I think this makes Camarija SCUM not TOWN. Because this argument is a ridiculous argument made in defense of himself. Not in the process of trying to find scum.

I'm dropping the argument because it's clear you have chosen to embrace absurdism

That's fine

You do you

However, I do take issue with your assertion that the purpose of that argument was to defend myself

First of all, there was no pressure or indication of pressure to me whatsoever

Second of all, the crux of my arguments was to point out the flaw in your logic, not to defend myself, but to help you build logical worlds

If you would walk away with anything from that argument, it would be that you should believe that I believe my method is logical and yours is illogical

Whether or not you agree with my assertions is a different matter

But again, you are conflating issues that do not exist

I hope Chris decides to lynch you today.

Did I jostle your jimmies Corrik? :)

Nope. You are just scum. I did have a small chance you just have such poor logical ability when playing as town to make competent arguments, but that comment to dowolf which is a contradiction to your professed love of your bar graphs of activity snuffing is pretty telling. You have this game alrdy said you are continuing to use it. You have alrdy said that your town reads are most based on those who posted more this game.

And, now you say that someone not being here doesn't matter to you or you find suspicious because it is their quality of their posts not their quantity.

It cannot literally be both ways and that is a direct contraction to your mantra and silly belief in that mafia are generally the least active players.

I'm done with you for today mate

I have you as town

I think I broke you a bit

Get well :)

Hope you weren't a strong scum role. Cuz you really blew that one.
---

Camarija posted...

Lea3Lea posted...

I have it on good authority that Ben is acting more like his excited scum self than he has been in his last few town games

That's probably an unfair standard

What's the phrase?

Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't?

All I see is hyper engagement and that's normally Town points in my books

Camarija posted...

Hbthebattle posted...

Camarija posted...

Let's put the game in front of us:

Playerlist (21 alive)
1. Pezloco - haven't read
2. UltimaterializerX - haven't read
3. Lea3Lea - Not Mafia with MKZero// Feels self-aware // Uncertain
4. Red13n - haven't read
5. Benjamin - Engaging, looking for answers rather than stirring the port // Town
6. SBell (Obellisk) - haven't read
7. Camarija - Town Opera Singer
8. MZero - Not Mafia with Lea3Lea// accused of post fluff// Lean Town
9. Sir Chris (DoomTheGyarados) - Town
10. 5tarscream - haven't read
11. Hbthebattle - haven't read
12. Death (HtaeD) - haven't read
13. Tom Bombadil - haven't read
14. TheSultanOfSlam - haven't read
15. Lopen - Dirty read but feels Town due to asking about the voting stuff
16. turbopuns3 - Probably a Town Gambit opener
17. eaedwards - haven't read
18. Corrik - Probably Town if my tinfoil is correct
19. Luis_Sera - haven't read
20. Lolo_Guru - haven't read
21. dowolf - haven't read

Cam, I notice you're falling into the trap of calling everyone active town, but that's not always a good judge.

I don't disagree

I'm using the post count parameter this game

I feel there are many players who may yet fit into the Mafia shaped boxes, but I'll do what I can with what I have

Logically, I'll have more Town reads than Mafia reads because there are naturally more Town than Mafia so that may also play into it

Right now I'm just trying to get my bearings to figure out some sort of Town Core

In your experience, do you believe Mafia normally post more early?

---